| FUND FOR AN OPEN SOCIETY 
        August 31, 2004 Mr. Robert E. FeldmanExecutive Secretary
 Attention: Comments/Legal ESS
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 550 17th St. NW
 Washington, DC 20429
 RE: RIN 3064-AC50  Dear Mr. Feldman:  As the executive voice of a national organization dedicated to 
        promoting and sustaining communities of choice for racially and 
        ethnically robust markets, I am a critic of CRA regulations as they have 
        been and as they would not be improved by your proposed changes.  Integrated and balanced living patterns and robust markets, an 
        American ideal that was anticipated to be furthered by the 1968 Civil 
        Rights Act, Title VIII and by CRA, continue to elude establishment in 
        much of America.  In part, this is because of over-reliance on 
        place-based—and, therefore race-based, given segregation levels--housing 
        and community reinvestment policy and regulation. Giving (double) 
        community-support credit for investments and services to lower-income 
        and minority people in lower-income and minority areas is predictably 
        segregative.  In their well-vetted book, American Apartheid, "Massey and Denton 
        provide unambiguous evidence that residential segregation is the major 
        factor accounting for the black underclass," avers Reynolds Farley, 
        renown scholar. George Galster and other economists agree.  Financial institutions should be investing in removal of ghetto 
        chains that bind too many people in geography of low opportunity. 
        Instead, CRA credits are distributed for making the chains of American 
        Apartheid more comfortable. And this kind of outcome is largely hidden 
        even from those well-intentioned people representing both financial and 
        community intereasts. How does this happen? It happens because CRA 
        regulations do not require or even encourage 
        integration/segregation-impact analysis. Separate and unequal prevails 
        in a system that does not measure it and correct for it.  Your proposal may achieve less segregation by requiring less of 
        financial Institutions, but that is not the way to fix what is wrong.
         Sincerely, Don DeMarcoActing Executive Director
 Fund for an Open Society
 The Philadelphia Building #1708
 1315 Walnut Street
 Philadelphia, PA 19107
 
 |