Skip Header

Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation

Each depositor insured to at least $250,000 per insured bank

2018 Annual Performance Plan


Appendix A

Program Resource Requirements

The chart below breaks out the 2018 FDIC Operating Budget by the FDIC’s three major program areas: insurance, supervision, and receivership management. It shows the budgetary resources that the FDIC estimates it will spend on these programs during 2018 to pursue the strategic goals and objectives and the annual performance goals in this plan and to carry out other program-related activities. The estimates include each program’s share of common support services that are provided on a consolidated basis.

Supervision $1,064,895,487
Insurance $307,543,490
Receivership Management $449,808,506
Corporate Expenses $269,885,104



back to top

Appendix B

The FDIC's Planning Process

The FDIC has a long-range Strategic Plan that identifies goals and objectives for its three major programs: insurance, supervision, and receivership management. It also develops an Annual Performance Plan that identifies annual goals, indicators, and targets for each strategic objective. In January 2018, the FDIC Board of Directors approved a new FDIC Strategic Plan, 2018–2022, that reflects the strategic goals and objectives of the FDIC for the next five years.

In developing its Strategic and Annual Performance Plans, the FDIC uses an integrated planning process in which senior management provides guidance and direction on FDIC goals and priorities. Plans and budgets are developed to achieve those goals and priorities with input from program personnel. Business requirements, industry information, human capital, technology, and financial data are considered in preparing annual performance plans and budgets. Factors influencing the FDIC’s plans include changes in the financial services industry, the findings of program evaluations and other management studies, and past performance.

The FDIC communicates its strategic goals and objectives and its annual performance goals, indicators, and targets to employees through its internal website and internal communications, such as videos, newsletters, and staff meetings. Pay and recognition programs are structured to reward employee contributions to the achievement of the FDIC’s annual performance goals.

Throughout the year, FDIC senior management reviews progress reports. The FDIC submits its Annual Report to Congress. That report, which is posted on the FDIC’s website (, compares actual performance results to the performance targets for each annual performance goal.

back to top

Appendix C

Program Evaluation

The Risk Management and Internal Controls Branch in the Division of Finance coordinates the evaluation of the FDIC’s programs with a focus on identifying material weakness or significant deficiencies. Program evaluations are interdivisional, collaborative efforts, and they involve management and staff from all affected divisions and offices. Division and office directors use the results of the program evaluations to support their annual assertions to the Chairman that operations are effective and efficient, financial data and reporting are reliable, laws and regulations are followed, and internal controls are adequate. These results are also considered in strategic planning for the FDIC.

In 2018, the FDIC will focus on enhancing the Enterprise Risk Management program to identify and mitigate risks to key operations. Additionally, the FDIC will continue to provide management scrutiny in the areas of cybersecurity, failed bank data, IT development supporting FDIC operations, infrastructure development for new operational areas, as well as process mapping and development of performance metrics in several areas. In 2018, risk-based reviews will also continue to be performed in each of the FDIC’s strategic program areas.  Results of these reviews will assist management by confirming that these programs are strategically aligned or by identifying changes that need to be made.

back to top

Appendix D

Interagency Relationships

The FDIC has productive working relationships with agencies at the state, federal, and international levels. It leverages those relationships to achieve the goals outlined in this plan and to promote confidence in the U.S. banking system. Listed below are examples of the many important relationships the FDIC has built with other agencies, seeking to promote strength, stability, and confidence in the financial services industry.

Other Federal Financial Institution Regulatory Agencies

The FDIC works closely with other federal financial institution regulators—principally the Board of Governors of the FRB and the OCC—to address issues and programs that transcend the jurisdiction of each agency. Regulations are, in many cases, interagency efforts. For example, interagency rules have been developed to address implementation of Basel III; revisions to risk-based and leverage capital requirements; the liquidity coverage ratio; credit risk retention; and other supervisory guidance policies, including policies addressing capital adequacy, information technology and cybersecurity risks, leveraged lending, and liquidity risk management. In addition, the OCC is a member of the FDIC Board of Directors, which facilitates crosscutting policy development and consistent regulatory practices between the FDIC and the OCC.

The FDIC also works closely with the CFPB to address consumer protection issues. The CFPB is responsible for issuing the majority of consumer protection rules and regulations. However, the CFPB is required to consult with the FDIC, the FRB, and the OCC on these matters. Enforcement jurisdiction for insured, state nonmember banks with less than $10 billion in assets remains with the FDIC, unless the institution is an affiliate of another insured institution with $10 billion or more in assets that is supervised by the CFPB. The CFPB Director is also a member of the FDIC Board of Directors. As with the OCC, participation on the FDIC Board facilitates crosscutting policy development and consistent regulatory practices among the FDIC, the CFPB, and the OCC.

The FDIC, FRB, and OCC also work closely with the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA), which supervises and insures credit unions; the Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS), which represents the state regulatory authorities; and individual state regulatory agencies. Finally, the FDIC collaborates with the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), which is the rule-writer and supervisor for the government-sponsored enterprises and the Federal Home Loan Banks.

The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC)

The FFIEC is a formal interagency body empowered to prescribe uniform principles, standards, and report forms for the federal examination of financial institutions and to make recommendations to promote uniformity in the supervision of financial institutions. The member agencies of the FFIEC are the FDIC, FRB, OCC, NCUA, and CFPB.

In addition, the Chair of the FFIEC State Liaison Committee serves as a member of the FFIEC (the State Liaison Committee is composed of five representatives of state supervisory agencies). To foster interagency cooperation, the FFIEC has established interagency task forces on consumer compliance, examiner education, information sharing, regulatory reports, surveillance systems, and supervision. The FFIEC has statutory responsibilities to facilitate public access to data that depository institutions must disclose under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act of 1975 (HMDA) and the aggregation of annual HMDA data for each metropolitan statistical area. It also publishes handbooks, catalogs, and databases that provide uniform guidance and information to promote a consistent examination process among the agencies and make information available to the public. This includes maintenance of a central data repository for CRA ratings and public evaluations. The FFIEC also provides an online Consumer Help Center that connects consumers with the appropriate federal regulator for a particular financial institution.

State Banking Departments

The FDIC, FRB, and OCC work with the Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS) and with individual state regulatory agencies to make the bank examination process more efficient and uniform. In most states, alternating examination programs reduce the number of examinations that are conducted at insured financial institutions, thereby reducing regulatory burden. Joint examinations of larger financial institutions also optimize the use of state and FDIC resources in the examination of large, complex, and problem state nonmember banks and state-chartered thrift institutions.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS)

The FDIC is a member of the BCBS, a forum for international cooperation on matters relating to financial institution supervision, and on numerous subcommittees of the BCBS. The BCBS aims to improve the consistency of capital regulations internationally; ensure that the regulatory capital framework for internationally active banks is risk-sensitive and includes appropriate constraints on the use of financial leverage; and promote enhanced risk management practices among large, internationally active banking organizations. Other areas of significant focus include liquidity and funds management, market risk exposure, and derivatives activities. The FDIC and the other federal banking agencies have worked closely with the BCBS to improve the Basel III Capital Accord to strengthen the resiliency of the banking sector and improve liquidity risk management.

In 2017, the BCBS published a number of final documents to continue this progress, including: a set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) on the revised market risk standard; FAQs on Basel III’s NSFR; a Basel III Monitoring Report; a consultative document on the identification and management of step-in risk; a report on progress in adopting the principles for effective risk data aggregation and risk reporting; Pillar 3 disclosure requirements; details of the interim regulatory treatment of accounting provisions and standards for transitional arrangements; a consultative document on the global systemically important banks assessment framework ; final guidance on the prudential treatment of problem assets (definitions of non-performing exposures and forbearance); the twelfth progress report on adoption of the Basel regulatory framework; revisions to the annex on correspondent banking; a second set of FAQs on Basel III’s Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR); the range of practices in implementing the countercyclical capital buffer policy; a consultative document on the simplified alternative to the standardized approach to market risk capital requirements; and a document setting out the Basel Committee’s finalization of the Basel III framework.

The FDIC also provides substantial support on various BCBS quantitative impact studies, which are used to monitor the impact of proposed and final standards on banking entities.

International Colleges of Regulators

The FDIC participates in several groups of international regulators to address international consistency in the implementation of over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives reforms. The OTC Derivatives Regulators’ Forum is a college of regulators that discuss initiatives on derivative reforms mandated by the G-20 and FSB.

The group is heavily involved in assuring international consistency on the development of trade repositories and central counterparty clearing. It makes recommendations to standing committees, including the Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems, International Organization of Securities Commissions, BCBS, and FSB, for rulemakings. The OTC Supervisors’ Group is primarily involved in changing the infrastructure of the largest dealer banks. The group is composed of supervisors of the G-SIFIs. Current efforts are focused on data repositories, dispute resolution, and client clearing. The group obtains commitments from the dealer community to make recommended changes and monitors implementation.

Interagency Country Exposure Review Committee (ICERC)

The ICERC was established by the FDIC, FRB, and OCC to ensure consistent treatment of the transfer risk associated with the exposure of banks to both public and private sector entities outside the United States. The ICERC assigns ratings based on its assessment of the degree of transfer risk inherent in U.S. banks’ foreign exposure.

International Association of Deposit Insurers (IADI)

The FDIC plays a leading role in developing IADI into a global standard setter and the world’s premier provider of technical assistance and training for deposit insurance. IADI contributes to the stability of the financial system by promoting international cooperation in the field of deposit insurance. Through IADI, the FDIC builds strong bilateral and multilateral relationships with foreign deposit insurers, resolution authorities, and international organizations. The FDIC also provides technical assistance and conducts outreach activities with foreign entities to help develop and maintain sound banking and deposit insurance systems.

Association of Supervisors of Banks of the Americas (ASBA)

The FDIC plays a leadership role in the ASBA and participates in the organization’s activities. ASBA develops, disseminates, and promotes sound bank supervisory practices and resilient financial systems throughout the Americas and the Caribbean in line with international standards. The FDIC supports the organization’s mission and activities by contributing to ASBA’s research and guidance initiatives, technical training and cooperative endeavors, and leadership building programs.

Shared National Credit Program

The FDIC participates with the other federal financial institution regulatory agencies in the Shared National Credit Program, an interagency program that performs a uniform credit review twice annually of financial institution loans that exceed $ 100 million and are shared by three or more financial institutions.  The results of these reviews are used to identify trends in industry sectors and the credit risk management practices of banks.

The reviews are published in December of each year and include findings from both reviews to help the industry better understand economic and credit risk management trends.

Joint Agency Task Force on Discrimination in Lending

The FDIC participates on the Joint Agency Task Force on Discrimination in Lending with several other federal financial institution regulators (i.e., the FRB, OCC, and NCUA) along with the CFPB, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), the Department of Justice, and the Federal Trade Commission. The agencies exchange information about fair lending issues, examination and investigation techniques, and interpretations of statutes, regulations, and case precedents.

European Forum of Deposit Insurers

The FDIC and the European Forum of Deposit Insurers share similar interests, and the FDIC supports the organization’s mission to contribute to the stability of financial systems by promoting European cooperation in the field of deposit insurance. The FDIC openly shares its expertise and experience in deposit insurance and failed bank resolution through discussions and exchanges on issues that are of mutual interest and concern (e.g., cross-border issues, bilateral and multilateral relations, and customer protection).

Financial and Banking Information Infrastructure Committee (FBIIC)

The FDIC works with the Department of Homeland Security and the Office of Cyberspace Security through the FBIIC to improve the reliability and security of the financial industry’s infrastructure. Other federal government members of the FBIIC include the CFPB, FHFA, FRB, NCUA, OCC, Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), Securities and Exchange Commission , Department of the Treasury, and the Farm Credit Administration.

Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), Anti-Money Laundering (AML), Counter-Financing of Terrorism (CFT), and Anti-Fraud Working Groups

The FDIC participates in several interagency groups, described below, to help combat money laundering, terrorist financing, and fraud:

Financial Literacy and Education Commission (FLEC)

The FDIC is a member of FLEC, which was established by the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003.  The FDIC actively supports FLEC’s efforts to improve financial literacy in America by assigning experienced staff to provide leadership and support for FLEC initiatives, including leadership of FLEC workgroups emphasizing integrating financial education into youth programs and those engaged in workforce development initiatives.

Financial Education Partnerships

The FDIC collaborates with other federal, state, and local government agencies to promote financial education and capability initiatives for consumers and small businesses. These include the CFPB, Small Business Administration, and other federal and state agencies. The FDIC also promotes initiatives combining youth accounts and financial education through collaboration with local financial institutions, governmental entities, workforce development and education organizations, and other non-profit organizations.

Alliance for Economic Inclusion (AEI)

The FDIC established and leads the AEI, a national initiative to bring all unbanked and underserved populations into the financial mainstream. The AEI is composed of broad-based coalitions of financial institutions, community-based organizations, and other partners in 14 markets across the country. These coalitions work to increase banking services for underserved consumers in low- and moderate-income neighborhoods, minority and immigrant communities, and rural areas. These services include savings accounts, affordable remittance products, targeted financial education programs, small-dollar loan programs, alternative delivery channels, and other asset-building programs.

The Financial Stability Board (FSB)

The FDIC actively participates in the work of the FSB, an international body established by the G-20 leaders in 2009. As a member of the FSB’s Resolution Steering Group and its Cross-Border Crisis Management Group, the FDIC has helped develop international standards and guidance on issues relating to the resolution of G-SIFIs. Much of this work has related to the operationalization of the FSB’s Key Attributes.

Federal Trade Commission, National Association of Insurance Commissioners, and the Securities and Exchange Commission

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), which was enacted in 1999, permits insured financial institutions to expand the products they offer to include insurance and securities. GLBA also includes increased security requirements and disclosures to protect consumer privacy. The FDIC and other FFIEC agencies coordinate with the FTC, SEC, and the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) to develop industry research and guidelines relating to these products.

GLBA also requires the SEC to consult and coordinate with the appropriate federal banking agencies on certain loan-loss allowance matters involving public bank and thrift holding companies.  The SEC and the agencies have an established consultation process designed to fully comply with this requirement while avoiding unnecessary delays in processing holding company filings with the SEC and providing these institutions access to the securities markets.

In addition, the accounting policy staffs of the FDIC and the other FFIEC agencies and the SEC’s Office of the Chief Accountant (OCA) meet quarterly to discuss accounting matters of mutual interest and maintain ongoing communications on accounting issues relevant to financial institutions.  Other meetings are held with the OCA, as necessary, either on an individual agency or interagency basis.

U.S. Small Business Administration Strategic Alliance Memorandum

The FDIC partners with the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) to encourage financial institutions to prudently serve entrepreneurs and small business owners.  Through a Strategic Alliance Memorandum (SAM), the FDIC and SBA collaborate by co-sponsoring events and activities to help banks become fully aware of SBA capital access programs and connect banks to opportunities to address small business training, counseling, and financial service needs.

back to top

Appendix E

External Factors: The Economy and its Impact on the Banking Industry and the FDIC

Economic conditions at the national, regional, and local levels affect banking strategies and the industry’s overall performance. Business and household activity tends to be cyclical, and influences loan growth and credit performance for the banking industry.  Business conditions and macroeconomic policies combine to determine the rate of inflation, domestic interest rates, equity market valuations, and the exchange value of the dollar . These, in turn, influence the lending, funding, and off-balance-sheet activities of FDIC-insured depository institutions.

The U.S. economy continued to grow at a moderate pace in 2017, but risks to the outlook remain. U.S. economic activity picked up in 2017 as the adverse effects of a strong dollar and low energy prices from 2016 abated. Expectations are for near-term economic growth around 2.5 percent annually. Business investment remains low, but steady gains in the labor market have supported consumer spending. The unemployment rate was low and stable at 4. 4 percent for much of 2017, and the tighter labor market has led to a modest increase in wage growth. Ongoing improvements in economic activity and steady inflation have raised expectations that the Federal Reserve will continue on its planned path to normalize monetary policy  and reduce the size of its balance sheet.

The U.S. economy faces a number of ongoing challenges  and key risks. As the economy improves and the Federal Reserve raises interest rates, it will seek to do so in a manner that supports both economic growth and price stability.  Financial markets may encounter periods of volatility, which may adversely affect bank profitability. Even modest increases in interest rates and shifts in the yield curve can affect asset valuations and the earnings potential of depository institutions.

Globally, European banks face significant income and balance-sheet challenges that may adversely affect broader financial markets.  Uncertainty about the future of global trade agreements and a slowdown of China’s growth could weigh on the global economy and financial markets. If U.S. growth and monetary policies continue to diverge from those of other major countries, then the resulting impact on capital flows could adversely affect global financial markets.

Steady expansion of the U.S. economy should continue to support the performance of FDIC-insured institutions.  However, the post-crisis environment still poses unique challenges and risks that merit ongoig attention by regulators.

Insured institutions continued to show improved performance in 2017. The 5, 670 FDIC-insured commercial banks and savings institutions that filed financial results in fourth quarter 2017 reported net income of $ 164.8 billion, down $6.0 billion ( 3.5 percent) from fourth quarter 2016. However, the decline in net income was largely due to one-time tax expenses resulting from changes in the new tax law. 

The average return on assets was 0.97 percent in 2017, down 7 basis points from 2016. Net operating revenue was $ 755 billion, up $ 39.5 billion from a year earlier. Noninterest income increased $1.8 billion (0. 7 percent) in 2017 from the prior year, due to an increase in servicing fee and securitization income. The Federal Reserve raised short-term interest rates three times in 2017, which bolstered net interest margins at many banks as they were able to reinvest their shorter-term assets at higher rates. Net interest income was $ 37.7 billion ( 8.2 percent) higher than in 2016.

Loan loss provisions were higher in 2017 than in 2016. Insured institutions set aside $ 51.1 billion in provisions for loan and lease losses, a $ 3.0 billion ( 6.2 percent) increase compared to a year earlier. Noninterest expenses were $19.5 billion ( 4.6 percent) higher than in 2016, as salary expenses rose $ 10.2 billion ( 5.1 percent).

Asset quality indicators continued to improve in 2017. At year-end 2017, noncurrent loan balances declined by $15.6 billion ( 11.8 percent ) from year-end 2016. Noncurrent 1-to-4 family residential mortgage loans fell by $ 8.6 billion ( 13.1 percent), while noncurrent nonfarm nonresidential real estate loans declined by $973 million (10.2 percent).  Noncurrent construction and land development loans fell by $558 million ( 24.2 percent ), and noncurrent commercial and industrial loans decreased by $6.6 billion (26.8 percent).

Net charge-offs of loans and leases totaled $ 46.8 billion in 2017, up $ 4.3 billion ( 10.3 percent) from a year earlier. Net charge-offs of credit cards increased $5.0 billion ( 20.8 percent) and net charge-offs of automobile loans increased $801 million ( 26.1 percent). Net charge-offs of real estate loans secured by nonfarm nonresidential real estate properties increased by $271 million (131 percent), which was driven primarily by mid-size regional banks, while commercial and industrial loan net charge-offs decreased by $1.1 billion (13.3 percent). Net charge-offs of 1-to-4 family residential mortgages were $688 million ( 58.1 percent ) lower than in 2016, and net charge-offs of home equity lines of credit declined by $ 622 million (51.0 percent).

Asset growth was relatively strong in 2017. At year-end 2017, total assets of insured institutions were $ 636 billion ( 3.8 percent) higher than a year earlier. Banks increased their investment securities portfolios by $ 72 billion ( 2.0 percent ) in 2017, as holdings of mortgage-backed securities rose by $ 128 billion ( 6.4 percent).  Insured institutions increased their balances with Federal Reserve banks by $ 56 billion ( 5.1 percent).  Total loan and lease balances increased by $ 416 billion (4.5 percent), led by a $78 billion (4.1 percent ) increase in commercial and industrial loans. Real estate loans secured by nonfarm nonresidential properties were up by $ 67 billion ( 5.1 percent), while real estate loans for acquisition, development, and construction purposes rose by $ 25 billion ( 8.1 percent).

Much of the growth in assets was funded by increased deposit balances. Deposits in domestic offices increased by $ 434 billion ( 3.7 percent) in the twelve months ended December 31.  The growth occurred in both large- and small-denomination accounts, as estimated insured and uninsured deposits increased by $ 234 billion and $ 223 billion, respectively. Other borrowed funds rose by $82.5 billion (5.8 percent) while all other liabilities declined by $24.7 billion (4.8 percent). Equity capital rose by $91.1 billion (4.9 percent).

As of year-end 2017, 95 insured institutions with total assets of $ 14 billion were on the FDIC’s “Problem Bank List.” This is down from 123 problem institutions with combined assets of $28 billion on the Problem Bank List at year-end 2016. Problem banks are those institutions with financial, operational, or managerial weaknesses that threaten their viability, although historical analysis shows that most institutions in the Problem Bank List do not fail.

Over the twelve months of 2017, eight banks failed with combined assets of $ 5.1 billion. The Deposit Insurance Fund balance stood at $ 92.7 billion with a reserve ratio of 1. 30 percent on December 31, 2017, up from $ 83.2 billion and a reserve ratio of 1. 20 percent at year-end 2016.

back to top


Skip Footer back to content