Skip to main content
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government
Dot gov
The .gov means it’s official. 
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
Https
The site is secure. 
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Federal Register Publications

FDIC Federal Register Citations



Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations




FDIC Federal Register Citations

12 October 2004

Mr. Robert E. Feldman Executive Secretary
Attention: Comments/Legal ESS
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
550 17th St. NW
Washington, DC 20429

RE: RIN 3064- AC50

Dear Mr. Feldman:

I am writing to urge that you withdraw the proposed changes to the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) regulations. Numerous organizations concerned with the needs of poverty areas and disenfranchised people have strongly supported the disclosure of lending patterns since legislation was first introduced in 1975. I believe that people must be permitted access to information about the lending practices and patterns of the financial institutions in their communities that seek their business. CRA has been an effective financial vehicle for rural and urban communities for decades. Low and moderate income families of all races and ethnicities have benefited from CRA with increased opportunities to purchase homes, open small businesses, or operate farms. The success of local communities gaining access to private capital should not be jeopardized. The proposed changes will dramatically reduce the ability of communities to monitor and promote community reinvestment Currently, banks with assets of at least $250 million are rated by performance evaluations that scrutinize their level of lending, investing, and services within low- and moderate- income communities. The proposed changes would substitute a, less challenging criterion of community development for state-charted banks with assets between $250 million and I billion. This proposal would allow mid-size banks to choose a, loosely defined "community development activity" rather than the current requirement of providing comprehensive community development activities needed by low-and moderate- income communities.
Many believe, and we fear, that the proposed community development criterion could result in fewer loans and a significant reduction in affordable rental housing investments. Community service facilities and economic development projects would falter from lack of financial support, as mid-size banks no longer maintain or build branches in low- and moderate-income communities. Families in these communities would lose access to affordable banking services.
People in rural communities especially would be disadvantaged by the new regulations that propose to consider any kind of community development activities in rural areas as meeting CRA requirement regardless of whether they focus on low- and moderate-income individuals or not This would allow banks to focus on affluent residents of rural areas, diverting community development activities away from the low- and moderate-income communities and consumers that CRA is designed to help.
I urge you to withdraw and reconsider how best to strengthen not weaken CRA's affirmative obligation of banks to meet credit needs. We seek to expand and enlarge community reinvestment The regulations, as proposed, are likely to result in a, significant reduction in the level of community reinvestment

Sincerely,
Irene Lucas Harborcreek, PA


Last Updated 11/18/2004 regs@fdic.gov

Last Updated: August 4, 2024