Skip Header

Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation

Each depositor insured to at least $250,000 per insured bank



Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations




FDIC Federal Register Citations

ENROLLED MEMBER OF THE CROW TRIBE OF INDIANS, MT

From: Cynthia Jurosek [mailto:crowindianland@yahoo.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2004 12:46 PM
To: Comments
Subject: Proposed changes to CRA; Attn: Comments

Mr. Robert Feldman; Executive Secretary Re: RIN 3064-AC50
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
550 17th St. NW
Washington, DC 20429
Attn: Comments/Legal ESS

Dear Mr. Feldman,

This is to adamantly urge the FDIC to withdraw its proposed changes to the Community Reinvestment Act. The FDIC's proposed changes will thwart the Administration's goals of creating 5.5 million new minority homeowners by the end of this decade; they will eliminate the investment and service parts of the CRA exam for state-chartered banks with assets between $250 million and $1 billion; and, additionally, as I understand it, the FDIC proposes to add a community development criterion which seems to be a sort of alternative remedy for what it proposes to eliminate.

These proposed changes are unquestionably contrary to the CRA Statute and the lawmakers intent of increasing homeownership and community development in low-moderate income communities. The proposed alternative remedy is not in the best interests of any community because it would allow banks to choose a community development activity that is easiest for them. Here is the problem with that: In rural areas, and states such as Montana with smaller populations, a large percentage of banks, including state-chartered and small banks, have an intolerable habit of "choosing" to reinvest their community development funds in their "wealthy and substantive friends" and youth organizations of such people--which is fine for them to do, however it is not fine for them to do it under the umbrella of the CRA--the CRA is for low-moderate income people, minorities, the underserved and those less fortunate--it is not to benefit the wealthy, the elite or the fortunate. The FDIC's proposed changes will defeat the CRA's true purpose.

If the FDIC goes forward with its proposed changes many low-moderate income communities, including Native Americans in both urban and rural areas, will suffer. Won't you please reconsider and leave the CRA as is?

Thank you for your consideration.

Very truly,
Cynthia Jurosek
Enrolled Member of the Crow Tribe of Indians, MT

Cc: Senate Members
Cc: House Members
Cc: Various Others

Last Updated 09/14/2004 regs@fdic.gov

Skip Footer back to content