Skip Header

Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation

Each depositor insured to at least $250,000 per insured bank



Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations




FDIC Federal Register Citations

Heritage Bank

September 17, 2004

Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
550 17th Street N.W.
Washington DC 20429

RE: CRA COMMENT LETTER (RIN Number 3064-AC50)

Dear Sir:

Heritage Bank supports the CRA Proposed Rule dated 8/20/04, along with community bankers across the nation. The new proposal is very much “on target” to reduce regulatory burden and make better use of the limited resources of banks in the $1 billion and less size range.

Banks up to $1 billion in assets are very much still “small banks” in today’s banking environment and the rules need to evolve to reflect that fact. The big are getting bigger, the small independent banks are disappearing, and those of us who are left in the middle will survive. It is not reasonable to subject a Wells Fargo-size institution and a $250-999 million asset-size institution to the same requirements.

Why? First, the requirements are unwarranted. As a community bank, we continually seek out credit opportunities. If we didn’t, we wouldn’t exist. Second, the large bank CRA rules, especially those related to reporting requirements, are too burdensome for even banks in the $250-999 million size range to comply with, as our technology cannot accomplish this reporting. In rural areas such as where Heritage Bank operates, measuring where loans are originated, size of borrowers, etc. is all rather a moot point.

The result of the current CRA regulations? Increased overhead cost thus increased cost of credit to the communities we all serve; more bank time spent reporting, less time spent lending, developing and educating our communities. That is clearly counterproductive, and the proposed CRA rule will improve this situation greatly.

I would further encourage the agencies to act expeditiously on this legislation, since reporting requirements begin and end on a calendar-year basis. From a practical standpoint, we need relief ASAP so that preparations aren’t made (i.e. resources wasted) to comply with the current CRA rules for the 2005 calendar year.

Thank you for your consideration of these comments in support of the proposed rule.

Sincerely,

Sara Arnett, Compliance Officer
Heritage Bank
Wood River, NE

 

Last Updated 09/21/2004 regs@fdic.gov

Skip Footer back to content