[Federal Register: September 8, 1998
(Volume 63, Number 173)]
[Notices]
[Page 47495-47498]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr08se98-75] =======================================================================
FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL
Administrative Enforcement of the Truth in Lending Act--Restitution
ACTION: Notice and request for comment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Consumer Compliance Task Force of the Federal Financial Institutions
Examination Council (FFIEC) is issuing a revised Joint Statement of Policy on the
Administrative Enforcement of the Truth in Lending Act--Restitution (Policy Statement).
The Policy Statement issued by the FFIEC on July 21, 1980 must be revised to reflect the
statutory changes to certain provisions of the Truth in Lending Act
(TILA)
[[Page 47496]]
made by the Congress in 1995 and 1996. The staffs of the Office of the Comptroller of
the Currency (OCC), the Federal Reserve Board (FRB), the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC), the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) and the National Credit Union
Administration (NCUA) have prepared this revised Policy Statement to reflect the changes
made to the TILA.
DATES: Public comment is invited on a continuing basis.
ADDRESSES: Questions and comments may be sent to Keith J. Todd, Acting Executive
Secretary, Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, 2100 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW, Suite 200, Washington, DC 20037, or by facsimile transmission to (202) 634-6556.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
OCC: Gene Ullrich, National Bank Examiner, Community and Consumer Policy, (202) 874-4866,
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 250 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20219.
FRB: Anthony Iwuji, Review Examiner, Division of Consumer and Community Affairs, (202)
452-3946, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 20th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551.
FDIC: James K. Baebel, Senior Review Examiner, Division of Compliance and Consumer
Affairs, (202) 942-3086, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 550 17th Street NW,
PA-1730-7048, Washington, DC
20429.
OTS: Gary Jackson, Program Analyst, Compliance Policy, (202) 906-5653, Office of Thrift
Supervision, 1700 G Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20552.
NCUA: Jodee Wuerker, Program Officer, Office of Examination and Insurance, (703) 518-6375,
National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-3428.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Truth in Lending Act Amendments of 1995 and the Economic Growth and Regulatory
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1996 amended the TILA to incorporate new tolerances for
disclosures of the finance charge and other disclosures affected by the finance charge on
certain types of loans. These amendments specify that in closed-end consumer credit
transactions secured by real property or a dwelling, the disclosed finance charge and
other disclosures affected by the disclosed finance
charge shall be treated as accurate if the amount disclosed as the finance charge is
overstated, or is understated by no more than $100 for transactions consummated on or
after September 30, 1995, or $200 for loans made before that date. The Federal Reserve
Board proposed and adopted amendments to Regulation Z in 1996 to implement the statutory
changes (12 CFR 226.18(d)(1), 226.18(d)(2), 226.22(a)(4) and 226.22(a)(5)).
The Policy Statement originally issued in 1980 was directly affected by the amendments to
the TILA and the changes to Regulation Z in several respects. First, the changes to the
tolerances affect the
definition for understated annual percentage rates (APR) contained in the Policy
Statement. Second, the amendments enhanced the agencies' abilities to make modifications
to the amount or timing of restitution
in the event that payment of restitution would adversely affect the capital position of
the financial institution. In the main, the revisions to the Policy Statement make only
those changes necessary to
accommodate statutory requirements. Some other editorial changes were made, however, to
reflect that some provisions of the original Policy Statement were no longer needed due to
the passage of time.
Summary of Changes
The revised Policy Statement drops the definition of ``Irregular Mortgage
Transaction.'' The term is used in the Truth in Lending Simplification and Reform Act in
the definition of an understated APR
for loans secured by dwellings consummated prior to March 31, 1982. There is no longer any
need for maintaining a separate definition of this term in the Policy Statement. A
footnote has been included in the
revised Policy Statement to indicate that, should loans consummated prior to March 31,
1982 having understated APRs be found, the original Policy Statement should be consulted
for guidance.
The definition of the term ``Understated APR'' in the Policy Statement has been modified
to reflect revised tolerances for certain real estate secured transactions. The Truth in
Lending Amendments of
1995 and the Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act of 1996 mandated these
revisions. The Policy Statement has also been revised to consolidate six separate
sub-parts to the definition of an ``Understated APR'' into two sub-parts; (1) Loans having
an amortization schedule of 10 years or less, and (2) loans with an amortization schedule
of more than 10 years.
<bullet> Loans having an amortization schedule of 10 years or less will be
provided a tolerance of 25 basis points (one-quarter of one percent). Loans that are
secured by real estate or a dwelling will be
provided the tolerances permitted by 12 CFR 226.22(a)(4) and (5).<bullet> Loans
having an amortization schedule of more than 10 years will be provided a tolerance of 12.5
basis points (one-eighth of
one percent) in the case of a regular transaction and 25 basis points (one-quarter of one
percent) in the case of an irregular transaction.
Loans that are secured by real estate or a dwelling will be provided the tolerances
permitted by 12 CFR 226.22(a)(4) and (5). References to 15 U.S.C. 1606(c) contained in the
body of the definition of an understated APR in the original Policy Statement have now
been moved to footnote 3 in the revised Policy Statement. The change was purely editorial
in nature. A new footnote 4 has been added
to more specifically identify the sections of Regulation Z (12 CFR 226.14(a) and
226.22(a)) that define the requirements for annual percentage rate disclosures.
The ``Corrective Action Period'' section of the original Policy Statement contains time
frames for determining which loans are subject to adjustment when violations are
discovered. Previously, the agencies have collectively taken the position that the phrase
``immediately preceding examination'' in subsection 2.b. means the most recent examination
that precedes the current examination in which compliance with Regulation Z and the Act
was reviewed. However, the United States Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit (First
National Bank of Council Bluffs v. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 956 F.2d
1456 (8th
Cir. 1992)), and the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit,
(Consolidated Bank, N.A. v. United States Department of the Treasury, 118 F.3d 1461 (11th
Cir. 1997)) determined that the phrase
``immediately preceding examination'' should be read as referring to an examination of any
type conducted immediately prior to the current examination, including examinations in
which no review of compliance with Regulation Z or the Act is conducted. Consequently, the
agencies, as a matter of policy, will now apply the decisions reached by the Eighth and
Eleventh Circuit Courts in carrying out their enforcement responsibilities with respect to
the meaning of ``immediately preceding
examination.'' No changes to the Policy Statement are necessary to effect this policy
position made by the agencies. Additional guidance will be provided to the examination
staff for
[[Page 47497]]
each agency to advise on the proper period for corrective action when violations
requiring adjustments are discovered. In the section of the Policy Statement entitled
``Violations Involving the Improper Disclosure of Credit Life, Accident, Health, or Loss
of Income Insurance,'' the original Policy Statement had a
separate provision detailing how certain violations involving credit life insurance
disclosures would be treated until March 31, 1982. Since this time period has now expired
that portion of the section has been
deleted.
The Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act of 1996 provided additional
flexibility for the regulatory agencies to require partial or delayed payments for
reimbursements by an institution if the
payment would cause the institution to become undercapitalized as that term is defined in
section 38 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.
Those provisions are now reflected in the section of the Policy Statement entitled
``Safety and Soundness.'' That section states that if the results of a full and immediate
adjustment required under the
Policy Statement would have a significant adverse impact on the capital position of the
creditor, the agencies can permit partial adjustments to be made or permit partial
payments over an extended period of time.
The text of the revised Policy Statement follows:
Administrative Enforcement of the Truth in Lending Act--Restitution
Joint Statement of Policy
The Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (Pub. L.
96-221) was enacted on March 31, 1980. Title VI of that Act, the Truth in Lending
Simplification and Reform Act, amends
the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. 1601, et seq. Section 608 of Title VI, effective March
31, 1980, authorizes the federal Truth in Lending enforcement agencies to order creditors
to make monetary and other adjustments to the accounts of consumers where an annual
percentage rate (APR) or finance charge was inaccurately disclosed. It generally requires
the agencies to order restitution when such disclosure errors resulted from a clear and
consistent pattern or practice of violations,
gross negligence, or a willful violation which was intended to mislead the person to whom
the credit was extended. However, the Act does not preclude the agencies from ordering
restitution for isolated disclosure errors.
This policy guide summarizes and explains the restitution provisions of the Truth in
Lending Act (Act), as amended. The material also explains corrective actions the financial
regulatory agencies
believe will be appropriate and generally intend to take in those situations in which the
Act gives the agencies the authority to take equitable remedial action. The agencies
anticipate that most financial institutions will voluntarily comply with the restitution
provisions of the Act as part
of the normal regulatory process. If a creditor does not voluntarily act to correct
violations, the agencies will use their cease and desist authority to require correction
pursuant to: 15 U.S.C. 1607 and 12
U.S.C. 1818(b) in the cases of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and
the Office of Thrift
Supervision; and 15 U.S.C. 1607 and 12 U.S.C. 1786(e)(1) in the case of the National
Credit Union Administration.
Restitution Provisions
Definitions
Except as provided below, all definitions are those found in the Act and Regulation Z,
12 CFR part 226.
1. ``Current examination'' means the most recent examination begun on or after March 31,
1980, in which compliance with Regulation Z was reviewed.
2. ``Lump sum method'' means a method of reimbursement in which a
cash payment equal to the total adjustment will be made to a consumer.
3. ``Lump sum/payment reduction method'' means a method of
reimbursement in which the total adjustment to a consumer will be made
in two stages:
a. A cash payment that fully adjusts the consumer's account up to
the time of the cash payment; and,
b. A reduction of the remaining payment amounts on the loan.
4. ``Understated APR'' means a disclosed APR that is understated by
more than the reimbursement tolerance provided in the Act,\1\ as
follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 1607(e)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<bullet> For loans \2\ with an amortization schedule of 10 years or less, a
disclosed APR which, when increased by the greater of the APR tolerance specified in the
Act \3\ and Regulation Z \4\ or one-quarter
of one percent, is less than the actual APR calculated under the Act.\5\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ For loans consummated after March 31, 1982. For loans consummated prior to that
date refer to the Policy Guide dated July
21, 1980 (45 FR 48712) for additional guidance.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 1606(c)
\4\ 12 CFR 226.14(a) and 226.22(a)
\5\ If, however, the loan is closed-end credit secured by real estate or a dwelling and
the APR is understated by more than one-quarter of one percent, the APR will be considered
accurate and not
subject to reimbursement if: (1) The finance charge is understated but considered accurate
in accordance with the Act and Regulation (i.e., the finance charge is not understated by
more than $100 on
loans made on or after 9/30/95, or $200 for loans made before that date); and (2) the APR
is not understated by more than the dollar equivalent of the finance charge error and the
understated APR
resulted from the understated finance charge that is considered accurate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<bullet> For loans with an amortization schedule of more than 10 years, a
disclosed APR which, when increased by the APR tolerance specified in the Act and
Regulation Z (i.e., one-quarter of one percent
for irregular loans, one-eighth of one percent for all other closed-end loans) is less
than the actual APR.\6\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ If, however, the loan is closed-end credit secured by real estate or a dwelling and
the APR is understated by more than one-eighth of one percent if the transaction is not
considered to be an
irregular transaction as defined by the Regulation (12 CFR 226.22(a)(3)) or one quarter of
one percent if the transaction is irregular according to the definition, the APR will be
considered
accurate and no subject to reimbursement if: (1) The finance charge is understated but
considered accurate according to the Actual Regulation (i.e., the finance charge is
understated but considered
accurate according to the Act and Regulation i.e., the finance charge is not understated
by more than $100 on loans made on or after 9/30/95, or $200 for loans made before that
date); and (2) the
APR is not understated by more than the dollar equivalent of the finance charge error and
the understated APR resulted from the understated finance charge that is considered
accurate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. ``Understated finance charge'' means a disclosed finance charge which, when
increased by the greater of the finance charge dollar tolerance specified in the Act and
Regulation Z or a dollar tolerance
that is generated by the corresponding APR reimbursement tolerance,\7\
is less than the finance charge calculated under the Act.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
\7\ The finance charge tolerance for each loan will be generated by the corresponding
APR tolerance applicable to that loan. For example, consider a single-payment loan with a
one-year maturity
that is subject to a one-quarter of one percent APR tolerance. If the amount financed is
$5,000 and the finance charge is $912.50, the actual APR will be 18.25%. The finance
charge generated by an APR of
18% (applying the one-quarter of one percent APR tolerance to 18.25%) for that loan would
be $900. The difference between $912.50 and $900 produces a numerical finance charge
tolerance of $12.50. If
the disclosed finance charge is not understated by more than $12.50, reimbursement would
not be ordered.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
De Minimis Rule
If the amount of adjustment on an account is less than $1.00, no restitution will be
ordered. However, the agencies may require a creditor to make any adjustments of less than
$1.00 by paying into the
United States Treasury, if more than one year has elapsed since the date of the violation.
[[Page 47498]]
Corrective Action Period
1. Open-end credit transactions will be subject to an adjustment if the violation
occurred within the two-year period preceding the date of the current examination.
2. Closed-end credit transactions will be subject to an adjustment if the violation
resulted from a clear and consistent pattern or practice or gross negligence where:
a. There is an understated APR on a loan which originated between
January 1, 1977 and March 31, 1980.
b. There is an understated APR or understated finance charge, and the practice giving rise
to the violation is identified during the current examination. Loans containing the
violation which were consummated since the date of the immediately preceding examination
are subject to an adjustment.
c. There is an understated APR or understated finance charge, the practice giving rise to
the violation was identified during a prior examination and the practice is not corrected
by the date of the
current examination. Loans containing the violation which were consummated since the
creditor was first notified in writing of the violation are subject to an adjustment.
(Prior examinations include any
examinations conducted since July 1, 1969).
3. Each closed-end credit transaction, consummated since July 1, 1969, and containing a
willful violation intended to mislead the consumer is subject to an adjustment.
4. For terminated loans subject to 2, above, an adjustment will not be ordered if the
violation occurred in a transaction consummated more than two years prior to the date of
the current examination.
Calculating the Adjustment
Consumers will not be required to pay any amount in excess of the finance charge or
dollar equivalent of the APR actually disclosed on transactions involving:
1. Understated APR violations on transactions consummated between January 1, 1977 and
March 31, 1980, or
2. Willful violations which were intended to mislead the consumer. On all other
transactions, applicable tolerances provided in the definitions of understated APR and
understated finance charge may be
applied in calculating the amount of adjustment to the consumer's
account.
Methods of Adjustment
The consumer's account will be adjusted using the lump sum method or the lump
sum/payment reduction method, at the discretion of the creditor.
Violations Involving the Non-Disclosure of the APR or Finance Charge
1. In cases where an APR was required to be disclosed but was not, the disclosed APR
shall be considered to be the contract rate, if disclosed on the note or the Truth in
Lending disclosure statement.
2. In cases where an APR was required to be disclosed but was not, and no contract rate
was disclosed, consumers will not be required to pay an amount greater than the actual APR
reduced by one-quarter of one percentage point, in the case of first lien mortgage
transactions, and by one percentage point in all other transactions.
3. In cases where a finance charge was not disclosed, no adjustment will be ordered.
Violations Involving the Improper Disclosure of Credit Life, Accident, Health, or Loss
of Income Insurance
1. If the creditor has not disclosed to the consumer in writing that credit life,
accident, health, or loss of income insurance is optional, the insurance shall be treated
as having been required and
improperly excluded from the finance charge. An adjustment will be ordered if it results
in an understated APR or finance charge. The insurance will remain in effect for the
remainder of its term.
2. If the creditor has disclosed to the consumer in writing that credit life, accident,
health, or loss of income insurance is optional, but there is either no signed insurance
option or no disclosure of the
cost of the insurance, the insurance shall be treated as having been required and
improperly excluded from the finance charge. An adjustment will be ordered if it results
in an understated APR or finance charge. The insurance will remain in effect for the
remainder of its term.
Special Disclosures
Adjustments will not be required for violations involving the disclosures required by
sections 106(c) and (d) of the Act, (15 U.S.C. 1605(c) and (d)).
Obvious Errors
If an APR was disclosed correctly, but the finance charge required to be disclosed was
understated, or if the finance charge was disclosed correctly, but the APR required to be
disclosed was understated, no
adjustment will be required if the error involved a disclosed value which was 10 percent
or less of the amount that should have been disclosed.
Agency Discretion
Adjustments will not be required if the agency determines that the disclosure error
resulted from any unique circumstances involving a clearly technical and non-substantive
disclosure violation which did
not adversely affect information provided to the consumer and which did not mislead or
otherwise deceive the consumer.
Safety and Soundness
In some cases, an agency may order, in place of an immediate, full adjustment, either a
partial adjustment, or a full adjustment in partial payments over an extended time period
that the agency considers reasonable. The agency may do so if it determines that (1) the
full, immediate adjustment would have a significantly adverse impact upon the safety and
soundness of the creditor, and (2) a partial adjustment, or making partial payments over
an extended period of time, is necessary to avoid causing the creditor to become
undercapitalized.\8\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ The term ``undercapitalized'' will have the meaning as defined in section 38 of the
Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1831o).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
Exemption from Restitution Orders
A creditor will not be subject to an order to make an adjustment if within 60 days
after discovering a disclosure error, whether pursuant to a final written examination
report or through the creditor's own
procedures, the creditor notifies the person concerned of the error and adjusts the
account to ensure that such person will not be required to pay a finance charge in excess
of that actually disclosed or the dollar
equivalent of the APR disclosed, whichever is lower. This 60-day period for correction of
disclosure errors is unrelated to the provisions of the civil liability section of the
Act.
Dated: September 2, 1998.
Keith J. Todd,
Acting Executive Secretary, Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council.
[FR Doc. 98-24057 Filed 9-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODES FRB: 6210-01-P 20%, OTS: 6720-01-P 20%, FDIC: 6714-01-P 20%, OCC: 4810-33-P
20%, NCUA: 7535-01-P 20%
|