FDIC: Trust Examination Manual

The Board of Director or trust committee should approve policies regarding the selection and retention of securities dealers. The FDIC Supervisory Statement Policy Statement on Investment Securities and End-User Derivative Activities considers the selection of dealers, investment bankers, and brokers particularly important in effectively managing risks. Trust management should have sufficient knowledge about the securities firm and the personnel with whom they are conducting business. At a minimum, trust management should consider the following before selecting a securities firm:

The ability of the securities dealer, its subsidiaries or affiliates to fulfill commitments as evidenced by capital strength, liquidity, and operating results;
The dealer's general reputation for financial stability, and fair and honest dealings with customers;
Information available from State or Federal securities regulators and securities industry self-regulatory organizations, such as the National Association of Securities Dealers, concerning any formal enforcement actions against the dealer, its affiliates or associated personnel;
In those instances when an institution relies upon the advice of a dealer's sales representative, the background of the sales representative with whom the business will be conducted, in order to determine their experience and expertise.

A.1. Approved Broker Monitoring
The Board or a committee thereof should approve the list of securities dealers used by the department. At least annually, a committee, which should include representation by senior investment officers and traders, should review the brokers used and forward recommendations as to the continued use or termination of relationships based on the following criteria:

Commission rates,
Net cost or net realization from the trade,
Promptness and certainty of execution,
Experience and knowledge of the broker with a security, industry, or market,
Access to a security's sources of supply,
The broker's market making ability,
Financial stability and reputation.

The quality and quantity of investment research furnished by outside firms and/or "soft dollar" arrangements should be evaluated collectively by the department's research analysts, senior investment officers, and traders. The recommendations as to the continued use of the research providers should be forwarded to the Board or trust committee. Based on the foregoing, the committee, or committees, reviewing broker and investment research providers should also forward recommendations on the allocation of broker and "soft dollar" commissions.

Limiting third-party brokerage services to a single broker significantly limits the Board's and management's ability to evaluate the quality of brokerage services. In such cases, the Board and management must be able to demonstrate that the institution has established adequate procedures for monitoring broker performance. The institution should also be able to document that, despite limiting brokerage to a single broker, the department is obtaining "best execution" for discretionary transactions.

A.2. Internet Trading
Internet or electronic( "E") trading did not exist a decade ago and has grown to an estimated over 10 million on-line brokerage accounts by year-end 2000. Experience to date suggests that Internet trading has actually increased the historical risks associated with securities trading. The explosive growth of the Internet in general, and Internet trading in particular, has given rise to:

       Fraudulent and unregistered on-line brokers;

       Fraudulent investment schemes;

       Fraudulent news stories; and

       New methods of disseminating erroneous reports on altered "website banners" pirated from legitimate institutions.

Fraudulent Internet investment schemes attempt to entice investors into purchasing investments whose values are inflated or worthless. In addition to investment scams, some on-line investors may be susceptible to intrinsic on-line trading system weaknesses. These weaknesses include the following:

       Technological failures brought on by overwhelming internet traffic on finite or outdated systems;

       The inability to effect transactions quickly enough to avoid volatile fluctuations in highly sought after securities,

       The volume of which may be fraudulently induced; failure to use "limit orders" to prevent the purchase of securities at prices inflated by market volatility;

       Failure to understand the meaning of "best execution" broker practices;

       Technological failures induced by the investor's own equipment; and

       The failure to recognize that on-line "real-time" pricing can in actuality be 15 minutes old, or older, which increases the likelihood that "market order" transactions may be executed at prices vastly different than anticipated by the investor in a turbulent market.

Internet Trade Execution Misconceptions:

Trades executed on-line are not instantaneous. The transmission of a trade order over the internet merely sends an order to the broker. The broker must then send the trade order into the market for execution. This is essentially the same process which occurs when investors place orders by phone. However, on-line investors may be easily mislead into believing that they are executing an order at the "real time" price appearing on their computer screen (a price which may be stale). In a volatile market, on-line investors may end up with "market order" trades executed at prices vastly different than expected. The execution process may also be affected by heavy internet traffic, faulty equipment, a broker's inadequate hardware or a slow internet provider, telephone line failures, etc.

Broker Options in the Execution of Trades:

Exchange listed securities - a broker may send the order to the exchange floor, to another exchange (regional), or to a firm which "makes a market" for the security. Some regional exchanges and "market makers" pay brokers to place orders with them, which may increase the cost of the executed price. This is called "payment for order flow." The existence of market makers which pay for order flow may influence how a broker directs a trade, and ultimately, the execution price.

Over-the-Counter (OTC) market securities - a broker may send the order to a NASDAQ "market maker" which may also pay for order flow.

Limit Orders may be routed by the broker to an Electronic Communications Network (ECN) - which matches buy and sell orders at specified prices by computer.

In a process called "Internalization" - the broker may execute the trade out of the firm's own trading inventory position in the security.

Best Execution Options:

NASD Regulation 2320 requires brokers to seek the "best execution" which is reasonably available. In doing so, brokers evaluate all orders received from all customers in light of conditions existing at the time they are received, and then determine which markets, market makers, or ECNs offer the most favorable terms of execution. Best execution factors include the speed and likelihood of execution, not simply the best price.

During highly volatile market conditions, where there exist large order imbalances or significant price fluctuations, firms which operate automated order execution systems are permitted to implement special procedures to preserve the continuous execution of orders, while reducing their own exposure to market risk. This may include switching from automated mode to manual execution mode and routing orders to other market makers. Some firms may provide partial executions, and place the balance of an order in a queue which is operated in a first-in, first-out, basis. These are only two methods available to a firm. Regulations require that any algorithm system used be fair, consistent and "reasonable."

Investor Directed Trades:

Investors retain greater "direction" of their executions by using "limit orders," and by (if permitted by their broker) directing the broker to transmit the trade to a particular exchange, market maker, or ECN. Some brokers charge additional fees for permitting investors to direct a trade to a particular exchange or market maker.

All investors are entitled to information concerning broker policies on order flow payments, internalization and algorithm procedures during volatile market conditions. On-line investors should be aware of these policies. This is of particular importance, as volatile markets, together with internal broker practices and technological factors beyond the internet investor's control, may significantly impact the execution price.

In 2000, North American Securities Administrators Association issued the following guidance to assist on-line investors:

Prior to opening an on-line account, obtain complete information about the alternatives available for buying and selling securities, and how to obtain account information if the broker's website cannot be accessed.
Recognize that the investor's computer is not directly linked to any market and that orders are not instantaneously executed when entered on the computer screen.
Obtain information from the firm to substantiate advertised claims concerning the ease and speed of on-line trading.
Obtain information from the firm about significant website outages, delays, and other interruptions to securities trading and account access.
Before trading, obtain information about entering and canceling orders (market, limit, and stop loss), and the details and risks of margin accounts.
Determine whether the computer is displaying delayed or real-time stock quotes, and when the information was last updated.
Review the firm's privacy and website security policies, and whether the investor's name may be used for mailing lists or other promotional activities.
Obtain clear information about sales commissions and fees, and any conditions which may apply to advertised discounts.
Learn how to contact customer service representatives with on-line trading concerns.
Contact state securities agencies to verify the registration and licensing status, and any disciplinary history of on-line firms and representatives; and file complaints when appropriate.

The joint state regulatory issuance also recommended the adoption of specific internet trading policies. Before engaging in on-line trading, trust management should adopt written internet trading policies, including, but not limited to:

Requiring a due diligence investigation of internet brokers.
Inquiring among peer trust departments about their experience with internet brokers, and obtaining other references.
Performing a due diligence review of the reasons for using internet trading instead of regular brokerage accounts.
Requiring Board of Director or trust committee authorization of internet trading practices. The Board or trust committee should review trust management's documented justification for using internet brokers, including:

projected commission savings by trust customers, and
best execution protections.

Requiring periodic reporting to the trust committee, or other operating committee, of usage of internet trading, including:

number and dollar volume of trades,
listing of trades which were executed at prices which were different than "real time" price on internet sites,
trades which were not executed,
problems with internet brokers,
delays in order transmission due to hardware problems,
slow internet transmissions,
discrepancies between trade orders and confirmations,
fails, etc.

Performing the following oversight functions by the Board, trust committee, or other operating committee:

Periodic reviews of the quality and execution of internet trading,
Approval of the continued use of internet trading brokers,
Analysis of whether the use of internet brokers will result in increased research costs, if internet broker does not provide investment advice, and
Analysis of the quality and availability of investment research provided by internet brokers.

Specific controls to limit internet trading risk.
Prohibiting the use of internet for personal trading by employees.
Prohibiting officers and employees from trading for accounts off the banking premises (or at home).
Prohibiting after-hours trading if the department has not established specific controls governing after-hours trading.

These policies, and the suggestions issued by state securities regulators, are all equally applicable to broker selection and trading in general. Examiners should inquire into trust management's due diligence policies and safeguards, and assess whether sufficient measures have been taken to limit broker and securities trading risk. Additional affirmative measures may be taken to protect the institution and its customers by obtaining on-line broker information from the SEC and NASD. The SEC's Enforcement Division website is http://www.sec.gov/enforce.html, and may be used to obtain information about disciplinary actions against broker/dealers, lodge complaints, and reference SEC customer awareness information. The NASD's public disclosure website is at http://www.nasdr.com, and provides broker background information and other useful investor guidance. NASD's broker complaint website is linked via their homepage at http://www.nasdr.com

B. Securities Trading

Trust department investment policies and procedures should prohibit research analysts, traders and/or portfolio managers from trading for their own account through brokerage accounts maintained by the trust department. Examiners should verify that the trust department's accounts with brokerage firms are used only to effect transactions for trust accounts or approved outside clients. If the bank has not established policies or control procedures, the examiner should discuss the potential hazards with management, and recommend adoption of policies and procedures. The audit program should include procedures to detect misuse of brokerage accounts.

In general, borrowing for the purpose of investment is an improper activity for a trustee, except when purchasing improved real estate. The bank as fiduciary should not maintain a margin account with a broker unless specifically authorized by the terms of the governing instrument and directed by a party having appropriate authority.

Examiners should be alert for any involvement in speculative securities trading activities. Any speculative transaction ordinarily evidences contravention of "prudent man" doctrines.

Churning is a term for excessive trading in an account for the purpose of generating and maximizing broker commissions and can occur in both discretionary and nondiscretionary accounts. The practice is illegal and is among the most common claims made against stockbrokers, investment advisers, and financial planners. In determining whether churning has occurred, consideration should be given to the following:

the number and frequency of trades;
the amount of "in-and-out" trading; the amount of commissions generated;
the investor's objectives and level of business sophistication; and
the degree of control the broker has over the account.

To be considered churning, the broker:

must have either explicit (discretionary accounts) or implied control (non-discretionary accounts) over the account;
trading must be excessive in relation to the customer's objectives; and,
the broker must have acted with the intent to defraud or with behavior that was reckless.

The broker's lack of or poor judgment does not demonstrate intent to defraud or reckless behavior. Furthermore, accounts with investment objectives of growth or speculation are likely to have more frequent transactions than accounts with investment objectives of long-term growth or income. Therefore, what may appear to be churning in accounts should be reviewed in light of the investment objectives of each account.

For a more detailed discussion on broker selection, internet trading, and due diligence policies and practices, refer to A. Brokerage Placement.

C. Brokerage Selection on Basis of Soft Dollars - SEC § 28(e)(1)

Section 28(e) was added to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by the Securities Acts Amendments of 1975. This section provides "safe harbor" protection to the fiduciary exercising investment discretion, provided certain conditions are met. Under Section 28(e)(1), "No person . . . shall be deemed to have acted unlawfully or to have breached a fiduciary duty . . . solely by reason of his having caused the account to pay . . . an amount of commission . . . in excess of the amount of commission another . . . dealer would have charged . . . if such person determined in good faith that such amount of commission was reasonable in relation to the value of the brokerage and research services provided . . . in terms of either that particular transaction or his overall responsibilities with respect to the accounts as to which he exercises investment discretion." Section 28(e)(3) defines research and brokerage services. in order to qualify as research or brokerage services, the services provided must:

Furnish advice, either directly or through publications or writings, as to the value of securities, the advisability of investing in purchasing, or selling securities, and the availability of securities;
Furnish analyses and reports concerning the issuer, industries, securities, economic factors and trends, portfolio strategy, and the performance of accounts; or,
Effect securities transactions and perform functions incidental thereto, such as clearance, such as settlement and custody, or required in connection therewith by the SEC, or a self-regulatory organization.

Note that transactions in futures or for transactions done on a principal basis are not covered by the safe harbor.

Four requirements must generally be satisfied to obtain "safe harbor" protection under Section 28(e):

The soft dollar goods and services must be provided by the broker-dealer effecting the securities transaction,
The soft dollar goods and services must be provided to the party holding investment discretion over the account,
The recipient of soft dollar goods and services must make a good faith determination that the commissions paid are reasonable in relation to the value of brokerage and research services provided, and
The goods and services provided for the soft dollars must qualify as "brokerage and research" services.

Section 28(e) is a "safe harbor" which affords "protection." It is not a regulation, and, therefore, cannot in itself be violated. Any "violations" connected with transactions not afforded the protections under Section 28(e), would be of the antifraud provisions of federal securities laws. Also, while not specifically addressed within Section 28(e), there exists a general fiduciary duty to seek "best execution." Best execution implies the best net price to the customer, together with accuracy and speed of execution. It is not intrinsically linked with, nor does it imply, the lowest brokerage commission.

Trust institutions which engage in soft- dollar trading are required to disclose the research products and services it obtains to the trust accounts paying soft-dollar commissions. In an inspection report on soft-dollar practices released September 22, 1998, the SEC stated that Section 28(e) "does not shield a person who exercises investment discretion from, violations of antifraud provisions of federal securities laws arising from churning an account, failing to obtain the best price or best execution, or failing to make required disclosure." Regarding full disclosure, the report provided, "Disclosure is required whether the product or service acquired by the adviser using soft dollars is inside or outside the safe harbor. Advisers are required to disclose, among other things, the products and services through soft dollar arrangements, regardless of whether the safe harbor applies." The SEC has directed advisers that they ".need not list individually each product, item of research, or service received, but rather .state the types of products, research, or services obtained with enough specificity so that clients can understand what is being obtained."

The SEC has also long taken the position that "mixed use items," or products and services that provide both research and non-research benefits (such as in-house computer networks used for other purposes in addition to research), should be allocated between soft dollars and hard-dollars. This requires institutions to allocate the costs associated with these products and to pay for the non-research portion with their own funds.

Refer to subsection E.2.a., located in Section 8 for additional discussion of this topic. Refer to Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 Release No. 34-23170, "Section 28(e) and Soft Dollars", for a discussion of the scope of Section 28(e).

D. Broker Selection on Basis of Deposits - SEC § 28(e)(2)

The Justice Department has long viewed the allocation of brokerage business by banks based upon the volume of demand deposits maintained by a security dealer as reciprocity in violation of antitrust laws. Reciprocity means the use by a company of its power as the buyer of products or services to influence the sale of its own products or services.

Section 28(e)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 states "A person exercising investment discretion . . . shall make such disclosure of his policies and practices with respect to commissions that will be paid . . . at such times and in such manner, as the appropriate regulatory agency, by rule, may prescribe as necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors." Although the Corporation does not require the disclosure of brokerage policies and practices, examiners should review this area to determine whether the bank is complying with its fiduciary duties in the placement of brokerage business. Consequently, the type and amount of deposit relationships maintained by brokerage firms used by trust departments should be ascertained. Examiners should evaluate whether reciprocity (as opposed to the quality of execution, research, cost, or other ancillary services), may have played a role in the selection of brokers.

E. Best Execution

The SEC and the courts have stressed the duty to obtain best execution. The term is usually defined as seeking the most favorable terms for a customer transaction reasonably available under the circumstances. Best execution does not require that the lowest possible commission be obtained and the SEC has not adopted regulations that require a trade to be executed within a set period of time.

Trust management should consider various qualitative and quantitative factors when determining the quality of execution and should establish policy and procedures to evaluate and demonstrate that trades are made using the following criteria: The selection of broker/dealers should comply with the FDIC Supervisory Policy Statement on Investment Securities and End-User Derivative Activities. The points to consider in determining best execution should consist of research provided if any, best price, speed of execution, certainty of execution, access to initial public offerings, recordkeeping, and the commission rate or spread. These general criteria do not endorse or prohibit on-line transactions.

The SEC has brought enforcement proceedings against investment advisors and those actions have been centered in transactions involving soft dollars, cross trade, affiliated trades, and advisors' failure to disclose execution practices. Failure to use best execution procedures, may violate the antifraud provisions under securities law.

Trust investment officers can verify that a particular investment is registered with the SEC via the SEC's EDGAR system. The NASD can provide information on brokers and dealers, such as disciplinary information. States have securities regulators that can provide information and accept complaints for various causes, including but not limited to poor or inappropriate execution, and broker/dealer licensing status, and fraud.

F. Securities Settlement Practices

Settlement occurs when the transaction is completed by the exchange of securities and money between the buyer and seller. On settlement date, the buyer receives the securities in either book-entry or definitive (physical) form, and a change in ownership is recorded.

The settlement period is the time between trade date and settlement date. Since 1995, most trades of U.S. government and federal agency securities settle the day after the trade date, which is known as next-day settlement. The standard for corporate debt and equities, American Depository Receipts (ADRs), and municipal securities has been three days. However, an initiative is underway to ultimately allow for straight-through processing (STP), in real-time with multiple currencies. In order for STP to occur, various actions must be implemented, and includes, but is not limited to the following:

International /Foreign Exchange -Implications to foreign investors trading U.S. issued securities

Legal and Regulatory - Rule changes to accommodate STP improvements

Payment Processing - Automated payment process

Physical Securities - Eliminate the movement of physical securities

Securities Lending - Implement the Automated Recall Management Systems (ARMS) to improve level of STP in the stock loan recall process

Real-time trade matching - For fixed income securities

The following is a more detailed explanation of current settlement practices based on the type of investment:

Transactions involving U. S. Treasury and Agency obligations are typically in book-entry form, rather than in physical certificate form. Book-entry is an electronic registration, transfer, and settlement system that enables the rapid and accurate registration and transfer of securities with concurrent cash settlement. Book-entry reduces handling costs and quickens transaction completion. U. S. Treasury and Agency book-entry securities are delivered and cleared over the Federal Reserve Wire System (Fedwire) on a delivery versus payment basis. Acceptance of the security automatically debits the payment amount from the buyer's account and credits it to the seller's account. The payment and securities involved are transferred over the Fedwire system. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York maintains the book-entry custody system. All depository banks are eligible to maintain book-entry accounts at their Federal Reserve District Bank, provided that they also maintain a funds account with that Federal Bank.

Mortgage securities settlement procedures are more complex than those for government, corporate, and municipal bonds. The Bond Market Association developed the Uniform Practices for the Clearance and Settlement of Mortgage-Backed Securities and Other Related Securities (hereinafter, "Uniform Practices") to establish industry standards for mortgage securities settlements. Since the Uniform Practices are updated frequently, trust management engaged in mortgage and asset-backed securities transactions should keep abreast of current settlement standards.

Corporate and municipal debt securities are available in book-entry and registered, definitive form. Book-entry corporate and municipal bonds settle through the Depository Trust Company (DTC).

Electronic trade processing and recordkeeping systems have improved the trade and settlement time and have reduced failed trades. However, failed trades may occur due to the following reasons

The buyer rejects the delivery due to not being in good delivery form or the records of the buyer and seller not matching. The primary reason for this problem is a lack of communication.
The buyer recognizes the trade, but it is in a different dollar amount.
The buyer rejects the transaction due to incorrect maturity date, interest rate, or series.

If the receiving party accepts delivery (upon payment) and discovers that it was not a good delivery, then the buyer can correct the error by reclamation. In the reclamation process, the buyer returns the securities with an explanation to the seller (who has already received payment). The seller is obligated to return the payment, if the claim is valid. Either party may make a reclamation, if information is discovered after delivery, which, if known at the time of delivery, would have caused the delivery not to constitute good delivery. However, reclamation must be made within the stated time limitations established by the Bond Market Association.

If a trade has a settlement date between a record date and a payable date, delivery of the securities must be accompanied by a due bill. A due bill is a document delivered by a seller of a security to a buyer evidencing that any principal and interest or dividends received by the seller past the record date will be paid to the buyer by the seller upon submission of the due bill for redemption. The record date is the date for determining who will be paid principal, dividends or interest on an issue. Book-entry messages are considered acceptable due bill substitutes for securities transferred over Fedwire (Treasury), DTC (Corporates and Municipals), or PTC (GNMA). Due bills and book-entry messages cease to be valid after 60 days from their issue date. A trust department may experience considerable delays in attempting to recover payments without the use of a due bill, which result in the accumulation of significant principal and interest receivable accounts. If delivery and payment on a trade occur after a record date and on or after a payable date, delivery of the securities must be accompanied by a check for the principal, dividend or interest due.

G. Securities Transfer Agent's Medallion Program (STAMP Program)

The Securities and Exchange Commission created a universal signature guarantee program that consists of a stamp that serves as a signature by an eligible institution, such as a bank, brokerage, or trust company, that participates in the program. The purpose is to ensure that the person signing the certificate or irrevocable stock or bond power form is the owner or authorized agent. The program also standardizes the signature guarantee by assigning a standard format and numbering system. The latter identifies the financial institution. The stamp is an ink impression applied to a certificate that allows good delivery form. It is not the same as a notary, which attests to the authenticity of documents and contracts and signatures of testator and witnesses.

H. Shareholder Communications Act of 1985

This Act gives the SEC jurisdiction to regulate the proxy processing of all entities exercising fiduciary powers, including trust departments. The Act is implemented primarily by SEC Rule 14b-2, which can be found in Appendix D. The purpose of this regulation is to ensure that beneficial owners of securities are provided proxy materials and other corporate communications within specified time periods. Refer to Operations and Internal Controls - Shareholder Communication Act for additional information and guidance.

I. Proxy Voting

As a function of equity ownership, a fiduciary has the duty to cast proxy votes for shares of stock held in a discretionary capacity. A policy should be developed which establishes the department's position with regard to voting on routine, as well as controversial, issues. The policy should also establish voting and recordkeeping procedures.

For ESOP investing in the employer securities that are registered with the SEC, participants must be given full voting rights for stock allocated to their accounts. In addition, the DOL has opined in a letter ruling dated September 28, 1995, that fiduciaries of ESOP in which participating employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement must pass through decisions concerning tender offers or proxy voting to the plan's participants and vote as directed.

ESOPS maintained by employers whose securities are not registered with the SEC are required to pass through voting rights to participants with stock allocated to their accounts only for the following purposes: Corporate mergers or consolidations; recapitalizations, reclassifications, liquidations, dissolutions, or, the sale of substantially all assets. Furthermore, the plan may authorize the trustees to vote allocated stock based on a one vote per participant basis, rather than number of shares basis. IRC 409(e)

Employer stock held in a suspense account, i.e., not yet allocated to participants, may be voted by the trustee, in accordance with their duty to plan participants and beneficiaries.

J. FDIC Regulations

J.1. FDIC Part 344: Record Keeping and Confirmation Requirements for Customer Securities Transactions
The purpose of Part 344 is to ensure that customers for whom state nonmember banks effect securities transactions are provided adequate information concerning a transaction, and that banks maintain adequate records and controls with respect to securities transactions. This part is also designed to ensure that banks subject to this part maintain adequate records and controls with respect to the securities transactions they effect. The regulationdoes not apply to trust company subsidiaries of FDIC insured banks. The regulation parallels the securities recordkeeping regulations of the other Federal financial institution regulators (FRB Regulation H, and OCC 12 CFR 12, OTS 563). The requirements are nearly identical to those contained in those regulations. FDIC examiners conducting concurrent examinations with these regulators may rely on their findings with respect to customer securities recordkeeping and confirmation requirements.

Part 344 applies to transactions (business and consumer) made by the bank as a whole, and is not department specific. Therefore, to determine if exceptions may apply, all transactions subject to the regulation should be totaled. Transactions may include sweep transactions made from deposit customers in the Commercial Department to mutual funds, all nondeposit securities products and variable annuities bought or sold, and transactions made within the Trust Department, for example. Unless one of two general exceptions to the regulation apply, a bank executing securities transactions for customers is subject to all of the requirements of Part 344. The regulation, however, provides specific requirements for trust department accounts.

The term "security" includes stocks, bonds, mutual funds, repurchase agreements, variable annuities, and other investments outlined in the regulation in Section 344.3(m). The term security does not include a deposit or share account in a Federally or state insured depository institution; a loan participation; a letter of credit or other form of bank indebtedness incurred in the ordinary course of business; currency; any note, draft, bill of exchange, or bankers acceptance which has a maturity at the time of issuance of not exceeding nine months, exclusive of days of grace, or any renewal thereof the maturity of which is likewise limited; units of a collective investment fund; interest in a variable amount (master) note of a borrower of prime credit; or U. S. Savings Bonds.

"Customer" as defined in Section 344.3(g) includes any person or account, including agency, trust, estate, guardianship, committee, or other fiduciary account for which a bank effects or participates in effecting the purchase or sale of securities. The term does not include a person or account having a direct contractual agreement with a fully disclosed broker/dealer, broker, dealer, dealer bank, or issuer of securities that are the subject of the transaction.

J .1.a. Exceptions to the Regulation

Low Activity Banks
Section 344.2(a)(1) provides that banks which, over the prior three calendar years, execute an average of fewer than 200 securities transactions per calendar year are exempt from the some of the recordkeeping requirements of 344.4(a)(2) through 344.4(a)(4) and the written policy and procedure requirements of 344.8(a)(1) through (3). All transactions in U.S. Government and agency securities, as defined in Section 344.3(i),are excluded when calculating the number of transactions. The recordkeeping requirements of Section 344.4 do not apply to banks effecting fewer than 500 government securities brokerage transactions per year. However, mutual fund, repurchase agreement, and variable annuity transactions are included when calculating the number of transactions.

High-Activity Banks
Banks which exceed the 200 securities transaction threshold are referred to as "high activity" banks in this material.

Transactions with a Broker/Dealer
Section 344.2(a)(5) exempts securities transactions from the requirements of the regulation if those transactions were effected for a bank customer by a registered broker/dealer. This exemption also applies when the broker/dealer is a dual employee. The exemption is applicable as long as: (1) the broker/dealer is "fully disclosed" to the customer, and (2) the bank customer has a direct contractual agreement with the broker/dealer. The term "fully disclosed" means that the broker/dealer's name (and not the bank's) appears on account documents, confirmations, statements, etc.

J.1.b. Record Keeping
Section 344.2(b) requires that a bank executing securities transactions for its customers is responsible for maintaining, directly or indirectly, an effective system of records and controls to ensure safe and sound operations. The records and systems must clearly and accurately reflect the information required by Part 344, and provide an adequate basis for an audit.

Section 344.4 requires the maintenance of certain records. Two sets of records are required. The first set of requirements applies to all banks providing such services, while the second set applies only to "high activity" banks.

Mandatory Basic Records for All Banks
Pursuant to Section 344.4(a)(1), securities transaction records must be maintained for at least three years and be in a chronological order. The account or customer name for which the transaction was effected, a description of the securities, the purchase or sales price, trade date, and the name of the broker/dealer or other person the securities were purchased from or sold to should be maintained as. Otherwise, under Section 344.4(b), the regulation does not require either the use of specific forms or the creation of specific recordkeeping systems. The records may be maintained in hard copy, automated, or electronic format, but must be "easily retrievable, readily available for inspection and capable of being reproduced in a hard copy. A bank may contract with third party service providers, including broker/dealers, to maintain records required by this section. Thus, a bank subject to all of the recordkeeping requirements noted below may, if it chooses, maintain one computer system for all of the required information.

Pursuant to Section 344.4(a)(5), written notifications are required by Section 344.5 and 344.6. The notification may take the form of a broker/dealer's confirmation or a confirmation from the bank that includes specific items. Section 344.6(b) permits trust departments to elect an alternative notification procedures, when the department exercises investment discretion other than in an agency capacity, whereby the grantor, or if there is no such person, then the beneficiary, and gives or sends to such person written notification within a reasonable amount of time. A fee may be charged for providing this information. For agency accounts, where the trust department exercises investment discretion, the department will provide the customer with an itemized statement no less frequently than once every three months. The statement will specify the funds and securities in the custody or possession at the end of the period, and all debits, credits, and transactions in the customers' account during the period.

"High Activity" Recordkeeping
All banks exceeding the 200-securities transaction threshold must maintain the following in addition to the requirements for all banks previously outlined:

For each customer, account records reflecting all purchases and sales of securities, and all receipts and disbursements of cash [Section 344.4(a)(2)];
A separate memorandum (order ticket) for each order to purchase or sell securities (whether executed or canceled). The memorandum must include: (i) the account name(s), (ii) whether the transaction(s) was a market order, limit order, or subject to special instructions, (iii) the time the order was received by the person responsible for effecting the transaction, (iv) the time the order was placed with the broker/dealer, or if there was no broker/dealer, the time the order was executed or canceled, (v) the price at which the order was executed, and (vi) the broker/dealer utilized [Section 344.4(a)(3)];
A record of all broker/dealers selected by the bank, and the amount of commissions paid or allocated to each broker during the calendar year [Section 344.4(a)(4)].

Records Retention
Records required by Part 344 must be retained for at least three years after the date of the transaction. [Section 344.4(a)]

J.1.c. Confirmations
All trust departments must follow the minimum guidelines of Section 344.5 in complying with the confirmation requirements. However a trust department may, optionally, comply with Section 344.6 for all or some of its accounts. Section 344.6 is an alternative approach which provides an exemption from most of the confirmation requirements. Examiners should note that trust department accounts generally comply under Section 344.6. The following discusses the general requirements first, and then the exemptive provisions of Section 344.6.

General Provisions
The bank must provide customers with information (a confirmation) regarding securities transactions effected for their accounts by either of the following types of notification:

A copy of the broker/dealer's confirmation and, if any remuneration is to be received by the bank, a statement of the source and amount of the remuneration (refer below for special remuneration provisions). If the confirmation is sent from the bank, it must be sent within one business day from the bank's receipt of the broker/dealer's confirmation. [Section 344.5(a)]; or
A written notification (bank confirmation) disclosing specified items of information about the transaction. [Section 344.5(b)] The confirmation may be sent to the customer by mail, FAX, or electronically.

The bank may elect to have the broker/dealer send the confirmation directly to the customer with either of these options. [Section 344.5(a)(1)]

If the broker/dealer's confirmation is not sent to the customer, the bank must provide the following in its confirmation:(1) the name of the bank, (2) the name of the customer, (3) the capacity in which the bank is acting (as principal or agent - see below), (4) the date and time of execution (or the fact that the time of execution will be furnished within a reasonable time upon request), the identity, price, and number of shares of securities purchased/sold, (5) the source and amount of any remuneration received by any broker/dealer or by the bank in connection with the transaction, and (6) the name of broker/dealer used or the name of the person from whom the securities were purchased/sold. [Section 344.5(b)(1) through (7)] The regulation also requires specific disclosures for transactions in debt securities [Section 344.5(b)(8) through (12)]. These requirements generally parallel the contents of the confirmations that broker/dealers must provide customers under SEC Rule 10b-10.

If the bank is acting as a "principal," it is selling or buying the security to the customer, in effect setting the purchase or sale price internally. If the bank is acting as an "agent," it is acting only as an intermediary between its customer and a third party. Disclosure must be made to the customer as to which capacity the bank is acting in.

Special Remuneration Provisions
Normally, the customer pays the broker/dealer a commission, and sometimes an additional bank fee, for executing a securities transaction. In addition to the direct commissions and fees paid by the customer, the bank may receive remuneration from outside sources, such as a broker/dealer or a mutual fund.

Under both of the general methods of complying with the confirmation requirements, the existence of any additional remuneration received (or to be received) by the bank from outside sources must be disclosed to the customer. [Section 344.5(b)(6)(i)] In general, the source and the amount of such remuneration must be disclosed. In three situations, however, the regulation provides an alternative approach:

When a prior written agreement between the bank and the customer provides for different treatment;
When the bank acts in a principal capacity for transactions involving government or municipal securities;
When the transaction involves open end mutual funds (where the amount of the bank's remuneration may be based on the number and/or amount of transactions over a given period which has not yet expired), if the customer has been provided a current prospectus which discloses all current fees, loads, and expenses at or before completion of the transaction.

In these three instances, Section 344.5(b)(6)(ii) provides that a bank may elect not to disclose the source and amount, if the customer's confirmation indicates that the bank will furnish the information within a reasonable period after the customer's written request.

Exemptive Provisions for Confirmations in Section 344.6
Section 344.6 permits a different approach from the general confirmation rules above. The exemptive provisions basically provide that the trust customer may agree to waive the general confirmation provisions outlined above. This exemption differs according to the type of account.

In discretionary fiduciary accounts (trusts, estates, guardianships, etc., but excluding collective investment funds), the customer may agree to the receipt of transaction information within a "reasonable" time frame other than that specified in the regulation. This alternative arrangement may be a part of the text of the trust agreement. The bank may charge a "reasonable" fee for furnishing such information. [Section 344.6(b)]

In such discretionary fiduciary accounts, the "customer" is the person having the right to terminate the account. If no such person exists, anyone with a vested interest in the account is the "customer."
In discretionary agency accounts, the bank must mail an itemized statement to the customer not less than once every three months. The statement must provide a detail of investments in the account, together with uninvested cash balance(s). It must also show all transactions during the statement period. [Section 344.6(c)]

If the customer requests, the bank is required to provide written notification conforming with Section 344.5. In such instances, the confirmation must be provided "within a reasonable time." The bank may charge a "reasonable" fee for furnishing these confirmations.

The term "reasonable," when applied to the time to provide confirmations as above, has not been interpreted to date. It must be applied in light of: (i) any provisions of the instrument, (ii) state law and regulation (if any), and (iii) the facilities and capabilities of the fiduciary institution.
The term "reasonable," when applied to the fees which may be charged as above, has not been interpreted to date either. It must be applied in light of: (i) any provisions of the instrument, (ii) state law and regulation (if any), and (iii) the bank's pricing for equivalent statements, such as deposit or loan statements.

In all nondiscretionary accounts (fiduciary and agency accounts, but excluding dividend reinvestment and similar periodic plans), the customer may opt to waive the confirmation.

The agreement (or separate disclosure statement), however, must clearly indicate that the customer may receive a confirmation within regulatory time frames at no additional cost. [Section 344.6(a)] The waiver must be sufficiently prominent that the customer realizes what is being waived. It may be either a separate disclosure document or included in the body of the trust agreement. If included in the agreement, the waiver may not be buried in "boiler plate" text. The waiver should be positively affirmed by the customer with a separate signature or initials, or by having the customer check a box.
In cash management sweep accounts, the bank must provide the customer a written statement for each month in which a purchase or sale of a security is effected in a customer's account. If no transactions occur in the account, a written statement must be provided to the customer at least quarterly. [Section 344.6(d)]

On December 22, 1998, the FDIC Legal Division issued an interpretation which provides that the monthly statement requirement in 344.6(d) for sweep accounts does not apply to sweeps performed for fiduciary and agency accounts in trust departments. The monthly statement requirement applies only to sweeps from retail deposit accounts of the commercial bank. However, if sweeps for the retail deposit accounts are routed through the trust department, the monthly statement requirement would apply. They would not be exempted merely because they were routed through the trust department.
Sweeps into repurchase agreements collateralized by government securities fall under U.S. Treasury Department regulations for government securities dealers, which require a daily confirmation [subject to the requirements of 17 CFR 403.5(d)] and do not permit the monthly/quarterly statement of Section 344.6(d).

Collective investment funds may follow the same provisions as in OCC Regulation 9.18(b)(6). [Section 344.6(e)]
Periodic plans (such as stock purchase or dividend reinvestment plans) must provide the customer written statements at least quarterly. The statement must detail the asset holdings of the account, charges and commissions paid by the customer, and all account transactions. The bank may charge a "reasonable" fee for providing this information. [Section 344.6(f)]
Retail bank customers may not waive the receipt of confirmations or statements, even by written agreement.

J .1.d. Settlement of Securities Transactions
Except under limited circumstances described in Section 344.7, a bank should not effect or enter into a contract for the purchase or sale of a security that provides for the payment of funds and delivery of securities later than the third business day after the date of the contract unless agreed upon by the parties at the time of the transaction. This portion of the regulation parallels SEC Rule 15c6-1 which established three business days instead of five as the standard settlement time frame.

J.1.e. Written Policies and Procedures
Section 344.8 requires that a bank executing securities transactions for its customers establish certain specified written policies and procedures. Two levels of policies are provided for in the regulation. The first applies to any bank providing such services, while the second applies only to "high activity" banks.

Mandatory Written Policy
All banks executing securities transactions for their customers must establish written policies and procedures for the crossing of buy and sell orders on a fair and equitable basis where applicable and permitted under local law. [Section 344.8(a)(4)]

"High Activity" Bank Policies
Section 344.8(a)(1) through (3) requires that banks exceeding the 200-securities transaction threshold [Section 344.2(a)(1)] maintain written policies and procedures governing:

The supervision of traders or others who transmit orders or execute transactions in securities for customers;
The supervision of all officers and employees who process orders for notification or settlement purposes, or perform back office functions with respect to securities transactions; and
Fair and equitable allocation of securities and prices to accounts when orders for the same security are received at approximately the same time.

J.1.f. Officer/Employee Reporting of Personal Investment Transactions
Section 344.9 requires bank officers and employees who make investment recommendations or decision for the accounts of customers, participate in such determination, or obtain information concerning which securities are being purchased, sold, or recommended must report to the bank within 10 business days after the end of the calendar quarter, all transactions in securities made by them or on their behalf, either at the bank or elsewhere in which they have a beneficial interest. The regulation does not require that the bank or trust department have written policy or procedures to ensure appropriate disclosure and only requires disclosure when transactions meeting the requirements are present. Similar policies and procedures are required for national banks (12 CFR 12) and state member banks [FRB Regulation H, Section 208.8(k)(5)(iv)].

Quarterly reports are required from bank officers and employees who make or participate in the making of investment recommendations or decisions for the accounts of customers, or who obtain information concerning which securities are being purchased or sold.

Bank directors are not covered by this provision. However, bank directors who are also officers of the bank are required to file the reports, when applicable.
Reports are required when transactions made by the covered officers and employees (or on their behalf) aggregate to more than $10,000 during the calendar quarter. All transactions in U.S. Government and agency securities [defined in Section 344.3(i)], and all mutual fund shares, are excluded when calculating the $10,000 threshold. The same securities are also excluded from the reporting requirement.
Reports must be provided to the bank within 10 days after the end of each calendar quarter.
Personal investment transaction reports are required whether or not the bank falls under the 200 securities transaction threshold exemptions of Section 344.2(a)(1).
Reports are required only if transactions have occurred. There is no requirement for "no-activity" reports to be filed by covered officers and employees with the bank.

The regulation does not specify with whom the reports are to be filed, but positions appropriate to each bank's organizational structure, such as the internal auditor, ethics office, or corporate secretary would be appropriate. Whatever position is chosen, it must have sufficient authority to effect corrections.

The purpose of these reports is to provide the institution with a mechanism for monitoring and identifying certain violations, conflicts of interest, self-dealing, violations of its own employee ethics code, and unethical actions. When properly monitored, the reports should aid in deterring and detecting the following personal investment transactions of covered bank investment insiders:

fraudulent, deceptive and manipulative acts,
improper use of material inside information, and
other abusive practices.

The report should identify the individual who is filing the report, and identify and describe each transaction being reported. [Section 344.9(a)(3)] If the $10,000 per quarter transaction threshold for any covered individual is met, all transactions (other than those exempt from the reporting requirements) must be reported, not merely those in excess of $10,000 per quarter.

Reports must contain certain details of the transaction(s), including the date(s) of the transactions, the type of transaction (purchases, sales, etc.) and an identification of the securities purchased or sold. While not required by the regulation, certain additional information is helpful in describing the securities and the transaction(s). This information includes: (1) the number of shares or the principal dollar amount of each transaction, (2) the price at which the transaction was effected, and (3) the name of the broker, dealer, or bank with or through which the transaction was effected. The absence of this additional information, however, should neither be scheduled as a violation nor criticized.

While not covered by Part 344, the bank should review the reports filed and investigate any indications of potential violations, exceptions and unethical conduct. The following illustrate transactions that should be of concern to the bank:

"front running" - A practice where an investment manager purchases securities for his/her own personal interest prior to an anticipated purchase of the same securities by the accounts for which he/she acts as investment manager. For example, the money manager may purchase securities for his/her personal account ahead of a purchase of the same securities by institutional accounts, since the purchase of a large block of securities could cause the price of the securities to increase.
"insider trading" - transactions where an individual uses nonpublic material inside information (covered by the SEC's Rule 10b5-1), typically concerning the condition of a company or impending announcements (mergers, takeovers, profits/losses, new products, product recalls, etc.) which may materially affect the price of a company's stock, to benefit personally from investment transactions (refer also to Section 8. D. Material Public Information),
"scalping" - trading for small gains over a short period of time, usually within a day. In some cases, this involves taking advantage of very narrow spreads in volatile markets. "Scalping" may be indicative of trading securities with advance knowledge of portfolio changes (particularly with respect to very large portfolios, usually the trust department's entire discretionary portfolio), or knowledge of material inside information.
transactions with the institution's fiduciary accounts, and
compliance with the provisions of the bank's code of ethics that restrict or otherwise require the reporting of securities trading by the bank's investment management staff for their personal benefit. Practices typically covered by an investment code of ethics include:

clearance in advance of personal trades;
delays of "x" period before buying or selling a security recently traded for discretionary trust accounts;
restrictions on short-term trading, such as requiring the holding of a stock for a designated period of time before taking a profit, perhaps dependent on whether a security is held in discretionary trust portfolios or recent trades in such securities;
selling short or investing in options on stocks, bonds and commodities held in trust accounts;
prohibitions against purchases of initial public offerings (IPOs), which are often hard to get and may be easily "flipped" for a quick profit; and
improper placement of personal investment transactions through the institution's brokerage accounts.

Examiners should not only ascertain that the required policies exist and the reports are filed, but also that the reports are reviewed by an appropriate bank official and that adequate follow-up action is taken as warranted.

If a bank acts as investment advisor to a mutual fund, the bank must also comply with SEC Rule 17j-1, as promulgated under the Investment Company Act of 1940 [17 CFR Section 270.17j-1], in addition to Part 344. Rule 17j-1 generally requires the same quarterly disclosures as Part 344, except:

All transactions must be reported; there is no $10,000 filing threshold;
Directors are covered by the report, as they are considered "access persons" under the SEC rule; and
The reports must be covered in the mutual fund's code of ethics. [Note that a model code of ethics has been prepared by the Investment Company Institute]

K . Compliance with SEC Requirements

Securities and transactions in securities are largely governed by Federal law. The following discussion addresses some important aspects of securities regulation which are relevant to trust departments. Special reports or notices may need to be filed in those accounts holding equity securities which are registered under Federal securities laws. These requirements may apply to the trust department as a whole, to individual trust accounts, and to individual transactions. Others apply to the selection of brokers, the placement of brokerage transactions, and mutual fund 12b-1 fees.

K .1. Marketable Securities
Section 12 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (Act) required that equity securities (common stock) issued by corporations with 500 or more shareholders and $1 million or more in assets be registered in order to be traded on a national securities exchange. The SEC's Rule 12g-1 (17 CFR 240.12g-1), which was issued subsequent to Section 12, increased the asset size threshold to $10 million in total assets.

FDIC Part 335 implements the law governing stock issued by FDIC-supervised banks. This regulation incorporates the SEC's asset size threshold of $10 million.

The following list recaps various requirements involving equity securities. A more extensive discussion of each requirement is included after the listing. When applicable, examiners should verify compliance with the requirements.

If the bank controls more than 5 percent of a registered company's outstanding stock, it must file notices under Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Refer to the discussion in K.1.a. below, under the caption 13D and 13G, Acquisition Statements for Registered Equity Securities.
If the bank has discretion over $100 million or more in stocks and convertible bonds, it must file quarterly 13F reports under SEC regulations. Refer to the discussion under Quarterly SEC 13F Equity reports in K.1.b. below.
If a "person" controls 10 percent or more of a registered company's outstanding stock, a filing under Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 may be required. Refer to K.1.c. below.
SEC Rule 144 governs the sale of restricted securities. Refer to K.2 below.

NOTE: Examiners may search the SEC EDGAR database to determine whether a bank (or anyone or entity) has submitted any required filing with the SEC at the following internet site: http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/webusers.htm

K.1.a. Acquisition Statements for Registered Equity Securities - SEC 13(d) and SEC 13(g)
As with any investor, bank trust departments must file Acquisition Statements when required by Federal securities law. Acquisition statements are required only for equity securities and are required only under certain circumstances.

Section 13(d)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Act) requires that persons holding a "beneficial ownership" in certain types of equity securities file a notice ("acquisition statement") with the SEC when such "beneficial ownership" exceeds 5 percent of the total outstanding shares of a covered equity security. Two types of notices are involved, more generally referred to as Schedules 13D and 13G under Federal securities law. Schedule 13G imposes similar, but less burdensome, requirements than Schedule 13D. Refer to the discussion of "beneficial ownership" below.

Purchasers of equity securities issued by entities (including national and state member banks, thrifts and bank holding companies) that are not FDIC-supervised state nonmember banks follow SEC requirements. SEC Rule 13d-1 (17 CFR 240.13d-1) implements Sections 13(d)(1) and 13(g)(1) of the Act regarding acquisition statements.

Purchasers of equity securities issued by nonmember banks and registered under Part 335 of FDIC's Rules and Regulations must follow requirements equivalent to those in Section 13 of the Act. FDIC Section 335.331 requires compliance with SEC Sections 13(d) and 13(e) of the Exchange Act. FDIC acquisition statements are the same as the acquisition statements required by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Beneficial Ownership
For bank trust departments, "beneficial ownership" involves the department's total holdings of any covered equity security where the bank: (1) has investment discretion over more than 5 percent of the total outstanding shares, or (2) has voting authority over more than 5 percent of the total outstanding shares. Note: "beneficial ownership" is defined in SEC Rule 13d-3 [17 CFR 240.13d-3].

It is important to note that the 5 percent threshold may be exceeded by the bank in its fiduciary capacity if it possesses any vestige of discretionary investment power or voting power. Neither of these powers must actually be exercised by the fiduciary. In fact such powers could be delegated to another interested party. If the bank as fiduciary has the authority to exercise either of these powers and has such powers over an aggregate exceeding 5 percent of a registered equity security, it must file the acquisition statements.

From the above, it is clear that such conditions are not met by: (1) nondiscretionary accounts where the bank has no voting authority or no investment authority, (2) custodial accounts, or (3) investment advisory accounts where the bank acts as custodian and does not manage the assets.

13D Acquisition Statements
13D filings are transaction-based reports that, typically, will not apply to trust departments. They are filed primarily when stock is being accumulated to obtain a controlling interest. Most trust department holdings are of a passive investment nature.

When a transaction occurs resulting in the control of a covered equity security in excess of the 5 percent beneficial ownership threshold, a 13D filing is required. Every time the beneficial ownership changes one percent or more, the change is considered a material change, and an amended 13D filing is required. A 13D Acquisition Statement must be filed within 10 days with: (1) the issuer of the security by certified or registered mail, (2) each exchange where the security is traded, and (3) the SEC or the primary Federal bank regulator for publicly held bank securities.

More than one 13D filing may be required.

Example:

On July 1st, a trust department's beneficial ownership holdings of ABC Company's registered stock increases to greater than 5 percent of the outstanding stock. The 5 percent threshold has been exceeded and, therefore, a 13D filing is generally required.

On September 15, the department's beneficial ownership holdings decrease by less than 1 percent, resulting in an assumed 5.5 percent position. Generally, no filing is required because no material change in ownership has occurred.

On November 15th the department's holdings rise again, this time exceeding 8 percent of outstanding stock. An amendment to Schedule 13D is required because a material change of ownership of outstanding stock has occurred since its previous filing.

13G Abbreviated Statements
13G filings are year-end reports of equity security holdings that often apply to trust departments. If the securities are not held for the purpose of exercising control (or as part of a related transaction, such as a takeover), but rather are for passive investment purposes, a short-form Schedule 13G may be filed instead of the 13D. The same 5 percent threshold must be exceeded, but it is applied only as of the calendar year-end. A Schedule 13G must be filed by February 14 of the following calendar year-end with the same entities as a Schedule 13D.

If there is no change from one year end to the next, no new 13G filing is required. However, if there is any change from one year-end to the next, a new 13G filing would be required. If there is a change of agency (e.g., due to a change from FDIC-registered bank stock to SEC-registered holding company stock), a new 13G filing would be required, even if there had been no change in beneficial ownership from one year-end to the next.

K.1.b. Reports of Equity Holdings - SEC 13F
This report applies to institutional investors, including trust departments, that exercise investment discretion over $100 million or more of equity securities (or securities convertible into stock).

SEC Rule 13f-1 securities include equities "traded on a national securities exchange or quoted on the automated quotation system of a registered securities association" [e.g., NASDAQ - ed.]. The Rule also states that filers may rely on the most recent SEC-released list of all required 13F securities.

Reports are filed with the SEC using the format of SEC Form 13F, which is required by SEC Regulation 240.13f-1 (Rule 13f-1). A sample 13F form is shown in SEC Regulation 249.325.

For each security held, the report: identifies the issuer, gives the CUSIP Number, and shows the market value and number of shares held. The number of shares reported is then broken down into two categories: investment discretion and voting authority. Under each category, the number of shares is further divided into three categories: sole authority, shared authority, and "other" discretionary authority.

Both the SEC Rule and Section 13f-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 require that copies of reports covering banks be filed with the primary Federal banking regulator. Thus, state nonmember banks filing individually must provide the FDIC with a copy of their 13F reports, as must holding companies whose 13F reports include the securities holdings of state nonmember banks.

SEC Rule 13f-1 and a copy of a printed Form 13F are in the FDIC's Rules and Regulations service in Volume III under the Miscellaneous Statutes and Regulations tab. The SEC's Division of Investment Management has issued a publication "Frequently Asked Question About Form 13F", which can be accessed on the internet at http://www.sec.gov . Once in the website, go to Divisions, Investment Management, Frequently Asked Questions about 13f. The website cannot be accessed directly.

K.1.c. Section 16 Statements for 10 percent or More Holders of Registered Stocks
» Not Applicable to Trust Departments «

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 generally requires that certain filings be made with the SEC for "persons" that have 10 percent or more "beneficial ownership" in stocks that are registered under Federal securities laws. The Act is implemented by SEC Rule 16a-3.

In a no-action letter to CS Holding (January 16, 1992), however, the SEC indicated that bank trust departments will not be deemed to be beneficial owners "of securities held for the benefit of third parties or in customer or fiduciary accounts where such securities are held in the ordinary course of business without the purpose or effect of changing or influencing control of the issuer."

K.2. Restricted Equity Securities - SEC Rule 144
In general, as promulgated under Section 4 of the Securities Act of 1933, Rule 144 (SEC regulation 230.144) provides that in order for securities to be sold without a formal registration:

the securities must have been beneficially owned for at least two years,
the number of shares sold in any three-month period must not exceed the greater of 1 percent of the total outstanding securities of the same class, or the average weekly trading volume for the class of securities during the four-week period preceding the sale, and
the securities must be sold either in a broker's transaction or in transactions directly with a market maker.

In addition, adequate information regarding the issuer must be available to the public and a Notice of Sale (Form 144) must be filed with the SEC. No report to the SEC is required if less than 500 shares are sold in any three-month period and the sales price does not exceed $10,000..

On February 20, 1997, the SEC issued Release No. 33-7390, which amended Rule 144 to reduce the holding periods for restricted securities (i.e., those securities issued in private placements under certain conditions) that are covered by Rule 144. Effective April 29, 1997:

the holding period requirement applicable to the resale of limited amounts of such restricted securities by any person will be reduced from two years to one year, and
the holding period applicable to the resale of unlimited amounts of restricted securities held by non-affiliates is reduced from three years to two years.

Regulation S provides both an issuer-distributor safe harbor (Rule 903) and a resale safe harbor (Rule 904) for offshore sales of securities. To qualify for either safe harbor, Regulation S requires that: (i) the offer or sale must be made in an "offshore transaction" and (ii) the offer or sale must not involve any "directed selling efforts" in the United States. "Offshore transaction" is defined in Rule 902(h)(1)(i) as those in which an offer is not made to a person in the United States, and (ii) either the buyer must be outside the United States (or the seller must reasonably believe that the buyer is) or the transaction is executed, for purposes of Rule 903, on or through a physical trading floor of an established foreign securities exchange, or for purposes of Rule 904, in, on or through the facilities of a "designated offshore securities market," which is either one of an enumerated list of foreign securities exchanges or one that meets a set of criteria set forth in Rule 902. "Directed selling efforts" is defined in Rule 902(c) to include those that are "undertaken for the purpose of, or that could be reasonably expected to have the effect of, conditioning the market in the United States" for the related securities (e.g., widespread advertising).

K.3. Electronic Submission of Forms and Notices
Since 1999, many forms, notices, and reports filed under various securities laws and regulations must be filed electronically:

Under SEC Regulation S-T (17 CFR 231.10 - .601) the SEC requires the electronic submission of all reports, statements, and schedules filed pursuant to:

Sections 12(b) and 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 (other than applications for exemptive relief filed pursuant to section 304 and section 310 of that Act);
Sections 13, 14, and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
Sections 8, 17, 20, 23(c), 24(e), 24(f), and 30 of the Investment Company Act of 1940; and
the Public Utility Act.

The rule also permits, but does not require, the electronic filing of Form 144, where the issuer of the securities is subject to 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Otherwise, Form 144 should be filed in paper format. However, some notices are required to be submitted in paper copy only, including, but not limited to: filings pursuant to Regulations A, D, and E; Form F6; and annual reports required by section 313 of the Trust Indenture Act of 1939.

"Temporary Hardship Exemption" hardcopy filings are permitted under Regulation S-T (Rule 201), for unanticipated technical difficulties. "Continuing Hardship Exemption" hardcopy filings are also permitted under Regulation S-T (Rule 202), if the filings cannot be submitted electronically without "undue burden and expense."
Under the revised reporting requirements of 17 CFR 249.325, banks which electronically submit Form 13F may submit a copy of the form to their banking agencies either: (a) in hardcopy; or (b) electronically, if the agency is capable of receiving the filings in electronic format (the FDIC currently receives this form in hardcopy).

Last Updated 05/10/2005

supervision@fdic.gov

Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation

Each depositor insured to at least $250,000 per insured bank