RE: Citibank (Delaware)
New Castle, New Castle County, Delaware
Application Pursuant to Section 24 of the
Federal Deposit Insurance Act for consent to Indirectly
Engage as Principal in Real Estate Activities Which
May Not Be Permissible for a Subsidiary of a National Bank
Pursuant to the provisions of section 24 of the Federal Deposit Insurance ("FDI") Act, Citibank (Delaware), New Castle, Delaware ("Bank") has filed an application with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC"). The applicant requests the FDIC's consent to continue to engage in real estate investment activity indirectly through one or more wholly owned subsidiaries of the bank.
The activity of holding real estate investment properties for lease to third parties may not be a permissible activity for a National bank or a subsidiary of a National bank. State chartered FDIC-insured banks may not engage as principal in an activity prohibited to nationally chartered banks unless they obtain consent from the FDIC. Consent may not be granted unless the bank is in compliance with applicable capital standards and the FDIC determines that the activity poses no significant risk to the deposit insurance fund. Delaware State law empowers state banks to hold, purchase, convey, mortgage, and lease real property; those powers permitted to banks may be conducted through one or more subsidiaries.
Since 1986, Citibank has engaged in, through a wholly owned subsidiary, real estate leasing activity of a type not closely related to banking. Such leases, otherwise impermissible under applicable regulations which became effective on December 19, 1992, were incidental to the bank's overall leasing activity, which involves primarily personal property, and were entered into for relationship and business development reasons. The bank requests consent from the FDIC to continue to engage as principal in real estate leasing activity of a type not closely related to banking, in an amount not to exceed 15% of the bank's Tier 1 capital.
Investments in real estate, at any stage of the development process or even completed properties, can be generally characterized as risky in that there is a high degree of variability or uncertainty of returns on invested funds. The cyclical downturn in the real estate market in the late 1980s and early 1990s, and the impact of that downturn on financial
institutions, provides an illustration of the market risk presented by real estate investment. In addition to the high degree of variability, real estate investments possess many risks that, while not entirely unique, are not readily comparable to typical equity investments (e.g., common stock). Real estate markets are for the most part localized, investments are normally not securitized, financial information flow is often poor, and the market is generally not very liquid.
Real estate investment risk is higher than for most traditional bank assets, such as loans or debt securities. Real estate investment can increase interest rate risk; optimum investment periods are typically long-term; real estate is relatively lacking in liquidity; and real estate is subject to specialized risks such as environmental liability. In addition, real estate investment is of questionable benefit in the diversification of a financial institution's portfolio of assets. The experience and expertise of management is a critical factor, and there is much anecdotal evidence to suggest that the lack of adequate management creates a significant level of risk of loss.
Due to these risks, real estate investment activities appear suitable to a financial institution only on a very limited scale and under restrictive conditions designed to control the various risks posed to the financial institution and the deposit
The FDIC has reviewed available information and has also taken into consideration the financial and managerial resources and future earnings prospects of the Bank. The FDIC also considered the risks associated with real estate investment activities and the risks associated with owning and leasing the particular properties held by the Subsidiary.
In determining if a significant risk to the fund exists in the proposal, the FDIC evaluated the specifics of the Bank's application. In evaluating a Section 24 real estate activity application, the FDIC considers the types of real estate investment activity proposed to determine if any activity is unsuitable for an insured depository institution. The proposed subsidiary structure and its management policies and practices are reviewed to determine if a bank is adequately protected from litigation risk. Capital adequacy is analyzed to ensure a bank first devotes sufficient capital to its more traditional banking activities. Capital adequacy is determined by a bank's "consolidated" and "bank only" leverage and risk-based capital ratios, with all investments in real estate investment subsidiaries excluded from capital in the "bank only" capital calculation. Limitations on investment in a subsidiary engaged in real estate investment activity are evaluated in order to assure that the maximum risk exposure is nominal. Policies relating to extensions of credit to third parties for subsidiary-related transactions are evaluated to determine if they protect the bank from concentrations of risk. A bank's policies on engaging in transactions in which insiders are involved are reviewed to determine if they protect the bank from potential insider abuse. A bank's policies relating to the conditioning of loans on the purchase of real estate from the subsidiary and the extending of credit by the bank to third parties for the purpose of acquiring real estate from its subsidiary are reviewed to determine if they prevent undesirable tying relationships and to determine if they are adequate to ensure that sound credit underwriting is maintained. Having reviewed these areas, the FDIC is imposing conditions for prudential reasons due to the volatility and other risks which are inherent in the subject real estate activity, as well as to mitigate any potential insider conflicts of interest and to reduce risk to the insurance fund.
As of June 30, 1995, Citibank's real estate investment activity represented approximately 4.76% of the bank's Tier 1 capital and 0.97% of the bank's total assets. Citibank is in compliance with applicable capital standards. The Bank states in its application that its real estate investments will be limited to 15% of its equity capital; however, no feasibility study, financial projections, and/or business plan regarding the conduct of the activity was submitted in the application. Due to the lack of specific information on the financial and other risks associated with real estate investment that a subsidiary could potentially undertake, the FDIC has determined that it is appropriate to limit the Bank to the level of real estate investment activity presently-held, with additional investments requiring the prior written consent of the FDIC. Before considering approval for the Bank to engage in additional real estate investment activities, the FDIC shall require that the Bank's investment, including-the proposed additional investment, in any subsidiary not represent more than 10% of Tier 1 capital, and the aggregate investment in all such subsidiaries not represent more than 15% of Tier 1 capital, the investment limitation requested by the Bank. Because the FDIC is limiting the activity of the Subsidiary, the Bank may form an additional subsidiary without making full application to the FDIC under Section 24. In order to ensure the Bank's capital is sufficient to support both traditional banking activities and real estate investment activities, the FDIC will also require that the Bank's capital, after deducting the Bank's aggregate investment, including the proposed investment, in all Subsidiaries, equal or exceed the level required for a "well capitalized" institution pursuant to Part 325.103(b)(1) of the FDIC's Rules and Regulations before providing consent for the Bank to make additional real estate related investments.
In order to promote the concept that real estate investment activities should be conducted in a separately and adequately capitalized subsidiary and to ensure that the appropriate insurance fund is adequately compensated for, and sufficiently
protected from, additional risk in the event that "bank only" capital levels fall below "well capitalized" levels, the Bank's capital category for purposes of Prompt Corrective Action will be determined, and the Bank's risk adjusted deposit insurance premium will be assessed, based on "bank only" capital ratios, except that such deductions shall not be made when determining whether the Bank is "critically undercapitalized" as defined under Part 325.
Given the high risk present in real estate investment activities, the FDIC has also imposed a condition requiring that transactions between the Bank and any subsidiary shall be made in accordance with the restrictions of Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act to the same extent as though the subsidiary were an affiliate of the Bank as defined under Sections 23A and 23B, with the exception that the collateral requirements and investment limitations of 23A shall not apply to loans made by the Bank to finance bona fide sales of assets to third parties provided any such loans are consistent with safe and sound banking practice and do not involve more than the normal degree of risk of repayment and the loans are extended on terms and under circumstances, including credit standards, that are substantially the same, or at least as favorable to the Bank, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions. Any such loans made by the Bank would be reviewed by examiners at each regular safety and soundness examination conducted by the FDIC.
For the reasons outlined above, including the imposition of conditions, the Board of Directors has concluded that the proposed retention of interest in real estate does not pose a significant risk to the Bank Insurance Fund, provided certain conditions are observed, and therefore approval of the application, subject to conditions in the Order, is warranted.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
IN RE: Citibank (Delaware)
New Castle, New Castle County, Delaware
Application Pursuant to Section 24 of the
Federal Deposit Insurance Act for Consent to Engage as Principal
Through a Majority. Owned Subsidiary in Real Estate Investment Activities That May Not Be Permissible for a Subsidiary of a
The Board of Directors has fully considered all available facts and information relevant to Section 24 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, 12 U.S.C. §1831a, and Part 362 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Rules and Regulations, 12 C.F.R. §362.4, relating to an application by Citibank (Delaware), New Castle, Delaware ("Bank"), for consent to engage as principal through its wholly owned subsidiary, Citicorp Del-Lease, Inc., and one or more other majority owned subsidiaries (defined collectively as the "Subsidiaries") in real estate investment activities that may not be permissible for a subsidiary of a national bank, and has concluded the application should be approved subject to certain conditions.
Accordingly. it is hereby ORDERED, for the reasons set forth in the attached Statement, that the application submitted by Citibank (Delaware) for consent to engage as principal through the Subsidiaries in real estate investment activities that may not be permissible for a subsidiary of a national bank be and the same hereby is approved subject to the following conditions:
1. That the Bank and the Subsidiaries shall take the necessary actions to establish, and the Subsidiaries shall operate in a manner so as to ensure, a separate corporate existence as a majority owned subsidiary which:
(a) is adequately capitalized,
(b) is physically separate and distinct in its operations
from the operations of the Bank,
(c; maintains separate accounting and other corporate
(d) observes separate formalities such as separate board of directors' meetings,
(e) maintains a board of directors with one or more independent, knowledgeable outside directors and management expertise capable of conducting activities in a safe and sound manner,
(f) contracts with the Bank for any service on terms and conditions comparable to those available to or from independent entities, and
(g) conducts business pursuant to separate policies and procedures designed to inform customers and prospective customers of the subsidiary that the subsidiary is a separate organization from the Bank, including the placement of specific language on any debt instrument or contract with a third party disclosing that the Bank itself is not responsible for payment or performance;
2. That the Bank's indirect real estate investment in any subsidiary, including equity interests, debt obligations of the subsidiary held by the Bank, Bank guarantees of debt obligations issued by the subsidiary, extensions of credit or commitments of credit from the Bank to the subsidiary, and any extensions of credit to any third parties for the purpose of making a direct investment in the subsidiary or making an investment in a real estate investment or any other investment in which the real estate investment subsidiary has an interest (defined collectively as "Real Estate Investment"), shall be limited to those which are currently held, and the Bank shall not make any additional Real Estate Investment in any subsidiary without the prior written consent of the FDIC's Director of Division of Supervision or the Director's designee. However, Real Estate Investment shall not include loans made by the Bank to finance bona fide sales of assets which meet the requirements of paragraph 11(b);
3. That before considering approval for the Bank to engage in additional real estate investment activities through a subsidiary, the FDIC shall require that the Bank's Real Estate Investment, including the proposed additional investment, in any subsidiary not represent more than 10% of Tier 1 capital, and not exceed 15% of Tier 1 capital to all the Subsidiaries in the aggregate;
4. That before considering approval for the Bank to engage in additional real estate investment activities through a subsidiary, the FDIC shall require that the Bank's capital level, after deducting all Real Estate Investments in all the Subsidiaries, equal or exceed the level required for a "well capitalized" institution pursuant to Part 325.103(b)(1) of the FDIC's Rules and Regulations;
5. The Bank shall, on a quarterly basis, perform the capital adequacy calculations described in paragraph 4 for the purpose of ascertaining its capital level, and that in the event the Bank falls below the level required for a "well capitalized" institution pursuant to Part 325.103(b)(1) of the FDIC's Rules and Regulations, the Bank shall notify the FDIC within 15 days and submit to the FDIC an acceptable plan for restoring capital to a level required for a "well capitalized" institution;
6. That henceforth, notwithstanding Parts 325 and 327 of the FDIC's Rules and Regulations, 12 C.F.R. Parts 325 and 327,
the Bank's capital category for purposes of prompt corrective action and risk adjusted deposit insurance premium shall be calculated based on the Bank's capital after deducting all Real Estate Investments, except that such deductions shall not be made when determining whether the Bank is "critically undercapitalized" as defined under Part 325;
7. That the Bank shall continue to meet all applicable capital standards;
8. That any extensions of credit to any third parties for the purpose of making a direct investment in any subsidiary, or making an investment in a real estate investment or any other investment in which any subsidiary has an interest, or any acceptance of any debt obligation of or equity interest in any subsidiary as collateral security for a loan or extension of credit to any third party by the Bank shall be clearly disclosed to the Bank's board of directors prior to approval of the extension-of credit and documented in the board's minutes.
9. That prior to the consummation of a transaction between any real estate investment subsidiary and any of the Bank's customers, any potential conflicts of interest be identified, be appropriately resolved, and be clearly disclosed to the board of directors and documented in the board's minutes;
10. That the Bank not engage directly or indirectly through any subsidiary in any real estate investment activity or other transaction with insiders or their related interests without the prior written consent of the FDIC's Director of the Division of Supervision or the Director's designee;
11. That the Bank shall:
(a) Not condition any loan on the purchase or rental of real estate from any subsidiary, and
(b) Not extend credit to any borrower to acquire real estate from any subsidiary unless it is consistent with safe and sound banking practice and does not involve more than the normal degree of risk of repayment and the credit is extended on terms and under circumstances, including credit standards, that are substantially the same, or at least as favorable to the Bank, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions;
12. That transactions between the Bank and any real estate investment activity subsidiary shall be made in accordance
with the restrictions of Section 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, 12 U.S.C. §371c and §371c-1, to the same extent as though the subsidiary were an affiliate of the Bank as defined under Sections 23A and 23B, with the exception that the collateral requirements and investment limitations of 23A shall not apply to loans made by the Bank to finance bona fide sales of assets to third parties consistent with safe and sound underwriting requirements contained in paragraph 11(b) above; and
13. That the consent granted herein is based on the facts and circumstances presented or otherwise known to the FDIC in connection with these requests. The Bank shall notify the FDIC of any significant change in facts or circumstances. If the facts and circumstances change significantly, the FDIC shall have the right to alter, suspend, or withdraw its approval.