Skip Header

Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation

Each depositor insured to at least $250,000 per insured bank

Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations

FDIC Federal Register Citations

[Federal Register: April 29, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 83)]
[Page 23502-23505]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access []



Office of the Comptroller of the Currency




Office of Thrift Supervision

Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment

AGENCIES: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), Treasury;
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board); Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC); and Office of Thrift Supervision
(OTS), Treasury.

ACTION: Joint notice and request for comment.


SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. chapter 35), the OCC, the Board, the FDIC, and
the OTS (the ``agencies'') may not conduct or sponsor, and the
respondent is not required to respond to, an information collection
unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number. The Federal Financial Institutions Examination
Council (FFIEC), of which the agencies are members, has approved the
agencies' publication for public comment of proposed revisions to the
instructions for the Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income (Call
Report) and the Thrift Financial Report (TFR), which are currently
approved collections of information. At the end of the comment period,
the comments and recommendations received will be analyzed to determine
the extent to which the FFIEC and the agencies should modify the
proposed revised instructions prior to giving final approval. The
agencies will then submit the revisions to OMB for review and approval.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before June 28, 2004.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments to
any or all of the agencies. All comments, which should refer to the OMB
control number(s), will be shared among the agencies.
OCC: Comments should be sent to the Public Information Room, Office
of the Comptroller of the Currency, Mailstop 1-5, Attention: 1557-0081,
250 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20219. Due to delays in paper mail
delivery in the Washington area, commenters are encouraged to submit
comments by fax or e-mail. Comments may be sent by fax to (202) 874-
4448, or by e-mail to You can inspect and
photocopy the comments at the OCC's Public Information Room, 250 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20219. You can make an appointment to
inspect the comments by calling (202) 874-5043.
Board: Written comments, which should refer to ``Consolidated
Reports of Condition and Income, 7100-0036,'' may be mailed to Ms.
Jennifer J. Johnson, Secretary, Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System, 20th and C Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551. Due to
temporary disruptions in the Board's mail service, commenters are
encouraged to submit comments by electronic mail to, or by fax to the Office of the

Secretary at 202-452-3819 or 202-452-3102. Comments addressed to Ms.
Johnson also may be delivered to the Board's mailroom between 8:45 a.m.
and 5:15 p.m. weekdays, and to the security control room outside of
those hours. Both the mailroom and the security control room are
accessible from the Eccles Building courtyard entrance on 20th Street
between Constitution Avenue and C Street, NW. Comments received may be
inspected in room M-P-500 between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. on weekdays
pursuant to sections 261.12 and 261.14 of the Board's Rules Regarding
Availability of Information, 12 CFR 261.12 and 261.14.
FDIC: Written comments should be addressed to Steven F. Hanft,
Clearance Officer, Legal Division, Room MB-3046, Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation, 550 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20429. All
comments should refer to ``Consolidated Reports of Condition and
Income, 3064-0052.'' Commenters are encouraged to submit comments by
electronic mail to Comments also may be hand-
delivered to the guard station at the rear of the 550 17th Street
Building (located on F Street) on business days between 7 a.m. and 5
p.m. Comments may be inspected and photocopied in the FDIC Public
Information Center, Room 100, 801 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC,
between 9 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. on business days.
OTS: Information Collection Comments, Chief Counsel's Office,
Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552,
Attention: 1550-0023, Fax number (202) 906-6518, or e-mail to Due to temporary disruptions in
mail service in the Washington, DC, area, commenters are encouraged to
send comments by fax or e-mail, if possible. OTS will post comments and
the related index on the OTS Internet site at
In addition, interested persons may
inspect comments at the Public Reading Room, 1700 G Street, NW., by
appointment. To make an appointment, call (202) 906-5922, send an e-
mail to, or send a facsimile transmission to
(202) 906-7755.
A copy of the comments may also be submitted to the OMB desk
officer for the agencies: Mark Menchik, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive
Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503, or electronic mail

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information about the
revisions discussed in this notice, please contact any of the agency
clearance officers whose names appear below. In addition, copies of
Call Report forms can be obtained at the FFIEC's Web site
( Copies of the TFR can be
obtained at the OTS's Web site

OCC: John Ference, Acting OCC Clearance Officer, or Camille Dixon,
(202) 874-5090, Legislative and Regulatory Activities Division, Office
of the Comptroller of the Currency, 250 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
Board: Michelle E. Long, Acting Clearance Officer, (202) 452-3829,
Division of Research and Statistics, Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System, 20th and C Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551.
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (TDD) users may call (202) 263-
FDIC: Steven F. Hanft, Paperwork Clearance Officer, (202) 898-3907,
Legal Division, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 550 17th Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20429.
OTS: Marilyn K. Burton, OTS Paperwork Clearance Officer, (202) 906-
6467, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, DC

[[Page 23503]]

by electronic mail at

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The agencies are proposing to revise the
following currently approved collections of information:
The effect of the proposed revisions to the reporting requirements
will vary from institution to institution depending on the
institution's involvement with the types of activities or transactions
to which the proposed instructional changes apply. The agencies
estimate that since the proposed instructional revisions change how
existing information is reported in the Call Report and TFR,
implementation of these instructional changes will result in little or
no change in the current reporting burden imposed by the Call Report
and TFR. The following burden estimates include the proposed revisions.
Report Title: OCC, Board, and FDIC: Consolidated Reports of
Condition and Income (Call Report). OTS: Thrift Financial Report (TFR).
Form Number: Call Report: FFIEC 031 (for banks with domestic and
foreign offices) and FFIEC 041 (for banks with domestic offices only).
TFR: OTS Form No. 1313.
Frequency of Response: Quarterly.
Affected Public: Business or other for-profit.


OMB Number: 1557-0081.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 2,126 national banks.
Estimated Time per Response: 46.40 burden hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden: 394,589 burden hours.


OMB Number: 7100-0036.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 952 state member banks.
Estimated Time per Response: 52.36 burden hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden: 199,369 burden hours.


OMB Number: 3064-0052.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 5,332 insured state nonmember
Estimated Time per Response: 37.04 burden hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden: 790,085 burden hours.


OMB Number: 1550-0023.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 925 insured savings associations.
Estimated Time per Response: 36.4 burden hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden: 134,679 burden hours.
The estimated time per response for the Call Report and the TFR is
an average, which varies by agency because of differences in the
composition of the institutions under each agency's supervision (e.g.,
size distribution of institutions, types of activities in which they
are engaged, and, for banks, existence of foreign offices). For the
Call Report, the average reporting burden includes the effect on burden
during 2004 of the new Central Data Repository (CDR) system for
processing Call Reports. The time per response for the Call Report is
estimated to range from 15 to 600 hours, depending on an individual
institution's circumstances, before considering the effect of voluntary
testing and global enrollment activities related to the CDR. The
reporting burden for testing and enrollment activities for an
individual institution is estimated to range from 16 to 69 hours in
2004, depending on the institution's level of participation.

General Description of Reports

These information collections are mandatory: 12 U.S.C. 161 (for
national banks), 12 U.S.C. 324 (for state member banks), 12 U.S.C. 1817
(for insured state nonmember commercial and savings banks), and 12 CFR
563.180 (for savings associations). Except for selected items, these
information collections are not given confidential treatment.


Institutions file Call Reports and TFRs with the agencies each
quarter for the agencies' use in monitoring the condition, performance,
and risk profile of individual institutions and the industry as a
whole. In addition, Call Reports and TFRs provide the most current
statistical data available for evaluating institutions' corporate
applications such as mergers, for identifying areas of focus for both
on-site and off-site examinations, and for monetary and other public
policy purposes. Call Reports and TFRs are also used to calculate all
institutions' deposit insurance and Financing Corporation assessments
and national banks' and savings associations' semiannual assessment

Current Action

I. Overview

This joint notice and request for comment addresses two proposed
instructional changes that will affect how institutions report certain
information in the Call Report and TFR. The agencies are not proposing
to change the report forms themselves. First, the agencies are
proposing to change and clarify the reporting requirements for certain
securitized loans that are 90 days or more past due and subject to
seller buy-back provisions. This first change will primarily affect
institutions that originate or purchase and then securitize certain
residential mortgage loans. Second, the agencies are proposing to
change the reporting requirements for ``when-issued'' securities from
settlement date accounting to trade date accounting. This change would
affect institutions filing the Call Report that purchase or sell
``when-issued'' securities and will not affect institutions filing the
TFR because the TFR instructions already require this reporting
Type of Review: Revision of currently approved collections.
The proposed instructional revisions to the Call Report and the TFR
have been approved for publication by the FFIEC. The agencies intend to
implement the proposed Call Report and TFR changes as of the September
30, 2004, report date. Nonetheless, as is customary for Call Report and
TFR changes, if the information to be reported in accordance with the
revised instructions is not readily available, institutions are advised
that they may report reasonable estimates of this information for the
report date as of which the proposed changes first take effect.

II. Discussion of Proposed Instructional Revisions

A. GNMA Buy-Back Option
Under the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) Mortgage-
Backed Securities Guide, the issuer of GNMA securities has the option
to repurchase individual Federal Housing Administration (FHA),
Department of Veterans Affairs/Veterans Administration (VA), and
Farmers Home Administration (FmHA) loans backing the securities when
the loans meet certain delinquency criteria. Such a buy-back option is
considered a conditional option under Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) Statement No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing
of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities (FAS 140), until
the delinquency criteria are met, at which time the option becomes
When the loans backing a GNMA security (GNMA loans) are initially
securitized, the issuer of the security treats the transaction as a
sale for accounting purposes under FAS 140

[[Page 23504]]

because the option is conditional and the issuer has surrendered
control of the loans. Accordingly, the loans are removed from the
issuer's balance sheet. When individual loans later meet GNMA's
specified delinquency criteria and are eligible for repurchase, the
issuer is deemed to have regained control of these loans and, under FAS
140, the loans can no longer be reported as sold. These individual
delinquent GNMA loans must be brought back onto the issuer's books as
assets, along with an offsetting liability, regardless of whether the
issuer intends to exercise the buy-back option.
Recently, the agencies became aware of several inconsistencies in
the way issuers of GNMA securities have reported certain information in
their Call Reports and TFRs relating to GNMA loans after they have
become delinquent. In this regard, the agencies found that some
institutions were reporting GNMA loans that were eligible for
repurchase, as well as those that have actually been repurchased, as
``Other assets'' on the balance sheet. Other institutions were
reporting these assets as ``Loans.'' Based on discussions with
representatives of the FASB, the Securities and Exchange Commission,
and other industry personnel, the agencies concluded that ``Loans'' is
the appropriate balance sheet classification for these assets and
included such guidance in the December 2003 Call Report Supplemental
Instructions and TFR Financial Reporting Bulletin.\1\

\1\ The December 2003 Call Report Supplemental Instructions and
TFR Financial Reporting Bulletin can be accessed at

and, respectively.


However, additional inconsistencies in practice still exist
the appropriateness of reporting repurchased
GNMA loans, and GNMA loans that are eligible for repurchase, as past
due loans in Call Report Schedule RC-N and TFR Schedule PD, and
the appropriate balance sheet classification of
foreclosed real estate that had been the collateral for GNMA loans,
i.e., whether the foreclosed real estate should be reported as ``other
real estate owned'' or ``other assets.''

The agencies December 2003 guidance did not address these reporting
The agencies' objective is to ensure consistent accounting and
reporting for these loans and foreclosed real estate. However,
achieving consistency will require changes to current practice for some
institutions and changes and clarifications to existing regulatory
reporting guidance. Accordingly, we are seeking comments on a number of
proposed changes.
Delinquency Status. For delinquent GNMA loans that are repurchased
when they are ``in foreclosure status'' at the time of repurchase,
current Call Report and TFR instructions permit institutions not to
report these loans as past due provided the government reimbursement
process is proceeding normally. However, some institutions are applying
this exception to their other rebooked delinquent GNMA loans, whether
repurchased or eligible for repurchase, and not reporting them as past
due in the Call Report and TFR. Other institutions report all rebooked
delinquent GNMA loans, except those covered by the exception, as past
The exception from past due reporting for GNMA loans ``in
foreclosure status'' predates FAS 140. More specifically, when this
exception was added to the Call Report and TFR instructions, the
accounting standards then in effect did not require the seller to
rebook delinquent GNMA loans for which the repurchase option became
unconditional unless the loans were actually repurchased. Institutions
could choose to repurchase delinquent GNMA loans ``in foreclosure
status'' from the loan pool backing a GNMA security rather than
continuing to make monthly advances to the pool on these delinquent
loans while initiating foreclosure action. Until the exception was
added, an institution that repurchased delinquent loans in foreclosure
status had to report the loans as past due in its regulatory reports
whereas an institution making monthly advances on delinquent loans
without repurchasing them did not have to report these loans as past
due. The creation of the exception eliminated this reporting
difference, which depended on how the institution chose to handle its
servicing responsibilities. In contrast, under FAS 140, delinquent GNMA
loans must be rebooked as assets as soon as the repurchase option
becomes unconditional, whether or not the loans are repurchased.
Consequently, the difference in balance sheet treatment for repurchased
delinquent GNMA loans versus those eligible for repurchase that led the
agencies to create the exception from past due reporting no longer
Thus, the agencies are proposing that all delinquent rebooked GNMA
loans (including those for which the institution is taking steps to
foreclose on the real estate collateral at the time of repurchase, but
for which the sheriff's sale has not yet taken place) should be treated
consistently and reported as past due on Call Report Schedule RC-N and
TFR Schedule PD in accordance with their contractual terms. Some
institutions that are GNMA issuers have objected to the possibility of
having to report delinquent GNMA loans as past due, so the agencies are
now seeking industry comment on the reporting of all delinquent
rebooked GNMA loans as past due residential mortgage loans. It should
be noted that such delinquent GNMA loans would also be reported in the
items for past due loans wholly or partially guaranteed by the U.S.
Government on Call Report Schedule RC-N and TFR Schedule PD. These
items provide a method for users of the Call Report and TFR to identify
the amount of delinquent loans that are not guaranteed by the U.S.
The agencies are seeking comment on whether this past due reporting
approach is appropriate and whether there are alternative methods to
ensure that all delinquent loans are treated consistently.
Foreclosed Real Estate. There are also inconsistencies in how
institutions, for balance sheet purposes, report the real estate
collateral backing delinquent GNMA loans on which they have foreclosed.
Some institutions report the foreclosed real estate as ``other real
estate owned.'' Other institutions report it as ``other assets''
because they consider their asset to be a receivable from the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the federal entity
that administers the GNMA program.
The agencies understand that in the case of FHA properties (which
eventually go back to HUD), the institution forecloses on the real
estate collateral for delinquent loans in its own name. The institution
must then hold the property through the state-specified redemption,
confirmation, or ratification periods. The length of these periods
varies from state to state. The property is not conveyed to HUD until
it is ``clean'' in terms of the completion of the redemption period and
the eviction of any occupants of the property, which could be an
extended period of time following foreclosure. HUD is not obligated to
receive the property until the successful completion of the entire
legal process.
In the case of VA loans, the institution also forecloses on the
real estate collateral in its own name. If the institution wins the bid
at the sheriff's sale, it instructs the sheriff to title the property
in the name of the VA. However, as with FHA loans, title is not
actually conveyed to the VA until the end of the redemption period,
which may be several months after foreclosure.
The agencies understand that in both FHA and VA foreclosures, HUD

[[Page 23505]]

accept the property nor can the government guarantee or insurance be
honored until all legal actions pursuant to foreclosure have been
A rationale that institutions have given for reporting the
foreclosed property as an ``other asset'' is that the financial
institution essentially is acting as an agent for HUD. The institution
makes arrangements for a sheriff's sale in its own name and bids for
the property in its name. Institutions that follow this reporting
treatment then record a receivable from HUD representing the amount due
under the government guarantee or insurance. Following the completion
of all legal proceedings and acceptance of the property, HUD is
responsible for disposing of the real estate.
However, the process for resolving foreclosed properties that
served as collateral for mortgage loans backing GNMA securities may
result in an institution's involvement with the property for an
extended period of time following the sheriff's sale. Accordingly, as
with other real estate collateral on which an institution forecloses,
an institution that forecloses on real estate backing delinquent GNMA
loans it has rebooked as assets should report the property as ``other
real estate owned'' on the balance sheet in the Call Report and TFR.
The foreclosed property should be reported in this manner beginning at
the time of foreclosure until it has been sold, transferred to HUD, or
otherwise disposed of.
The agencies request comments on the appropriateness of this
balance sheet treatment.
B. ``When-Issued'' Securities
The agencies have identified a potential difference in the
accounting for ``when-issued'' securities between the Call Report
instructions and generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
Specifically, the Call Report Glossary entry for ``When-Issued
Securities Transactions'' indicates that ``[p]urchases and sales of
when-issued securities for which settlement date has not occurred as of
the report date are not to be reflected in the balance sheet, Schedule
RC, until settlement date.'' Accordingly, the Call Report instructions
indicate that institutions should follow ``settlement date accounting''
for when-issued securities. Under GAAP, all securities are required to
be reported on the balance sheet as of the ``trade date.''
Specifically, paragraph 5.92 of the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants' (AICPA) Audit and Accounting Guide for Banks and
Savings Institutions (May 2000 edition) indicates that purchases and
sales of securities are recorded on the balance sheet as of the trade
date (``trade date accounting'').
The requirement that institutions account for when-issued
securities at settlement date is a longstanding regulatory reporting
practice. However, given that GAAP and industry practice seem to
predominantly follow trade date accounting, the agencies are proposing
to eliminate the Call Report instruction that indicates institutions
should follow settlement date accounting for when-issued securities and
replace it with one that calls for trade date accounting for such
In addition, the agencies would remove the references to
commitments to purchase and sell when-issued securities from the
instructions for Schedule RC-L, item 9, ``All other off-balance sheet
liabilities,'' and item 10, ``All other off-balance sheet assets,''
respectively. The instructions would instead indicate that, consistent
with the reporting of other purchased securities under trade date
accounting, an institution's purchases of when-issued securities should
be reported on the balance sheet as ``Held-to-maturity securities,''
``Available-for-sale securities,'' or ``Trading assets,'' as
appropriate, when recorded on the trade date. The selling of when-
issued securities is considered a trading activity.
Furthermore, the agencies would revise the Call Report Glossary
entry for ``Trade Date and Settlement Date Accounting'' to clarify that
institutions should follow trade date accounting for all securities,
including when-issued securities. In so doing, this Glossary entry's
reference to the conditions under which settlement date accounting is
acceptable would be eliminated.
The proposed change will improve regulatory reporting by
eliminating a potential unnecessary difference between the Call Report
instructions and GAAP. The agencies request comment on whether these
instructional changes are appropriate and whether they would be
consistent with institutions' current accounting practices. In this
regard, the agencies request comment on whether there is justification
for retaining the current settlement date accounting treatment for
when-issued securities when the accounting for all other securities is
based on trade date. The agencies also request comment on the
appropriateness of reporting purchases of when-issued securities on the
balance sheet as ``Held-to-maturity securities,'' ``Available-for-sale
securities,'' or ``Trading assets,'' as appropriate, on the trade date.

III. Request for Comment

Public comment is requested on all aspects of this joint notice. In
addition, comments are invited on:
(a) Whether the proposed revisions to the Call Report and TFR
collections of information are necessary for the proper performance of
the agencies' functions, including whether the information has
practical utility;
(b) The accuracy of the agencies' estimates of the burden of the
information collections as they are proposed to be revised, including
the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected;
(d) Ways to minimize the burden of information collections on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology; and
(e) Estimates of capital or start up costs and costs of operation,
maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information.
Comments submitted in response to this joint notice will be shared
among the agencies and will be summarized or included in the agencies'
requests for OMB approval. All comments will become a matter of public
record. Written comments should address the accuracy of the burden
estimates and ways to minimize burden as well as other relevant aspects
of the information collection request.

Dated: April 19, 2004.
Mark J. Tenhundfeld,
Assistant Director, Legislative and Regulatory Activities Division,
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 22,
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
Dated at Washington, DC, this 20th day of April, 2004.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
Dated: April 20, 2004.

By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
James E. Gilleran,
[FR Doc. 04-9772 Filed 4-28-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-33-P; 6210-01-P; 6714-01-P; 6720-01-P


Last Updated 04/30/2004

Skip Footer back to content