Skip to main content
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government
Dot gov
The .gov means it’s official. 
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
Https
The site is secure. 
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Federal Register Publications

FDIC Federal Register Citations



Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations




FDIC Federal Register Citations









Heritage Bank

Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
550 17th Street N.W.
Washington DC 20429

RE: CRA COMMENT LETTER

Dear Sir:

I write today on behalf of Heritage Bank to support conceptually what the CRA NPR is attempting to do. However, we respectfully offer the following viewpoints in opposition to the proposed rule.

1. Moving the small bank threshold to $500MM is not enough; it should be moved to at least $1 billion in assets instead. Banks from $500MM up to $1 billion in assets are very much still “small banks” in today’s banking environment and the rules need to reflect that fact. The big are getting bigger, the small independent banks are disappearing, and those of us who are left in the middle will survive. It is not reasonable to subject a Wells Fargo-size institution and a $500-999MM asset-size institution to the same requirements. First, the requirements are unwarranted. As a community bank, we continually seek out credit opportunities. If we didn’t, we wouldn’t exist. Second, the large bank CRA rules, especially those related to reporting requirements, are too burdensome for even banks in the $500-999MM size range to comply with as our technology cannot accomplish this reporting. The result? Increased overhead cost thus increased cost of credit to the communities we all serve; more bank time spent reporting, less time spent lending, developing and educating our communities.

2. Data “enhancement” translates into more workload. As I stated above, more overhead is not conducive to what CRA is trying to accomplish. In rural areas such as where Heritage Bank operates, measuring where loans are originated, size of borrowers, etc. is all rather a moot point. Please be very mindful of the reporting burden in rural areas. At what point do community bankers throw their hands in the air and sell out? How big do you want the Wells Fargo’s of the world to get? Does that improve the availability of credit in rural areas? No.
3. Relative to the investment test, I am aware of very few qualifying opportunities that have existed in the markets we serve simply because most projects are not designated solely to meet LMI needs. Use this opportunity to modify the definition to include any economic or community development project as those too benefit LMI areas and persons. Communities will benefit.
4. Who was it that wrote, “Oh the tangled web we weave”? That certainly applies to the notion of factoring into a bank’s CRA rating its level of compliance with existing consumer protection regulations. Keep everything in it’s own jurisdiction – each has its merits and should be evaluated as such.

Thank you for your consideration of these comments as you prepare the Final Rule.

Sincerely,

Sara Arnett, Compliance Officer
Heritage Bank
Wood River, NE

 

Last Updated 03/31/2004 regs@fdic.gov

Last Updated: August 4, 2024