Skip to main content
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government
Dot gov
The .gov means it’s official. 
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
Https
The site is secure. 
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Federal Register Publications

FDIC Federal Register Citations



Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations




FDIC Federal Register Citations

From: Paul C. Adamski [mailto:pineries@charter.net]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 11:05 AM
To: Comments
Subject: Community Reinvestment Act Regulation

Paul C. Adamski
3601 Main St.
Stevens Point, WI 54481

April 5, 2004

Dear FDIC:

Please accept this correspondence as my comment letter urging your agency to increase the asset size of banks eligible for the small bank streamlined Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) examination from $250 million to $500 million. I also understand that this proposal would eliminate the holding company size limit (currently $1 billion). Obviously this proposal would greatly reduce regulatory burden.

Approximately eight years ago a group of investors and I purchased the smallest bank in the state for the purpose of growing that bank in its original market and in a new market(ie, Stevens Point, WI). During that time we have worked hard to keep a loan to deposit ratio that has typically ranged from 75% to 83% It is our opinion that consistent high loan to deposit ratios of this type speak for themselevs when it comes time for regulators to determine how a financial institution is meeting the needs of its communities.

We would also suggest that adjusting the asset size limit is appropriate at this time because it more accurately reflects significant changes and consolidation within the banking industry in the last 10 years. When I first started in the banking business every bank in Portage County Wisconsin was independently owned and operated. Obviously time and legislation have changed that situation signifcantly. Now is the time to recognize that banks should not all be examined and subject to the exact same types of regulations. This proposal is a significant step in that direction.

I applaud your agencies initiative to bring this streamlined CRA proposal to the forfront and encourage you to take similar measures in other areas of regulation that will prudently reduce the regulatory burden for community banks throughout the nation.

Yours very truly

Paul C. Adamski

Last Updated 04/13/2004 regs@fdic.gov

Last Updated: August 4, 2024