Skip to main content
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government
Dot gov
The .gov means it’s official. 
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
Https
The site is secure. 
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Federal Register Publications

FDIC Federal Register Citations



Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations




FDIC Federal Register Citations

 

Godbold Financial Associates


July 19, 2004

Re: Comments Interagency
Guidelines on Overdraft Protection Programs
Volume 69, #109 of the Federal Register - June 7, 2004

I am pleased to respond in behalf of the Overdraft Protection Program, Godbold Financial Associates of which I am president is affiliated with Impact Financial Services of Little Rock, Arkansas. Godbold Financial has been selling and implementing the Overdraft Privilege in South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia, Tennessee, Maryland, and Delaware for the past 4 years. We currently represent 77 banks in these areas.

My background in banking began in 1963 with C&S Bank of South Carolina and continued through until I retired in 1998 which included President of Bank of Gaffney, Gaffney, South Carolina, President of Lincoln Bank in Lincolnton, North Carolina, and President of Carolina State Bank in Shelby, North Carolina. I was involved in the initial development of Lincoln Bank and Carolina State Bank, which were denovo banks.

My experience in community banking has helped me relate to the financial institution that we represent and more particular to their customers. The Overdraft Privilege has proven to be very good and safe for financial institution. The customer needs and appreciates the product. The customer feels like the financial institution trusts them for the small limit provided and appreciates the financial institution for proving the safety net to avoid returned checks, additional costs, and embarrassment of having to pick up returned checks. This is one of the best retail products that I have seen in my years of banking. Win for the financial institution - Win for the customer.

COMMENTS:

CHARGE OFF IN 30 DAYS

Charging off in 30 days is too fast. It is my strong recommendation that charge off should be at 60 days. Sixty days will only increase the risk to the financial institution slightly. Impact’s collection process starts at 30 days therefore a customer has not received a collection letter until this time. The customer must be given time to respond to the 30 day letter. Upon receipt of this letter a large number of customers will clear their account with a deposit or they will request to be placed on a repayment plan.

By charging off in 30 days the financial institution will have to cancel ATM/Debit Card, notify Chexsystems, etc. When the customer clears there account (which happens frequently) the financial institution must reverse the steps they took at charge off. This is bulky for the financial institution and bad for the customer. 60 DAYS to charge off will eliminate a tremendous amount of extra work for the financial institution. To counter the risk the financial institutions should set up a reserve specifically for the Overdraft Privilege and Repayment Plans, using actual experience to determine the amount.

The 60 days along with the reserve should be sufficient and it will save the financial institution a tremendous amount of time and money. Not to mention the inconvenience to the customer to reopen their checking account and replace their ATM/Debit cards.

UNUSED COMMITMENT REPORTING

It is my opinion an unused commitment report serves no purpose. It will make it appear that the risk is much greater than it really is. Using a reserve account should satisfy the fears of the general public and the regulators.

FREE ACCOUNT DISCLOSURES

I do not believe marketing free checking with the Overdraft Privilege is misleading when adequate disclaimers are made and given. This is no different from a financial institution marketing free checking and requiring a direct deposit to get the free account. Adequate disclaimer is the answer.

NOTICES UPON FIRST AND SUBSEQUENT OVERDRAFTS

I suggest that this section be deleted. All of the financial institution we are responsible for their Overdraft Privilege (77 banks) use their main processing system to provide the notices when checks have been paid in an overdraft status, this allows the customer to know that they are overdrawn and how much. To modify this notice specifically for the Overdraft Privilege could be very expensive and in most cases the operating system will not allow multiple types of notices plus many are limited to the number of characters that can be put on the notices. This would be a requirement that most community financial institution would not be able to meet.

REPAYMENT PLANS

It has been our experience when a customer signs up on a formalized basis for a repayment plan 80% will pay it off as agreed. To charge this off in 30 days requires the financial institution to close the account for the customer when most customers need a checking account. One of the major purposes of the repayment plan is to allow the customer to retain their account while drafts are being made against the account. To charge off the account in 30 days is not in the best interest of the customer since 80% of these customers would retain their account with the financial institution in good standing. Most checking account customers are good people that want to pay the financial institution.

CONCLUSIONS

I am pleased that the regulators are coming together to form guidelines that will be good for the financial institutions and their customers. The Overdraft Privilege product has proven to be good for the financial institution and the customer. We have just gone through a lengthy recession and the Overdraft Privilege program held up well. The Overdraft Privilege actually performed better during the recession since the financial institution customers needed the Overdraft Privilege more and the financial institution experience only a slight increase in charge offs. The Overdraft Privilege appears to be a minor safety and soundness issue since this is such a small part of the financial institution’s overall risk and reserves would balance the risk.

Another issue that was not in the potential guidelines is the use of the Overdraft Privilege at the ATM and Point of Sale. Electronic banking is becoming a major way of banking for the customer. It is important that the customer be able to access their account for the Overdraft Privilege at the ATM and Point of Sale. We do support not showing the Overdraft Privilege limit in the available balance at the ATMs. This can be misleading to customers.

John J. Godbold
President
Godbold Financial Associates
(affiliate of IMPACT Financial Services)
PO Box 37540
Rock Hill, SC 29732



Last Updated 07/20/2004 regs@fdic.gov

Last Updated: August 4, 2024