Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations
FDIC Federal Register Citations
[Federal Register: January 21, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 13)]
[Proposed Rules] [Page 2852-2855]
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Request for Burden Reduction Recommendations; Consumer Protection: Lending-Related Rules; Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act of 1996 Review
AGENCIES: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), Treasury; Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board); Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC); and Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of regulatory review; request for
We will analyze the comments received and propose burden reducing changes to our regulations where appropriate. Some of your suggestions for burden reduction might require legislative changes. Where legislative changes would be required, we will consider your suggestions in recommending appropriate changes to the Congress.
DATES: Written comments must be received no later than April 20, 2004.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the
Individual agency addresses: You are also welcome to submit comments to the Agencies at the following contact points (due to delays in paper mail delivery in the Washington area, commenters may prefer to submit their comments by alternative means):
OCC: You may submit comments, identified by Docket Number 04-05, by any of the following methods:
Board: You may submit comments, identified by Docket Number R-1180, by any of the following methods:
FDIC: You may submit comments, identified as EGRPRA burden reduction comments, by any of the following methods:
OTS: You may submit comments, identified by "No. 2003-67," by any of the following methods:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The Agencies are asking for your comments and suggestions on ways in which the Agencies can reduce regulatory burdens consistent with our statutory obligations. Today, we request your input to help us identify which Consumer Protection Lending-Related rules are outdated, unnecessary, or unduly burdensome. The rules in this category are listed in a chart at the end of this notice. Please send us your recommendations at our Web site, www.EGRPRA.gov, or to one of the listed addresses.
The rest of this notice will discuss the essential elements of our EGRPRA review project, some suggestions we received on carrying it out, and today's request for comment.
II. Agencies' Proposed and Current Plan
A. The EGRPRA Review Requirements and the Agencies'
The EGRPRA review required us to categorize our rules by type. Our June 16, 2003 Federal Register publication placed our rules into 12 categories. The categories are:
To spread the work of commenting on and reviewing the categories of rules over a reasonable period of time, we proposed to publish one or more categories of rules approximately every six months between 2003 and 2006 and provide a 90-day comment period for each publication. We asked for comment on all aspects of our plan, including: the categories, the rules in each category, and the order in which we should review the categories. Because the Agencies were eager to begin reducing unnecessary burden where appropriate, our initial notice also published three categories of rules for comment (Applications and Reporting, Powers and Activities, and International Operations). All our covered categories of rules must be published for comment and reviewed by the end of September, 2006.
The EGRPRA review then requires the Agencies to: (1) Publish a summary of the comments we received, identifying and discussing the significant issues raised in them; and (2) eliminate unnecessary regulatory requirements. Within 30 days after the Agencies publish the comment summary and discussion, the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC), which is the formal interagency body to which the Agencies belong, must submit a report to the Congress. This report will summarize significant issues raised by the public comments and the relative merits of those issues. It will also analyze whether the appropriate Federal banking agency can address the burdens by regulation, or whether they must be addressed by legislation.
B. Public Response and the Agencies' Current Plan
We received 19 comments in response to the first notice. You can view the comments at our EGRPRA Web site by clicking on "Comments." In addition to soliciting written comments in 2003, we held banker outreach meetings in Orlando, St. Louis, Denver, San Francisco, and New York City in order to hear directly from the industry about ways the Agencies could reduce regulatory burden. More than 250 representatives from the industry attended the outreach meetings. These meetings have given us valuable insights and have helped focus our regulatory burden reduction efforts. We anticipate holding additional outreach events in 2004. We also will be taking into account the important views of consumer and community organizations when we meet with them. You can view descriptions of the meetings and related recommendations at our EGRPRA Web site by clicking on ``Events'' and then choosing a meeting by its location.
The Agencies appreciate the response to our notice and the outreach meetings. The written comments and remarks at the meetings came from individuals, banks, savings associations, holding companies, and industry trade groups. We are actively reviewing the feedback received about specific ways to reduce regulatory burden, as well as conducting our own analyses. Because the main purpose of this notice is to request comment on the next category of regulations, we will not discuss specific recommendations about the first set of regulation categories here. However, as we develop initiatives to reduce burden in the future--whether through regulatory, legislative, or other channels `` we will discuss the public's recommendations that relate to our proposed actions.
We requested comment about our proposed categories and placement of the rules within each category. Industry trade groups and others observed that commenting on all consumer protection regulations at one time would be burdensome in itself and suggested that we might receive more useful feedback if the category was divided. As a result, we divided the consumer protection regulations into two categories: (1) Lending-Related Rules, and (2) Account--Deposit Relationships and Miscellaneous Consumer Rules. The regulations in the Lending-Related Rules category are listed in the chart below. The Account--Deposit Relationships and Miscellaneous Consumer Rules category will contain the remaining rules previously identified in the Consumer Protection category. We plan to request comment on the Account--Deposit Relationships and Miscellaneous Consumer Rules in the next notice.
We also requested comment about the order in which we should review the categories. According to some industry representatives, the requirements imposed by the Consumer Protection regulations are among the most burdensome. Given this response, we will focus on those rules first.
III. Request for Comment on Consumer Protection: Lending--Related Rules Category
Today, we are asking the public to identify the ways in which the Consumer Protection: Lending-Related Rules may be outdated, unnecessary, or unduly burdensome. As noted, the rules in this category are listed in the chart below. We encourage comments that address not only individual rules or requirements but also pertain to certain product lines. For example, in the case of a particular loan, are any disclosure requirements under one regulation inconsistent with or duplicative of requirements under another regulation? Are there unnecessary records that must be kept? A product line approach is consistent with EGRPRA's focus on how rules interact, and may be especially helpful in exposing redundant or potentially inconsistent regulatory requirements. We recognize that commenters using a product line approach may want to make recommendations about rules that are not in our current request for comment. They should do so since the EGRPRA categories are designed to stimulate creative approaches rather than limiting them.
Specific issues to consider. While all comments are welcome, we specifically invite comment on the following issues:
By order of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System on January 7, 2004.
By order of the Board of Directors, Federal Deposit
1The National Credit Union Administration has participated in planning the EGRPRA review but has issued, and will issue, requests for comment separately.
2 Public Law 104-208, Sept. 30, 1996, 12 U.S.C. 3311.
3 The citation for our first Federal Register notice is 68 FR 35589. You can view it at our Web site http://www.EGRPRA.gov by clicking on "Federal Register Notices."
4 Foreign banking organizations that conduct
banking operations in the U.S., either directly through
branches and agencies or indirectly through U.S. bank
subsidiaries or commercial lending company subsidiaries,
generally are subject to the same regulatory regime as
domestic bank holding companies
|Last Updated firstname.lastname@example.org|