Skip to main content
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government
Dot gov
The .gov means it’s official. 
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
Https
The site is secure. 
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Federal Register Publications

FDIC Federal Register Citations



Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations




FDIC Federal Register Citations

MINNESOTA BANKERS ASSOCIATION

March 25, 2004

Robert E. Feldman
Executive Secretary
Attention: Comments
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
550 17th St NW
Washington D.C. 20429

Attn: Docket No. 04-06

Dear Mr. Feldman:

The Minnesota Bankers Association (MBA) is pleased to have the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to the Community Reinvestment Act. The MBA is a trade group representing nearly 500 Minnesota banks. The MBA membership includes a broad range of banks, from independent community banks to regional banking organizations operating in multiple states.

The MBA strongly supports the Federal banking agencies’ proposal to increase the asset size of banks eligible for the small bank CRA examination and to eliminate the holding company size requirement. Banks’ regulatory burden has increased greatly over the past few years with the passage of such laws as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the USA PATRIOT Act, and the FACT Act. Most of the MBA’s member banks are not large enough to afford a full-time compliance officer and while they understand the need for the myriad of banking regulations, they find complying with them extremely burdensome. Changing the asset threshold to $500 million will decrease the regulatory burden for many of our member banks, leaving more time for bank employees to meet the credit needs of their community.

Eliminating the holding company size requirement will also reduce the regulatory burden for many of our member banks. As noted in the Proposed Rules, small banks with sizable holding companies find complying with CRA requirements just as difficult as small banks without sizable holding companies. When examined under the large bank requirements based on their holding company status, small banks that are part of sizable holding companies are at a competitive disadvantage. Such banks should be measured with their peers, not put on the same playing field as large banks.

We thank you very much for considering our input on this proposed revision. If you have any questions concerning this comment letter, do not hesitate to call me at (952) 835-3900.

Sincerely,

Tess Rice
General Counsel
Minnesota Bankers Association

Last Updated 04/05/2004 regs@fdic.gov

Last Updated: August 4, 2024