Skip to main content
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government
Dot gov
The .gov means it’s official. 
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
Https
The site is secure. 
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Federal Register Publications

FDIC Federal Register Citations



Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations




FDIC Federal Register Citations

From: Melvin Chustz
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 5:41 PM
To: Comments
Subject: EGRPRA burden reduction comment

February 24, 2004


To Whom It May Concern:

Relative to reducing the regulatory burden on banks, I have the following suggestions:

1. RESPA - I feel that in-house refinancings of Residential Real Estate should not be subject to the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), when there are no outside parties involved. Example: Our real estate loans are amortized for 20 years with 5 year balloons. After 5 years, the customer comes into the bank to refinance. No attorneys, appraisers or any other outside parties are used. The only fee charged is a $100.00 origination fee, which is retained by the bank. This same approach is used when a customer wishes to use a mortgage on his home to consolidate bills, purchase a car, etc. If the mortgage is already in place,(i.e. Collateral Mortgage or Multiple Indebtedness Mortgage) which is often the case, we again only charge a $100.00 origination fee. To comply with the existing regulation, we must give all of the advance disclosures estimating all sorts of fees for services that are not required. Many times this requires that the borrower make 2 trips to the bank and turns a simple 15 minute transaction into a more complex 90 minute ordeal, only to disclose our same old $100.00 origination fee. It appears to me that the regulation should not apply to loans, when the fees are less than some predetermined, reasonable threshold.

2. HMDA - Our Community Bank of 34 Million Dollars has recently become subject to the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act. We are located in the town of Maringouin, La.,which has a population of approximately 1100. We have 1 branch in the neighboring town of Grosse Tete, La., which has a population of approximately 480. We are located approximately 20 miles from Baton Rouge, La., which is the nearest MSA. The vast majority of our loans are local and at this time we only have 2 or 3 loans within the boundaries of the nearest MSA (only because existing customers moved from our area into Baton Rouge, but wanted to continue to do business with us). It appears unnecessarily burdensome for us to be subject to HMDA reporting requirements, when we are located in a farming community. Perhaps the size and location of small community banks could be considered individually whenever counties or parishes are being included in MSA's.

Please accept these comments as possible ideas to aid in reducing the regulatory burdens to community banks, which can be expensive but not always helpful to the consumer.

As always, your consideration and guidance is very much appreciated.


Sincerely,
Bank of Maringouin

Melvin L. Chustz
President & CEO

Last Updated 02/26/2004 regs@fdic.gov

Last Updated: August 4, 2024