FDIC Law, Regulations, Related Acts
4000 - Advisory Opinions
Proportionate Anti-Dilution Adjustments and Amendments to Non-Qualified Stock Option Plans Do Not Require Shareholder Approval Under FDIC Regulations
August 19, 1993
Gerald J. Gervino, Senior Attorney
Re. *** Savings Bank Employee benefit plan
exemption from Section 16 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934
This is in response to your replacement letter of July 2, 1993, submitted on behalf of your client bank. ("bank"). The bank has its common stock listed on NASDAQ and is subject to section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78a-7811 (1988). You write to request the FDIC to concur in your view that the amendment, which you have described, to your client bank's non-qualified stock option program for non-officer directors ("director's plan") and its stock option and appreciation rights plan ("employee's plan") (The two plans are sometimes referred to as the "plans") does not require shareholder approval for a certain exemption under our rules.
The plans have been approved by the bank's shareholders. The bank would now like to amend the plans by board of director action. Rule 16b-3 of the SEC (12 CFR § 240.16b-3 (1992) is applicable as provided by a cross-reference in § 335.410 of our regulations, 12 CFR § 335.410 (1993). We intend to follow controlling SEC interpretations, which are brought to our attention.
Each plan contains a paragraph 5(g), which reads as follows:
(g) Recapitalization. Subject to any required action by the stockholders, if any, the number of shares as to which Options [and Stock Appreciation Rights have been or] may be granted under this Plan, will be adjusted proportionately for any increase or decrease in the number of outstanding Shares resulting from stock splits and reverse stock splits, but not for stock dividends. The number of Shares will be adjusted to the nearest whole Share. Any stock dividend resulting in an increase of twenty percent (20%) or more in the outstanding Shares shall be deemed a stock split.
The bank's board of directors intends to amend paragraph (g) of each plan by adding the following sentence to the end of each paragraph:
Anything herein to the contrary notwithstanding, the number of Shares covered by outstanding Options [and Stock Appreciation Rights] and the per share exercise price thereof shall be adjusted proportionately for any increase or decrease in the number of outstanding Shares resulting from stock splits, reverse stock splits and stock dividends.
You indicate that the purpose and effect of the proposed amendment is to require, in connection with stock splits, reverse stock splits, and stock dividends, the proportionate anti-dilution adjustments necessary to preserve the same economic benefits for the holders of outstanding options after the stock split, reverse stock split, or stock dividend, as the holders had before the event.
The proposed amendments will not increase the number of shares issuable under either plan. As a result, the maximum number of shares issuable under the director's plan (100,000 shares) and the employee's plan (443,250 shares) will remain the same as originally approved by the bank's shareholders.
As of the date of your letter, there are options to purchase 48,817 shares of the bank's common stock, granted and unexercised under the director's plan. No stock appreciation rights have been granted to date. Proportionate anti-dilution adjustments to these outstanding and unexercised options, as a result of the proposed 5% stock dividend, would increase the number of shares subject to the options by 2,441 under the directors' plan and by 15,232 under the employees' plan. Since the total number of shares issuable under the plans will not change as a result of the proposed 5% stock dividend, the number of shares available for future option grants under the directors' plan will decrease by 2,441 and the number of shares available for future option or stock appreciation right grants under the employees' plan will decrease by 15,232. The bank's board of directors also intends to effect a proportionate anti-dilution reduction to the per share (although not the total) exercise price of the outstanding and unexercised options.
You state that the two proportionate anti-dilution adjustments ("adjustments") and the amendments to the plans have the effect of preserving the existing value of the outstanding options. Absent the adjustments and the amendments, you indicate that the optionees would suffer an economic loss not experienced by shareholders receiving the stock dividend. In your opinion, the amendment and the adjustments would not materially increase the existing benefits of optionees under the directors' plan or the employees' plan. You emphasize that there would be no increase in benefits at all. In your view, the adoption of the amendment is necessary to permit the adjustments. You feel that the adjustments are necessary to preserve the pre-stock dividend economic value of the outstanding options.
You conclude that the proposed amendment to the plans and the adjustments does not (i) increase the benefits to participants, (ii) increase the number of securities issuable pursuant to the plans or (iii) change in any way the participant eligibility requirements under the plans. You also conclude that the bank's board of directors has the power to adopt the proposed amendment to the plans without the necessity of approval by the bank's shareholders.
Based upon the facts which you have presented, we feel that the amendment and adjustments, which are described above, do not require shareholder approval under 17 CFR § 240.16b-3 (1992) as applied to your client by 12 CFR § 335.410 (1993). Because our position is based upon the representations made to us in your letter, we note that any different facts or conditions may require a different conclusion.