Skip to main content
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government
Dot gov
The .gov means it’s official. 
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
Https
The site is secure. 
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Federal Register Publications

FDIC Federal Register Citations



Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations




FDIC Federal Register Citations


From: Sandra Rosenblith [mailto:SRosenblith@liscnet.org]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 3:35 PM
To: Comments
Subject: RIN 3064-AC50

Re: RIN 3064-AC50

Gentlemen:

I am a lawyer who helped draft the original CRA regulations adopted
unanimously by the FDIC and three other major federal financial
regulatory agencies. In 2002, I celebrated the 25th anniversary of CRA
and the tremendous positive change it has produced, i.e., $1.5 trillion
in private capital invested to benefit low and moderate income people
and communities.

Having worked in community development for the nearly three decades
since, I've seen the real difference CRA makes in peoples' lives.
CRA has stimulated banks to help finance hundreds of thousands of
affordable homes and tens of thousands of small businesses, farms and
facilities like supermarkets, shopping centers and industrial parks as
well as childcare centers, medical clinics and churches. As a result,
whole city neighborhoods and small towns have revived and thrived.

CRA works. It is essential fuel for what President Bush calls the
Ownership Society. No banks have failed making CRA investments. In
fact, many have grown as the people and communities benefiting from CRA
prospered.

I strongly oppose the proposed changes in the CRA regulations. They
aren't broke, and they don't need fixing. The proposed changes will
be especially hurtful to rural communities, even whole mainly rural
states. For example, if the proposed rule is adopted, Alaska, Arizona,
Idaho, Minnesota, Montana, New Mexico, West Virginia and Wyoming won't
have a single FDIC regulated bank subject to full CRA examination. 34
other states will have five or fewer covered lenders.

Rural areas are poorer than metropolitan areas and they are served by
fewer lenders. It is especially important to retain the requirement
that rural banks help meet the credit needs of low and moderate income
places and people. Access to bank financing is particularly important
to them because other capital is a very scarce commodity.

Respectfully,

Sandra Rosenblith
Chevy Chase, MD

 

Last Updated 09/15/2004 regs@fdic.gov

Last Updated: August 4, 2024