| First Bank & Trust East Texas
 
 Mr. Robert E. Feldman
 Executive Secretary
 Attention: Comments/Legal ESS
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 550 17th Street, NW
 Washington, DC 20429
 Re: RIN Number 3064-AC50: FDIC Proposed Increase in the Threshold
              for the Small Bank CRA Streamlined Examination
 Dear Sir or Madam: I am Jay Shands
              of First Bank & Trust East Texas located in
            Diboll, Texas, a community of just over 5,000 residents. My bank
            has assets of $540,000,000 and is currently subject ot the large
            bank CRA exam procedures. . I am writing to strongly support the
            FDIC’s proposal to raise the threshold for the streamlined
            small bank CRA examination to $1 billion without regard to the size
            of the bank’s holding company. This would greatly relieve the
            regulatory burden imposed on many small banks such as my own under
            the current regulation, which are required to meet the standards
            imposed on the nation’s largest $1 trillion banks. I understand
            that this is not an exemption from CRA and that my bank would still
            have to help meet the credit needs of its entire community and be
            evaluated by my regulator. However, I believe that this would lower
            my current regulatory burden by about 750 man hours a year and reduce
            the cost of outside services provided for compliance by about $10,000
            per year. I also support
              the addition of a community development criterion to the small
              bank examination
              for larger community banks. It appears
            to be a significant improvement over the investment test. As FDIC
            examiners know, it has proven extremely difficult for small banks,
            especially those in rural areas, to find appropriate CRA qualified
            investments in their communities. Many small banks have had to make
            regional or statewide investments that are extremely unlikely to
            ever benefit the banks’ own communities. That was certainly
            not intent of Congress when it enacted CRA. Prior to our last exam
            we spent a great deal of time attempting to locate investments within
            our community and were unable to do so. While we did make qualifying
            investments they did not directly benefit our community and we did
            not receive full credit for them in our last exam.  An additional
              reason to support the FDIC’s CD criterion is
            that it significantly reduces the current regulation’s “cliff
            effect.” Today, when a small bank goes over $250 million, it
            must completely reorganize its CRA program and begin a massive new
            reporting, monitoring and investment program. If the FDIC adopts
            its proposal, a state nonmember bank would move from the small bank
            examination to an expanded but still streamlined small bank examination,
            with the flexibility to mix Community Development loans, services
            and investments to meet the new CD criterion. This would be far more
            appropriate to the size of the bank, and far better than subjecting
            the community bank to the same large bank examination that applies
            to $1 trillion banks. This more graduated transition to the large
            bank examination is a significant improvement over the current regulation.  I strongly oppose
              making the CD criterion a separate test from the bank’s overall CRA evaluation. For a community bank, CD lending
            is not significantly different from the provision of credit to the
            entire community. The current small bank test considers the institution’s
            overall lending in its community. The addition of a category of CD
            lending (and services to aid lending and investments as a substitute
            for lending) fits well within the concept of serving the whole community.
            A separate test would create an additional CD obligation and regulatory
            burden that would erode the benefit of the streamlined exam.  I strongly support
              the FDIC’s proposal to change the definition
            of “community development” from only focusing on low-
            and moderate-income area residents to including rural residents.
            I think that this change in the definition will go a long way toward
            eliminating the current distortions in the regulation. We caution
            the FDIC to provide a definition of “rural” that will
            not be subject to misuse to favor just affluent residents of rural
            areas.  In conclusion, I believe that the FDIC has proposed a major improvement
            in the CRA regulations, one that much more closely aligns the regulations
            with the Community Reinvestment Act itself, and I urge the FDIC to
            adopt its proposal, with the recommendations above. I will be happy
            to discuss these issues further with you, if that would be helpful. Sincerely,             _______________________Jay Shands
 President & CEO
 First Bank & Trust East Texas
             |