Skip Header

Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation

Each depositor insured to at least $250,000 per insured bank



Home > About FDIC > Financial Reports > Chief Financial Officer's (CFO) Report to the Board




Chief Financial Officer's (CFO) Report to the Board

Skip Left Navigation Links

II. Investments Results - Fourth Quarter 2009

DIF Investment Portfolio

  • The amortized cost (book value) of the DIF investment portfolio increased by $32.7 billion during 2009, or by 123 percent, from $26.6 billion on December 31, 2008, to $59.3 billion on December 31, 2009. Similarly, the DIF portfolio’s market value increased by $30.6 billion, or by 106 percent, from $28.8 billion on December 31, 2008, to $59.4 billion on December 31, 2009. During the year, deposit insurance assessment collections—including the $45.7 billion in prepaid assessment collected at the end of December 2009—and other cash inflows exceeded operating expenses and resolution-related cash outlays.
  • The DIF investment portfolio’s total return for 2009 was 0.306 percent, approximately 172 basis points higher than that of its benchmark, the Merrill Lynch 1 – 10 Year U.S. Treasury Index (Index), which had a total return of -1.411 percent during the same period. The DIF portfolio’s higher-yielding Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) considerably outperformed the Index’s conventional Treasury securities. In addition, because the DIF’s conventional Treasury securities have a lower average duration than the securities held in the Index—and given the substantial increase in yields over the course of the year on longer-duration securities—the DIF’s conventional Treasury securities outperformed those in the Index. Finally, the DIF portfolio’s high cash balances helped contribute to the positive relative return.
  • During the fourth quarter of 2009, staff did not need to sell any Treasury securities to help fund resolution-related cash outlays, as the DIF had received about $8.7 billion at the end of the third quarter of 2009 from regular quarterly deposit insurance assessments and special assessments. Although there were 45 bank failures during the fourth quarter, resolution outlays were relatively low, as several of the larger failures were resolved as whole bank transactions with loss-share agreements.

Other Corporate Investment Portfolios

  • During 2009, the book value of the Debt Guarantee Program investment portfolio increased substantially, from $2.4 billion on December 31, 2008 to $6.4 billion on December 31, 2009. The funds in this portfolio are from the guarantee fees related to the Debt Guarantee Program under the TLGP. More recently, during the fourth quarter, the book value of the Debt Guarantee Program investment portfolio decreased from $7.0 billion on September 30, 2009, to the aforementioned $6.4 billion. The recent decline in funds was due to the fact that new Debt Guarantee Program fees received were less than the transfer of funds that were used to reimburse the DIF for claims under the TLGP’s Transaction Account Guarantee Program. Consistent with the approved quarterly investment strategy, all Debt Guarantee Program investment portfolio funds were invested in overnight investments during the quarter.
  • During 2009, the Other Systemic Risk Reserves investment portfolio increased from $0 on December 31, 2008, to $191.6 million on December 31, 2009, reflecting the receipt over the course of the year of three dividend payments totaling $191.6 million on the $3.0 billion of Citigroup trust preferred securities held by the DIF. As a result of an agreement executed on December 23, 2009 that terminated the FDIC’s guarantee against losses on a portfolio of Citigroup assets, the entire balance of funds held in the Other Systemic Risk Reserves investment portfolio were transferred to the DIF, effective December 31, 2009.
  • On December 31, 2009, the FDIC collected $188.7 million in fees related to the Transaction Account Guarantee Program under the TLGP. However, these funds were then immediately transferred to the Debt Guarantee Program investment portfolio for reimbursement of claims and expenses, so the Transaction Account Guarantee Program investment portfolio had no balance at year end.

The Treasury Market

  • During the fourth quarter of 2009, most conventional Treasury yields increased, with the largest increases seen in longer-maturity securities. The three-month Treasury bill (T-Bill) yield actually declined by 6 basis points, while the six-month T-Bill increased by 2 basis points. The yield on the two-year Treasury note, which also is very sensitive to actual and anticipated changes in the federal funds rate, increased by 19 basis points, still reflecting consensus forecasts for no significant changes in the federal funds target rate over the near term. Intermediate- to longer-maturity Treasury security yields increased more substantially; the yield on the five-year Treasury note increased by 37 basis points, and the yield on the ten-year Treasury note increased by 53 basis points. Finally, the 30-year Treasury bond yield increased by 59 basis points. The conventional Treasury yield curve steepened further during the fourth quarter. On December 31, 2009, the two- to ten-year yield curve had a 270-basis point positive spread (higher than the 236-basis point spread at the beginning of the quarter). Over the past five years, this spread has averaged 93 basis points.

Prospective Strategies

  • In light of the large cash infusion received during the fourth quarter of 2009, the first quarter 2010 DIF investment strategy calls for purchasing up to $25.0 billion of shorter-term Treasury securities with maturities between April 1, 2010, and December 31, 2010. This strategy attempts to balance the need to maintain sufficient portfolio liquidity for the funding of potential near-term resolutions against the yield pick-up that can be obtained by investing in short-maturity securities.
  • Similar to the first quarter 2010 DIF investment strategy outlined above, for the Debt Guarantee Program investment portfolio, staff will consider purchasing up to $3.0 billion of Treasury securities with maturities between April 1, 2010, and December 31, 2010. This strategy attempts to balance the need to maintain sufficient portfolio liquidity against the yield pick-up that can be obtained by investing in short-maturity securities.




Last Updated 04/14/2010 dofbusinesscenter@fdic.gov

Skip Footer back to content