FDIC: 2017 Annual Report - FSLIC RESOLUTION FUND (FRF)
Skip Header

Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation

Each depositor insured to at least $250,000 per insured bank

2017 Annual Report

Previous | Contents | Next

V. Financial Section

FSLIC RESOLUTION FUND (FRF)

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
FSLIC Resolution Fund Balance Sheet
As of December 31
(Dollars in Thousands) 2017 2016
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents $885,380 $874,174
Other assets, net 497 4,391
Total Assets $885,877 $878,565
LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and other liabilities $92 $26
Total Liabilities 92 26
RESOLUTION EQUITY (NOTE 5)
Contributed capital 125,489,317 125,489,317
Accumulated deficit (124,603,532) (124,610,778)
Total Resolution Equity 885,785 878,539
Total Liabilities and Resolution Equity $885,877 $878,565
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
FSLIC Resolution Fund Statement of Income and Accumulated Deficit
For the Years Ended December 31
(Dollars in Thousands) 2017 2016
REVENUE
Interest on U.S. Treasury securities $7,065 $2,070
Other revenue 764 3,278
Total Revenue 7,829 5,348
EXPENSES AND LOSSES
Operating expenses 562 2,725
Losses related to thrift resolutions (Note 6) 21 (993)
Recovery of tax benefits 0 (3,750)
Total Expenses and Losses 583 (2,018)
Net Income 7,246 7,366
Accumulated Deficit - Beginning (124,610,778) (124,618,144)
Accumulated Deficit - Ending $(124,603,532) $(124,610,778)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
FSLIC Resolution Fund Statement of Cash Flows
For the Years Ended December 31
(Dollars in Thousands) 2017 2016
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Provided by:
Interest on U.S. Treasury securities $7,065 $2,070
Recovery of tax benefits 3,750 0
Recoveries from thrift resolutions 1,001 2,270
Department of Justice's return of unused goodwill legal expense funds (Note 3) 0 2,162
Miscellaneous receipts 4 0
Used by:
Operating expenses (555) (3,363)
Miscellaneous disbursements (59) (2)
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities 11,206 3,137
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents 11,206 3,137
Cash and Cash Equivalents - Beginning 874,174 871,037
Cash and Cash Equivalents - Ending $885,380 $874,174
 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

FSLIC Resolution Fund

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2017 and 2016

1. Operations/Dissolution of the FSLIC Resolution Fund
OVERVIEW

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is the independent deposit insurance agency created by Congress in 1933 to maintain stability and public confidence in the nation’s banking system. Provisions that govern the FDIC’s operations are generally found in the Federal Deposit Insurance (FDI) Act, as amended (12 U.S.C. 1811, et seq). In accordance with the FDI Act, the FDIC, as administrator of the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF), insures the deposits of banks and savings associations (insured depository institutions). In cooperation with other federal and state agencies, the FDIC promotes the safety and soundness of insured depository institutions (IDIs) by identifying, monitoring, and addressing risks to the DIF.

In addition to being the administrator of the DIF, the FDIC is the administrator of the FSLIC Resolution Fund (FRF). As such, the FDIC is responsible for the sale of remaining assets and satisfaction of liabilities associated with the former Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (FSLIC) and the former Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC). The FDIC maintains the DIF and the FRF separately to support their respective functions.

The FSLIC was created through the enactment of the National Housing Act of 1934. The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA) abolished the insolvent FSLIC and created the FRF. At that time, the assets and liabilities of the FSLIC were transferred to the FRF – except those assets and liabilities transferred to the newly created RTC – effective on August 9, 1989. Further, the FIRREA established the Resolution Funding Corporation (REFCORP) to provide part of the initial funds used by the RTC for thrift resolutions.

The RTC Completion Act of 1993 terminated the RTC as of December 31, 1995. All remaining assets and liabilities of the RTC were transferred to the FRF on January 1, 1996. Today, the FRF consists of two distinct pools of assets and liabilities: one composed of the assets and liabilities of the FSLIC transferred to the FRF upon the dissolution of the FSLIC (FRF-FSLIC), and the other composed of the RTC assets and liabilities (FRF-RTC). The assets of one pool are not available to satisfy obligations of the other.

OPERATIONS/DISSOLUTION OF THE FRF

The FRF will continue operations until all of its assets are sold or otherwise liquidated and all of its liabilities are satisfied. Any funds remaining in the FRF-FSLIC will be paid to the U.S. Treasury. Any remaining funds of the FRF-RTC will be distributed to the REFCORP to pay the interest on the REFCORP bonds. In addition, the FRF-FSLIC has available until expended $602 million in appropriations to facilitate, if required, efforts to wind up the resolution activity of the FRF-FSLIC.

The FDIC has extensively reviewed and cataloged the FRF's remaining assets and liabilities. Some of the unresolved issues are:

  • criminal restitution orders (generally have from 1 to 21 years remaining to enforce);
  • collections of judgments obtained against officers and directors and other professionals responsible for causing or contributing to thrift losses (generally have up to 10 years remaining to enforce, unless the judgments are renewed or are covered by the Federal Debt Collections Procedures Act, which will result in significantly longer periods for collection of some judgments);
  • liquidation/disposition of residual assets purchased by the FRF from terminated receiverships;
  • one remaining issue related to assistance agreements entered into by the former FSLIC (FRF could continue to receive or refund overpayments of tax benefits sharing in future years);
  • a potential tax liability associated with a fully adjudicated goodwill litigation case (see Note 3); and
  • Affordable Housing Disposition Program monitoring (the last agreement expires no later than 2045; see Note 4).

The FRF could realize recoveries from tax benefits sharing, criminal restitution orders, and professional liability claims. However, any potential recoveries are not reflected in the FRF’s financial statements, given the significant uncertainties surrounding the ultimate outcome.

On April 1, 2014, the FDIC concluded its role as receiver of FRF receiverships when the last active receivership was terminated. In total, 850 receiverships were liquidated by the FRF and the RTC. To facilitate receivership terminations, the FRF, in its corporate capacity, acquired the remaining receivership assets that could not be liquidated during the life of the receiverships due to restrictive clauses and other impediments. These assets are included in the “Other assets, net” line item on the Balance Sheet.

During the years of receivership activity, the assets held by receivership entities, and the claims against them, were accounted for separately from the FRF’s assets and liabilities to ensure that receivership proceeds were distributed in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. Also, the income and expenses attributable to receiverships were accounted for as transactions of those receiverships. The FDIC, as administrator of the FRF, billed receiverships for services provided on their behalf.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
GENERAL

The financial statements include the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of the FRF and are presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). During the years of receivership activity, these statements did not include reporting for assets and liabilities of receivership entities because these entities were legally separate and distinct, and the FRF did not have any ownership or beneficial interest in them.

The FRF is a limited-life entity, however, it does not meet the requirements for presenting financial statements using the liquidation basis of accounting. According to Accounting Standards Codification Topic 205, Presentation of Financial Statements, a limited-life entity should apply the liquidation basis of accounting only if a change in the entity’s governing plan has occurred since its inception. By statute, the FRF is a limited-life entity whose dissolution will occur upon the satisfaction of all liabilities and the disposition of all assets. No changes to this statutory plan have occurred since inception of the FRF.

USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenue and expenses, and disclosure of contingent liabilities. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Where it is reasonably possible that changes in estimates will cause a material change in the financial statements in the near term, the nature and extent of such potential changes in estimates have been disclosed. The estimate for other assets is considered significant.

CASH EQUIVALENTS

Cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments consisting primarily of U.S. Treasury Overnight Certificates.

RELATED PARTIES

The nature of related parties and a description of related party transactions are discussed in Note 1 and disclosed throughout the financial statements and footnotes.

APPLICATION OF RECENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In January 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-01, Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. The ASU addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments through targeted changes to existing guidance. The ASU permits nonpublic entities to exclude disclosures related to the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost. The FDIC has early adopted this provision and Note 7 was revised accordingly. The FDIC has determined that the other provisions of the ASU, which are effective for the FRF beginning on January 1, 2019, will not have a material effect on the financial position of the FRF or its results of operations.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The ASU will replace the incurred loss impairment model with a new expected credit loss model for financial assets measured at amortized cost and for off-balance-sheet credit exposures. The FDIC has determined the ASU, which is effective for the FRF beginning on January 1, 2021, will not have a material effect on the financial position of the FRF or its results of operations.

Other recent accounting pronouncements have been deemed not applicable or material to the financial statements as presented.

3. Goodwill Litigation

In United States v. Winstar Corp., 518 U.S. 839 (1996), the Supreme Court held that when it became impossible following the enactment of FIRREA in 1989 for the federal government to perform certain agreements to count goodwill toward regulatory capital, the plaintiffs were entitled to recover damages from the United States. The contingent liability associated with the nonperformance of these agreements was transferred to the FRF on August 9, 1989, upon the dissolution of the FSLIC.

The FRF can draw from an appropriation provided by Section 110 of the Department of Justice Appropriations Act, 2000 (Public Law 106-113, Appendix A, Title I, 113 Stat. 1501A-3, 1501A-20), such sums as may be necessary for the payment of judgments and compromise settlements in the goodwill litigation. This appropriation is to remain available until expended. Because an appropriation is available to pay such judgments and settlements, any estimated liability for goodwill litigation will have a corresponding receivable from the U.S. Treasury and therefore have no net impact on the financial condition of the FRF.

The last remaining goodwill case was resolved in 2015. However, for another case fully adjudicated in 2012, an estimated loss of $8 million for the court-ordered reimbursement of potential tax liabilities to the plaintiff is reasonably possible.

The FRF-FSLIC paid goodwill litigation expenses incurred by the Department of Justice (DOJ), the entity that defended these lawsuits against the United States, based on a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) dated October 2, 1998, between the FDIC and the DOJ. These expenses were paid in advance by the FRF-FSLIC and any unused funds were carried over by the DOJ and applied toward the next fiscal year charges. In September 2016, the DOJ returned $2 million of unused funds to the FRF-FSLIC and retained $250 thousand to cover future administrative expenses. The returned funds were recognized in the “Other revenue” line item on the Statement of Income and Accumulated Deficit.

4. Guarantees
FANNIE MAE GUARANTEE

On May 21, 2012, the FDIC, in its capacity as administrator of the FRF, entered into an agreement with Fannie Mae for the release of $13 million of credit enhancement reserves to the FRF in exchange for indemnifying Fannie Mae from all future losses incurred on 76 multi-family mortgage loans. The former RTC supplied Fannie Mae with the credit enhancement reserves in the form of cash collateral to cover future losses on these mortgage loans through 2020. Based on the most current data available, as of September 30, 2017, the maximum exposure on this indemnification is the current unpaid principal balance of the remaining 18 multi-family loans totaling $919 thousand. Based on a contingent liability assessment of this portfolio as of September 30, 2017, the majority of the loans are at least 90 percent amortized, and all are scheduled to mature within one to three years. Since all of the loans are performing and no losses have occurred since 2001, future payments on this indemnification are not expected. No contingent liability for this indemnification has been recorded as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.

AFFORDABLE HOUSING DISPOSITION PROGRAM

Required by FIRREA under section 501, the Affordable Housing Disposition Program (AHDP) was established in 1989 to ensure the preservation of affordable housing for low-income households. The FDIC, in its capacity as administrator of the FRF-RTC, assumed responsibility for monitoring property owner compliance with land use restriction agreements (LURAs). To enforce the property owners’ LURA obligation, the RTC, prior to its dissolution, entered into Memoranda of Understanding with 34 monitoring agencies to oversee these LURAs. As of December 31, 2017, 24 monitoring agencies oversee these LURAs. The FDIC, through the FRF, has agreed to indemnify the monitoring agencies for all losses related to LURA legal enforcement proceedings.

Since 2006, the FDIC entered into two litigations against property owners and paid $23 thousand in legal expenses, which was fully reimbursed due to successful litigation. The maximum potential exposure to the FRF cannot be estimated as it is contingent upon future legal proceedings. However, loss mitigation factors include: (1) the indemnification may become void if the FDIC is not immediately informed upon receiving notice of any legal proceedings and (2) the FDIC is entitled to reimbursement of any legal expenses incurred for successful litigation against a property owner. AHDP guarantees will continue until the termination of the last LURA, or 2045 (whichever occurs first). As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, no contingent liability for this indemnification has been recorded.

5. Resolution Equity

As stated in the Overview section of Note 1, the FRF is composed of two distinct pools: the FRF-FSLIC and the FRF-RTC. The FRF-FSLIC consists of the assets and liabilities of the former FSLIC. The FRF-RTC consists of the assets and liabilities of the former RTC. Pursuant to legal restrictions, the two pools are maintained separately and the assets of one pool are not available to satisfy obligations of the other.

Contributed capital, accumulated deficit, and resolution equity consisted of the following components by each pool (dollars in thousands).

December 31, 2017
  FRF-FSLIC FRF-RTC FRF
Consolidated
Contributed capital - beginning $43,864,980 $81,624,337 $125,489,317
Contributed capital - ending 43,864,980 81,624,337 125,489,317
Accumulated deficit (43,022,301) (81,581,231) (124,603,532)
Total Resolution Equity $842,679 $43,106 $885,785
December 31, 2016
  FRF-FSLIC FRF-RTC FRF
Consolidated
Contributed capital - beginning $43,864,980 $ 81,624,337 $125,489,317
Contributed capital - ending $43,864,980 $81,624,337 $125,489,317
Accumulated deficit (43,029,200) (81,581,578) (124,610,778)
Total Resolution Equity $835,780 $42,759 $878,539

CONTRIBUTED CAPITAL

The FRF-FSLIC and the former RTC received $43.5 billion and $60.1 billion from the U.S. Treasury, respectively, to fund losses from thrift resolutions prior to July 1, 1995. Additionally, the FRF-FSLIC issued $670 million in capital certificates to the Financing Corporation (a mixed-ownership government corporation established to function solely as a financing vehicle for the FSLIC) and the RTC issued $31.3 billion of these instruments to the REFCORP. FIRREA prohibited the payment of dividends on any of these capital certificates. Through December 31, 2017, the FRF-FSLIC received a total of $2.3 billion in goodwill appropriations, the effect of which increased contributed capital.

Through December 31, 2017, the FRF-RTC had returned $4.6 billion to the U.S. Treasury and made payments of $5.1 billion to the REFCORP. The most recent payment to the REFCORP was in July of 2013 for $125 million. In addition, the FDIC returned $2.6 billion to the U.S. Treasury on behalf of the FRF-FSLIC in 2013. These actions reduced contributed capital.

ACCUMULATED DEFICIT

The accumulated deficit represents the cumulative excess of expenses and losses over revenue for activity related to the FRF-FSLIC and the FRF-RTC. Approximately $29.8 billion and $87.9 billion were brought forward from the former FSLIC and the former RTC on August 9, 1989, and January 1, 1996, respectively. Since the dissolution dates, the FRF-FSLIC accumulated deficit increased by $13.2 billion, whereas the FRF-RTC accumulated deficit decreased by $6.3 billion.

6. Losses Related to Thrift Resolutions

Losses related to thrift resolutions represent changes in the estimated losses on assets acquired from terminated receiverships, as well as expenses for the disposition and administration of these assets. These losses were $21 thousand for 2017, compared to negative $993 thousand for 2016. The negative balance in 2016 was due to a $1 million reduction in estimated losses for better-than-anticipated recoveries upon disposition of an asset.

7. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the FRF’s financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are cash equivalents (see Note 2) of $842 million and $831 million, respectively. Cash equivalents are Special U.S. Treasury Certificates with overnight maturities valued at prevailing interest rates established by the U.S. Treasury’s Bureau of the Fiscal Service. The valuation is considered a Level 1 measurement in the fair value hierarchy, representing quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.

8. Information Relating to the Statement of Cash Flows

The following table presents a reconciliation of net income to net cash from operating activities (dollars in thousands).

  December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Operating Activities
Net Income: $7,246 $7,366
Change in Assets and Liabilities:
Decrease (Increase) in other assets 3,894 (3,631)
Increase (Decrease) in accounts payable and other liabilities 66 (598)
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities $11,206 $3,137
9. Subsequent Events

Subsequent events have been evaluated through February 8, 2018, the date the financial statements are available to be issued. Based on management’s evaluation, there were no subsequent events requiring disclosure.

 

Previous | Contents | Next