| From:
            Kent Franzen Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 5:04 PM
 To: regs.comments@federalreserve.gov; Comments; regs.comments@occ.treas.gov;
          regs.comments@ots.treas.gov
 Subject: EGRPRA
 May 1, 2002
 Dear Sirs,
 
 In regards to FL-10-2004 request for ideas on regulatory relief in
            I have the following suggestions.
 Reg B, Collection of race/sex data on residential loans. To have
            a rule where it is a violation not to collect the data and a violation
            to collect the data is a witches brew that only breeds contempt for
            the law in general and is guaranteed to leave an open festering sore
            on the skin of the relationship between regulator and regulated.
            Please either ask us to collect this data all the time or forget
            collecting it at all. The CRA exam and follow up on complaints are
            much more effective in preventing discrimination than this insane
            arrangement. Why don’t you put us in a round room and tell
            us to sit in the corner instead?
 
 The whole residential real estate documentation process needs to
            be examined and streamlined from the borrowers point of view. We
            are currently completing up to 19 documents for residential real
            estate loans and several of these are multiple pages in length. This
            is overwhelming to most of our borrowers, and does not serve the
            intended purpose of an informed consumer. The majority of residential
            borrowers look at me like a deer in the headlights of an oncoming
            truck and ask what the paper in front of them is, I tell them in
            a concise way and they sign and go on to the next one. I propose
            to go to a one page disclosure incorporating the Good Faith Estimate,
            TIL early and the HUD 1 or 1A forms with simple statements such as:
 
 Is the property you want to purchase in a flood plain? YES or NO
            if NO go to next question if YES see below. The estimate given by
            a local agent for flood insurance coverage on the property is $_____
            per year. You are required to provide proof of flood insurance coverage
            through an agent of your choosing by loan closing. If you want to
            know the identity of the agent that gave this estimate, please ask
            your lender.
 
 Property insurance coverage for the property you want to purchase
            is estimated at $ _____ per year. You must have coverage from an
            agent of your choosing before closing. The coverage must be for the
            purchase price or more. If you want to know the identity of the agent
            that gave this estimate ask your lender.
 
 I would continue this type of listing for the servicing disclosure,
            escrows, appraisals etc. The costs for the loan closing expenses
            should be listed in the same manner. In this way the borrowers are
            free to make the arrangements without steering by the lender if they
            would like. If this was done properly one page would supply all of
            the early disclosures the consumer needs and it would be done in
            a way that the borrowers can control as many of the arrangements
            as they care to.
 
 As a related point I believe the regulation puts the responsibility
            for filling out the HUD 1 and 1A on the “settlement agent”. As our bank avoids
  being the settlement agent at all costs why don’t you go after them,
  in our area it is the realtors, or have the state agencies responsible for
  the real estate agents go after them to get this done?
 
 HUD regulations require that we supply this phone number ( 800-569-4287) for
  counseling of past due home borrowers does not work in rural areas. Please
  call it yourself right now and punch in 69044 when prompted for a zip code.
  Now try to imagine you are a high school graduate working for a cattle feed
  yard in rural Nebraska and not a college educated federal policy maker. Imagine
  continuing to use the phone to try to reach this counselor in the desperate
  attempt to save your home because you believe that if the bank gave you the
  phone number because you were having trouble with your payments the people
  on the other end of that number will surely be able get the bank to wait on
  foreclosure, or take a lower payment, or even make a payment for you. If you
  get lucky and guess the North Platte zip code you will find out that there
  is a counselor over an hour and a half away. I have had a borrower accuse me
  of supplying this number in order to mentally torture her as revenge for not
  paying on their past due loan. As you can imagine this “help” elevated
  my appreciation of HUD’s benevolent intentions to a level that is beyond
  description. This requirement should either exempt rural areas where counseling
  is not available or preferably it should be eliminated completely.
 
 I would like you to survey your bank examiners and ask them if Home Equity
  Lines of Credit are available in rural areas? If the answer is Home Equity
  Lines of Credit are generally not available in the rural areas I would like
  you to ask them what they think the reason is. If the reason they give is agrees
  with us, that the compliance effort to offer this product is too complicated,
  too costly and too risky from an exam aspect to offer it. Then I ask that If
  I am correct is this not discrimination based on population density?
 
 Thank you for taking the time to read my suggestions for change. Hopefully
  you sensed of the depth of my frustration with some of these subjects. Please
  consider the comments of my community bank colleagues. We have the experience
  of setting policy for our banks as well as the understanding of using those
  same policies while in direct contact with our customers. I am in favor of
  simple, clean, and easily understood options that customers in banks of all
  sizes can take advantage of. Such reform will be appreciated by, and useful
  to, Joe & Jane Borrower.
 
 Respectfully,
 Kent M. Franzen Sr.VP
 Farmers State Bank Of Trenton
 PO Box 338
 Trenton NE 69044
 |