|  
 The
              Peoples Bank & Trust Company
 
 From:
              Tia Breedlove [mailto:tiab@thepeopleplace.com]
 Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 6:20 PM
 To: Comments; regs.comments@federalreserve.gov; regs.comments@occ.treas.gov;
regs.comments@ots.treas.gov
 Subject: EGRPRA
 From: Tia BreedloveDate: April 19, 2004
 To: Comments
 Subject: Reduce Regulatory Burden from Lending-Related Consumer Protection
  Rules
 Thank you for
              giving us the opportunity to express our views on some burdensome
              consumer protection rules. Our comments are as follows: • National
              Flood Insurance Reform Act of 1994 requires that all lenders provide
              notification to the borrower, “Notice of Special Flood Hazard
              and Availability of Federal Disaster Relief Assistance”,
              when the building securing the loan is located in a Special Flood
              Hazard Area (SFHA). This notice is required on loan originations
              as well as refinances. At the time of the refinance when the borrower
              is aware that the property is located in a SFHA because they have
              an active flood policy in effect, giving the notice and giving
              the notice a reasonable time (10 days prior to closing) is burdensome. If all insurance
              is through FEMA and the same cost to the customer, why can’t
              we force place insurance on a note that requires flood insurance?
              The cost to the borrower should be the same. • RESPA
              requires the Servicing Disclosure be given to the customer at the
              time of application if in person and within 3 days if by phone.
              Since these disclosures originally pertained to home purchase loans
              but now are required on all residential mortgage transactions,
              why can’t the Servicing disclosure be given within the 3
              day period as is the Good Faith and the Truth-in-Lending. • Reg B
              new guidelines effective April 15, 2004 require confirmation of
              a joint application yet the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac applications
              do not required any more than joint signatures. If both borrowers
              sign the application, their signatures should confirm the request
              for a joint application. Initialing the request for a joint application
              at the top of the application and signing the application seems
              to be double confirmation and burdensome. Thank you for
              allowing me to express my concerns of these particular regulation
              issues. Sincerely, Tia Breedlove,
              Asst. V.P.Compliance/CRA Officer
 The Peoples Bank & Trust Company
 Tupelo, MS
   
  |