From: Cynthia Jurosek [mailto:crowindianland@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 7:45 PM
To: regs.comments@occ.treas.gov; regs.comments@federalreserve.gov;
Comments; regs.comments@ots.treas.gov; jsilver@ncrc.org
Subject: Proposed CRA Regulatory Changes
To: President George Bush
Fx: (202) 456-2461
Treasury Secretary Snow
Fx: (202) 622-6415
Docket No. 04-06
Communications Division
Public Information Room, Mailstop 1-5
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
250 E St. NW
Washington, DC 20219
Email: regs.comments@occ.treas.gov
Docket No. R-1811
Ms. Jennifer Johnson
Secretary
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
20th St. and Constitution Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20551
Email: regs.comments@federalreserve.gov
Robert E. Feldman
Executive Secretary
Attention: Comments
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
550 17th St. NW
Washington, DC 20429
Email: comments@fdic.gov
Regulation Comments, Attention: No. 2004-04
Chief Counsel's Office
Office of Thrift Supervision
Washington, DC 20552
Email: regs.comments@ots.treas.gov
Dear Officials of Federal Bank and Thrift Agencies:
Recently, it has come to my attention that a number of Republican
Members of the House of Representatives of the US Congress sent you a
letter requesting you exclude banks with up to one billion dollars in
assets from the CRA tests for lending, servicing and investments. It has
also come to my attention that certain regulators have, themselves,
already proposed that banks with a half billion dollars in assets be
excluded from the comprehensive CRA Exam. Please be advised that such
changes are unacceptable.
The CRA has thus far been instrumental in increasing access to
homeownership, boosting economic development and expanding small
business in our nation's minority, immigrant and low-to-moderate income
communities. These activities are vital to furthering the stability of
these groups of people.
As I understand it, if such proposed CRA Regulatory changes are
enacted, $387 Billion in assets and 1,111 banks would be removed from
any obligation to invest, reinvest or make contributions which would
further and encourage minority and low-and-moderate income community
development. The proposed changes are contrary to and will defeat the
true intention of the CRA Statute because they will halt the progress
made in community reinvestment in minority and low-and-moderate income
communities. As I understand it, proposed changes include three primary
elements: 1) Provide streamlined and cursory exams for banks with assets
between $250 and $500 Million; 2) Establish a weak, predatory lending
compliance standard; 3) Expand data collection and reporting for small
business and home lending. The first two proposals not only overwhelm,
but also mock and discourage the potential benefits of the third.
Additionally, in their proposal, federal banking agencies did not update
procedures regarding affiliates and assessment areas and thus missed a
vital opportunity to continue CRA's effectiveness.
In terms of streamlined and cursory exams, under current regulations,
banks with assets of at least $250 Million are rated by performance
evals that scrutinize their level of lending, investing and services to
low-and-moderate income communities. The proposed changes will eliminate
the investment and service parts of the exam for banks and thrifts with
assets between $250 and $500 Million. These proposed changes would
reduce the need for these banks to be diligent and comply with the rigor
of CRA Exams for more than $300 Billion in assets. All of this is
intolerable and unacceptable.
Grave, unnecessary and unacceptable damages for minority, immigrant,
low-to-moderate income families and underserved communities would result
from such proposed changes. Such communities would, instead, prosper if
rigorous, diligent CRA Testing continues. Additionally, such proposed
changes will directly undercut President Bush's Administration Policy to
encourage minority homeownership and economic development and defeat his
goal to create 5.5 million new minority homeowners by the end of the
decade.
It is my understanding that proposed changes, if they contain the
proposed anti-predatory standard, allow abusive lending, by neglecting
to address problems such as packing of fees into mortgage loans, high
prepayment penalties, loan flipping and other numerous abuses. Rigorous
fair lending audits are absolutely necessary in order to ensure
fulfillment of the intent of the CRA and maintain minority and
low-to-moderate income communities with a reasonable amount of safety
and soundness.
There is also a spiritual component here that is vitally important.
Those proposing such changes fail to understand the importance of
"tithing" and that the CRA Statute is a form of imposed tithing. Tithing
is a spiritual law that whether imposed (in the form of a tax or
obligation) or comes from the heart, has wonderful, long-range effects.
Galations 6:7: "whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap".
Respectfully, all banks that desire such CRA Regulatory changes have
failed in their understanding of the importance of tithing to make their
own communities strong. "Community" definitions which apply here: "An
interacting population of various kinds of individuals in a common
location"; every community in America includes low-to-moderate income
people and minorities; such people need vigorous CRA testing and bank
compliance.
If regulators enact such proposed changes to the current CRA Regs,
the affected banks will, obviously, not continue on with community
development investment/lending in the low-to-moderate income and
minority communties. Unwittingly, such changes will deprive and deny
affected banks the community good will, positive word-of-mouth
advertising, positive name recognition, and tithing benefits, which
result from CRA Testing and Compliance.
It is highly unlikely that few, if any, religious, spiritual and
community development leaders would support the proposed CRA Regulatory
changes, if they knew about them and if they had time to present
objections. Respectfully, I believe there are literally thousands of
such persons and groups who would not only protest such proposed
changes, but also take action to get more rigorous, diligent CRA testing
requirements enacted.
Please do not enact any changes to the current CRA Regs which would
reduce the current rigor level of CRA Testing and Compliance.
Very truly,
Cynthia Jurosek
821 No. 27th St. #248
Billlings, MT
Contact Ph: (406) 254-0121
|