| Reliance Savings Bank
 From: John Musser
 Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 3:38 PM
 To: Comments
 Subject: Community Reinvestment: RIN number 3064-AC50
 John MusserSr.Vice-President
 Reliance Savings Bank
 1119 - 12th Street
 Altoona, Pa 16603
             September 8, 2004 Robert E. FeldmanFederal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 550 17th Street, NW
 Washington, DC 20429
             Dear Robert Feldman: As a community banker, I am pleased to comment in support of the
            proposal issued by the FDIC that would amend the definition of a small institution
 to be a bank that is under $1 billion in assets. I believe that this
 change will provide much needed regulatory burden relief for me and
            other
 community bankers. It seems that every week there is a new or additional
 regulation with which we must comply. This is one example of regulatory
 burden relief that will really make a difference. I would much rather
            use
 the limited resources available to my bank to serve my community
            than to
 collect and maintain data and documents to prove to examiners that
            I am
 meeting the needs of my community.
 Reliance Savings
              Bank is a mutually owned, community bank located in central Pennsylvania, with approximately 73 full-time employees.
            Our bank
 has assets of approximately $260 million, which would make us ineligible
 to be classified as a small bank under the current CRA standards.
 Compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act is something we take
            very seriously at our bank. We don’t just believe it is the
            right thing
 to do; we believe it is the right business thing to do. No community
            bank
 can survive and compete without meeting the needs of its customers
            and
 communities. We believe in our community and in our customers and
            want to
 work with them to provide products and services that best meet their
 credit needs. We do not need a complicated examination process to
            show
 that we are complying with the law.
 It is absurd to think that a bank thousands of times larger than
            my own community bank should be examined using the same procedures. I strongly
 urge you to amend the definition of a small bank for CRA purposes
            to be an
 institution with less than $1 billion in assets, regardless of whether
            the
 bank is part of a holding company. This is a good proposal and is
            the
 right thing to do.
 Thank you for considering my views. Sincerely,             John W. Musser814-949-6243
 Sr.Vice-President
 Reliance Savings Bank
                               |