Skip to main content
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government
Dot gov
The .gov means it’s official. 
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
Https
The site is secure. 
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Federal Register Publications

FDIC Federal Register Citations



Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations




FDIC Federal Register Citations




CALVIN B. TAYLOR BANKING CO.



March 24, 2004

Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary
Attention Comments
Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
550 – 17th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20429

Re: Reducing Regulatory Burden
Lending-Related Consumer Protection Rules

Dear Mr. Feldman:

We applaud your efforts to reduce regulatory burden on the financial services industry. Taylor Bank has always been a highly capitalized bank with above average profits. We have had no consumer complaints, to our knowledge. In spite of our strong 114-year history, we experience regulatory burden during exams and in daily operations. Chairman Powell is correct in his stated initiatives in asking for comments regarding regulatory burden. Our comments are:

• Flood Hazard Insurance – The value of the land should be taken into consideration of flood insurance requirements, even if located in a flood zone. If the value of the land exceeds the amount of the loan, the borrower should be able to opt out of purchasing flood insurance. Also, if the loan is on vacant land, in a flood zone, we are required to advise the customer. Vacant land cannot be insured therefore this requirement should be eliminated. Because of the Regulators strong stance on this requirement, banks are at a competitive disadvantage with non-regulated mortgage companies. Bank customers would also benefit from this requested change.

• 12 CFR 202 (Reg. B) – Equal Credit Opportunity – Monitoring information – If a customer does not wish to disclose this information, the loan officer must complete it through visual determination. We should not be required to do this, which is against the customer’s wishes. In some cases the accuracy of visual determination might be questioned. Making this requested change would protect bank customer’s privacy.

• RESPA, HUD (Reg.X) – Servicing transfer disclosure: Our bank retains servicing on all residential mortgages loans that we originate. We have never sold any loans. Only lenders with a history of transferring servicing should be required to disclose their practice. Bank customers would benefit by having one less disclosure to deal with.

• 12 CFR 226 (Reg. Z) – Truth In Lending – 3-day Right Of Rescission. This should be eliminated entirely. The intent of the original law was not for banks and should not apply to bank mortgages. Bank borrowers do not need a “cooling off period” to consider their decision to take a mortgage. Bank customers would benefit greatly from this requested change.

• CRA and HMDA – The threshold for reporting banks should be raised to $1 Billion with respect to CRA and HMDA.

• Consolidate exams by combining Safety and Soundness, Compliance, IS exams and CRA concurrently. Banks are asked for a lot of the same information during these separate exams, which is a duplication of work for the bank.

• Examine a well-run bank every 2 years for Safety and Soundness, Compliance, IS exam and CRA concurrently. Since the bank’s Call Report data is available quarterly and customer complaints are available on an on-going basis, well-run banks could be monitored with increased outreach between examinations.

• Require each field office to enforce FDIC regulations the same. We have a disclosure requirement from the Maryland field office that my research has determined, is unique to that office alone. “Examiner discretion” creates many unique burdens for banks.

• Reduce the quarterly and annual regulatory filing burden for smaller bank holding companies. The following should be combined or made uniform: FFIEC Call Reports (banks only), Federal Reserve reports (parent company and consolidated), and SEC quarterly filings (consolidated)). A small bank holding company might be one with consolidated assets of $1 billion or less.

• As a side issue, we implore the FDIC to continue it’s strong support of adequate loan loss reserves, which have recently come under scrutiny by the AICPA and SEC. This matter is very important to the safety and soundness of our industry and should not be subject to influence by non-banking regulators.

I will be glad to expand on any of the above. We look forward to working with the FDIC in keeping the banking industry as a symbol of confidence.

Sincerely,
CALVIN B. TAYLOR BANKING CO.

Reese F. Cropper, Jr.,
Chairman/CEO






Last Updated 03/24/2004 regs@fdic.gov

Last Updated: August 4, 2024