August 29, 2003
Mr. Robert E. Feldman
Executive Secretary
Attn: Comments/Legal ESS
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
550 17th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20429
Re: FDIC Coverage for Living Trust Accounts
Dear Mr. Feldman:
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the proposed changes
regarding FDIC coverage for Living Trust Accounts.
As most everyone would agree, insurance for deposit accounts is very
complex and often difficult to understand, not only for customers, but
for many bank employees as well. Any steps that can be taken to simplify
the insurance rules would benefit all involved.
Alternative One that is proposed would continue to offer more
coverage, since it is based on coverage for each beneficiary rather than
each owner. However, it appears if this alternative is chosen, the
burden placed upon the banks would be significant in that we would be
required to review trust documents in detail to determine each
beneficiary’s ownership interest in the trust. Potential conflicts could
arise if beneficiary changes are subsequently made and the bank is not
notified of the change. Additionally, the bank would need to record the
information pertaining to beneficiary interest. Would there be a
standard format provided by FDIC? Or would banks need to make changes to
signature cards to record the beneficiary information? Regardless of the
method used, more burden would be placed on banks to record and update
beneficiary information for living trusts.
Alternative Two, if chosen, would not require banks to verify
beneficiary information. Additionally, if changes were made to the trust
agreement, the coverage would not be affected, since it is based on the
owner rather than the beneficiaries. However, the amount of coverage
under Alternative Two could be significantly less, resulting in
customers possibly separating high balance accounts between
institutions. Not only would this negatively impact the banks, it would
create additional paperwork for the customer to keep up with multiple
accounts for one trust.
If I had to choose between the two alternatives as proposed, I would
choose Alternative Two. However, because of the potential reduced
coverage, I would propose increasing the coverage amount under this
alternative.
Thank you again for allowing us to comment on this important change.
Sincerely,
Patty McClure
Asst Vice President
HomeTrust Bank
Asheville, NC
|