Skip to main content
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government
Dot gov
The .gov means it’s official. 
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
Https
The site is secure. 
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Federal Register Publications

FDIC Federal Register Citations



Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations




FDIC Federal Register Citations

VENTURE BANK

July 20, 2004

Robert E. Feldman
Executive Secretary
Attention: Comments
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
550 17th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20429
Re: Interagency Guidance on Overdraft Protection

comments@fdic.gov

RE: Proposed Guidance on Certain Overdraft Protection Programs

Dear Mr. Feldman:

I am writing on behalf of Venture Bank (“Bank”) to comment on the agencies’ proposed guidance on overdraft protection. We recognize the amount of effort that has gone into preparing this guidance. We respectfully submit our comments below.

The Bank has offered its customers an Overdraft Protection Program (“ODP”) for the last two and a half years; approximately 17% of the Bank’s customers use the ODP. The Bank has managed the risk for this program in an appropriate manner mitigating losses while providing a valued service to its customers. The Bank already complies with a substantial majority of the proposed guidelines as well as best practices.

Throughout the proposed guidance overdraft protection programs are labeled as a “credit service”; we find this label troubling and entirely inaccurate. Regulation Z applies when all four of the following conditions are met: (i) the credit is offered or extended to consumers; (ii) the offering or extension of credit is done regularly; (iii) the credit is subject to a finance charge or is payable by a written agreement in more than 4 installments; and (iv) the credit is primarily for personal, family or household purposes. Our ODP is not offered regularly it is simply provided as a service to our customers at the time of account opening where they are provided an opportunity to opt out from the service. We do not assess a finance charge, nor is this service payable by written agreement in more than 4 installments. Payment of the overdraft is expected at the time the account is overdrawn. The Bank’s ODP is a discretionary service; we are not obligated to pay any item presented for payment if an account does not maintain sufficient funds. The ODP is simply a more efficient NSF processing system. Our ODP provides an automated system for making pay/return decisions allowing for more efficient use of our resources and quicker processing. Our ODP is of benefit to our customers because not as many items are returned and therefore, they are not charged as much in fees by merchants and are saved the embarrassment of returned checks. No written agreement is entered into at the time of account opening and we may approve reasonable overdrafts as a non-contractual courtesy. We feel it is essential that the final guidance eliminate the term “credit service.”

The guidance establishes a clear safety and soundness standard that overdraft balances must be charged off within 30 days from the date first overdrawn. Further, it is stated that the existence of a repayment plan would not extend the charge-off determination period beyond the 30 days measured from the date of the overdraft. We feel our ODP does not pose a safety and soundness concern. The risk of this program has been identified and accepted by the Bank’s board of directors and is managed by senior management. A notice is sent to the customer upon the first use of the ODP reminding them that repayment is expected immediately, follow-up letters are sent at 10 day intervals and the overdraft privilege is discontinued at the 30 day mark with customer letters used for further collection. Bank procedures provide for the charge off of the overdrawn balance at 60 days, at which time additional collection efforts are made. A longer charge off period is also more favorable to the customer since no damage would be done to depositors by the premature reporting of charged off accounts to the credit bureaus.

The proposed guidance states that “When an institution routinely communicates the available amount of overdraft protection to depositors, these available amounts should be reported as “unused commitments” in regulatory reports.” Unused commitments in the call report are defined as “unused portions of commitments to make or purchase extensions of credit in the form of loans or participations in loans, leases or similar transactions.” Overdraft protection programs do not fit this definition and thereby should not be included in unused commitments for regulatory reporting. ODP’s as previously discussed are a discretionary service not a credit product. There is no commitment to advance monies or any written agreement with the customer. The Bank is not obligated to pay any overdrafts and may cancel the service at any time. This reporting requirement should only be reserved for contractually binding obligations such as traditional overdraft lines of credit or other formal credit facilities.

The proposed best practices includes a suggestion that all financial institutions involved with ODP’s monitor excessive consumer usage, which may indicate a need for alternative credit arrangements or other services and inform consumers of these available options. Several concerns are raised by this suggested “best practice.” First would be the definition of “excessive consumer usage” this is a broad statement and we feel not easily defined; what may be considered excessive for one customer may not be for another. Second, we do not feel it is the Bank’s responsibility or in the best interests of the customer to restrict use of this product; customers want this product as evidenced by the volume of transactions.

In Conclusion:

• Generally, we are in agreement with many elements of the proposed ODP guidance. Many of the best practices suggested have already been implemented by our institution.
• We disagree with the regulatory agencies’ requirement for charge off of overdraft balances at 30 days as well as the suggested practice of monitoring excessive consumer usage and classification of unused commitments in regulatory reporting.
• Finally, we feel it is very important that the agencies take out all references that ODP’s are a credit service, previous discussion shows that this is a discretionary deposit product service.

Sincerely,

Jon M. Jones
President
Venture Bank

Last Updated 08/06/2004 regs@fdic.gov

Last Updated: August 4, 2024