|
FDIC Federal Register Citations
United
Bank of Michigan
Lisa L. Wenzel
United Bank of Michigan
900 East Paris SE
Grand Rapids, Michigan 49546
616-559-7000
Mr. Robert E. Feldman
Executive Secretary
Attention: Comments/Legal ESS
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
550 17th Street, NW
Washington DC 20429
Re: RIN Number 3064-AC50: FDIC Proposed Increase in the Threshold for the
Small Bank CRA Streamlined Examination
Dear Sir:
I am Senior Vice President of United Bank of Michigan, located in Grand
Rapids, Michigan, a community of just under 200,000 residents. Additionally
we service several smaller communities ranging in size from 600 to 5,000
residents. The bank has total assets of $375 million and is currently subject
to large bank CRA examination criteria. I am writing to strongly support
the FDIC ' s proposal to raise the threshold for the streamlined
small bank CRA examination to $1 billion without regard to size of the
bank ' s holding company. This would greatly relieve the regulatory
burden imposed on many small banks such as my own under the current regulation,
which are required to meet the standards imposed on the nation ' s
largest $1 trillion banks. I understand that this is not an exemption from
CRA and that the bank would still have to help meet the credit needs of
its entire community and be evaluated by our regulator. However, I believe
that this would lower our current regulatory burden by a reduction in man
hours of at least 200 per year just for data preparation and input required
to meet the reporting requirements.
I also support the addition of a community development (CD) criterion to
the small bank examination for larger community banks. It appears to be
a significant improvement over the investment test. However, I urge the
FDIC to adopt its original $500 million threshold for small banks without
a CD criterion and only apply the new CD criterion to community banks greater
than $500 million up to $1 billion. Banks under $500 million now hold about
the same percent of overall industry assets as community banks under $250
million did a decade ago when the revised CRA regulations were adopted,
so this adjustment in the CRA threshold is appropriate. As FDIC examiners
know, it has proven extremely difficult for small banks, especially those
in rural areas, to find appropriate CRA qualified investments in their
communities. Many small banks have had to make regional or statewide investments
that are extremely unlikely to ever benefit the banks ' own communities.
That was certainly not the intent of Congress when it enacted CRA.
An additional reason to support the FDIC ' s CD criterion is that
it significantly reduces the current regulation ' s " cliff
effect " Today, when a small bank goes over $250 million,
it must completely reorganize its CRA program and begin a massive new reporting,
monitoring and investment program. If the FDIC adopts its proposal, a state
nonmember bank would move from the small bank examination to an expanded
but still streamlined small bank examination, with the flexibility to mix
Community Development loans, services and investments to meet the new CD
criterion. This would be far more appropriate to the size of the bank,
and far better than subjecting the community bank to the same large bank
examination that applies to $1 trillion banks. This more graduated transition
to the large bank examination is a significant improvement over the current
regulation.
I strongly oppose making the CD criterion a separate test from the bank ' s
overall CRA evaluation. For a community bank, CD lending is not significantly
different from the provision of credit to the entire community. The current
small bank test considers the institution ' s overall lending in
its community. The addition of a category of CD lending (and services to
aid in lending and investments as a substitute for lending) fits well within
the concept of serving the whole community. A separate test would create
an additional CD obligation and regulatory burden that would erode the
benefit of the streamlined exam.
In conclusion, I believe that the FDIC has proposed a major improvement
in the CRA regulations, one that much more closely aligns the regulations
with the Community Reinvestment Act itself, and I urge the FDIC to adopt
its proposal, with the recommendations above. I will be happy to discuss
these issues further with you, if that would be helpful.
Sincerely,
Lisa L. Wenzel
Senior Vice President
|