Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary
            Attention Comments
            Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. 
            550 – 17th Street, NW
            Washington, DC 20429
Dear Mr. Feldman:
We applaud your efforts to reduce regulatory burden on the financial
            services industry. Taylor Bank has always been a highly capitalized
            bank with above average profits. We have had no consumer complaints,
            to our knowledge. In spite of our strong 114-year history, we experience
            regulatory burden during exams and in daily operations. Chairman
            Powell is correct in his stated initiatives in asking for comments
            regarding regulatory burden. Our comments are: 
• Flood Hazard Insurance – The
                  value of the land should be taken into consideration of flood insurance
                  requirements, even
                if located in a flood zone. If the value of the land exceeds the
                amount of the loan, the borrower should be able to opt out of purchasing
                flood insurance. Also, if the loan is on vacant land, in a flood
                zone, we are required to advise the customer. Vacant land cannot
                be insured therefore this requirement should be eliminated. Because
                of the Regulators strong stance on this requirement, banks are at
                a competitive disadvantage with non-regulated mortgage companies.
                Bank customers would also benefit from this requested change.
• 12 CFR 202 (Reg. B) – Equal Credit Opportunity – Monitoring
              information – If a customer does not wish to disclose this
              information, the loan officer must complete it through visual determination.
              We should not be required to do this, which is against the customer’s
              wishes. In some cases the accuracy of visual determination might
              be questioned. Making this requested change would protect bank customer’s
              privacy. 
• RESPA, HUD (Reg.X) – Servicing
                transfer disclosure: Our bank retains servicing on all residential
                mortgages loans that
              we originate. We have never sold any loans. Only lenders with a history
              of transferring servicing should be required to disclose their practice.
              Bank customers would benefit by having one less disclosure to deal
              with.
• 12 CFR 226 (Reg. Z) – Truth In Lending – 3-day
              Right Of Rescission. This should be eliminated entirely. The intent
              of the original law was not for banks and should not apply to bank
              mortgages. Bank borrowers do not need a “cooling off period” to
              consider their decision to take a mortgage. Bank customers would
              benefit greatly from this requested change.
• CRA and HMDA – The
                threshold for reporting banks should be raised to $1 Billion with
                respect to CRA and HMDA.
• Consolidate
                exams by combining Safety and Soundness, Compliance, IS exams and
                CRA
                concurrently. Banks are asked for a lot of the same
              information during these separate exams, which is a duplication of
              work for the bank. 
• Examine a well-run bank every 2 years for Safety and Soundness,
              Compliance, IS exam and CRA concurrently. Since the bank’s
              Call Report data is available quarterly and customer complaints are
              available on an on-going basis, well-run banks could be monitored
              with increased outreach between examinations.
• Require each field office to enforce FDIC regulations the
              same. We have a disclosure requirement from the Maryland field office
              that my research has determined, is unique to that office alone. “Examiner
              discretion” creates many unique burdens for banks. 
• Reduce
                the quarterly and annual regulatory filing burden for smaller bank
                holding companies.
                The following should be combined
              or made uniform: FFIEC Call Reports (banks only), Federal Reserve
              reports (parent company and consolidated), and SEC quarterly filings
              (consolidated)). A small bank holding company might be one with consolidated
              assets of $1 billion or less. 
• As a side issue, we implore the FDIC to continue it’s
              strong support of adequate loan loss reserves, which have recently
              come under scrutiny by the AICPA and SEC. This matter is very important
              to the safety and soundness of our industry and should not be subject
              to influence by non-banking regulators.
 I will be glad to expand on any of the above. We look forward to
            working with the FDIC in keeping the banking industry as a symbol
            of confidence.
  Reese F. Cropper, Jr., 
  Chairman/CEO