From: Ed
Hanson
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 4:37 PM
To: Comments
Subject: RIN 3064-AD35
November 5, 2008
To:
FDIC
From: Ed Hanson, Crown Bank- Edina, Minnesota
RE: RIN 3064-AD35
Comments on proposed FDIC Premium Increase for Brokered Deposits
I
appreciate the opportunity to comment on the proposed changes to the FDIC
insurance premium schedule, including the proposed adjustment for brokered
deposits.
Please consider the following in adopting the final rule:
-
A 20% asset growth rate over a four year period is arbitrarily low. This
would especially low for a relatively new bank that has experienced growth
over that time frame and where the bank has a relatively low asset base
level going back four years.. Some combination of dollar growth and a
higher level than 20% in growth rate should be given consideration.
-
Brokered deposits are an effective means for some banks to support their
ability to fund loans in their markets. With the current tightness in
liquidity and the weakness in the national economy, this would be the
wrong time to implement a surcharge for using brokered deposits. The
impact may cause banks to cut back on their lending in order to reduce the
use of brokered deposits due to the premium adjustment.
-
Applying the assessment to only “brokered deposits” is somewhat arbitrary
and could be viewed as discriminatory. If a surcharge is ultimately
adopted, the final regulation should also apply the surcharge to other
sources of non core funding such as funds obtained through internet
listing services or the CDARs program. These types of non core funds are
similar to brokered deposits even though they may not be classified as
such. By doing so, the surcharge could be spread among a greater deposit
base.
-
Premium schedule should be adjusted to exclude a premium on a bank’s
uninsured deposits. The current premium assessment methodology
discriminates against those banks that are able to attract a higher level
of deposits in excess of the FDIC insurance limits.
-
With many banks currently experiencing credit issues and other factors
impacting profit levels, raising premiums so drastically at this time will
only put additional pressures on the banking industry when the bank are
working to improve profitability and build investor and customer
confidence.
-
The use of a 10% threshold for brokered deposits may unintentionally
create a cap or benchmark for examiners when evaluating a bank’s funding
source and may cause them to negatively view those banks that exceed this
limit even though the bank may have effective controls and management
processes over brokered deposit activity.
