Skip to main content
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government
Dot gov
The .gov means it’s official. 
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
Https
The site is secure. 
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Federal Register Publications

FDIC Federal Register Citations



Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations




FDIC Federal Register Citations

Astor Place Neighborhood Association

From: MLMAssocAICP@aol.com [mailto:MLMAssocAICP@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 4:27 PM
To: regs.comments@occ.treas.gov; regs.comments@federalreserve.gov; Comments; comments@ots.treas.gov
Cc: jsilver@ncrc.org; cford@ncrc.org

Subject: Proposed Changes to Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) Regulations

April 5,2004

Docket No. 04-06
Communications Division
Public Information Room, Mailstop 1-5
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
250 E St. SW,
Washington 20219

Docket No. R-1181
Jennifer J. Johnson
Secretary
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
20th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington DC 20551

Robert E. Feldman
Executive Secretary
Attention: Comments
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
550 17th St NW
Washington DC 20429

Regulation Comments, Attention: No. 2004-04
Chief Counsel's Office
Office of Thrift Supervision
1700 G Street NW
Washington DC 20552

Dear Officials of Federal Bank and Thrift Agencies:

As a member of the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, the Astor Place Neighborhood Association urges you to withdraw the proposed changes to the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) regulations. These changes, if adopted, would make it even more difficult for community development organizations such as ours to obtain financing for projects in distressed areas.

The proposed changes include three major elements: 1) provide streamlined and cursory exams for banks with assets between $250 million and $500 million; 2) establish a weak predatory lending compliance standard under CRA; and 3) expand data collection and reporting for small business and home lending. The beneficial impacts of the third proposal are overwhelmed by the damage imposed by the first two proposals.

The proposals for streamlined exams for banks and thrifts with assets between $250 and $500 million would reduce the rigor of CRA exams for 1,111 banks that account for more than $387 billion in assets. The elimination of the investment and service tests for these banks would translate into considerably less access to banking services and capital for underserved communities.

For example, these banks would no longer be held accountable under CRA exams for investing in Low Income Housing Tax Credits, which have been a major source of affordable rental housing needed by large numbers of immigrants and lower income segments of the minority population. Likewise, the banks would no longer be held accountable for the provision of bank branches, checking accounts, Individual Development Accounts (IDAs), or debit card services. Thus, the effectiveness of the Administration's housing and community development programs would be diminished. Moreover, if the investment and service test is eliminated for a large subset of depository institutions,the federal bank agencies will fail to enforce CRA's statutory requirement that banks have a continuing and affirmative obligation to serve credit and deposit needs.

CRA has been instrumental in increasing access to homeownership, boosting economic development, and expanding small businesses in the nation's minority, immigrant, and low- and moderate-income communities. Your proposed changes are contrary to the CRA statute because they will halt the progress made in community reinvestment.

The proposed CRA changes will thwart the Administration's goals of improving the economic status of immigrants and creating 5.5 million new minority homeowners by the end of the decade. Instead, the proposed CRA changes would facilitate predatory lending and reduce the ability of the general public to hold financial institutions accountable for compliance with consumer protection laws.

Please do not let this happen. CRA is too vital to be gutted by harmful regulatory changes and neglect.

Thank you for your attention to this critical matter.

Sincerely,

Mary L. McLean
President
Astor Place Neighborhood Association
90 Astor Place
Jersey City, NJ 07304

Cc: National Community Reinvestment Coalition
President George W. Bush
Treasury Secretary John W. Snow

Last Updated 04/14/2004 regs@fdic.gov

Last Updated: August 4, 2024