Home > News & Events > Inactive Financial Institution Letters
Inactive Financial Institution Letters
Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council
Uniform Bank Performance Reports
Over the past three years, the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) Task Force on Surveillance Systems has substantially changed the distribution procedures for Uniform Bank Performance Reports (UBPRs). This letter is intended to update users on the current distribution practices for UBPRs and to describe the related statistical reports that are available on the UBPR website. It also details some significant changes to the March 31, 2004, version of the UBPR that will affect peer group statistics and percentile rankings for commercial banks. These changes reduce the number of asset-based commercial bank peer groups from 24 to 15 and introduce three new peer groups for de novo banks.
The UBPR is produced quarterly from Call Report data submitted by banks. The UBPR is usually published on the public website within 35 days of a Call Report due date. For example, the March 31, 2004, Call Report is filed by banks on April 30, 2004. The March 2004 UBPR should be available on June 3, 2004. Please see the UBPR section of www.ffiec.gov for a complete schedule.
To supplement the UBPR, several other reports are also available on the FFIEC website under "All UBPR Statistical Reports." These reports include:
The FFIEC Task Force on Surveillance Systems will implement two changes to the peer group structure used in the UBPR effective with the March 31, 2004, version of the report. The first combines several asset-based commercial bank peer groups. The second replaces the current de novo bank peer group with three "class-of" peer groups.
The current peer group structure is multi-tiered. Financial institutions are first segregated into one of four broad groups. These groups include commercial banks, FDIC-insured savings banks, credit card specialty banks, and bankers' banks. Within the first three groups, institutions are then subdivided by asset size. The commercial bank group is further divided based on location (urban or rural determined by whether the bank is located in a Metropolitan Statistical Area) and number of branches. For the most part, the asset-based peer groups have produced reasonable benchmarks to gauge bank performance. In addition, analysis conducted by the task force shows that key financial measures for overhead, margins, capitalization, and profitability continue to differ depending on bank location (urban or rural) and number of branches.
However, the asset ranges used to define commercial peer groups have remained substantially unchanged since their inception 20 years ago. Additionally, the number of banking institutions has declined significantly. As a result, some current peer groups now contain less than 100 institutions. In some instances, the resulting peer group statistics have proven to be less reliable because of the impact a few institutions can have on averaged ratios. The planned consolidation of peer groups is designed to address these distortions.
The changes will only affect commercial bank peer groups. The number of commercial bank asset-based peer groups will decline from 24 to 15. For example, banks in current peer groups 1 (assets > $10 billion) and 2 (assets between $3 and $10 billion) will be combined into new peer group 1 (assets > $3 billion). Current peer groups 15 through 24, which have a variety of asset ranges below $50 million, will be combined into four new peer groups that divide banks with less than $50 million in assets based on their location and number of branches. Changes to commercial bank asset-based peer groups will be made retroactively for all quarters.
Additionally, a more fundamental change to the way peer group statistics are calculated for de novo banks will be implemented. Previously, all newly chartered banks were placed in peer group 25 for three years or until they reached $50 million in assets. A "class-of" structure for de novo banks would group banks by the year of their opening. De novo banks would be compared to their "class-of peers" for five years, or until attaining $750 million in assets. After five years, these banks would be moved to the appropriate asset-based peer group. Initially, the class-of structure will span three years, i.e., banks opened in 2001, 2002 and 2003. Additional classes will be added until five separate de novo peer groups are attained.
Also, see the spread sheet at http://www.ffiec.gov/pdf/ubpr/revised-peer-stats.xls
for a detailed comparison of current and revised peer groups.
For de novo banks, the task force believes that the proposed changes will provide a marked improvement in usefulness of the benchmark statistics. Under the current structure, the peer group averages reflect a static composite bank that is 1.5 years old, with loss operations and a high capital ratio. The new structure will compare banks that are at similar maturity levels. Basing the comparisons of banks within the de novo categories on the degree to which they have become "seasoned" and overcome the initial expenses of opening should strengthen the UBPR's identification of outliers.
Questions or comments regarding the UBPR may be addressed to UBPR Coordinator John Smullen by email at firstname.lastname@example.org or by phone at (703) 516-5732.
# # #
Distribution: Insured Commercial Banks and FDIC-Supervised Savings Banks
|Last Updated email@example.com|