Skip Header

Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation

Each depositor insured to at least $250,000 per insured bank



Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations




FDIC Federal Register Citations

October 21, 2002

Robert E. Feldman
Executive Secretary
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
550 17th Street N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20429

ATTN: Comments/OES

Re: Proposal on Insurance Eligibility of Limited Liability Companies

Dear Mr. Feldman:

The Kansas Bankers Association (KBA) appreciates the opportunity to comment on such an important and progressive proposal. The KBA is a nonprofit organization fortunate to have 367 of the 371 Kansas banks as members. Included in its membership are many community banks as well as larger, regional banks and holding companies.

As you are well aware, the key to this proposal is the statutory requirement that only state chartered banks that are “incorporated” under state law are eligible for federal deposit insurance. This proposal seeks to clarify the term, “incorporated”, so that it encompasses not just the legal entities identified as corporations, but also the legal entities organized as Limited Liability Companies (LLC’s), if they meet certain criteria.

The legal entity known as the LLC has become a very popular form of organization for many types of businesses. The attractiveness of the LLC is that it grants the owners the limited liability protections similar to that of the corporate shareholder, taxes the owners (under the federal tax code) as partnerships and contains no restrictions on the size and classes of owners as does the Subchapter S corporation.

The proposal identifies four corporate attributes that must be present in order for a state bank chartered as an LLC to be considered to be “incorporated” for purposes of federal deposit insurance. These four attributes are:

~ Perpetual Succession. This is necessary so that depositors can be assured that events such as bankruptcy, or the death or disability or an owner will have no effect on the existence of the financial institution;

~ Centralized Management. Having managers that operate as a Board of Directors or in substantially the same manner is important in aiding in the supervision of these banks;

~ Limited Liability. This encourages the stability of capital as it limits the exposure of each owner to the amount of the owner’s investment.

~ Free Transferability of Ownership. Management and voting rights must be transferable without the consent of any other owner so as to attract new capital.

These four attributes are designed to bring together the regulatory treatment of banks as LLC’s with the regulatory principles that apply to bank organized under a more traditional, corporate structure.
The KBA is in strong support of this proposal. We believe that this proposal is an important first step in enhancing the competitive abilities of many banks.

Undoubtedly, this proposal will allow more banks to achieve a more favorable tax treatment. Many of our community banks have been ineligible for Subchapter S status due to limitations on the number and types of owners allowed. It becomes increasingly difficult for Kansas banks to remain competitive with other tax-advantaged financial institutions such as the credit unions and the farm credit system. We believe it is in the public’s best interests to keep all financial institutions competing on an equal basis. This proposal will help in that endeavor.

In addition, we believe it is important to allow banks the same range of corporate tax structures as other businesses have available to them. Banks compete with a wide variety of institutions – many of whom already have the ability to choose to organize as an LLC. Although a fairly new form of entity, LLC’s are now considered one of the fastest growing forms of corporate identity. Banks have shown that they perform well under other types of business structures and should be allowed to pursue the identity of an LLC.

Thank you, once again, for the opportunity to comment on this proposal. For the reasons stated above, the KBA strongly supports this proposal as a positive first step in allowing banks to continue to be competitive.
 

Sincerely,
James S. Maag
Executive Vice President

Kathleen Taylor Olsen
Associate General Counsel
 

 

Last Updated 10/22/2002 regs@fdic.gov

Skip Footer back to content