| Mr. Robert E. Feldman
 Executive Secretary
 Attention: Comments/Legal ESS
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 550 17th St. NW
 Washington D.C. 20429
 RE: RIN 3064-AC50, Community Reinvestment Dear Mr. Feldman:I am writing to express my opposition to watering down CRA (Community 
        Reinvestment Act) requirements for mid-sized banks. The proposed changes 
        are in direct opposition to the CRA mandate that requires lenders to 
        meet community needs.
 I have had extensive experience working closely with local banks which 
        were fulfilling their CRA requirements within the community, both as an 
        executive director of large non-profit organization in Illinois, and as 
        a community volunteer/leader for many years in Wisconsin. Mid-size banks 
        played an essential role in increasing homeownership, other housing 
        opportunities and economic development in lower-income communities. As 
        you are undoubtedly aware, a great number of persons who benefit from 
        CRA are employed but still have a limited amount of money to spend on 
        housing.
 Further, community economic development itself has often been a direct 
        result of CRA requirements, such as the development of health clinics, 
        community centers and other community benefiting structures and 
        services. My observation is that often it is only the mid-sized banks 
        that will move into lower-income communities and provide services there. 
        For all these reasons and more, changes proposed by the FDIC would have 
        a very negative impact on such communities.
 The changes proposed would allow mid-sized banks to choose which one of 
        three community development activities they would undertake resulting in 
        less community development activity. One problem with this, of course, 
        is that community problems and needs are multi-faceted and must be 
        approached from a variety of avenues to be effective.
 I am also very concerned that community development activities in rural 
        areas would be changed in a way that would allow banks to work with 
        affluent residents of rural areas rather than the lower income consumers 
        CRA targets. One problem that I've observed is that as higher income 
        persons move into rural areas, essentially developing new "suburbs," the 
        needs of lower and moderate income residents are often put at risk in 
        the milieu of rising housing costs.
 This proposal would also eliminate publicly available data on the small 
        business lending of mid-sized banks. Such data is essential for enabling 
        community groups and citizens to hold banks accountable for lending to 
        small businesses in their neighborhoods.
 As stated above, the proposed changes are in direct opposition to the 
        CRA mandate to require lenders to meet community needs. CRA is an 
        essential tool for the purposes for which it was created – the changes 
        proposed would seriously undermine it. Please drop this proposal.
 
 Donna Ferency10558 W. Cortez Cr., #15
 Franklin, WI 53132
 Cc: National Community Reinvestment Coalition President George W. Bush
 Senators John Kerry and John Edwards
 
 |