| 
 
 NORTHSTAR BANK August 243, 2004
 
 
 Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary
 Attn: Comments
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 550 17th Street North West
 Washington, DC 20429
 
 Subject:
                  Community Reinvestment RIN 3064-XXXX
 Dear Mr. Feldman:  Northstar Bank is a four year old $100 million state non-member
            bank, with two offices in the Thumb of Michigan. Our main office
            is located in Bad Axe, Michigan, approximately 100 miles north of
            Detroit, Michigan. Farming and agri-business are primary building
            blocks of our local economy. The bank is owned by Northstar Financial
            Group, Inc. which also has a bank just north of Metropolitan Detroit.  Our organization supports
              the increasing of the size limit for eligibility for the small-bank
              exam from $250 million to $1 billion and the elimination
            of the separate holding company qualification. As community bankers
            we realize the "streamlined" examination procedures do
            not exempt our organization from the original mandate of the Community
            Reinvestment Act. We feel the proposed changes actually recognize
            how community banks function. Community banks must meet the financial
            needs of our local communities or we will cease to exist.  It has been my experience the Directors, Officers, Staff, and, most
            importantly, the Shareholders of community banks have a strong bond
            with their local area. They have both a financial interest, and a
            personal pride which creates a vested interest in the success of
            their hometown.  The adding of the new community development criterion to small bank
            performance standards will need a common sense approach on the part
            of-the banks and the Regulators. While a community bank may support
            the idea of a particular community development project it might be
            beyond the risk tolerance or expertise of the institution. The dollar
            amount or required terms of sorne projects could be beyond the banks
            ability to prudently fund. The Regulators must consider these factors
            when judging a bank's community development activities.  The expansion of community development definitions to include a
            broader range of activities in rural areas does recognize the unique
            characteristics of rural America. This change will provide additional
            flexibility needed by community banks to meet the community development
            criterion. 
                       The
              Community Reinvestment Act was enacted to encourage banks to provide
              financial service to all parts of the communities where
              they collect deposits. The FDIC's proposal does not change that,
            but provides some relief from the burden of regulatory compliance.  I appreciate
              the opportunity to comment on the proposed changes. 
 Sincerely
 John R. Booms
 President & CEO
 
 
 
 
 
 |