CORNERSTONE NATIONAL BANK
From: Jennifer Champagne [mailto:jchampagne@cornerstonenatlbank.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 2:41 PM
To: Comments
Subject: FW: Response to Regulators re: Overdraft Privilege
To whom it may concern:
We are a user of IMPACT, which offers an overdraft protection program.
Based on our experience, we agree with the comments in the attached
message prepared by IMPACT. Please accept our comment and consider
it in your deliberations of the final regulations.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Jennifer M. Champagne
Chief Financial Officer
Cornerstone National Bank
GUIDELINE COMMENTS
IMPACT has reviewed the newly published Interagency Guidance on
Overdraft Protection Programs, published in Volume 69, Number 109 of the
Federal Register on June 7, 2004. Comments to these proposed guidelines
are due back to any of the agencies before August 6, 2004. IMPACT was
pleased to see that the majority of the requirements and best practices
are already being followed in financial institutions utilizing the
IMPACT Overdraft Privilege Service. However, there are a few areas which
we believe are worthy of comment and they are as follows:
I. CHARGE OFF OVERDRAFTS AT 30 DAYS:
IMPACT has considered this issue and has created a collection process
designed to minimize losses to the Financial Institution while still
focusing on customer retention. This process is designed to make
systematic contact with the customers and determine which customers wish
to cure their negative balance and which are deserving of being charged
off. This process has been used for quite some time and we believe that
it efficiently manages the risk of the financial institution.
Accordingly, IMPACT would advocate that overdrafts be allowed up to an
aging of sixty (60) days prior to charging off an overdraft but in no
event less than forty-five (45) days as credit union regulations
currently require.
II. UNUSED COMMITMENT REPORTING:
The Proposed Guidelines
provide that the amount of unused commitments should be reported
in regulatory reports when an institution routinely
communicates the available amount of overdraft protection. IMPACT has
advocated loss reserves be maintained by financial institutions and
that
these reserves be based on the historical performance of the overdraft
protection service. However, reporting in the manner suggested by
the
guidelines would, in IMPACT’s opinion, greatly overstate the risks
associated with this product.
III. FREE ACCOUNT DISCLOSURES:
Financial institutions have greatly enjoyed great success through
marketing Free Accounts. These accounts have proven equally valuable for
a large segment of depositors. However, it would appear to be common
sense that fees can be charged on the account under certain
circumstances which are set out in detail in the depository agreement.
IMPACT would advocate allowing free account advertising with overdraft
protection when conspicuous disclaimers are included in the
communication that make clear that other restrictions may apply.
IV. NOTICES UPON FIRST AND SUBSEQUENT OVERDRAFTS:
The proposed regulations suggest that notices be provided containing
certain specific information upon the first overdraft paid under the
service as well as later uses of the privilege. IMPACT would not argue
that a notice should be issued promptly upon an overdraft being created.
However, the systems which financial institutions frequently use do not
accommodate inclusion of the type of additional information suggested by
the guidelines. Accordingly, IMPACT would suggest that this suggestion
be deleted.
V. REPAYMENT PLANS:
The guidelines suggest that repayment arrangements which are
formalized between a depositor and a bank should be charged off when the
underlying overdraft has aged past thirty (30) days. IMPACT has
experienced a high degree of success in utilizing repayment plans and
find that they provide an additional safety net for the customers. These
repayment arrangements also produce a small degree of risk during the
period in which they are being paid according to their terms.
Accordingly, IMPACT would suggest that current and performing repayment
plus not be charged off.
CONCLUSION
To the extent that your financial institution would like to join
IMPACT in commenting on any or all of the aforementioned areas, or any
other covered by the guidelines, your response should be directed as
follows (Although these may be submitted to any agency, the FDIC
information below will suffice):
You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
Agency Web site:http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/federal/propose.html.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments on the Agency Web site.
E-Mail: Comments@FDIC.gov.
Mail: Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary, Attention:
Comments, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 550 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20429.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency
name. All comments received will be posted without change to
http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/federal/propose.html
including any
personal information provided.
June 23, 2004
Clients and Friends of IMPACT:
As anticipated several months
ago, the Federal regulators have now proposed “Guidelines on Overdraft Protection Programs” and
published those proposed guidelines earlier this month. You should
have received a
copy by now and be somewhat familiar with them.
We at IMPACT Financial Services
think that, for the most part, the Guidelines are good and we commend
the agencies for taking this action.
However, we plan to comment on a few points….and, we urge YOU to do
likewise. Enclosed (or attached, as the case may be) are our comments on
five specific issues contained in the proposed guidelines. We are urging
you to follow suit and to likewise make your institution’s feelings
known. The comment system and procedure WORKS, as we have seen in the
past. Thus, we hope that you will participate with us and draft your
own
comments. You may use ours, verbatim, if you like, or better yet, put
your own thoughts and words into it. Either way, please send your
comments to your regulatory agency by no later than August 6.
(All comments may be sent to the FDIC and we have included that address,
and e-mail address, for your convenience.) I will appreciate receiving a
copy, too, or you may send our copy to your IMPACT Sales Rep or Project
Manager.
Regards, best wishes and good banking.
Sincerely,
William B. Brady, President & CEO
|