North Houston Bank, Houston, TX
Closing Date: October 30, 2009
| Bidder | Type of Transaction | Deposit Premium % | Asset Premium/(Discount) $(000) | SF Loss Share Tranche 1 | SF Loss Share Tranche 2 | SF Loss Share Tranche 3 | Commercial Loss Share Tranche 1 | Commercial Loss Share Tranche 2 | Commercial Loss Share Tranche 3 | Value Appreciation Instrument | Conforming Bid | Linked |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winning bid and bidder: U.S. Bank, N.A., Minneapolis, MN | All deposit whole bank with loss share | 0.00% | $(25,000) | 80% | 95% | N/A | 80% | 95% | N/A | No | Yes | Yes |
| Cover (second place): Woodforest National Bank, Houston, TX | All deposit whole bank with loss share | 1.00% | $(41,911) | 80% | 95% | N/A | 80% | 95% | N/A | No | Yes | No |
| Other Bid | All deposit whole bank with loss share | 1.00% | $(41,911) | 80% | 95% | N/A | 80% | 95% | N/A | No | Yes | Yes |
| Other Bid | All deposit whole bank with loss share | 1.00% | $(41,911) | 80% | 95% | N/A | 80% | 95% | N/A | No | No (1) | Yes |
| Other Bid | All deposit whole bank with loss share | 0.00% | $(42,209) | 80% | 95% | N/A | 80% | 95% | N/A | No | No (2) | Yes |
| Other Bid | AIl deposit whole bank with loss share | 0.00% | $(42,209) | 80% | 95% | N/A | 80% | 95% | N/A | No | No (2) | Yes |
(1) Non-conforming due to asset discount being combined for two banks instead of individuals stated asset discount for each bank
(2) Non-conforming due to exclusion of participation loans and other contingencies
Other Bidder Names:
MidSouth Bank, N.A., Lafayette, LA
Woodforest National Bank, Houston, TX
Notes:
- The winning bidder's acquisition of all the deposits was the least costly resolution compared to a liquidation alternative. The liquidation alternative was valued using valuation models to estimate the market value of the assets. Bids for loss share, if any, were valued using a discounted cash flow analysis for the loss share portfolio over the life of the loss share agreement. If any bids were received that would have been more costly than liquidation they have been excluded from this summary.
- There are more bids than bidders because one or more bidders submitted more than one bid.
- The Other Bidder Names and the Other Bids are in random order. There is no linkage between bidder names and bids, except in the case of the winning bid and cover bid.
- For more information on the bid disclosure policy, see https://www.fdic.gov/resources/resolutions/bank-failures/failed-bank-list/biddocs.html