| 
 Federation
            Bank
 
 April 19, 2004
 Mr. Robert E.
              FeldmanFDIC
 550 – 17th Street, NW
 Washington, DC 20429
 Attn: EGRPRA Burden Reduction Comments.
 Dear Mr. Feldman: I appreciate
              the regulators working toward reducing the regulatory burden on
              banks and especially on community banks.  They biggest
              problem we have in our community bank is with the interpretation
              of the way certain regulations are administered. There are so many
              forms and disclosures that we are required to give the customer
              it has become a joke with our customers and a huge burden for our
              loan officers.  I have been in
              banking for over 30 years and I can honestly say I cannot recall
              more than a couple of customers actually reading all of the documents.
              Customers are interested in presenting their case, working with
              the loan officer and acquiring the loan to finance their need.
              It is pretty simple. I don’t think the regulatory burden
              we are under is driven by any of our customers.  The regulatory
              items that are particularly burdensome are: right of recission,
              HMDA, and flood insurance.  Right of recission.
              I know this is a statutory requirement of lending, but it is one
              of the most confusing to the customer of all regulations. What
              makes this especially confusing is that I have never had any customer
              rescind the loan in all of the years I have been in banking. Generally
              when a customer has made the final decision to purchase a property
              they have made sure what they want to do and they do not want to
              stop the transaction. If this right of recission could be waived
              I think you would find the large majority of the customers who
              would waive it, get the money to close the loan and move into their
              new home the same day. It is a very misunderstood regulation.  HMDA. We have
              just recently come under this burdensome regulation. It is very
              difficult to interpret how the information is to be reported and
              if it is done wrong, even though it is not intentional, the penalties
              are substantial. We have had to devote up to 15 hours per week
              of one of our employees to administer this program. We are a $100
              million bank in a rural area. Our county has 25,000 population
              and our bank is located in a town of 7,500. I hardly think we have
              much to add to the reporting of HMDA. I would suggest that you
              increase the exemption for this burdensome regulation to $250 million
              in assets and set a limit for population that is more realistic.  Flood Insurance.
              This is another regulation that customers do not understand. It
              would help if these requirements were more streamlined and simplified.
              This is another area where the government requires the insurance
              in certain circumstances, but the customer blames the bank for
              the problem.  Again I appreciate
              your interest in reducing our regulatory burden. It may be useful
              for you to involve community bankers who actually serve the customer
              to work on an advisory panel to reduce the burden that is so costly
              to our banks and customers.  If you have any
              questions please contact me.  Yours truly, Dale J. Torpey
 President & CEO
 Federation Bank
 Washington, IA 52353
 |