TABLE OF CONTENTS
This chapter covers the guiding principles of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) Acquisition Policy Manual (APM) and the associated Procedures, Guidance and Information (PGI) document, and how these affect the FDIC acquisition process.
Acquisition Team – Consists of the Contracting Officer; supporting Contract Specialists and other support staff in the Acquisition Services Branch (ASB); the responsible officials of the Program Office, particularly including the Oversight Manager and Technical Monitor; the Legal Division Contracting Law Unit (CLU); and, as appropriate, the supporting officials and staff of the Office of Minority and Women Inclusion and the ASB, Policy and Systems Section staff.
There are five key attributes of professional acquisition management that are promoted throughout the APM. These key attributes are:
(1) Effectiveness: The timely and cost-effective procurement of goods and services that work well for the customer;
(2) Flexibility: The ability to make good decisions based on best practices for particular circumstances, rather than rigid adherence to standard procedures;
(3) Efficiency: Simple processes that achieve good results without undue oversight or waste of resources;
(4) Responsibility: The role of each member of the FDIC Acquisition Team is to exercise personal initiative and sound business judgment; and
(5) Public Trust: Achieved through fairness and open and honest communications with contractors and the public.
The policies set forth in the APM apply to all members of the FDIC Acquisition Team, including ASB and Program Office personnel, as well as the clients they serve and the contractors who provide the goods and services. These policies allow FDIC to:
(1) Establish reasonable competition as the preferred method of source selection;
(2) Enable innovative and creative tailoring of procurement processes to meet individual requirements, so that the right contractor is selected for each requirement;
(3) Select contractors on the basis of the best value to FDIC;
(4) Strive to provide small disadvantaged businesses and minority and women-owned businesses with attainable and reasonable opportunities to participate as contractors and subcontractors; and
(5) Resolve protests and contract disputes fairly and expeditiously at the lowest level possible.
This chapter covers the parameters of FDIC contracting authority, describes the contracting capacities unique to FDIC, details those federal statutes and regulations that apply and do not apply to FDIC contracting, and describes Contracting Officer authority and responsibilities.
Board of Directors – The governing body of FDIC, empowered to elect and appoint officers and agents to act on matters on behalf of, and affecting, the corporation.
Ratification – The act of approving an unauthorized commitment by an official who has the authority to do so.
Unauthorized Commitment – An agreement that is not binding solely because the government representative who made it lacked the authority to enter into that agreement on behalf of the government.
The APM establishes the procurement policy of FDIC. The procedures used to implement the policy and to conduct the business of contracting with the private sector for goods and services are set out in the accompanying FDIC Procedures, Guidance, and Information (PGI) document. Additionally, the FDIC ASB, Policy and Systems Section, provides interim policy as required, and other tools as appropriate, to keep the FDIC Acquisition Team fully informed and supported.
The FDIC procurement policy applies to all acquisitions of goods and services by the Corporation, acting in its various capacities, except:
(1) Acquisitions by the Office of Inspector General, which are governed by the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended;
(2) Acquisition of legal services by the Legal Division, which has independent contracting authority;
(3) Leasing of office and warehouse space by the Corporate Services Branch of the Division of Administration (DOA), which is governed by the Leasing Policy Manual; and
depository accounts at financial institutions by the Chief Financial Officer,
including setting the terms of the accounts, such as the designation of
signatories, acquiring ancillary services for the processing of receipts and
disbursements, and purchasing and selling investments.
Interagency agreements (IAA) and memoranda of understanding (MOU) are not addressed in this manual. Guidance on IAAs and MOUs is addressed in FDIC Circular 3800.10, Memoranda of Understanding and Interagency Agreements, which is available at http://fdic01/division/doa/adminservices/records/directives/3000/index.html.
Modifications and revisions to the APM are effected by corporate directives issued by the DOA Director. The ASB Deputy Director, DOA, is authorized to approve one-time deviations to policy and to issue interim policy memoranda when policies are permanently revised, pending issuance of a revision of the APM. Suggestions for modification of procurement policy should be directed to the ASB Assistant Director, Policy and Systems Section.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDI Act) –12 U.S.C. § 1819 et seq., empowers FDIC to enter into contracts for goods or services with private sector firms. The FDI Act authorizes FDIC to establish policies and procedures to administer the powers granted to it, including the power to enter into contracts.
The FDIC Board of Directors has delegated the authority to establish policies and procedures for the contracting program to the DOA Director. The delegations appoint the DOA Director as the FDIC Chief Contracting Officer, with authority to develop contracting policy; solicit proposals; and enter into, modify, and terminate contracts on behalf of FDIC in any of its capacities.
The DOA Director, in turn, delegates this authority to the ASB Deputy Director. This includes the authority to appoint Contracting Officers. The ASB Deputy Director re-delegates authority to issue Purchase Card (P-Card) Appointment Letters to the ASB Assistant Director, Policy and Systems Section, and the FDIC P-Card Program Agency Coordinator. The authority to contract on behalf of FDIC is only granted to individuals who have been appointed as Contracting Officers, or who have been appointed as FDIC P-Card holders. Any FDIC employee who solicits proposals or enters into, modifies, or terminates contracts without the delegated contracting authority to do so, is acting outside the scope of their authority. Within DOA, ASB is responsible for issuing the policies governing the contracting program and the procedures for implementing those policies.
FDIC operates in three distinct capacities: corporate, receivership and conservatorship. The specific capacity in which FDIC is operating when it enters into a contract for goods or services must be stated in the contract and the contract must be executed in that capacity.
In its corporate capacity, FDIC conducts all its main functions, except those associated with the resolution of failed financial institutions. Thus, the majority of contracts are entered into by FDIC in its corporate capacity. Examples of this type of contract are contracts for information technology, office supplies, furniture, delivery services, library services and construction services.
In its receivership capacity, FDIC becomes an organizational entity appointed to wind up the affairs of a failed insured depository institution by managing and liquidating its assets, collecting monies due, and paying its creditors. FDIC as receiver succeeds to all the rights, titles, powers, and privileges of the institution and its stockholders. In this capacity, FDIC contracts for the purpose of fulfilling its receivership responsibilities, i.e., to perform liquidation activities of receivership assets and to complete the business of closed institutions.
In its conservatorship capacity, FDIC becomes an organizational entity appointed to preserve the assets of a depository institution for the benefit of the depositors and other creditors. The conservator takes possession of the books, records, liabilities and assets of the institution, and takes whatever action is necessary to preserve the business of the institution as a going concern. In this capacity, FDIC contracts for the sole purpose of fulfilling its conservatorship responsibilities on behalf of an open institution that is operating under FDIC management and control. Contracts are likely to include those for the performance of day-to-day operations or asset management and disposition.
As part of acquisition planning, the Contracting Officer and Program Office must decide which of the several federal laws that apply to the FDIC procurement program apply to their particular requirement. For instance, does the acquisition require application of the Service Contract Act, the Trade Agreements Act, or Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act? Refer to PGI 1.208, Application of Federal Statutes to the FDIC Contracting Program, for discussion of the scope of the federal laws and their application to particular procurements; refer to Module 5 for in-depth coverage of the procedures to follow to comply with those federal laws the Contracting Officer encounters most frequently in fulfilling FDIC acquisitions.
The federal statutes and regulations that establish government procurement policies and procedures and govern procurement by agencies funded through congressional appropriations do not apply to FDIC. Among these are:
(1) Federal Procurement Policy Act – 41 USC §402;
(2) Competition in Contracting Act of 1984 – 40 USC §472 et seq.;
(3) Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994 – Public Law 103-355,108 Stat. 3245;
(4) Contract Disputes Act – 41 USC §601;
(5) Tucker Act – 28 USC §1419(a); and
(6) Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) – 48 CFR Parts 1 through 53
These federal statutes touching on elements of the procurement process, also do not apply to FDIC:
(1) Brooks Architects and Engineers Act – 40 USC §1101;
(2) Economy Act – 31 USC §1535; and
(3) Veterans Benefit Act of 2003, Section 308 – 15 USC §1657f.
There are many federal statutes that touch on elements of procurement that apply to FDIC, such as wage and hour laws, certain laws establishing socio-economic programs and laws governing ethics, privacy and information security. Whether a particular federal statute applies to the FDIC contracting program usually depends on whether FDIC falls within the definition of the agencies to which a statute is directed. Occasionally, FDIC voluntarily complies with a statute which does not apply to it because doing so generally conforms to FDIC policy, or promotes important new policy. Consult the CLU for additional guidance on the applications of federal statutes to the FDIC contracting program.
All of the federal statutes and executive orders listed below apply to FDIC when it contracts in its corporate capacity, but many do not apply when FDIC contracts in its receivership or conservatorship capacities. The notation “corporate capacity only” distinguishes those statutes that do not apply to receivership and conservatorship contracts. The contract thresholds and other factors that trigger application of a given statute are described in the PGI.
(1) Labor Laws:
§ Service Contract Act of 1965 – 41 USC §351 et seq. (corporate capacity only);
§ Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act – 40 USC §3701 et seq. (corporate capacity only);
§ Davis-Bacon Act – 40 USC §3141 et seq. (construction contracts) (corporate capacity only);
§ 40 USC §3131 et seq. – formerly known as the Miller Act –(construction contracts) (corporate capacity only); and
§ Walsh-Healey Public Contracts Act – 41 USC §§35-45 (corporate capacity only).
(2) Socio-Economic Programs:
§ Buy American Act – 41 USC §10a et seq. (partial);
§ Trade Agreements Act of 1979 – 19 USC §2501 et seq.;
§ Rehabilitation Act of 1973 – 29 USC §794d (commonly known as Section 508);
§ Javits-Wagner-O’Day Act – 41 USC §46 et seq.;
§ Rehabilitation Act of 1973 – 29 USC §793 (partial) (voluntary compliance)(prohibits employment discrimination based on physical or mental disabilities);
§ Executive Order 11246 – Equal Opportunity;
§ FDIC Minority and Women Outreach Program for Contracting – 12 USC §1833e and 12 CFR Part 361;
§ Vietnam Era Veterans Rehabilitation Act of 1972 – 38 USC §4212;
§ Executive Order 12564 – Drug Free Work Place (voluntary compliance);
§ Federal Prison Industries - 18 USC §4124 (corporate capacity only); and
§ Small Business Act – 15 USC §644(e) (commonly known as the contract bundling provision) (corporate capacity only).
(3) Privacy and Payment Laws:
§ Privacy Act of 1974 – 5 USC §552a;
§ Prompt Payment Act – 31 USC §3901-05 (corporate capacity only); and
§ Assignment of Claims Act – 31 USC §3727.
(4) Ethics and Integrity Laws:
§ Anti-Kickback Act of 1986 – 41 USC §§51-58;
§ Byrd Amendment – 31 USC §1352(b) (corporate capacity only);
§ Copeland (Anti-Kickback) Act – 40 USC §3145 and 18 USC §874 (construction contracts) (corporate capacity only);
§ FDI Act – 12 USC 1822 (f); and
§ Integrity and fitness standards for contractors – 12 CFR Part 366.
(5) Environmental Laws:
§ Clean Air Act (CAA) of 1990 – 42 USC 7401 et seq., specifically 42 USC §7414 (air quality and emissions limitations; inspection and monitoring of facilities related to development of implementation plans for the control of emissions or detection of violations of CAA standards) (construction contracts only); and 42 USC §7671g, §7671h and §7671j (obligations related to refrigeration equipment, air conditioning and ozone-depleting substances); and
§ Clean Water Act (CWA) – 33 USC §1251 et seq., specifically 33 USC §1318 (water pollution prevention and control; maintenance of records and monitoring equipment at facilities to assist in developing limitations on and treatment of effluence or detection of violations of CWA standards) (construction contracts only).
(6) Information Security Law: Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002 – 44 USC §§ 3541-49.
(7) Tax Law: FDI Act - 12 USC §1825 - exempts FDIC from all federal, state and local taxes, except taxes on real property.
(8) Suspension and Exclusion of Contractors: The standards and process for the suspension and exclusion of contractors are described in 12 CFR Part 367.
(9) Claims Process: Disputes arising from certain receivership contracts are handled under the claims process set out in 12 USC §1821(d).
(10) The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980: Pub. L. 96-511 - In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, FDIC has obtained all required Office of Management and Budget information collection approvals. Details are provided at PGI 1.208(c)(8).
(11) Other Federal Regulations: The federal regulations (except the FAR) implementing the statutes listed above apply to FDIC procurements, as well.
Contracts may be entered into and signed on behalf of FDIC only by duly appointed Contracting Officers. Contracting Officers operate under the authority of Certificates of Appointment issued by the ASB Deputy Director. The certificate establishes the scope and limits of a Contracting Officer’s authority. Contracting authority is delegated to named individuals, rather than to positions, based on the individual's education, experience and training.
Contracting Officers have the exclusive authority to enter into, administer, and terminate contracts and to make related decisions. Contracting Officers are responsible for ensuring the performance of all actions necessary for efficient and effective contracting, ensuring compliance with the terms of contracts, and with protecting the interests of FDIC in all of its contractual relationships.
The Contracting Officer may not enter into any contract unless all requirements of this APM and the PGI, law, executive orders, regulations, and all other applicable procedures and approvals have been met. Operating under these guidelines (and, when necessary, seeking and gaining approval for deviations from them), Contracting Officers have latitude to exercise sound business judgment based on the competitive and business needs of FDIC. In meeting these responsibilities, Contracting Officers are expected to consult and confer with the Program Office, CLU and others.
Contracting Officers are also responsible for managing contractor relationships by overseeing the integrity and effectiveness of the contracting process, ensuring that all contractors are treated in a business-like and objective manner, and maintaining effective communications with contractors during
Lastly, Contracting Officers must cooperate with the Office of Inspector General as required by FDIC Circular 12000.1, Cooperation with the Office of Inspector General, which is available at http://fdic01/division/doa/adminservices/records/directives/12000/index.html.
Contracting Officers may award contracts or orders against FDIC contractual agreements subject to the limitations of their Contracting Officer Certificate of Appointment, and up to the amount provided to them through appropriately approved procurement requests, Accordingly, Contracting Officers must ensure that an appropriately funded and approved procurement request is received prior to releasing a solicitation.
Contracting Officers must be fully qualified by education, experience and training in order to be appointed as Contracting Officers, and to solicit, negotiate, award, and administer contracts on behalf of FDIC. Continuous learning requirements must also be met to maintain that appointment.
The ASB, Policy and Systems Section, is responsible for management of the FDIC Contracting Officer Warrant Program detailed at PGI 1.209(d).
The Contracting Officer may delegate certain responsibilities to individuals to act on behalf of the Contracting Office in overseeing general contractor performance and the technical work of the contractor. These individuals are referred to as Oversight Managers and Technical Monitors. The policies and procedures discussed herein regarding Oversight Managers and Technical Monitors also apply to Task Order Oversight Managers. Because Oversight Managers and Technical Monitors are not duly appointed Contracting Officers, they may not authorize contractors to perform work or incur costs which are not specified in the contract. Further information on contract oversight management and the roles of the Oversight Manager and Technical Monitor may be found at APM 6.4, Contract Administration and Oversight Management.
A contract is not binding when the FDIC representative who made it lacked the authority to enter into that contract on behalf of FDIC. This is otherwise known as an unauthorized commitment. Unauthorized commitments may only be ratified when:
(1) The goods or service have been provided to and accepted by FDIC, or FDIC has obtained or will obtain a benefit resulting from performance of the unauthorized commitment;
Procedures for ratification of unauthorized commitments are found at PGI 1.211.
The ASB Assistant Director, Policy and Systems Section, is responsible for the overall management of the FDIC P-Card Program and for issuing policy and guidance for the program. Day-to-day management of the program is the responsibility of the FDIC P-Card Agency Program Coordinator. Contracting authority, limited to P-Card use, is delegated to cardholders by the ASB Assistant Director, Policy and Systems Section, and the FDIC P-Card Agency Program Coordinator, dependent upon the dollar level. Policy and procedures for use of the card and associated products are found at PGI Appendix C, FDIC Purchase Card (P-Card) Guide.
It is the policy of the FDIC to conduct acquisition business by electronic means as a preferred business practice to the maximum extent possible. Acquisition business is defined as the all-inclusive steps in the acquisition process, including market research, solicitation, proposal submission, proposal review, contract award, contract administration/contract modification and contract closeout.
This chapter covers FDIC policy on ethics matters applicable to contractors, and Contracting Officers and the Program Offices they support.
Contracting Officers and the Program Offices they support must comply with the policy surrounding the ethics issues discussed in this chapter in the award of contracts for FDIC.
FDIC business is to be conducted in a manner above reproach and, except as authorized by statute or regulation, with complete impartiality and with preferential treatment for none. The general rule is to avoid any conflict of interest or even the appearance of a conflict of interest in FDIC-contractor relationships. While many federal laws and regulations place restrictions on the actions of government personnel, their official conduct must, in addition, be such that they would have no reluctance to make a full public disclosure of their actions.
The ethical standards to which FDIC holds its contractors and subcontractors are delineated in 12 CFR §366, which is available at http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_08/12cfr366_08.html. While this codification applies specifically to those contractors and subcontractors performing service contracts, FDIC expects all contractors and subcontractors to perform using the highest ethical standards, reflecting the integrity necessary to support and retain public trust and confidence in our acquisition process.
FDIC does not contract for services with anyone who has committed an act deemed to be a disqualifying condition. The disqualifying conditions are set out in the Federal Deposit Insurance Act at 12 USC §1822(f) (4) and are restated in the regulations at 12 CFR §366.3. They are:
(1) Conviction of a felony;
(2) Removal from or being prohibited from participation in the affairs of an insured depository institution as a result of a federal banking agency final enforcement action;
(3) Demonstration of a pattern or practice of defalcation or embezzlement on financial obligations to insured depository institutions; or
(4) Causing a substantial loss to a federal deposit insurance fund.
The FDIC does not enter into, or continue contracts with individuals or organizations that present an unmitigated conflict of interest. If a conflict of interest exists, it precludes a contractor from performing the contract unless the conflict is waived by FDIC or the contractor eliminates it. Conflicts of interest can be either individual or organizational. They most frequently arise when a personal, business or financial interest of a contractor (or its employee or subcontractor) is such that the contractor’s judgment and loyalty in performing services for FDIC might be compromised by concerns for pursuit of its own interest. Other conditions that FDIC has identified as creating conflicts of interest are:
(1) Involvement in litigation adverse to FDIC, as a party or representative of a party;
(2) Offering to buy an asset from FDIC for which services were performed in the three years prior to the offer, unless provided for in the contract for services; or
(3) Engaging in an activity that would cause FDIC to question the integrity of the services a contractor has performed, is performing, or offers to perform.
Conflicts of interest are covered in 12 CFR §366.10, which is available at http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_08/12cfr366_08.html.
FDIC policy is to award contracts only to those firms that meet the minimum standards set forth in APM 1.301-1.304. FDIC has the authority, under 12 USC Section 1822(f), to suspend and to exclude a contractor or a subcontractor from providing services to FDIC, if, upon notice and hearing, FDIC determines the contractor has violated the integrity and fitness standards or through other acts has shown itself to be unsuitable to perform services or functions for FDIC. The specific acts of ethical misconduct that give rise to suspension actions and to exclusion actions are laid out in 12 CFR Part 367, specifically Section 367.6 (exclusions) and Section 367.8 (suspensions), which is available at
Besides the administrative sanctions of suspension and exclusion from contracting with FDIC, a contractor or any other party covered by Part 366 who violates Part 366 is subject to other actions or sanctions, depending on the circumstance of the violation. Other actions include criminal sanctions, civil actions for damages, and rescission or termination of a contract.
12 CFR Part 366 requires FDIC service contractors to meet the minimum standards of integrity and fitness. Contracting Officers must include clauses and provisions that convey the requirements of Part 366 in FDIC solicitations and contracts as prescribed by the Policies, Guidance and Information (PGI) document, except for contracts entered into by FDIC in which it operates as an insured depository institution as a conservator or as a bridge bank (12 CFR 366.2, which is available at http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_08/12cfr366_08.html).
For guidance on Roles and Responsibilities – Contractor Integrity and Fitness, see PGI 1.309.
The FDIC Legal Division, Contracting Law Unit, the Security Management Section, the FDIC Inspector General and the FDIC designated Ethics Counselor have key roles and responsibilities along with the ASB in matters pertaining to suspension and exclusion of contractors. See PGI 1.310 for further guidance and information.
FDIC employees are held to the highest standards of conduct in performing their duties. The standards of conduct are set out in FDIC Circular 2410.6 – Standards of Ethical Conduct For Employees of the FDIC – which incorporates the governmentwide standards of conduct in 5 CFR Part 2635. It is the employee’s responsibility to become familiar with, and to comply with, these standards. Employees who have questions regarding standards of conduct may consult their Deputy Ethics Counselor or the corporation’s Ethics Office, which can be accessed at http://fdic01/division/legal/ethics/index.html.
A contractor, and anyone else who performs services on the behalf of FDIC, is obligated to maintain as confidential any information it receives from FDIC. This means the contractor may not use the information or disclose it to a third party, unless:
(1) The contract or FDIC authorizes disclosure;
(2) The information is generally available to the public; or
FDIC makes the information
available to the general public.
The contractor’s duty of non-disclosure is set out in 12 CFR Section 366.13. Further information on this subject may be found at APM 5.1and PGI 5.1.
The chapter covers FDIC policy on contracts for personal services and performance of inherently governmental functions.
Inherently Governmental Function – A function that is so intimately related to the public interest as to mandate performance by government employees. These functions include those activities that require either the exercise of discretion in applying government authority or the making of value judgments in making decisions for the government. Inherently governmental functions normally fall into two categories: (1) the act of governing, i.e., the discretionary exercise of government authority, and (2) monetary transactions and entitlements.
Inherently governmental functions do not normally include gathering information for or providing advice, opinions, recommendations, or ideas to government officials. They also do not include functions that are primarily ministerial and internal in nature, such as building security; mail operations; operation of cafeterias; housekeeping; facilities operations and maintenance, warehouse operations, motor vehicle fleet management and operations, or routine electrical or mechanical services.
Personal Services Contract – A contract that, either by its terms or the way it is administered, makes contractor personnel appear to be FDIC employees.
The policies regarding contracts for personal services, and the use of contractors to perform services in support of the performance of inherently governmental functions, are detailed in APM 1.404 and 1.405, respectively.
The award of contracts for personal services is prohibited, unless specifically authorized by statute. A contract for personal services can arise when the terms of the contract or its actual performance create a situation where:
(1) FDIC employees are providing day-to-day supervision of contractor personnel; or
(2) Contractor personnel are performing or engaging in a function that is inherent to the mission of FDIC, that is, a function that is inherently governmental.
The Contracting Officer is required to review all requirement packages for services from the Program Office to ensure that a contract for personal services is not created. Further, both the Contracting Officer and the Oversight Manager are required to periodically review contracts for services to ensure that employer-employee relationships are not established by FDIC with contractor personnel at any point during the life of the contract. The following questions should be considered when assessing whether a proposed contract for services could be characterized as one for personal services:
(1) Are the services to be performed on site at an FDIC office or facility?
(2) Are the principal tools and equipment used to perform the services furnished by FDIC?
(3) Do the services apply directly to the integral effort of FDIC, or one of its organizational subparts, in carrying out its mission or its essential functions?
(4) Are comparable services, meeting comparable needs, performed by civil service personnel at FDIC or at other agencies similar to FDIC?
(5) Is the need for the services in question reasonably expected to last beyond one (1) year?
(6) Does the inherent nature of the services in question, or the manner in which they are provided, reasonably require FDIC to direct or supervise contractor personnel, directly or indirectly, in order to:
§ Adequately protect FDIC interests;
§ Retain control of the function involved; or
§ Keep full personal responsibility for the function - being performed by contractor personnel - in a duly authorized federal officer or employee?
Any one of the factors outlined above does not in itself define a requirement as one for personal services. However, the combination of two or more of these factors in a requirement may raise the specter that the services in question are personal services. The Contracting Officer must carefully analyze the factors and make a determination whether a contract for personal services should be created. The Contracting Officer consults the Contracting Law Unit (CLU) when questions arise regarding whether proposed services are considered personal in nature.
To further preclude the creation of a prohibited employer-employee relationship between FDIC and contractor personnel, and to preserve the independent status of contractor personnel, the following precautions must be observed:
(1) FDIC employees must not directly or indirectly supervise contractor personnel;
(2) Contractor personnel work stations must be separated from FDIC employee work stations to the maximum extent practicable;
(3) Contractor personnel are required to wear badges on site at FDIC offices or facilities, display office signs that identify them as contractor personnel, and take other measures, as appropriate, to clearly identify themselves as contractor personnel;
(4) Contractor personnel must not be invited to attend regular FDIC staff meetings; and
(5) Contractor personnel, in general, may not participate in services provided for the benefit of FDIC employees, e.g., counseling and referral services or FDIC-employee recreational activities, e.g., office picnics and holiday parties.
If an FDIC employee knows of facts in a particular services contract that suggest the relationship between one or more FDIC employees and contractor personnel is such that it appears a contract for personal services may be created, that individual should refer the matter to the Contracting Officer. The Contracting Officer then seeks CLU review.
It is the policy of FDIC to:
(1) Prohibit the use of service contracts for the performance of inherently governmental functions; and
(2) Provide greater scrutiny and an appropriate enhanced degree of management oversight when contracting for functions that are not inherently governmental, but closely support the performance of inherently governmental functions. In using the products of contracts that closely support the performance of inherently governmental functions, the ASB and Program Office must ensure that:
§ Any final agency action complies with the laws and policies of the United States and reflects the independent conclusions of FDIC officials and not those of contractors who may have interests that are not in concert with the public interest, and who may be beyond the reach of management controls otherwise applicable to public employees; and
§ Reasonable identification of contractors and the contractors’ work product is made whenever there is a risk that the public, congress, or other persons outside of FDIC might confuse them with FDIC officials or with an FDIC work product, respectively.
Inherently governmental functions include such things as:
(1) The determination of agency policy, such as determining the content and application of regulations, among other things;
(2) The determination of federal program priorities or budget requests;
(3) The direction and control of federal employees;
(4) The selection or non-selection of individuals for Federal Government employment;
(5) The approval of position descriptions and performance standards for federal employees;
(6) The determination of what government property is to be disposed of and on what terms (although an agency may give contractors authority to dispose of property at prices with specified ranges and subject to other reasonable conditions deemed appropriate by the agency);
(7) In federal procurement activities with respect to prime contracts:
§ Determining what supplies or services are to be acquired by the government (although an agency may give contractors authority to acquire supplies at prices within specified ranges and subject to other reasonable conditions deemed appropriate by the agency);
§ Participating as a voting member on any source selection boards;
§ Approval of any contractual document, to include documents defining requirements, incentive plans and evaluation criteria;
§ Awarding contracts;
§ Performing contract administration functions that involve ordering changes in contract performance or contract quantities, taking actions based on evaluations of contractor performance, and accepting or rejecting contractor products or services);
§ Terminating contracts; and
§ Determining whether contract costs are reasonable, allocable and allowable.
(8) The approval of agency responses to Freedom of Information Act requests (other than routine responses that, because of statute, regulation or agency policy, do not require the exercise of judgment in determining whether documents are to be released or withheld), and the approval of agency responses to the administrative appeals of denials of Freedom of Information Act requests;
(9) The conduct of administrative hearings to determine the eligibility of any person for a security clearance, or involving actions that affect matters of personal reputation or eligibility to participate in government programs; and.
(10) The determination of budget policy, guidance, and strategy.
A list of services and actions that are considered not to be inherently governmental functions follows. While not considered to be inherently governmental functions, these services and actions may approach being in that category because of the way in which the contractor performs the contract or the manner in which FDIC administers contractor performance. When contracting for such services and actions, FDIC must be fully aware of the terms of the contract, contractor performance and contract administration to ensure that appropriate FDIC control is preserved.
This is an illustrative listing, and is not intended to promote or discourage their use:
(1) Services that involve or relate to budget preparation, including workload modeling, fact finding, efficiency studies, and should-cost analyses, etc.;
(2) Services that involve or relate to reorganization and planning activities;
(3) Services that involve or relate to analyses, feasibility studies, and strategy options to be used by agency personnel in developing policy;
(4) Services that involve or relate to the development of regulations;
(5) Services that involve or relate to the evaluation of another contractor's performance;
(6) Services in support of acquisition planning;
(7) Contractors' providing assistance in contract management (such as where the contractor might influence official evaluations of other contractors);
(8) Contractors' providing technical evaluation of contract proposals;
(9) Contractors' providing assistance in the development of statements of work;
(10) Contractors' providing support in preparing responses to Freedom of Information Act requests;
(11) Contractors' working in any situation that permits or might permit them to gain access to confidential business information and/or any other sensitive information;
(12) Contractors' providing information regarding agency policies or regulations, such as attending conferences on behalf of an agency, conducting community relations campaigns, or conducting agency training courses;
(13) Contractors' participating in any situation where it might be assumed that they are agency employees or representatives;
(14) Contractors' participating as technical advisors to a source selection board or participating as voting or nonvoting members of a source evaluation board;
(15) Contractors' serving as arbitrators or providing alternative methods of dispute resolution;
(16) Contractors' constructing buildings or structures intended to be secure from electronic eavesdropping or other penetration by foreign governments;
(17) Contractors' providing inspection services;
(18) Contractors' providing legal advice and interpretations of regulations and statutes to government officials; and
(19) Contractors' providing special non-law enforcement, security activities that do not directly involve criminal investigations, such as prisoner detention or transport and non-military national security details.
Office of Management and Budget Circular No A-76, while not specifically applicable to FDIC, provides detailed guidance on the identification of inherently governmental activities. The Office of Federal Procurement Policy Letter 92-1, Inherently Governmental Functions, provides background information regarding inherently governmental functions which assists Program Offices and Contracting Officers in making decisions regarding whether a function may be performed by contractor personnel.
This chapter covers the policy on acquisition planning.
The policies for acquisition planning are set forth in the following paragraphs.
Program Offices must coordinate with the ASB as soon as a potential procurement need is identified and support the acquisition planning process. Close coordination and early planning between the Program Office, Contracting Officer, and other members of the Acquisition Team are essential for effective and efficient procurement.
FDIC Program Offices and the Contracting Officer must work together to conduct market research to support all acquisition planning. Market research involves obtaining information and knowledge about the different types of goods or services in the commercial marketplace, and their availability and pricing. Market research can also identify the type and extent of competition that may exist for a product or service. This is done to keep abreast of marketplace changes and trends when there is no specific procurement identified, or to identify firms that may offer the goods and/or services required by FDIC for current or future procurements.
Market research also plays an important role in obtaining the approvals for capital investment projects by supporting the development of a cost benefit analysis and determining the extent of competition for the required products or services. If market research identifies only one potential source for requirements estimated above $5,000, non-competitive contracting procedures, as discussed in PGI 2.206 may be used.
The Acquisition Plan documents the course of action for the procurement and is developed jointly by the Program Office and the Contracting Officer beginning with early acquisition planning, as described above. Written Acquisition Plans must be prepared for all acquisitions $1,000,000 or more using the format at PGI 2.106. While written plans are not required below that level, reasonable planning is expected for all procurement actions.
A significant part of acquisition planning is assembling the requirements package. The requirements package consists of all the documents and information needed to produce a solicitation or contract to fulfill a requirement. The core documents in the requirements package are the approved requisition; the statement of work or statement of objectives; and the independent FDIC cost estimate. The Program Office must provide ASB with the complete requirements package, including other documents identified by ASB as essential to initiate the procurement action. Program Office officials should hold early strategy sessions with ASB Contracting Officers to identify the other types of documentation needed to support a specific procurement action. Particular attention should be given to early coordination if the action involves information security and business continuity requirements. The requirements package checklist must be completed for every requirement over $100,000 and filed in the official contract file. The checklist may be found on the ASB website at http://fdic01/division/DOA/buying/acquisitiondocuments/acqdocs.html.
Further guidance on requirements packages may be found at PGI 2.107.
FDIC policy is to encourage use of minority and women-owned businesses (MWOBs), and small disadvantaged businesses (SDBs) concerns in the acquisition of goods and services, whether as contractors or subcontractors. ASB includes these types of business concerns in FDIC acquisition planning and contracting opportunities whenever practical.
The Office of Minority and Women Inclusion has corporate-wide responsibility for oversight of the FDIC MWOB and SDB Outreach Program. The goal of the program is to increase the number of MWOB, and SDB. firms available to meet FDIC contracting requirements. The Outreach Program identifies qualified MWOB and SDB firms that are interested in providing goods and services used by FDIC.
This chapter covers FDIC policy regarding competition in contracting.
Bundling – The consolidation of two or more requirements for goods or services, previously provided or performed under separate smaller contracts, into a solicitation for a single contract that is likely to be unsuitable for award to a small business concern due to:
(1) The diversity, size, or specialized nature of the elements of the performance specified;
(2) The aggregate dollar value of the anticipated award;
(3) The geographical dispersion of the contract performance sites; or
(4) Any combination of the factors described above.
Separate smaller contract, as used in ”bundling,” is
a contract that has been performed by one or more small business concerns or
that was suitable for award to one or more small business concerns.
Single contract, as used in “bundling,” includes:
(1) Multiple awards of indefinite-quantity contracts under a single solicitation for the same or similar supplies or services to two or more sources; and
(2) An order placed against an indefinite quantity contract under a Federal Supply Schedule contract; or task-order contract or delivery-order contract awarded by another agency, i.e., governmentwide acquisition contract or multi-agency contract.
Substantial Bundling – Any bundling that results in a contract or order that is equal to, or greater than $2,000,000. This definition does not apply to a contract that is awarded and performed entirely outside of the United States.
Contracting Officers and Program Offices must use competition in acquisitions to the maximum extent possible. Contracting Officers should look for competitive opportunities when procuring goods and services valued at over $5,000. Competitive procedures are preferred as they bring market forces to bear. Through competition, FDIC is able to compare the value of competing technical proposals and prices in order to determine which proposal affords the best value. Reasonable competition also means soliciting a sufficient number of sources to obtain an adequate market response so that an analysis of the fairness and reasonableness of individual offers can be performed.
Bundling related requirements into one large contract is generally discouraged, unless the benefits to FDIC are clear. In some instances, bundling may provide substantial benefits to FDIC. However, because of the potential impact on small business participation, the Contracting Officer participates with the Program Office in conducting market research to determine whether bundling is necessary and justified. The definition of "bundling" and related terms is in APM 2.202. Additional requirements for acquisitions involving bundling follow.
When a proposed acquisition strategy involves substantial bundling, the acquisition strategy must:
(1) Identify the specific benefits anticipated to be derived from bundling;
(2) Include an assessment of the specific impediments to participation by small business concerns that result from bundling;
(3) Specify actions designed to maximize small business participation as contractors, including provisions that encourage small business teaming;
(4) Specify actions designed to maximize small business participation as subcontractors (including suppliers) at any tier under the contract, or order, that may be awarded to meet the requirements;
(5) Include a specific determination that the anticipated benefits of the proposed bundled contract or order justify its use; and
(6) Identify alternative strategies that would reduce or minimize the scope of the bundling, and the rationale for not choosing those alternatives.
When a proposed acquisition strategy involves substantial bundling, the Contracting Officer must:
(1) Justify bundling in the acquisition strategy documentation;
(2) Consider the cost that has been charged or, where data is available, could be charged by small business concerns for the same or similar work in assessing whether cost savings would be achieved through bundling;
(3) Notify the small businesses currently performing separate smaller contracts of FDIC intent to bundle them into a single, larger requirement prior to proceeding with bundling; and
(4) Notify the Small Business Administration area office thirty (30) days prior to issuing any solicitation for bundled requirements.
(1) When the Program Office believes that the benefits of bundling are substantial, it must support the Contracting Officer in developing the acquisition strategy and the Acquisition Plan and must prepare a decision package to be forwarded through the appropriate levels of management to the Chairman of FDIC for approval.
(2) Measurably substantial benefits may include, individually or in any combination or aggregate, cost savings or price reduction, quality improvements that save time or improve or enhance performance or efficiency, reduction in acquisition cycle times, better terms and conditions, and any other benefits. The agency must quantify the identified benefits and explain how their impact would be measurably substantial. Except as provided in paragraph (4) of this section, the agency may determine bundling to be necessary and justified if, as compared to the benefits that it would derive from contracting to meet those requirements if not bundled, it would derive measurably substantial benefits equivalent to:
§ Ten (10) percent of the estimated contract order value (including options) if the value is $75,000,000 or less; or
§ Five (5) percent of the estimated contract order value (including options) or $75,000,000, whichever is greater, if the value exceeds $75,000,000.
§ For multiple award contracts, these same dollar thresholds apply and are based on cumulative contract value.
(3) The Chairman of FDIC may determine that bundling is necessary and justified when:
§ The expected benefits do not meet the thresholds in paragraph (2) of this section, but are critical to the agency’s mission success; and
§ The acquisition strategy provides for maximum practicable participation by small business concerns.
The Chairman’s decision regarding bundling does not preclude the FDIC from notifying the SBA of a solicitation for bundled requirements
(4) Reduction of administrative or personnel costs alone is not sufficient justification for bundling unless the cost savings are expected to be at least ten (10) percent of the estimated contract or order (including options) of the bundled requirements.
Requirements must not be split to circumvent thresholds for application of statute or FDIC policy. Specific exceptions for recurring services using the FDIC purchase card (P-Card) are outlined in the FDIC Purchase Card (P-Card) Guide at PGI Appendix C.
All contracting actions estimated to exceed $5,000, which are not competed, must be justified prior to award in accordance with PGI 2.206.
This chapter covers the policy for the procurement of goods and services using simplified procurement procedures.
Commercial Goods – Those goods determined to be in the commercial marketplace, as documented by market research, sold in substantial quantities to the general public in the course of normal business operations, at prices based upon established catalog or market prices.
Commercial Services – Services of a type offered and sold competitively in substantial quantities in the commercial marketplace, based on established catalog or market prices for specific tasks performed, or specific outcomes to be achieved, and under standard commercial terms and conditions.
Request for Quotation (RFQ) – A solicitation document used in simplified procurements to communicate requirements to prospective contractors and to solicit quotations from them. An RFQ may be oral or written.
Simplified Procurement – A streamlined method of buying goods and services valued at $100,000 or less, or for commercial goods or services valued at less than $5,000,000.
Simplified procurements are used in lieu of formal contracts when buying commercial goods or commercial services valued at less than $5,000,000, or when buying other goods and services valued at $100,000 or less. In exceptional circumstances it may be appropriate to use simplified procurement for requirements normally subject to formal contracting procedures when only limited technical evaluations are necessary. (See APM 3.203, Formal Contracting Policy).
This simplified procurement policy does not apply when FDIC can meet its requirements using:
(1) Required sources of supply, e.g., Federal Prison Industries and AbilityOne (formerly Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act);
(2) Federal Supply Schedule contracts;
(3) Existing FDIC contracts; or
(4) Other established contracts.
FDIC uses competition to procure goods and services for all simplified procurements valued over $5,000. Non-competitive awards of simplified procurements valued over $5,000 may be made, but must be justified. See APM 2.203 and PGI 2.203, Competition Policy. Procurements valued at $5,000 or less may be awarded without competition and do not require justification.
The Contracting Officer must identify potential sources to solicit, depending upon what a particular procurement may require. The Contracting Officer must provide the Office of Minority and Women Inclusion the opportunity to furnish a list of potential sources for all actions greater than $100,000.
To solicit quotations, the Contracting Officer may use either an oral or a written RFQ.
At the Contracting Officer’s discretion, oral RFQs may be used when:
(1) The acquisition does not exceed the simplified procurement threshold;
(2) The award is based on price only; and
(3) Any required representations and certifications and any necessary information to complete background investigations are provided in writing.
The Contracting Officer must use written RFQs when oral RFQs are not permitted.
Communications with offerors must not afford any offeror an unfair competitive advantage. Once a solicitation has been identified for competitive procurement, communications with offerors must be handled through the Contracting Officer.
The Contracting Officer is responsible for the receipt and safeguarding of all quotations.
The Contracting Officer evaluates quotations in accordance with the criteria cited in the RFQ and selects the best quotation relative to the needs of FDIC and the reasonableness of the proposed price.
Prior to making an award, the Contracting Officer must document the following pre-award reviews of the successful offeror, as required:
(1) Excluded parties;
(2) Central Contractor Registration;
(3) New Financial Environment vendor file review;
(4) Contractor representations and certifications, as applicable;
(5) Integrity and fitness representations and certifications, if over $100,000;
(6) Background investigations completed by the Security and Emergency Preparedness Section; and
(7) Financial capability review.
The Contracting Officer must document the results of the evaluation of quotations, including the determination of price reasonableness in the official contract file.
As a general rule under simplified procurements, the Contracting Officer is not required to notify an unsuccessful offeror of the award or offer debriefings, unless requested. If a debriefing is requested use the procedures at PGI 3.216(b).
There is an exception for acquisitions covered by the World Trade Organization – Government Procurement Agreement or a Free Trade Agreement, as discussed in APM 5.12. In these cases, notification of the award through FedBizOpps is required. Contracting Officers must submit a synopsis of the award to FedBizOpps in sufficient time to permit its publication not later than sixty (60) days after award.
The Contracting Officer awards simplified procurements using simplified procurement orders, blanket purchase agreements, or purchase cards.
This chapter covers the policy for acquiring goods and services using formal contracting procedures.
Advance Authorization Letter – A letter issued by the Contracting Officer authorizing the contractor to begin performance prior to a formal contract being executed. It contains the key aspects of an engagement, such as a description of the work, the limits on costs to be incurred, and the period of performance. It does not contain all the terms, conditions, and clauses required for the final formal contract, which is negotiated and executed as soon as possible after the contractor begins work under the advance authorization letter.
Commercial Goods – See definition at APM 3.102.
Commercial Services – See definition at APM 3.102.
Competitive Range – Those offerors determined by the Contracting Officer to have a reasonable chance of being selected for award of a contract, based on initial technical and price evaluations.
Price Analysis – The process of examining and evaluating a proposed price without evaluating its separate cost elements and proposed profit. Price analysis includes price realism, when appropriate. The final objective of price analysis is to determine a fair and reasonable price.
Price Realism – The analysis performed on a price proposal to determine whether the price proposed is realistic for the work to be performed and consistent with the technical proposal.
Request for Proposal (RFP) – A document sent to prospective offerors to request a formal proposal to provide the goods or services required by FDIC, under stated terms and conditions.
Source Selection Plan (SSP) – A key document which specifies how source selection activities are organized, initiated, and conducted. It specifically defines the evaluation factors to be used to analyze proposals and serves as the guide for conducting the analysis of proposals and the selection of source(s) that will receive an award.
The Contracting Officer must use formal contracting procedures for the acquisition of goods or services valued above the limits for simplified procurements (less than $5,000,000 for commercial goods or services, or $100,000 or less for non-commercial). When only limited technical evaluations are necessary, it may be appropriate to use simplified procurement for requirements normally subject to formal contracting procedures.
Contracting Officers must provide for and promote competition in soliciting offers and awarding contracts, where practicable. See the policy on competition addressed in APM 2.203. In the case of non-competitive awards and modifications, the Program Office must justify the lack of competition, using a Justification for Non-Competitive Procurement (JNCP), as addressed in APM 2.206. The JNCP template may be found on the ASB website at http://fdic01/division/DOA/buying/acquisitiondocuments/acqdocs.html.
The Contracting Officer must select an appropriate number of potential sources, normally a minimum of three (3), to ensure adequate competition and must prepare a solicitation list that identifies the firms to be solicited. The methods for identifying potential sources are outlined in PGI 3.105. The Contracting Officer must provide the Office of Minority and Women Inclusion (ONWI) the opportunity to furnish a list of potential sources for actions greater than $100,000.
Before including any firm on a solicitation list, the Contracting Officer must consult the Debarred Vendors List, FDIC Division of Administration: Debarred Vendors, found at http://fdic01/division/DOA/buying/fitness/debarredvendors.html and the Federal Government Excluded Parties List System at http://www.epls.gov, to ensure that none of the firms being solicited are suspended or excluded from FDIC contracting.
The Contracting Office must ensure that the contract is awarded to the offeror whose proposal provides the best value. To help accomplish this, the Contracting Officer and the Program Office must jointly develop a SSP. The SSP must clearly and succinctly express the source selection methodology, the evaluation factors, including their relative order of importance, and identify Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) members, if known.
A separate SSP is not required, if all required elements of the SSP can be adequately defined in the Acquisition Plan, as discussed in APM 2.1.
When the acquisition requires a technical evaluation, the Program Office must identify a TEP to review and evaluate proposals received in response to an RFP. The TEP members are appointed by the Contracting Officer. At a minimum, the TEP must be identified prior to the receipt of proposals. The size and membership of the TEP are at the discretion of the Contracting Officer, and depends upon the size and complexity of the requirement.
The TEP is usually made up of three voting members, although more or less may be designated. One member must be designated as the TEP Chairperson. If the Program Office requests the use of a single evaluator, or if a supervisor of a TEP member serves on the TEP, the Contracting Officer must obtain approval of the respective ASB Assistant Director. The TEP may also include representatives from outside the Division(s) acquiring the goods or service, such as representatives from the Contracting Law Unit, OMWI, the Division of Information Technology, and others, as necessary for the procurement. These representatives shall be non-voting TEP members, except for OMWI representatives who, at the discretion of OMWI, may be voting TEP members. TEP members must be available for the duration of the evaluation process.
When the acquisition requires specific technical expertise, the Contracting Officer may name individuals inside or outside FDIC as TEP advisors. All TEP advisors are non-voting.
Each member of the TEP must read and sign the Confidentiality Agreement and a Conflict of Interest Certification, (found on the ASB website at http://fdic01/division/DOA/buying/acquisitiondocuments/acqdocs.html) and submit them to the Contracting Officer for inclusion in the official contract file, prior to beginning the technical evaluation process. If for any reason, a member cannot evaluate a proposal objectively, that member must alert the Contracting Officer immediately and be removed from the panel.
The purpose of the RFP is to provide potential offerors the information they need to respond to FDIC requirements. The RFP must provide guidance to potential offerors on both proposal format and content, and must contain guidance on the evaluation factors that is consistent with the SSP.
Each solicitation specifies a date and time for receipt of proposals. Proposals must be submitted by the date and time specified in the RFP to be considered for award.
The Contracting Officer is responsible for all proposals in the possession of FDIC and must safeguard them from unauthorized disclosure throughout the source selection process. This includes disclosure to FDIC employees who are not TEP members, other offerors, or other individuals not involved in the source selection process. The Contracting Officer must prepare and maintain a list of the proposals received, including the date and time received, for the official contract file.
Proposals received after the due date and time specified in the RFP are late and are not to be considered unless received before award is made and the Contracting Officer, with approval of the respective ASB Assistant Director, determines that accepting the late proposal is in the best interest of FDIC. The Contracting Officer must document all exceptions in the official contract file. If the proposal is late and not accepted, the Contracting Officer must notify the offeror in writing.
Proposals received after the date and time specified in the RFP are not considered late if:
(1) It was sent by registered or certified mail not later than the fifth (5th) calendar day prior to the date specified for receipt of offers (e.g., an offer submitted in response to a RFP requiring receipt of offers by the twentieth (20th) of the month must have been mailed on the fifteenth (15th) or earlier); or
(2) It was sent by mail and it is determined by FDIC that the late receipt was due solely to mishandling by FDIC after receipt at an FDIC installation.
Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or sub-factors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. The Contracting Officer has the right to reject proposals that do not comply with the solicitation. The Contracting Officer must document the reasons for deeming a proposal non-responsive, and obtain the respective ASB Assistant Director’s approval before eliminating it from consideration.
With Program Office concurrence, the Contracting Officer may cancel a solicitation. The Contracting Officer must send a written notice, in the form of an amendment to the RFP, to every offeror on the solicitation list.
Offerors may withdraw proposals by written notice to the Contracting Officer at any time prior to award.
The purpose of the proposal evaluation process is to assess each offeror’s capability to successfully perform the requirements specified in the RFP.
The Contracting Officer must review each proposal for responsiveness to the RFP requirements, eliminating from further consideration any non-responsive proposals. The Contracting Officer then briefs the TEP regarding the technical evaluation process.
The Contracting Officer must ensure that the evaluation of proposals is completed in a timely manner and is consistent with source selection methodology and evaluation factors stated in the RFP and SSP. Awards may be made to the offeror that represents (a) the best value, or (b) the lowest price technically acceptable solution, depending on which evaluation methodology is specified in the SSP. Awards must be made within the acceptance period specified by the proposal.
The objective of the mission capability (technical) evaluation is to determine which of the offerors is most qualified to perform. The factors and sub-factors are the means to accomplishing that objective. Mission capability ratings are assigned based on the strengths and weaknesses in the offeror's proposal. Mission capability is evaluated using the approaches discussed in PGI 3.210(a).
The Contracting Officer and the Program Office must evaluate past performance in all procurements using formal contracting procedures. Past performance information may be obtained through a number of methods:
(1) Information provided by the offeror with its proposal;
(2) Information provided by other government agencies and/or commercial entities using the FDIC Past Performance Questionnaire found on the ASB website at http://fdic01/division/DOA/buying/acquisitiondocuments/acqdocs.html;
(3) Previous evaluation reports on past FDIC contracts, located in the FDIC Contractor Performance Evaluation System (see PGI 6.408(f));
(4) It is mandatory that the TEP review and consider any recent/relevant information that is available in this system;
(5) Previous evaluation reports on other government contracts, located in the National Institute of Health Contractor Performance System;
(6) Dunn and Bradstreet found at http://www.dnb.com/us; and
(7) Any other sources deemed appropriate.
Price evaluation is always required to assure the validity and reasonableness of an offeror's price proposal. Price evaluation includes a determination of reasonableness and realism of the proposed prices. The preferred method of determining price reasonableness is through effective competition.
The Contracting Officer is responsible for determining price reasonableness. The TEP is responsible for determining price realism and documenting its analysis in either the TEP Report or a written memorandum to the Contracting Officer.
The Contracting Officer communicates with offerors through two different levels of exchanges, clarifications and discussions. The level of exchange is determined by the degree of interaction necessary for the Contracting Officer to make the award.
If the award is not made based on the initial offers, then the Contracting Officer must establish a competitive range and hold discussions. The competitive range is based on the ratings of each proposal against all evaluation factors. It is comprised of the most highly rated proposals that have a reasonable chance of being selected for award, unless the range is further reduced for purposes of efficiency. If the Contracting Officer determines that a proposal is not in the competitive range, the Contracting Officer must promptly notify the offeror in writing that its proposal will not be evaluated further. The notice must include the basis for the determination and that a proposal revision will not be considered.
FDIC preference is to make an award based on initial offers. Following the initial evaluation, if there is no one successful offeror, the Contracting Officer must establish a competitive range and hold technical or price discussions, or both, with offerors. At the conclusion of discussions the Contracting Officer requests best and final offers (BAFOs).
BAFO evaluations may include a re-evaluation of the related technical proposal, or revisions or clarifications submitted by the offerors, and any changes to terms and conditions.
Once the BAFO is requested, the Contracting Officer may not re-open discussions unless available information is not adequate for contractor selection and award, or unless it is in the best interest of FDIC. Request for a second round of BAFOs requires approval by the respective ASB Assistant Director.
The Contracting Officer must document the principal elements of the source selection decision in the official contract file. The documentation includes the TEP Report and Selection Recommendation Report (SRR).
The TEP Chairperson provides the Contracting Officer a report (TEP Report), which documents the panel’s consensus ratings of each technical proposal, and the strengths and weaknesses of each by factor and subfactor. If BAFOs are received, the TEP provides an addendum to its initial TEP Report addressing the BAFO evaluation results. The TEP Report includes the price realism analysis discussed in APM 3.210, unless the TEP chooses to address its price realism review in a separate written memorandum to the Contracting Officer.
The Contracting Officer must prepare the SRR, using the TEP Report, price analysis, and any other relevant decision-making factors, such as determination of financial responsibility. The SRR explains the basis for the award recommendation.
The Contracting Officer must ensure all pre-award reviews addressed in PGI 3.215 are accomplished, and then prepare and submit the SRR for approval. Once all reviews are completed, the Contracting Officer notifies the successful offeror, and fully executes the contract with the awardee. An advance authorization letter may only be used in unusual or urgent circumstances as addressed in APM chapters 3.4 and 3.5, unless approved by the respective ASB Assistant Director.
Within fifteen (15) calendar days after award, the Contracting Officer must send a written or electronic notice of the award to all unsuccessful offerors, and provide procedures for requesting a debriefing. The debriefing provides the offerors feedback on the rationale for the source selection decision. Debriefings are not required for price-only competitions.
The Contracting Officer must select the type of contract and pricing arrangement that represents the most prudent and reasonable relationship with the contractor and minimizes cost and other risks to FDIC. Available contract types include, but are not limited to, contracts or basic ordering agreements (BOAs). Receivership basic ordering agreements, a unique type of contract which is similar to a BOA, may only be used for contracts in support of the Division of Resolutions and Receiverships’s efforts related to failing or failed financial institutions.
Available pricing arrangements include, but are not limited to firm fixed price, fixed unit prices, time and materials, and labor hours. Any of these types of pricing arrangements may include some cost reimbursement features, where the contractor is reimbursed for actual costs, and may also include performance incentives such as monetary and contract extension incentives, as addressed in PGI 5.7.
The Contracting Officer may use any combination of contract type and pricing arrangement suitable to the procurement. The objective is to select a contract type and pricing arrangement that results in reasonable contractor risk and provides the contractor with the greatest incentive for efficient and economical performance.
This chapter covers the policies associated with other contracting methods available to FDIC Contracting Officers, including use of mandatory sources (Federal Prison Industries, Inc. [FPI] and AbilityOne), and optional awards under Federal Supply Schedules (FSS).
Federal Prison Industries, Inc. – The FPI (commonly referred to by its trade name, UNICOR), is a wholly-owned government corporation established by the United States Congress on June 23, 1934. Its mission is to employ and provide job skills training to the greatest practicable number of inmates confined within the Federal Bureau of Prisons. It utilizes prisoners to make products and provide services, mainly for the United States Government.
Federal Supply Schedule – The FSS program (also known as the General Services Administration (GSA) Schedules Program or the Multiple Award Schedule Program) is directed and managed by GSA and provides federal agencies with a simplified process for obtaining commercial supplies and services at prices associated with volume buying.
AbilityOne (formerly known as the Javits-Wagner-O’Day [JWOD]) – A program under JWOD (41 U.S.C. §§46-48c) that requires federal agencies to purchase certain goods and services from qualified workshops that employ people who are blind or severely disabled.
Besides simplified procurement and formal contracting, Contracting Officers may use a number of other contracting methods to award contracts, including awards through mandatory sources (FPI and AbilityOne), or optional sources such as FSS.
(1) FPI (18 U.S.C. §4124); and
Title 18 USC §4124 directs federal departments and agencies to purchase “prison-made products,” at not to exceed current market prices, if available and meet the agencies requirements. The Contracting Officer must ensure that prices paid for goods or services available from FPI do not exceed current market prices. If the FPI item is not comparable to goods available from the private sector, the Contracting Officer may purchase the item from any other available source.
JWOD (41 U.S.C. §46-48c) requires that federal agencies purchase certain goods and services from qualified workshops that employ people who are blind or severely disabled. The Committee for Purchase from People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled determines which supplies and services must be purchased and their price.
Goods and services must be ordered from the central nonprofit agency designated on the Procurement List found on the AbilityOne website at http://www.abilityone.gov/procurement_list/index.html, or from the workshops concerned, and may not be purchased from commercial sources unless authorized by the agency or the Committee for Purchase from People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled, which is authorized to grant an exception based on time and volume requirements. When the Contracting Officer and Program Office determine that the goods available through AbilityOne do not satisfy FDIC requirements, the Contracting Officer may request an exception using the procedures at PGI 3.304(b).
Once a product or service is on the Procurement List, FDIC must buy it from the organization designated by the Committee for Purchase from People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled, until FDIC no longer has requirements for that item, or until a nonprofit agency employing people with severe disabilities can no longer furnish that item.
The policies and procedures of this section do not apply to goods that are available from both AbilityOne and FPI. If goods are available from both mandatory sources, the Contracting Officer must procure them from FPI, as addressed in APM 3.304(a) and PGI 3.304(a).
FDIC is an optional user of GSA FSS contracts and may place orders against them when it is in the best interest of FDIC. In order to ensure fair opportunity among FSS contractors, the Contracting Officer must follow the procedures provided at PGI 3.305 when placing orders against FSS contracts. Orders placed against FSS contracts must comply with all terms and conditions of the FSS contract.
This chapter covers the roles, responsibilities and authorities of FDIC Contracting Officers and other officials who support the FDIC Division of Resolutions and Receivership (DRR), as it plans for the resolution of a financial institution that may fail, conducts the resolution upon the closing, or performs the duties of receiver in the immediate post-closing period. It also provides the policy to be used to expedite awards in support of the related DRR efforts. Contracts under this chapter may be awarded in either the corporate or receivership capacity.
Advance Authorization Letter – See definition at APM 3.202.
Closing – Removal of a financial institution’s charter by its chartering authority, due to insolvency and/or its operating in an unsafe and unsound manner. The chartering authority usually appoints FDIC as receiver. FDIC arranges for the transfer of the deposit liabilities to a healthy financial institution, or begins the payment of the insured deposit liabilities. If a purchase and assumption agreement is reached with the assuming institution, some or all of the assets of the failed institution may be included. As receiver, FDIC then begins liquidating the remaining assets.
Receiver – The role FDIC assumes, when appointed by a chartering authority, to liquidate the assets of a failed institution and distribute the proceeds to the approved creditors.
Resolution – The FDIC process for managing its deposit insurance and other statutory obligations related to failing financial institutions. FDIC acts to dispose of the assets and liabilities of a failing financial institution through sale (to the maximum extent possible) and at the least cost to the insurance fund. It spans a period from the time FDIC receives notification of a potential financial institution failure, through the time the institution is closed by its primary regulator and FDIC is appointed to act as receiver.
The FDIC mission requires it to minimize the effect that a failed financial institution has on the nation’s economy and financial system. DRR is responsible for the effective and efficient resolution of financial institution failures.
Delays in awarding contracts could increase the risk of negative impact on the nation’s economy. Therefore, in addition to using existing contracts, two types of accelerated contracting procedures have been developed for meeting the contracting needs related to financial institution failures when insufficient time is available to follow established contracting procedures; one is expedited contracting, the other is emergency contracting. Which procedure is used depends on the urgency of the financial institution failure, that is, the amount of time DRR has to prepare before the closing of the financial institution occurs. The Contracting Officer has the discretion, based on exchanges with DRR officials, to choose the most appropriate contracting approach. Both are treated in this chapter and the related PGI chapter.
Both DRR and the ASB rely on advance planning to reduce the need for expedited or emergency contracting procedures to award contracts. While emergencies can arise that require their use, expedited and emergency contracting procedures are not to be used when there is sufficient time to follow established contracting procedures.
The DRR Director, or a Deputy Director, must initiate the process for implementing expedited or emergency contracting in support of potential financial institution failures by a notification to the ASB Deputy Director, or an ASB Assistant Director. No activity under these categories of contracting is authorized without DRR notification.
In order to obtain the goods and services needed to support DRR efforts in relation to the anticipated closing of a failed financial institution, Contracting Officers must use existing contracts to the maximum extent practical. Contracts put in place as part of DRR and ASB advance planning, such as the Receivership Assistance Contract, are the tools of choice for Contracting Officers to use to most quickly and efficiently award task orders and supply DRR with the contractor support critical to its mission. Both expedited and emergency procedures may also be used with existing contracts.
Contracting Officers and others with delegated authority can also use purchase cards and convenience checks to obtain the goods and services needed to support the anticipated closing of a failed financial institution.
Expedited contracting is the ASB process for accelerating the award of contracts in support of DRR activities when either the timeframe for resolution, or the closing of a failing financial institution, does not call for emergency contracting procedures, or there is adequate time to accomplish a streamlined competition in support of the DRR requirement.
Contracting Officers use expedited contracting procedures in support of DRR when existing contracts cannot meet the need for goods and services and when time and other constraints do not allow for the use of established FDIC contracting practices. Expedited procedures focus on providing optimum contract support for DRR’s critical mission, while using competition to award contracts to the extent that time allows, as discussed in PGI 3.406.
Contracting Officers use emergency contracting procedures when the time constraints associated with a resolution or a potential closing do not allow for use of expedited or normal contracting procedures, as discussed in PGI 3.407.
The contracting procedures described in this chapter and the PGI may be used with expedited or emergency contracting, as required. These procedures are not intended to limit ideas or creativity in designing a contracting process to meet the immediate need. The Contracting Officer has full discretion to determine the appropriate procedures unique to each requirement.
An advance authorization letter may be issued under either expedited or emergency contracting procedures to speed the award process and initiate critical performance.
A formal contract must be issued within sixty (60) calendar days to replace an advance authorization letter, if one is used.
In the case of emergency contracting procedures, documentation requirements, including preparation of the Justification for Non-Competitive Procurement and Price Evaluation Memorandum or Selection Recommendation Report, are suspended for the immediate crisis period. PGI 3.411 details further documentation requirements.
This chapter covers the policies relating to the roles, responsibilities and authorities of Contracting Officers and other officials when issuing contracts under emergency situations as defined below. These contracts are generally issued under corporate capacity, however, in unique circumstances may be issued under other authorities.
Emergency Situation –