Home > Regulation & Examinations > Bank Examinations > FDIC Enforcement Decisions and Orders
FDIC Enforcement Decisions and Orders
Respondent is prohibited from participating in the conduct of affairs of, or exercising voting rights in, any insured institution without the prior written approval of the FDIC.
[.1] Prohibition, Removal, or SuspensionProhibition FromParticipation in Conduct of Affairs
[.2] Prohibition, Removal, or SuspensionProhibition FromVoting Rights, exercise of
In the Matter of
Brian D. Barber ("Respondent") has received a NOTICE OF INTENTION TO PROHIBIT FROM FURTHER PARTICIPATION ("NOTICE") issued by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC"), detailing the unsafe or unsound banking practices and breaches of fiduciary duty for which an ORDER OF PROHIBITION FROM FURTHER PARTICIPATION ("ORDER") may issue, and has been advised of his right to a hearing on the charges under section 8(e) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act ("Act"), 12 U.S.C. §1818(e), and the FDIC Rules of Practice and Procedure, 12 C.F.R. Part 308. Having waived that right, among others, Respondent entered into a STIPULATION AND CONSENT TO THE ISSUANCE OF AN ORDER OF PROHIBITION FROM FURTHER PARTICIPATION ("CONSENT AGREEMENT"), whereby solely for the purpose of this proceeding and without admitting or denying unsafe or unsound banking practices, or breaches of fiduciary duty, Respondent consented to the issuance of an ORDER by the FDIC.
Upon due consideration, the FDIC determined it had reason to believe that:
1. Respondent has engaged or participated in unsafe or unsound banking practices and/or breaches of fiduciary duty as an institution-affiliated party of Farmers State Bank, Yale, Iowa ("Bank").
2. By reason of such practices and/or breaches of fiduciary duty, the Bank has suffered or will probably suffer financial loss or other damage, and/or the interests of the Bank's depositors have been or could be prejudiced.
3. Such practices and/or breaches of fiduciary duty demonstrate Respondent's willful and/or continuing disregard for the safety or soundness of the Bank, and/or involve personal dishonesty on the part of the Respondent.
The FDIC further determined that such practices and breaches of fiduciary duty demonstrate Respondent's unfitness to serve as a director, officer, person participating in the conduct of the affairs, or as an institution-affiliated party of the Bank, of any other insured depository institution, or of any other agency or organization enumerated in section 8(e)(7)(A) of the Act, 12 U.S.C. §1818(e)(7)(A).
The FDIC, therefore, accepted the CONSENT AGREEMENT and issued the following:
ORDER OF PROHIBITION FROM FURTHER PARTICIPATION
1. Unless Respondent receives prior written approval of the FDIC and the appropriate Federal financial institutions regulatory agency, as that term is defined in section 8(e)(7)(D) of the Act, 12 U.S.C. §1818(e)(7)(D), Respondent is prohibited from:
[.1] (a) participating in any manner in the conduct of the affairs of any financial institution or organization enumerated in section 8(e)(7)(A) of the Act, 12 U.S.C. §1818(e)(7)(A);
[.2] (b) soliciting, procuring, transferring, attempting to transfer,
voting, or attempting to vote any proxy, consent or authorization with
respect to any voting rights in any financial
institution enumerated in section 8(e)(7)(A) of the Act, 12 U.S.C. §1818(e)(7)(A);
(c) violating any voting agreement previously approved by the appropriate Federal banking agency; or
(d) voting for a director, or serving or acting as an institution-affiliated party.
2. This ORDER will become effective immediately upon its issuance. The provisions of this ORDER will remain effective and enforceable except to the extent that, and until such time as, any provision of this ORDER shall have been modified, terminated, suspended, or set aside by the FDIC.
Pursuant to delegated authority.
Dated at Washington, D.C., this 1st day of August, 2005.
|Last Updated firstname.lastname@example.org|