CAPITAL CITY BANK 
 
          From: Staalenburg, LeAnne  
          Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 11:34 AM 
          To: Comments 
          Cc: Hutchison, John 
          Subject: GLBA / EGRPRA Burden Reduction Comment Letter 
          Importance: High 
To Whom It May Concern: 
 
            The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 established requirements to provide 
            privacy notices at the time of account opening and on an annual basis.
            The 
            initial mailing of privacy notices (prior to July 1, 2001) served
            the 
            purpose of notifying consumer customers of a financial institution's
            privacy 
            policy. After that date, a privacy notice is provided to each new
            deposit, 
            loan, and other financial services consumer customer at time of account 
            opening and is posted in each institution's branch offices. The initial 
            notice is important to consumers because it informs them about the
            way their 
            institution handles their non-public personal financial information.  
 
            Currently, GLBA requires a financial institution to annually provide
            their 
            privacy policy notice to consumer customers. At our bank, we have
            found 
            clients complaining about getting these notices each year. We send
            the 
            majority of these notices as statement stuffers, but there is a segment
            of 
            our consumer customer base who do not annually receive a statement.
            For 
            those customers, we must do a direct mail to get them the privacy
            notice. 
            The annual notice requirement is an especially costly (in printing,
            postage 
            and man hours) and non-productive exercise that adds to the institution's 
            regulatory burden and provides the customer with no new information.  
 
            After an institution has provided an initial privacy policy notice,
            unless 
            the policy changes, it seems impracticable to provide that same policy 
            annually. The GLBA notice requirements would be much more meaningful
            to the 
            customer and efficient and cost effective to the financial institution
            if 
            the notices are sent only if the institution's privacy policy changed.
            If 
            notices are mailed annually (even with no policy change), consumer
            customers 
            will be less likely to read and notice when the policy has been revised.
            If 
            a customer gets a privacy notice each year, he/she might not notice
            if their 
            institution (who initially was not subject to the opt-out provision)
            changed 
            their policy where opt-out would apply.  
 
            Thank you for allowing me the opportunity to comment. 
 
            LeAnne Bailey Staalenburg, CRCM  
            Assistant Vice President 
            Compliance Privacy & Training 
            Capital City Bank  
            P O Box 900  
            Tallahassee, FL 32302  
 
               |