Skip to main content
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government
Dot gov
The .gov means it’s official. 
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
Https
The site is secure. 
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Federal Register Publications

FDIC Federal Register Citations



Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations




FDIC Federal Register Citations

KITSAP BANK

From: Roger Fitzpatrick [mailto:rfitzpatrick@kitsapbank.com]
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 1:45 PM
To: Comments
Subject: Community Reinvestment Act Regulations

As a community banker, I strongly endorse the federal bank regulators' proposal to increase the asset size of banks eligible for the small bank streamlined Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) examination from $250 million to $500 million and elimination of the holding company size limit (currently $1 billion). This proposal will greatly reduce regulatory burden.

Adjusting the asset size limit also more accurately reflects significant changes and consolidation within the banking industry in the last 10 years. To be fair, banks should be evaluated against their peers, not banks hundreds of time their size. The proposed change recognizes that it's not right to assess the CRA performance of a $500 million bank or a $1 billion bank with the same exam procedures used for a $500 billion bank. Large banks now stretch from coast-to-coast with assets in the hundreds of billions of dollars. It is not fair to rate a community bank using the same CRA examination.

As community bank that just passed the $500 million level, the proposed increase is a good first step, but does nothing to relieve our recordkeeping and investment requirements for which we are evaluated and must compete at the mega-bank level.

The size of banks eligible for the small-bank streamlined CRA examination should be increased to $2 billion, or at a minimum, $1 billion. Increasing the size of banks eligible for the small-bank streamlined CRA examination does not relieve banks from CRA responsibilities. Our presence in the communities we serve is an important factor in the success of our bank. The increase will merely eliminate some of the most burdensome requirements.

Raising the limit to at least $1 billion is appropriate for two reasons. First, keeping the focus of small institutions on lending, which the small institution examination does, would be entirely consistent with the purpose of the Community Reinvestment Act, which is to ensure that the Agencies evaluate how banks help to meet the credit needs of the communities they serve.

Second, raising the limit to $1 billion will have only a small effect on the amount of total industry assets covered under the more comprehensive large bank test. According to the Agencies’ own findings, raising the limit from $250 to $500 million would reduce total industry assets covered by the large bank test by less than one percent. According to December 31, 2003, Call Report data, raising the limit to $1 billion will reduce the amount of assets subject to the much more burdensome large institution test by only 4% (to about 85%). Yet, the additional relief provided would, again, be substantial, reducing the compliance burden on more than 500 additional banks and savings associations (compared to a $500 million limit).

In summary, I believe that increasing the asset-size of banks eligible for the small bank streamlined CRA examination process is an important first step to reducing regulatory burden. I also support eliminating the separate holding company qualification for the streamlined examination, since it places small community banks that are part of a larger holding company at a disadvantage to their peers. While community banks still must comply with the general requirements of CRA, this change will eliminate some of the most problematic and burdensome elements of the current CRA regulation from community banks. I also urge the agencies to seriously consider raising the size of banks eligible for the streamlined examination to $2 billion or, at least, $1 billion in assets to better reflect the current demographics of the banking industry.

Roger Fitzpatrick CBA, CCBCO
AVP & Compliance Officer
Kitsap Bank
PO Box 9
619 Bay Street
Port Orchard, WA 98366
RFitzpatrick@KitsapBank.com
360-876-7757 360-876-7885(fax)

Last Updated 04/09/2004 regs@fdic.gov

Last Updated: August 4, 2024