| 
 
 
 CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK From: Janet Dukes [mailto:JANET@cnbohio.com]
 Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 10:56 AM
 To: regs.comments@federalreserve.gov; Comments; regs.comments@occ.treas.gov;
                  regs.comments@ots.treas.gov
 Subject: EGRPRA
 Re: EGRPRA Review of Consumer Protection Lending Related Rules Dear Sir or Madam: As the VP/COO and Compliance Officer of a community bank (Citizens
            National Bank-$350M), I greatly welcome the regulators' effort on
            the critical problem of regulatory burden. Community bankers work
            hard to establish the trust and confidence with our customers that
            are fundamental to customer service, but consumer protection rules
            frequently interfere with our ability to serve our customers. Truth in Lending (Federal Reserve Regulation Z)Right of Rescission. One of the most burdensome requirements is the three-day
    right of rescission under Regulation Z. Rarely, if ever, does a consumer
    exercise the right. Consumers resent having to wait three additional days
    to receive loan proceeds after the loan is closed, and they often blame the
    bank for "withholding" their funds. Even though this is a statutory
    requirement, inflexibility in the regulation making it difficult to waive
    the right of rescission aggravates the problem. If not outright repealed,
    depository institutions should at least be given much greater latitude to
    allow customers to waive the right.
  Finance Charges. Another problem under Regulation Z is the definition
            of the finance charge. Assessing what must be included in - or excluded
            from - the finance charge is not easily determined, especially fees
            and charges levied by third parties. And yet, the calculation of
            the finance charge is critical in properly calculating the annual
            percentage rate (APR). This process desperately needs simplification
            so that all consumers can understand the APR and bankers can easily
            calculate it. Equal Credit Opportunity Act (Federal Reserve Regulation B)Section 202.7(d)(3)- Evidence of Joint Application. These requirements make
    it difficult and almost require all parties - and their spouses - come into
    the bank personally to complete documents. This makes little sense as the
    world moves toward new technologies that do not require physical presence
    to apply for a loan.
 Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) (Federal Reserve Regulation
            C)The volume of the data that must be collected and reported is clearly
            burdensome. Certain data collection requirements are difficult to
            apply in practice and therefore add to regulatory burden and the
            potential for error, e.g., assessing loans against HOEPA (the Home
            Owners Equity Protection Act) and reporting rate spreads; determining
            the date the interest rate on a loan was set; determining physical
            property address or census tract information in rural areas, etc.
 Flood InsuranceThe current flood insurance regulations create difficulties with customers,
    who often do not understand why flood insurance is required and that the
    federal government - not the bank - imposes the requirement. The government
    needs to do a better job of educating consumers to the reasons and requirements
    of flood hazard insurance. Flood insurance requirements should be streamlined
    and simplified to be understandable.
 ConclusionThe volume of regulatory requirements facing the banking industry today presents
    a daunting task for any institution, but severely saps the resources of community
    banks. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this critical issue.
 Janet A. DukesVP/COO and Compliance Officer
 Citizens National Bank of Bluffton
 131 Citizens Parkway
 Bluffton, OH 45817
                 |