Skip Header

Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation

Each depositor insured to at least $250,000 per insured bank



Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations




FDIC Federal Register Citations

CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE

Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
550 17th St. NW
Washington, DC 20429
Attention: Comments/Legal ESS
RE: RIN 3064-AC50

Dear Mr. Feldman:

I am strongly opposed to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's (FDIC) proposal to raise to $1 billion the threshold for assets at which financial institutions will be subject to a full examination for compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA).

The CRA is intended to encourage financial institutions to help meet the credit needs of their communities. This proposal would exempt banks with assets between $250 million and $1 billion from the Service and Investment tests of the CRA — in effect eliminating regulations for 95.7 percent of the state-chartered banks you monitor.

As and elected representative of the south Los Angeles community for over a dozen years, first as a City Councilman and now as a state Assembly member where I Chair the Committee on Jobs, Economic Development, and the Economy, I recognize the significant role banks play in boosting economic and community development in moderate- to low-income areas. Community banks have the opportunity to revitalize their communities by offering affordable financial services, enhancing lending, improving access to capital by consumers, and working to provide affordable housing.

Should. the proposal be approved, banks will no longer be required to invest in economic and community development activities. This proposal is patently adverse to my understanding of the CRA's intent - that banks should serve all income groups in the communities from which they draw funds. Moreover, the current regulations do not hamper banks' earnings — the law is clear that an institution's CRA activities should be undertaken in a safe and sound manner. Financial institutions have proven they can still turn a profit by providing financing and services to underserved communities. Absent the regulatory requirements of the CRA, banks will neglect underserved communities in favor of what they perceive to be more lucrative opportunities.

Finally, the proposal would eliminate publicly accessible data on small business lending of mid-sized banks. Small businesses are frequently the engines of job creation and economic revitalization in communities with chronically high rates of unemployment. Small business owners are reliant on the services and convenience of financial institutions that understand and are committed to the neighborhoods in which they operate. Without the proper data, public officials, community groups and citizens would be unable to hold their financial institutions accountable for their lending practices.

I strongly urge the FDIC to rescind these proposed changes to the CRA regulations and renew its commitment to the goal of ensuring access to financial capital and services for low- and moderate-income communities.

With hope,
MARK RIDLEY-THOMAS, Chair
Assembly Committee on Jobs, Economic Development and the Economy
State Capitol, Sacramento, CA

Last Updated 10/04/2004 regs@fdic.gov

Skip Footer back to content