Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation

{{5-31-92 p.C-2026}}
   [¶10,465] In the Matter of James M. Meyer, Community Bank, Granbury, Texas, and Community Bank, Rockwall, Texas, Docket No. FDIC-92-12e (3-4-92).

   Respondent prohibited from participating in the conduct of affairs of, or exercising voting rights in, any insured institution without the prior consent of the FDIC.

   [.1] Prohibition — Participation in Conduct of Affairs
   [.2] Prohibition — Exercise of Voting Rights

In the Matter of
JAMES M. MEYER, individually
and as an institution-affiliated
party of
COMMUNITY BANK
GRANBURY, TEXAS
(Insured State Nonmember Bank)
and
COMMUNITY BANK
ROCKWALL, TEXAS
(Insured State Nonmember Bank)
ORDER OF PROHIBITION
FROM FURTHER
PARTICIPATION

   James M. Meyer ("Respondent") having been advised of his right to a NOTICE OF INTENTION TO PROHIBIT FROM FURTHER PARTICIPATION ("NOTICE") issued by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") detailing the violations of law or regulation and/or unsafe or unsound banking practices alleged to have been engaged in by the Respondent individually and as an institution-affiliated party of Community Bank, Granbury, Texas, and Community Bank, Rockwall, Texas (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Banks"), which have resulted, or will probably result in, financial loss or other damage to the Banks and/or prejudice to the interests of depositors; and which demonstrate Respondent's willful or continuing disregard for the safety and soundness of the Banks; and having been further advised of his right to a hearing on the alleged charges under section 8(e) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act ("Act"), 12 U.S.C. § 1818(e), and Part 308 of the FDIC Rules of Practice and Procedure, 56 Fed. Reg. 37,968 (1991) (to be codified at 12 C.F.R. Part 308), and having waived those rights, Respondent entered into a STIPULATION AND CONSENT TO THE ISSUANCE OF AN ORDER OF PROHIBITION FROM FURTHER PARTICIPATION ("CONSENT AGREEMENT") with a representative of the Legal Division of the FDIC, dated November 1, 1991, whereby solely for the purpose of this proceeding and without admitting or denying any violations of law or regulation and/or any unsafe or unsound banking practices. Respondent consented to the issuance of an ORDER OF PROHIBITION FROM FURTHER PARTICIPATION ("ORDER") by the FDIC.
   The FDIC considered the matter and determined it had reason to believe that:

   (i) Respondent had engaged or participated in violations of law or regulation and/or unsafe or unsound banking practices;
   (ii) By reason of such violations and/or practices, the Banks have suffered or will probably suffer financial loss or other damage and/or the interests of the Banks' depositors have been or could be prejudiced; and
   (iii) Such violations and/or practices demonstrate Respondent's willful or continuing disregard for the safety or soundness of the Banks. The FDIC further determined the violations and/or practices evidence Respondent's unfitness to serve as an officer, director and/or institution-affiliated party of the Banks, or any insured depository institution or agency or organization enumerated in section 8(e)(7)(A) of the Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1818(e)(7)(A). The FDIC, {{5-31-92 p.C-2027}}therefore, accepts the CONSENT AGREEMENT and issues the following:

   [.1] 1. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that James M. Meyer shall not participate in any manner in the conduct of the affairs of the Banks or any insured depository institution, agency or organization enumerated in section 8(e)(7)(A) of the Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1818(e)(7)(A), without the prior written consent of the FDIC and the appropriate Federal financial institutions regulatory agency, as that term is defined in section 8(e)(7)(D) of the Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1818(e)(7)(D).

   [.2] 2. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that James M. Meyer shall not solicit, procure, transfer or attempt to transfer, vote or attempt to vote any proxy, consent or authorization with respect to any voting rights in the Banks, or any insured depository institution, agency or organization enumerated in section 8(e)(7)(A) of the Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1818(e)(7)(A), without the prior written consent of the FDIC and the appropriate Federal financial institutions regulatory agency, as that term is defined in section 8(e)(7)(D) of the Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1818(e)(7)(D).
   3. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that James M. Meyer shall not violate any voting agreement with respect to any insured depository institution, agency or organization enumerated in section 8(e)(7)(A) of the Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1818(e)(7)(A), previously approved by the appropriate Federal financial institutions regulatory agency, without the prior written consent of the FDIC and the appropriate Federal financial institutions regulatory agency, as that term is defined in section 8(e)(7)(D) of the Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1818(e)(7)(D).
   4. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that James M. Meyer shall not vote for a director, or serve or act as an institution-affiliated party, as that term is defined in section 3(u) of the Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1813(u), of the Banks or any insured depository institution, agency or organization enumerated in section 8(e)(7)(A) of the Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1818(e)(7)(A), without the prior written consent of the FDIC and the appropriate Federal financial institutions regulatory agency as that term is defined in section 8(e)(7)(D) of the Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1818(e)(7)(D).
   This ORDER shall become effective ten days after issuance by the FDIC. The provisions of this ORDER shall remain effective and enforceable, except to the extent that, and until such time as, any provision of this ORDER shall have been modified, terminated, suspended, or set aside by the FDIC.
   Dated at Washington, D.C., this 4th day of March, 1992.
   Pursuant to delegated authority.