| October 14, 2003
 
 
| 
Public 
            Information RoomOffice of 
            the Comptroller of the Currency
 250 E Street, SW,
            Mail stop 1-5
 Washington, D.C. 20219
 Attention:  Docket No. 03-18
 | Regulation Comments Chief Counsel's Office
 Office of Thrift Supervision
 1700 G. Street, N.W.
 Washington, DC 20522
 Attention: No.  03-35
 |  
| Ms. Jennifer J. Johnson, Secretary Board of Governors of the
 Federal Reserve
            System
 20th Street and Constitution Ave, NW
 Washington, D.C. 20551
 Docket No. OP-1155
 | Robert E. Feldman Executive Secretary
 Attention: Comments/OES
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 550 17th Street, N.W.
 Washington, D.C. 20429
 |  Re: Interagency Guidance on Response Programs for Unauthorized Access 
        to Customer Information and Customer Notice, Docket Nos. 03-18 (OCC), 
        OP1155 (FRB), 03-35 (OTS)  Ladies and Gentlemen:  On behalf of the National Coalition on Privacy and E-Commerce, we are 
        pleased to have the opportunity to submit a comment on the proposed 
        Interagency Guidance on Response Programs for Unauthorized Access to 
        Customer Information and Customer Notice ("Proposed Guidance" or 
        "Guidance").  The National Business Coalition on E-Commerce and Privacy is 
        comprised of nationally recognized companies from diverse economic 
        sectors dedicated to the pursuit of a balanced and uniform national 
        policy pertaining to electronic commerce and privacy. Our member 
        companies are top competitors in the e-commerce marketplace, and are 
        strongly committed to ensuring the privacy of our customers, both 
        on-line and off-line.  Overall, we believe the Proposed Guidance is a thoughtful and 
        reasoned attempt to prevent unauthorized access and to mitigate the 
        adverse consequences of such access. We would nevertheless urge the 
        agencies to make clear that the Proposed Guidance would apply only to 
        consumer information and not to information from or about business or 
        commercial customers. We believe that the Proposed Guidance intends this 
        result, but in order to ensure that the Guidance has the same scope as 
        the law and regulations on which it relies, a clarification would be 
        useful.  The Proposed Guidance is clear that it is based on and interprets 
        section 501(b) of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, and, additionally, that it 
        interprets the Interagency Guidelines Establishing Standards for 
        Safeguarding Customer Information ("Security Guidelines"). Section 
        501(b) directs the relevant agencies to establish standards that insure 
        the security of "customer records and information" and that protect 
        against threats, hazards, or unauthorized access to such records.1 
        The Security Guidelines represent the first set of standards under 
        section 501(b) and contain a comprehensive set of standards to protect 
        customer information.2  Although Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act does not itself define 
        "customer records and information," the Security Guidelines define the 
        term as "any record containing nonpublic personal information [as 
        defined in the banking agencies' privacy rules] about a customer."3 
        "Customer" is defined in those rules as a "consumer who has a customer 
        relationship,"4 and a "consumer" is an "individual who 
        obtains or has obtained a financial product or service ... that is to be 
        used primarily for personal, family, or household purposes."5 
        These definitions do not purport to encompass commercial information 
        that an institution has received from or about a business (whether that 
        business is a corporation or a sole proprietorship).  The Proposed Guidance is designed to protect "customer information," 
        which the Guidance notes is "the same term used in the Security 
        Guidelines." The Proposed Guidance goes on to state that customer 
        information "means any record containing nonpublic personal information 
        whether in paper, electronic, or other form, maintained by or on behalf 
        of the institution."6 Accordingly, we believe that the 
        Proposed Guidance is limited to information received from or about 
        individuals in relation to products or services obtained for personal, 
        family, or household reasons. Other information regarding products or 
        services that have a commercial or business purpose is not so covered.
         This distinction makes eminent sense. The laws and regulations on 
        which the Proposed Guidance is based make the same distinction, and 
        there are long-established public policy reasons for treating business 
        customers differently from consumers, among them that business customers 
        have greater resources and knowledge to protect their information.  We would ask the agencies to confirm specifically in the preamble to 
        the release of final guidelines that the guidelines do not address 
        information received from or about a business or other commercial 
        enterprise.  John A. Schall Executive Director
 The National Business Coalition on E-Commerce and Privacy
 Washington, DC
 
 1 See 15 U.S.C. § 6801(b). 2 See 66 Fed. Reg. 8616 (Feb. 1, 2001).
 3 Id. at 8633 (Feb. 1, 2001).
 4 See, e.g., 12 C.F.R. § 40.3(h).
 5 See, e.g., 12 C.F.R. § 40.3(e)(1).
 6 68 Fed. Reg. at 47958 n. 3.
 
 |