Each depositor insured to at least $250,000 per insured bank

Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Law, Regulations, Related Acts



[Table of Contents] [Previous Page] [Next Page] [Search]

2000 - Rules and Regulations


PART 327—ASSESSMENTS

Subpart A—In General

Sec.

Subpart B—Implementation of One-Time Assessment Credit

Subpart C—Implementation of Dividend Requirements

AUTHORITY:  12 U.S.C. 1441, 1813, 1815, 1817--1819, 1821; Sec. 2101--2109, Pub. L. 109--171, 120 Stat. 9--21, and Sec. 3, Pub. L. 109--173, 119 Stat. 3605.

SOURCE:  The provisions of this Part 327 appear at 54 Fed. Reg. 51374, December 15, 1989, 71 Fed. Reg. 61383, effective November 17, 2006, 71 Fed. Reg. 61389, October 18, 2006, effective January 1, 2007 and 73 Fed. Reg. 73162, December 2, 2008, effective January 1, 2009 except as otherwise noted.

Subpart A—In General

§ 327.1  Purpose and scope.

(a)  Scope. This Part 327 applies to any insured depository institution, including any insured branch of a foreign bank.

(b)  Purpose. (1) Except as specified in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, this Part 327 sets forth the rules for:

(i)  The time and manner of filing certified statements by insured depository institutions;

(ii)  The time and manner of payment of the assessments by such institutions; and

(iii)  The payment of assessments by depository institutions whose insured status has terminated.

(iv)  The classification of depository institutions for risk; and

(v)  The processes for review of assessments.

(2)  Deductions from the assessment base of an insured branch of a foreign bank are stated in subpart B part 347 of this chapter.

[Codified to 12 C.F.R. § 327.1]

[Section 327.2 amended at 59 Fed. Reg. 67160, December 29, 1994, effective April 1, 1995; 63 Fed. Reg. 17075, April 8, 1998, effective July 1, 1998; 71 Fed. Reg. 69277, November 30, 2006, effective January 1, 2007]

§ 327.2  Certified statements.

(a)  Required. (1) The certified statement shall also be known as the quarterly certified statement invoice. Each insured depository institution shall file and certify its quarterly certified statement invoice in the manner and form set forth in this section.

(2)  The quarterly certified statement invoice shall reflect the institution's risk assignment, assessment base, assessment computation, and assessment amount, for each quarterly assessment period.

(b)  Availability and access. (1) The Corporation shall make available to each insured depository institution via the FDIC's e-business Web site FDICconnect a quarterly certified statement invoice each assessment period.

(2)  Insured depository institutions shall access their quarterly certified statement invoices via FDICconnect, unless the FDIC provides notice to insured depository institutions of a successor system. In the event of a contingency, the FDIC may employ an alternative means of delivering the quarterly certified statement invoices. A quarterly certified statement invoice delivered by any alternative means will be treated as if it had been downloaded from FDICconnect.

(3)  Institutions that do not have Internet access may request a renewable one-year exemption from the requirement that quarterly certified statement invoices be accessed through FDICconnect. Any exemption request must be submitted in writing to the Manager of the Assessment Section.

(4)  Each assessment period, the FDIC will provide courtesy e-mail notification to insured depository institutions indicating that new quarterly certified statement invoices are available and may be accessed on FDICconnect. E-mail notification will be sent to all individuals with FDICconnect access to quarterly certified statement invoices.

(5)  E-mail notification may be used by the FDIC to communicate with insured depository institutions regarding quarterly certified statement invoices and other assessment-related matters.

(c)  Review by institution. The president of each insured depository institution, or such other officer as the institution's president or board of directors or trustees may designate, shall review the information shown on each quarterly certified statement invoice.

(d)  Retention by institution. If the appropriate officer of the insured depository institution agrees that, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, the information shown on the quarterly certified statement invoice is true, correct, and complete and in accordance with the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and the regulations issued under it, the institution shall pay the amount specified on the quarterly certified statement invoice and shall retain it in the institution's files for three years as specified in section 7(b)(4) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.

(e)  Amendment by institution. If the appropriate officer of the insured depository institution determines that, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, the information shown on the quarterly certified statement invoice is not true, correct, and complete and in accordance with the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and the regulations issued under it, the institution shall pay the amount specified on the quarterly certified statement invoice, and may:

(1)  Amend its report of conditions, or other similar report, to correct any data believed to be inaccurate on the quarterly certified statement invoice; amendments to such reports timely filed under section 7(g) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act but not permitted to be made by an institution's primary federal regulator may be filed with the FDIC for consideration in determining deposit insurance assessments; or

(2)  Amend and sign its quarterly certified statement invoice to correct a calculation believed to be inaccurate and return it to the FDIC by the applicable payment date specified in § 327.3(b)(2).

(f)  Certification. Data used by the Corporation to complete the quarterly certified statement invoice has been previously attested to by the institution in its reports of condition, or other similar reports, filed with the institution's primary federal regulator. When an insured institution pays the amount shown on the quarterly certified statement invoice and does not correct that invoice as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, the information on that invoice shall be deemed true, correct, complete, and certified for purposes of paragraph (a) of this section and section 7(c) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.

(g)  Requests for revision of assessment computation. (1) The timely filing of an amended report of condition or other similar report under paragraph (e)(1) of this section, or the timely filing of an amended quarterly certified statement invoice under paragraph (e)(2), that will result in a change to deposit insurance assessments owed or paid by an insured depository institution, shall be treated as a timely filed request for revision of computation of quarterly assessment payment under § 327.3(f).

(2)  The assessment rate on the quarterly certified statement invoice shall be amended only if it is inconsistent with the assessment risk assignment(s) provided to the institution by the Corporation for the assessment period in question pursuant to § 327.4(a). Agreement with the assessment rate shall not be deemed to constitute agreement with the assessment risk assignment. An institution may request review of an assessment risk assignment it believes to be incorrect pursuant to § 327.4(c).

[Codified to 12 C.F.R. § 327.2]

[Section 327.2 amended at 59 Fed. Reg. 67160, December 29, 1994, effective April 1, 1995; revised at 69 Fed. Reg. 68073, November 23, 2004, effective March 1, 2005; 71 Fed. Reg. 69277, November 30, 2006, effective January 1, 2007]

§ 327.3 Payment of assessments.

(a)  Required. (1) In general. Each insured depository institution shall pay to the Corporation for each assessment period an assessment determined in accordance with this part 327.

(2)  Notice of designated deposit account. For the purpose of making such payments, each insured depository institution shall designate a deposit account for direct debit by the Corporation. No later than 30 days prior to the next payment date specified in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, each institution shall provide notice to the Corporation via FDICconnect of the account designated, including all information and authorizations needed by the Corporation for direct debit of the account. After the initial notice of the designated account, no further notice is required unless the institution designates a different account for assessment debit by the Corporation, in which case the requirements of the preceding sentence apply.

(3)  Transition Rule for Financing Corporation (FICO) Payments. Quarterly FICO payments shall be collected by the FDIC without interruption during the assessment system transitional period in 2007. All insured depository institutions shall make scheduled quarterly FICO payments on January 2, 2007 (unless prepaid on December 30, 2006), and March 30, 2007, based upon, respectively, their September 30, 2006, and December 31, 2006 reported assessment bases, which shall be the final assessment bases calculated pursuant to 12 CFR 327.5(a) and (b) (2006). Simultaneous collection of deposit insurance assessments and FICO assessments will resume in June of 2007, based on the March 31, 2007 reported assessment base.

(b)  Assessment payment--(1) Quarterly certified statement invoice. Starting with the first assessment period of 2007, no later than 15 days prior to the payment date specified in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the Corporation will provide to each insured depository institution a quarterly certified statement invoice showing the amount of the assessment payment due from the institution for the prior quarter (net of credits or dividends, if any), and the computation of that amount. Subject to paragraph (e) of this section, the invoiced amount of the quarterly certified statement invoice shall be the product of the following: the assessment base of the institution for the prior quarter computed in accordance with § 327.5 multiplied by the institution's rate for the prior quarter as assigned to the institution pursuant to §§ 327.4(a) and 327.9.

(2)  Quarterly payment date and manner. The Corporation will cause the amount stated in the applicable quarterly certified statement invoice to be directly debited on the appropriate payment date from the deposit account designated by the insured depository institution for that purpose as follows:

(i)  In the case of the assessment payment for the quarter that begins on January 1, the payment date is the following June 30;

(ii)  In the case of the assessment payment for the quarter that begins on April 1, the payment date is the following September 30;

(iii)  In the case of the assessment payment for the quarter that begins on July 1, the payment date is the following December 30; and

(iv)  In the case of the assessment payment for the quarter that begins on October 1, the payment date is the following March 30.

(c)  Necessary action, sufficient funding by institution. Each insured depository institution shall take all actions necessary to allow the Corporation to debit assessments from the insured depository institution's designated deposit account. Each insured depository institution shall, prior to each payment date indicated in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, ensure that funds in an amount at least equal to the amount on the quarterly certified statement invoice are available in the designated account for direct debit by the Corporation. Failure to take any such action or to provide such funding of the account shall be deemed to constitute nonpayment of the assessment. Penalties for failure to timely pay assessments are provided for at 12 CFR 308.132(c)(3)(v).

(d)  Business days. If a payment date specified in paragraph (b)(2) falls on a date that is not a business day, the applicable date shall be the previous business day.

(e)  Payment adjustments in succeeding quarters. Quarterly certified statement invoices provided by the Corporation may reflect adjustments, initiated by the Corporation or an institution, resulting from such factors as amendments to prior quarterly reports of condition, retroactive revision of the institution's assessment risk assignment, and revision of the Corporation's assessment computations for prior quarters.

(f)  Request for revision of computation of quarterly assessment payment--(1) In general. An institution may submit a written request for revision of the computation of the institution's quarterly assessment payment as shown on the quarterly certified statement invoice in the following circumstances:

(i)  The institution disagrees with the computation of the assessment base as stated on the quarterly certified statement invoice;

(ii)  The institution determines that the rate applied by the Corporation is inconsistent with the assessment risk assignment(s) provided to the institution in writing by the Corporation for the assessment period for which the payment is due; or

(iii)  The institution believes that the quarterly certified statement invoice does not fully or accurately reflect adjustments provided for in paragraph (e) of this section.

(2)  Inapplicability. This paragraph (f) is not applicable to requests for review of an institution's assessment risk assignment, which are covered by § 327.4(c) of this part.

(3)  Requirements. Any such request for revision must be submitted within 90 days from the date the computation being challenged appears on the institution's quarterly certified statement invoice. The request for revision shall be submitted to the Manager of the Assessments Section and shall provide documentation sufficient to support the change sought by the institution. If additional information is requested by the Corporation, such information shall be provided by the institution within 21 days of the date of the request for additional information. Any institution submitting a timely request for revision will receive written notice form the Corporation regarding the outcome of its request. Upon completion of a review, the DOF Director (or designee) shall promptly notify the institution in writing of his or her determination of whether revision is warranted. If the institution requesting revision disagrees with that determination, it may appeal to the FDIC's Assessment Appeals Committee. Notice of the procedures applicable to appeals will be included with the written determination.

(g)  Quarterly certified statement invoice unavailable. Any institution whose quarterly certified statement invoice is unavailable on FDICconnect by the fifteenth day of the month in which the payment is due shall promptly notify the Corporation. Failure to provide prompt notice to the Corporation shall not affect the institution's obligation to make full and timely assessment payment. Unless otherwise directed by the Corporation, the institution shall preliminarily pay the amount shown on its quarterly certified statement invoice for the preceding assessment period, subject to subsequent correction.

[Codified to 12 C.F.R. § 327.3]

[Section 327.3 added at 59 Fed. Reg. 67161, December 29, 1994, effective April 1, 1995; amended at 60 Fed. Reg. 50407, September 29, 1995; 61 Fed. Reg. 67696, December 24, 1996, effective December 11, 1996; 64 Fed. Reg. 70181, December 16, 1999, effective April 1, 2000; 71 Fed. Reg. 69278, November 30, 2006, effective January 1, 2007; 74 Fed. Reg. 9551, March 4, 2009, effective April 1, 2009]

§ 327.4  Assessment rates.

(a)   Assessment risk assignment. For the purpose of determining the annual assessment rate for insured depository institutions under § 327.9 each insured depository institution will be provided an assessment risk assignment. Notice of an institution's current assessment risk assignment will be provided to the institution with each quarterly certified statement invoice. Adjusted assessment risk assignments for prior periods may also be provided by the Corporation. Notice of the procedures applicable to reviews will be included with the notice of assessment risk assignment provided pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section.

(b)  Payment of assessment at rate assigned. Institutions shall make timely payment of assessments based on the assessment risk assignment in the notice provided to the institution pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section. Timely payment is required notwithstanding any request for review filed pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section. Assessment risk assignments remain in effect for future assessment periods until changed. If the risk assignment in the notice is subsequently changed, any excess assessment paid by the institution will be credited by the Corporation, with interest, and any additional assessment owned shall be paid by the institution, with interest, in the next assessment payment after such subsequent assignment or change. Interest payable under this paragraph shall be determined in accordance with § 327.7.

(c)  Requests for review. An institution that believes any assessment risk assignment provided by the Corporation pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section is incorrect and seeks to change it must submit a written request for review of that risk assignment. An institution cannot request review through this process of the CAMELS ratings assigned by its primary federal regulator or challenge the appropriateness of any such rating; each federal regulator has established procedures for that purpose. An institution may also request review of a determination by the FDIC to assess the institution as a large, highly complex, or a small institution (Sec. 327.9(e)(3)) or a determination by the FDIC that the institution is a new institution (Sec. 327.9(f)(5)). Any request for review must be submitted within 90 days from the date the assessment risk assignment being challenged pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section appears on the institution's quarterly certified statement invoice. The request shall be submitted to the Corporation's Director of the Division of Insurance and Research in Washington, DC, and shall include documentation sufficient to support the change sought by the institution. If additional information is requested by the Corporation, such information shall be provided by the institution within 21 days of the date of the request for additional information. Any institution submitting a timely request for review will receive written notice from the Corporation regarding the outcome of its request. Upon completion of a review, the Director of the Division of Insurance and Research (or designee) or the Director of the Division of Supervision and Consumer Protection (or designee) or any successor divisions, as appropriate, shall promptly notify the institution in writing of his or her determination of whether a change is warranted. If the institution requesting review disagrees with that determination, it may appeal to the FDIC's Assessment Appeals Committee. Notice of the procedures applicable to appeals will be included with the written determination.

(d) Disclosure restrictions. The portion of an assessment risk assignment provided to an institution by the Corporation pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section that reflects any supervisory evaluation or confidential information is deemed to be exempt information within the scope of § 309.5(g)(8) of this chapter and, accordingly, is governed by the disclosure restrictions set out at § 309.6 of this chapter.

(e)  Limited use of assessment risk assignment. Any assessment risk assignment provided to a depository institution under this part 327 is for purposes of implementing and operating the FDIC's risk-based assessment system. Unless permitted by the Corporation or otherwise required by law, no institution may state in any advertisement or promotional material, or in any other public place or manner, the assessment risk assignment provided to it pursuant to this part.

(f)  Effective date for changes to risk assignment. Changes to an insured institution's risk assignment resulting from a supervisory ratings change become effective as of the date of written notification to the institution by its primary federal regulator or state authority of its supervisory rating (even when the CAMELS component ratings have not been disclosed to the institution), if the FDIC, after taking into account other information that could affect the rating, agrees with the rating. If the FDIC does not agree, the FDIC will notify the institution of the FDIC's supervisory rating; resulting changes to an insured institution's risk assignment become effective as of the date of written notification to the institution by the FDIC.

(2)  Changes to an insured institution's risk assignment resulting from a change in a long-term debt issuer rating become effective as of the date the change is announced by the rating agency.

(g)  Designated reserve ratio. The designated reserve ratio for the Deposit Insurance Fund is 2 percent.

[Codified to 12 C.F.R. § 327.4]

[Section 327.3 amended at 57 Fed. Reg. 45284, October 1, 1992, effective November 2, 1992; 58 Fed. Reg. 34364, June 25, 1993, effective October 1, 1993; redesignated as section 327.4 and amended at 59 Fed. Reg. 67161, December 29, 1994, effective April 1, 1995; 61 Fed. Reg. 67696, December 24, 1996, effective December 11, 1996; 63 Fed. Reg. 17075, April 8, 1998, effective July 1, 1998; 64 Fed. Reg. 70181, December 16, 1999, effective April 1, 2000; 67 Fed. Reg. 44351, July 2, 2002, effective June 30, 2002; 70 Fed. Reg. 17560, April 6, 2005, effective July 1, 2005; 71 Fed. Reg. 69279, November 30, 2006, effective January 1, 2007; 71 Fed. Reg. 69326, November 30, 2006, effective January 1, 2007; amended 75 Fed.Reg. 79293, Dec. 20, 2010; 76 Fed.Reg. 10672, Feb. 25, 2011]

§ 327.5 Assessment base.

(a)  Assessment base for all insured depository institutions. Except as provided in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section, the assessment base for an insured depository institution shall equal the average consolidated total assets of the insured depository institution during the assessment period minus the average tangible equity of the insured depository institution during the assessment period.

(1)  Average consolidated total assets defined and calculated. Average consolidated total assets are defined in the schedule of quarterly averages in the Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income, using either a daily averaging method or a weekly averaging method as described in paragraphs (a)(1)(i) or (ii) of this section. The amounts to be reported as daily averages are the sum of the gross amounts of consolidated total assets for each calendar day during the quarter divided by the number of calendar days in the quarter. The amounts to be reported as weekly averages are the sum of the gross amounts of consolidated total assets for each Wednesday during the quarter divided by the number of Wednesdays in the quarter. For days that an office of the reporting institution (or any of its subsidiaries or branches) is closed (e.g., Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays), the amounts outstanding from the previous business day will be used. An office is considered closed if there are no transactions posted to the general ledger as of that date. For institutions that begin operating during the calendar quarter, the amounts to be reported as daily averages are the sum of the gross amounts of consolidated total assets for each calendar day the institution was operating during the quarter divided by the number of calendar days the institution was operating during the quarter.

(i)  Institutions that must report average consolidated total assets using a daily averaging method. All insured depository institutions that report $1 billion or more in quarter-end consolidated total assets on their March 31, 2011 Consolidated Report of Condition and Income or Thrift Financial Report (or successor report), and all institutions that become insured after March 31, 2011, shall report average consolidated total assets as of the close of business for each day of the calendar quarter.

(ii)  Institutions that may report average consolidated total assets using a weekly averaging method. All insured depository institutions that report less than $1 billion in quarter-end consolidated total assets on their March 31, 2011, Consolidated Report of Condition and Income or Thrift Financial Report may report average consolidated total assets as an average of the balances as of the close of business on each Wednesday during the calendar quarter, or may at any time opt permanently to report average consolidated total assets on a daily basis as set forth in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section. Once an institution that reports average consolidated total assets using a weekly average reports average consolidated total assets equal to or greater than $1 billion for two consecutive quarters, it shall permanently report average consolidated total assets using daily averaging starting in the next quarter.

(iii)  Mergers and consolidations. The average calculation of the assets of the surviving or resulting institution in a merger or consolidation shall include the assets of all the merged or consolidated institutions for the days in the quarter prior to the merger or consolidation, whether reported by the daily or weekly method.

(2)  Average tangible equity defined and calculated. Tangible equity is defined as Tier 1 capital.

(i)  Calculation of average tangible equity. Except as provided in paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section, average tangible equity shall be calculated using monthly averaging. Monthly averaging means the average of the three month-end balances within the quarter.

(ii)  Alternate calculation of average tangible equity. Institutions that report less than $1 billion in quarter-end consolidated total assets on their March 31, 2011 Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income or Thrift Financial Reports may report average tangible equity using an end-of-quarter balance or may at any time opt permanently to report average tangible equity using a monthly average balance. An institution that reports average tangible equity using an end-of-quarter balance and reports average daily or weekly consolidated assets of $1 billion or more for two consecutive quarters shall permanently report average tangible equity using monthly averaging starting in the next quarter. Newly insured institutions shall report using monthly averaging.

(iii)  Calculation of average tangible equity for the surviving institution in a merger or consolidation. For the surviving institution in a merger or consolidation, Tier 1 capital shall be calculated as if the merger occurred on the first day of the quarter in which the merger or consolidation occurred.

(3)  Consolidated subsidiaries--(i) Reporting for insured depository institutions with consolidated subsidiaries that are not insured depository institutions. For insured institutions with consolidated subsidiaries that are not insured depository institutions, assets, including assets eliminated in consolidation, shall be calculated using a daily or weekly averaging method, corresponding to the daily or weekly averaging requirement of the parent institution. The Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income instructions in effect for the quarter for which data is being reported shall govern calculation of the average amount of subsidiaries' assets, including those assets eliminated in consolidation. An insured depository institution that reports average tangible equity using a monthly averaging method and that has subsidiaries that are not insured depository institutions shall use monthly average reporting for the subsidiaries. The monthly average data for these subsidiaries, however, may be calculated for the current quarter or for the prior quarter consistent with the method used to report average consolidated total assets and in conformity with Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income requirements. Once the method of reporting the subsidiaries' assets and tangible equity is chosen, however (current quarter or prior quarter), insured depository institutions cannot change the reporting method from quarter to quarter. An institution that reports consolidated assets and tangible equity using data for the prior quarter may switch to concurrent reporting on a permanent basis.

(ii)  Reporting for insured depository institutions with consolidated insured depository subsidiaries. Insured depository institutions that consolidate with other insured depository institutions for financial reporting purposes shall report for the parent and for each subsidiary individually, daily average consolidated total assets or weekly average consolidated total assets, as appropriate under paragraph (a)(1)(i) or (ii) above, and tangible equity, without consolidating their insured depository institution subsidiaries into the calculations. Investments in insured depository institution subsidiaries should be included in total assets using the equity method of accounting.

(b)  Assessment base for banker's banks--(1) Bankers bank defined. A banker's bank for purposes of calculating deposit insurance assessments shall meet the definition of banker's bank as that term is used in 12 U.S.C. 24. Banker's banks that have funds from government capital infusion programs (such as TARP and the Small Business Lending Fund), and stock owned by the FDIC resulting from banks failures, as well as non-bank-owned stock resulting from equity compensation programs, are not thereby excluded from the definition of banker's banks.

(2)  Self-certification. Institutions that meet the requirements of paragraph (b)(1) of this section shall so certify to that effect each quarter on the Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income or Thrift Financial Report or successor report.

(3)  Assessment base calculation for banker's banks. A banker's bank shall pay deposit insurance assessments on its assessment base as calculated in paragraph (a) of this section provided that it conducts 50 percent or more of its business with entities other than its parent holding company or entities other than those controlled (control has the same meaning as in section 3(w)(5) of the FDI Act) either directly or indirectly by its parent holding company. The assessment base will exclude the average (daily or weekly depending on how the institution calculates its average consolidated total assets) amount of reserve balances passed through to the Federal Reserve, the average amount of reserve balances held at the Federal Reserve for its own account (including all balances due from the Federal Reserve as described in the instructions to line 4 of Schedule RC--A of the Consolidated Report of Condition and Income as of December 31, 2010), and the average amount of the institution's federal funds sold, but in no case shall the amount excluded exceed the sum of the bank's average amount of total deposits of commercial banks and other depository institutions in the United States and the average amount of its federal funds purchased.

(c)  Assessment base for custodial banks--(1) Custodial bank defined. A custodial bank for purposes of calculating deposit insurance assessments shall be an insured depository institution with previous calendar-year trust assets (fiduciary and custody and safekeeping assets, as described in the instructions to Schedule RC--T of the Consolidated Report of Condition and Income as of December 31, 2010) of at least $50 billion or an insured depository institution that derived more than 50 percent of its total revenue (interest income plus non-interest income) from trust activity over the previous calendar year.

(2)  Assessment base calculation for custodial banks. A custodial bank shall pay deposit insurance assessments on its assessment base as calculated in paragraph (a) of this section, but the FDIC will exclude from that assessment base the daily or weekly average (depending on how the bank reports its average consolidated total assets) of all asset types described in the instructions to lines 34, 35, 36, and 37 of Schedule RC--R of the Consolidated Report of Condition and Income as of December 31, 2010 with a Basel risk weighting of 0 percent, regardless of maturity, plus 50 percent of those asset types described in lines 34, 35, 36, and 37 of Schedule RC--R as of December 31, 2010 with a Basel risk weighting of 20 percent regardless of maturity subject to the limitation that the daily or weekly average value of these assets cannot exceed the daily or weekly average value of those deposits classified as transaction accounts in the instructions to Schedule RC--E of the Consolidated Report of Condition and Income as of December 31, 2010, and identified by the institution as being directly linked to a fiduciary or custodial and safekeeping account asset.

(d)  Assessment base for insured branches of foreign banks. Average consolidated total assets for an insured branch of a foreign bank are defined as total assets of the branch (including net due from related depository institutions) in accordance with the schedule of assets and liabilities in the Report of Assets and Liabilities of U.S. Branches and Agencies of Foreign Banks as of the assessment period for which the assessment is being calculated, but measured using the definition for reporting total assets in the schedule of quarterly averages in the Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income, and calculated using the appropriate daily or weekly averaging method under paragraph (a)(1)(i) or (ii) of this section. Tangible equity for an insured branch of a foreign bank is eligible assets (determined in accordance with § 347.210 of the FDIC's regulations) less the book value of liabilities (exclusive of liabilities due to the foreign bank's head office, other branches, agencies, offices, or wholly owned subsidiaries) calculated on a monthly or end-of-quarter basis, according to the branch's size.

(e)  Newly insured institutions. A newly insured institution shall pay an assessment for the assessment period during which it became insured. The FDIC will prorate the newly insured institution's assessment amount to reflect the number of days it was insured during the period.

[Codified to 12 C.F.R. § 327.5]

[Section 327.4 amended at 58 Fed. Reg. 34365, June 25, 1993, effective October 1, 1993; redesignated as section 327.5 and amended at 59 Fed. Reg. 67162, December 29, 1994, effective April 1, 1995; 71 Fed. Reg. 69279, November 30, 2006, effective January 1, 2007; amended 76 Fed.Reg. 10672, Feb. 25, 2011]

§ 327.6   Mergers and consolidations; other terminations of insurance.

(a)  Final quarterly certified invoice for acquired institution. An institution that is not the resulting or surviving institution in a merger or consolidation must file a report of condition for every assessment period prior to the assessment period in which the merger or consolidation occurs. The surviving or resulting institution shall be responsible for ensuring that these reports of condition are filed and shall be liable for any unpaid assessments on the part of the institution that is not the resulting or surviving institution.

(b)  Assessment for quarter in which the merger or consolidation occurs. For an assessment period in which a merger or consolidation occurs, consolidated total assets for the surviving or resulting institution shall include the consolidated total assets of all insured depository institutions that are parties to the merger or consolidation as if the merger or consolidation occurred on the first day of the assessment period. Tier 1 capital shall be reported in the same manner.

(c)  Other termination. When the insured status of an institution is terminated, and the deposit liabilities of such institution are not assumed by another insured depository institution--

(1)  Payment of assessments; quarterly certified statement invoices. The depository institution whose insured status is terminating shall continue to file and certify its quarterly certified statement invoice and pay assessments for the assessment period its deposits are insured. Such institution shall not be required to certify its quarterly certified statement invoice and pay further assessments after it has paid in full its deposit liabilities and the assessment to the Corporation required to be paid for the assessment period in which its deposit liabilities are paid in full, and after it, under applicable law, goes out of business or transfers all or substantially all of its assets and liabilities to other institutions or otherwise ceases to be obliged to pay subsequent assessments.

(2)  Payment of deposits; certification to Corporation. When the deposit liabilities of the depository institution have been paid in full, the depository institution shall certify to the Corporation that the deposit liabilities have been paid in full and give the date of the final payment. When the depository institution has unclaimed deposits, the certification shall further state the amount of the unclaimed deposits and the disposition made of the funds to be held to meet the claims. For assessment purposes, the following will be considered as payment of the unclaimed deposits:

(i)  The transfer of cash funds in an amount sufficient to pay the unclaimed and unpaid deposits to the public official authorized by law to receive the same; or

(ii)  If no law provides for the transfer of funds to a public official, the transfer of cash funds or compensatory assets to an insured depository institution in an amount sufficient to pay the unclaimed and unpaid deposits in consideration for the assumption of the deposit obligations by the insured depository institution.

(3)  Notice to depositors. (i) The depository institution whose insured status is terminating shall give sufficient advance notice of the intended transfer to the owners of the unclaimed deposits to enable the depositors to obtain their deposits prior to the transfer. The notice shall be mailed to each depositor and shall be published in a local newspaper of general circulation. The notice shall advise the depositors of the liquidation of the depository institution, request them to call for and accept payment of their deposits, and state the disposition to be made of their deposits if they fail to promptly claim the deposits.

(ii)  If the unclaimed and unpaid deposits are disposed of as provided in paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section, a certified copy of the public official's receipt issued for the funds shall be furnished to the Corporation.

(iii)  If the unclaimed and unpaid deposits are disposed of as provided in paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section, an affidavit of the publication and of the mailing of the notice to the depositors, together with a copy of the notice and a certified copy of the contract of assumption, shall be furnished to the Corporation.

(4)  Notice to Corporation. The depository institution whose insured status is terminating shall advise the Corporation of the date on which it goes out of business or transfers all or substantially all of its assets and liabilities to other institutions or otherwise ceases to be obligated to pay subsequent assessments and the method whereby the termination has been effected.

(d)  Resumption of insured status before insurance of deposits ceases. If a depository institution whose insured status has been terminated is permitted by the Corporation to continue or resume its status as an insured depository institution before the insurance of its deposits has ceased, the institution will be deemed, for assessment purposes, to continue as an insured depository institution and must thereafter file and certify its quarterly certified statement invoices and pay assessments as though its insured status had not been terminated. The procedure for applying for the continuance or resumption of insured status is set forth in § 303.248 of this chapter.

[Codified to 12 C.F.R. § 327.6]

[Section 327.6 amended at 59 Fed. Reg. 67164, December 29, 1994, effective April 1, 1995; 61 Fed. Reg. 64983, December 10, 1996, effective January 1, 1997; 71 Fed. Reg. 69280, November 30, 2006, effective January 1, 2007; 74 Fed. Reg. 9551, March 4, 2009, effective April 1, 2009; amended 76 Fed.Reg. 10672, Feb. 25, 2011]

§ 327.7  Payment of interest on assessment underpayments and overpayments.

(a)  Payment of interest--(1) Payment by institutions. Each insured depository institution shall pay interest to the Corporation on any underpayment of the institution's assessment.

(2)  Payment by Corporation. The Corporation will pay interest on any overpayment by the institution of its assessment.

(3)  Accrual of interest. (i) Interest on an amount owed to or by the Corporation for the underpayment or overpayment of an assessment shall accrue interest at the relevant interest rate.

(ii)  Interest on an amount specified in paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section shall begin to accrue on the day following the regular payment date, as provided for in § 327.3(b)(2), for the amount so overpaid or underpaid, provided, however, that interest shall not begin to accrue on any overpayment until the day following the date such overpayment was received by the Corporation. Interest shall continue to accrue through the date on which the overpayment or underpayment (together with any interest thereon) is discharged.

(iii)  The relevant interest rate shall be redetermined for each quarterly assessment interval. A quarterly assessment interval begins on the day following a regular payment date, as specified in § 327.3(b)(2), and ends on the immediately following regular payment date.

(b)  Interest rates. (1) The relevant interest rate for a quarterly assessment interval that includes the month of January, April, July, and October, respectively, is the coupon equivalent yield of the average discount rate set on the 3-month Treasury bill at the last auction held by the United States Treasury Department during the preceding December, March, June, and September, respectively.

(2)  The relevant interest rate for a quarterly assessment interval will apply to any amounts overpaid or underpaid on the payment date immediately prior to the beginning of the quarterly assessment interval. The relevant interest rate will also apply to any amounts owed for previous overpayments or underpayments (including any interest thereon) that remain outstanding, after any adjustments to such overpayments or underpayments have been made thereon, at the end of the regular payment date immediately prior to the beginning of the quarterly assessment interval. Interest will be compounded daily.

[Codified to 12 C.F.R. § 327.7]

[Source 327.7 amended at 57 Fed. Reg. 45286, October 1, 1992, effective November 2, 1992; 59 Fed. Reg. 67164, December 29, 1994, effective April 1, 1995; 60 Fed. Reg. 50409, September 29, 1995, effective October 30, 1995; 71 Fed. Reg. 69281, November 30, 2006, effective January 1, 2007]

§ 327.8  Definitions.

For purposes of this part 327:

(a)  Deposits. The term deposit has the meaning specified in section 3(l) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.

(b)  Quarterly report of condition. The term quarterly report of condition means a report required to be filed pursuant to section 7(a)(3) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.

(c)  Assessment period--In general. The term assessment period means a period beginning on January 1 of any calendar year and ending on March 31 of the same year, or a period beginning on April 1 of any calendar year and ending on June 30 of the same year; or a period beginning on July 1 of any calendar year and ending on September 30 of the same year; or a period beginning on October 1 of any calendar year and ending on December 31 of the same year.

(d)  Acquiring institutions. The term acquiring institution means an insured depository institution that assumes some or all of the deposits of another insured depository institution in a terminating transfer.

(e)  Small Institution. An insured depository institution with assets of less than $10 billion as of December 31, 2006, and an insured branch of a foreign institution shall be classified as a small institution. If, after December 31, 2006, an institution classified as large under paragraph (f) of this section (other than an institution classified as large for purposes of § 327.9(e)) reports assets of less than $10 billion in its quarterly reports of condition for four consecutive quarters, the FDIC will reclassify the institution as small beginning the following quarter.

(f)  Large Institution. An institution classified as large for purposes of § 327.9(e) or an insured depository institution with assets of $10 billion or more as of December 31, 2006 (other than an insured branch of a foreign bank or a highly complex institution) shall be classified as a large institution. If, after December 31, 2006, an institution classified as small under paragraph (e) of this section reports assets of $10 billion or more in its quarterly reports of condition for four consecutive quarters, the FDIC will reclassify the institution as large beginning the following quarter.

(g)  Highly complex institution. (1) A highly complex institution is:

(i)  An insured depository institution (excluding a credit card bank) that has had $50 billion or more in total assets for at least four consecutive quarters that is controlled by a U.S. parent holding company that has had $500 billion or more in total assets for four consecutive quarters, or controlled by one or more intermediate U.S. parent holding companies that are controlled by a U.S. holding company that has had $500 billion or more in assets for four consecutive quarters; or

(ii)  A processing bank or trust company.

(2)  Control has the same meaning as in section 3(w)(5) of the FDI Act. A U.S. parent holding company is a parent holding company incorporated or organized under the laws of the United States or any State, as the term "State" is defined in section 3(a)(3) of the FDI Act. If, after December 31, 2010, an institution classified as highly complex under paragraph (g)(1)(i) of this section falls below $50 billion in total assets in its quarterly reports of condition for four consecutive quarters, or its parent holding company or companies fall below $500 billion in total assets for four consecutive quarters, the FDIC will reclassify the institution beginning the following quarter. If, after December 31, 2010, an institution classified as highly complex under paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section falls below $10 billion in total assets for four consecutive quarters, the FDIC will reclassify the institution beginning the following quarter.

(h)  CAMELS composite and CAMELS component ratings. The terms CAMELS composite ratings and CAMELS component ratings shall have the same meaning as in the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System as published by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council.

(i)  ROCA supervisory ratings. ROCA supervisory ratings rate risk management, operational controls, compliance, and asset quality.

(j)  New depository institution. A new insured depository institution is a bank or savings association that has been federally insured for less than five years as of the last day of any quarter for which it is being assessed.

(k)  Established depository institution. An established insured depository institution is a bank or savings association that has been federally insured for at least five years as of the last day of any quarter for which it is being assessed.

(1)  Merger or consolidation involving new and established institution(s). Subject to paragraphs (k)(2), (3), (4), and (5) of this section and § 327.9(f)(3) and (4), when an established institution merges into or consolidates with a new institution, the resulting institution is a new institution unless:

(i)  The assets of the established institution, as reported in its report of condition for the quarter ending immediately before the merger, exceeded the assets of the new institution, as reported in its report of condition for the quarter ending immediately before the merger; and

(ii)  Substantially all of the management of the established institution continued as management of the resulting or surviving institution.

(2)  Consolidation involving established institutions. When established institutions consolidate, the resulting institution is an established institution.

(3)  Grandfather exception. If a new institution merges into an established institution, and the merger agreement was entered into on or before July 11, 2006, the resulting institution shall be deemed to be an established institution for purposes of this part.

(4)  Subsidiary exception. Subject to paragraph (k)(5) of this section, a new institution will be considered established if it is a wholly owned subsidiary of:

(i)  A company that is a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 or a savings and loan holding company under the Home Owners' Loan Act, and:

(A)  At least one eligible depository institution (as defined in 12 CFR 303.2(r)) that is owned by the holding company has been chartered as a bank or savings association for at least five years as of the date that the otherwise new institution was established; and

(B)  The holding company has a composite rating of at least "2" for bank holding companies or an above average or "A" rating for savings and loan holding companies and at least 75 percent of its insured depository institution assets are assets of eligible depository institutions, as defined in 12 CFR 303.2(r); or

(ii)  An eligible depository institution, as defined in 12 CFR 303.2(r), that has been chartered as a bank or savings association for at least five years as of the date that the otherwise new institution was established.

(5)  Effect of credit union conversion. In determining whether an insured depository institution is new or established, the FDIC will include any period of time that the institution was a federally insured credit union.

(l)  Risk assignment. For all small institutions and insured branches of foreign banks, risk assignment includes assignment to Risk Category I, II, III, or IV, and, within Risk Category I, assignment to an assessment rate or rates. For all large institutions and highly complex institutions, risk assignment includes assignment to an assessment rate or rates.

(m)  Unsecured debt--For purposes of the unsecured debt adjustment as set forth in § 327.9(d)(1) and the depository institution debt adjustment as set forth in § 327.9(d)(2), unsecured debt shall include senior unsecured liabilities and subordinated debt.

(n)  Senior unsecured liability--For purposes of the unsecured debt adjustment as set forth in § 327.9(d)(1) and the depository institution debt adjustment as set forth in § 327.9(d)(2), senior unsecured liabilities shall be the unsecured portion of other borrowed money as defined in the quarterly report of condition for the reporting period as defined in paragraph (b) of this section, but shall not include any senior unsecured debt that the FDIC has guaranteed under the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program, 12 CFR Part 370.

(o)  Subordinated debt--For purposes of the unsecured debt adjustment as set forth in § 327.9(d)(1) and the depository institution debt adjustment as set forth in § 327.9(d)(2), subordinated debt shall be as defined in the quarterly report of condition for the reporting period; however, subordinated debt shall also include limited-life preferred stock as defined in the quarterly report of condition for the reporting period.

(p)  Long-term unsecured debt--For purposes of the unsecured debt adjustment as set forth in § 327.9(d)(1) and the depository institution debt adjustment as set forth in § 327.9(d)(2), long-term unsecured debt shall be unsecured debt with at least one year remaining until maturity; however, any such debt where the holder of the debt has a redemption option that is exercisable within one year of the reporting date shall not be deemed long-term unsecured debt.

(q)  Reciprocal deposits--Deposits that an insured depository institution receives through a deposit placement network on a reciprocal basis, such that:

(1)  For any deposit received, the institution (as agent for depositors) places the same amount with other insured depository institutions through the network; and (2) each member of the network sets the interest rate to be paid on the entire amount of funds it places with other network members.

(r)  Parent holding company--A parent holding company has the same meaning as "depository institution holding company," as defined in § 3(w) of the FDI Act.

(s)  Processing bank or trust company--A processing bank or trust company is an institution whose last three years' non-lending interest income, fiduciary revenues, and investment banking fees, combined, exceed 50 percent of total revenues (and its last three years fiduciary revenues are non-zero), and whose total fiduciary assets total $500 billion or more, and whose total assets for at least four consecutive quarters have been $10 billion or more.

(t)  Credit card bank--A credit card bank is a bank for which credit card receivables plus securitized receivables exceed 50 percent of assets plus securitized receivables.

(u)  Control--Control has the same meaning as in section 2 of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, 12 U.S.C. 1841(a)(2).

[Codified to 12 C.F.R. § 327.8]

[Section 327.8 amended at 59 Fed. Reg. 67164, December 29, 1994, effective April 1, 1995; 60 Fed. Reg. 42741, August 16, 1995, effective September 15, 1995; 61 Fed. Reg. 64983, December 10, 1996, effective January 1, 1997; 61 Fed. Reg. 67696, December 24, 1996, effective December 11, 1996; 62 Fed. Reg. 27176, May 19, 1997, effective May 6, 1997; 71 Fed. Reg. 69281, November 30, 2006, effective January 1, 2007; 74 Fed. Reg. 9551, March 4, 2009, effective April 1, 2009; amended 76 Fed.Reg. 10707, Feb. 25, 2011]

§ 327.9  Assessment pricing methods.

(a)  Small institutions.

(1)  Risk Categories.--Each small insured depository institution shall be assigned to one of the following four Risk Categories based upon the institution's capital evaluation and supervisory evaluation as defined in this section.

(i)  Risk Category I. Small institutions in Supervisory Group A that are Well Capitalized will be assigned to Risk Category I.

(ii)  Risk Category II. Small institutions in Supervisory Group A that are Adequately Capitalized, and small institutions in Supervisory Group B that are either Well Capitalized or Adequately Capitalized will be assigned to Risk Category II.

(iii)  Risk Category III. Small institutions in Supervisory Groups A and B that are Undercapitalized, and small institutions in Supervisory Group C that are Well Capitalized or Adequately Capitalized will be assigned to Risk Category III.

(iv)  Risk Category IV. Small institutions in Supervisory Group C that are Undercapitalized will be assigned to Risk Category IV.

(2)  Capital evaluations. Each small institution will receive one of the following three capital evaluations on the basis of data reported in the institution's Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income or Thrift Financial Report (or successor report, as appropriate) dated as of March 31 for the assessment period beginning the preceding January 1; dated as of June 30 for the assessment period beginning the preceding April 1; dated as of September 30 for the assessment period beginning the preceding July 1; and dated as of December 31 for the assessment period beginning the preceding October 1.

(i)  Well Capitalized. A Well Capitalized institution is one that satisfies each of the following capital ratio standards: Total risk-based ratio, 10.0 percent or greater; Tier 1 risk-based ratio, 6.0 percent or greater; and Tier 1 leverage ratio, 5.0 percent or greater.

(ii)  Adequately Capitalized. An Adequately Capitalized institution is one that does not satisfy the standards of Well Capitalized under this paragraph but satisfies each of the following capital ratio standards: Total risk-based ratio, 8.0 percent or greater; Tier 1 risk-based ratio, 4.0 percent or greater; and Tier 1 leverage ratio, 4.0 percent or greater.

(iii)  Undercapitalized. An undercapitalized institution is one that does not qualify as either Well Capitalized or Adequately Capitalized under paragraphs (a)(2)(i) and (a)(2)(ii) of this section.

(3)  Supervisory evaluations. Each small institution will be assigned to one of three Supervisory Groups based on the Corporation's consideration of supervisory evaluations provided by the institution's primary federal regulator. The supervisory evaluations include the results of examination findings by the primary federal regulator, as well as other information that the primary federal regulator determines to be relevant. In addition, the Corporation will take into consideration such other information (such as state examination findings, as appropriate) as it determines to be relevant to the institution's financial condition and the risk posed to the Deposit Insurance Fund. The three Supervisory Groups are:

(i)  Supervisory Group "A." This Supervisory Group consists of financially sound institutions with only a few minor weaknesses;

(ii)  Supervisory Group "B." This Supervisory Group consists of institutions that demonstrate weaknesses which, if not corrected, could result in significant deterioration of the institution and increased risk of loss to the Deposit Insurance Fund; and

(iii)  Supervisory Group "C." This Supervisory Group consists of institutions that pose a substantial probability of loss to the Deposit Insurance Fund unless effective corrective action is taken.

(4)  Financial ratios method. A small insured depository institution in Risk Category I shall have its initial base assessment rate determined using the financial ratios method.

(i)  Under the financial ratios method, each of six financial ratios and a weighted average of CAMELS component ratings will be multiplied by a corresponding pricing multiplier. The sum of these products will be added to a uniform amount. The resulting sum shall equal the institution's initial base assessment rate; provided, however, that no institution's initial base assessment rate shall be less than the minimum initial base assessment rate in effect for Risk Category I institutions for that quarter nor greater than the maximum initial base assessment rate in effect for Risk Category I institutions for that quarter. An institution's initial base assessment rate, subject to adjustment pursuant to paragraphs (d)(1), (2), and (3) of this section, as appropriate (resulting in the institution's total base assessment rate, which in no case can be lower than 50 percent of the institution's initial base assessment rate), and adjusted for the actual assessment rates set by the Board under § 327.10(f), will equal an institution's assessment rate. The six financial ratios are: Tier 1 Leverage Ratio; Loans past due 30--89 days/gross assets; Nonperforming assets/gross assets; Net loan charge-offs/gross assets; Net income before taxes/risk-weighted assets; and the Adjusted brokered deposit ratio. The ratios are defined in Table A.1 of Appendix A to this subpart. The ratios will be determined for an assessment period based upon information contained in an institution's report of condition filed as of the last day of the assessment period as set out in § 327.9(a)(2). The weighted average of CAMELS component ratings is created by multiplying each component by the following percentages and adding the products: Capital adequacy--25%, Asset quality--20%, Management--25%, Earnings--10%, Liquidity--10%, and Sensitivity to market risk--10%. The following table sets forth the initial values of the pricing multipliers:

  Risk Measures* Pricing Multipliers**
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio (0.056)
Loans Past Due 30 - 89 Days/Gross Assets 0.575
Nonperforming Assets/Gross Assets 1.074
Net Loan Charge-Offs/Gross Assets 1.210
Net Income before Taxes/Risk-Weighted Assets (0.764)
Adjusted brokered deposit ratio 0.065
Weighted Average CAMELS Component Rating 1.095

* Ratios are expressed as percentages.

** Multipliers are rounded to three decimal places.

(ii)  The six financial ratios and the weighted average CAMELS component rating will be multiplied by the respective pricing multiplier, and the products will be summed. To this result will be added the uniform amount. The resulting sum shall equal the institution's initial base assessment rate; provided, however, that no institution's initial base assessment rate shall be less than the minimum initial base assessment rate in effect for Risk Category I institutions for that quarter nor greater than the maximum initial base assessment rate in effect for Risk Category I institutions for that quarter.

(iii)  Uniform amount and pricing multipliers. Except as adjusted for the actual assessment rates set by the Board under § 327.10(f), the uniform amount shall be:

(A)  4.861 whenever the assessment rate schedule set forth in § 327.10(a) is in effect;

(B)  2.861 whenever the assessment rate schedule set forth in § 327.10(b) is in effect;

(C)  1.861 whenever the assessment rate schedule set forth in § 327.10(c) is in effect; or

(D)  0.861 whenever the assessment rate schedule set forth in § 327.10(d) is in effect.

(iv)  Implementation of CAMELS rating changes.

(A)  Changes between risk categories. If, during a quarter, a CAMELS composite rating change occurs that results in a Risk Category I institution moving from Risk Category I to Risk Category II, III or IV, the institution's initial base assessment rate for the portion of the quarter that it was in Risk Category I shall be determined using the supervisory ratings in effect before the change and the financial ratios as of the end of the quarter, subject to adjustment pursuant to paragraphs (d)(1), (2), and (3) of this section, as appropriate, and adjusted for the actual assessment rates set by the Board under § 327.10(f). For the portion of the quarter that the institution was not in Risk Category I, the institution's initial base assessment rate, which shall be subject to adjustment pursuant to paragraphs (d)(1), (2), and (3), shall be determined under the assessment schedule for the appropriate Risk Category. If, during a quarter, a CAMELS composite rating change occurs that results in an institution moving from Risk Category II, III or IV to Risk Category I, then the financial ratios method shall apply for the portion of the quarter that it was in Risk Category I, subject to adjustment pursuant to paragraphs (d)(1), (2) and (3) of this section, as appropriate, and adjusted for the actual assessment rates set by the Board under § 327.10(f). For the portion of the quarter that the institution was not in Risk Category I, the institution's initial base assessment rate, which shall be subject to adjustment pursuant to paragraphs (d)(1), (2), and (3) of this section shall be determined under the assessment schedule for the appropriate Risk Category.

(B)  Changes within Risk Category I. If, during a quarter, an institution's CAMELS component ratings change in a way that will change the institution's initial base assessment rate within Risk Category I, the initial base assessment rate for the period before the change shall be determined under the financial ratios method using the CAMELS component ratings in effect before the change, subject to adjustment pursuant to paragraphs (d)(1), (2), and (3) of this section, as appropriate. Beginning on the date of the CAMELS component ratings change, the initial base assessment rate for the remainder of the quarter shall be determined using the CAMELS component ratings in effect after the change, again subject to adjustment pursuant to paragraphs (d)(1), (2), and (3) of this section, as appropriate.

(b)  Large and Highly Complex institutions.

(1)  Assessment scorecard for large institutions (other than highly complex institutions).

(i)  A large institution other than a highly complex institution shall have its initial base assessment rate determined using the scorecard for large institutions.

Scorecard for Large Institutions

  Scorecard Measures and Components Measure Weights Component Weights
P Performance Score
P.1 Weighted Average CAMELS Rating 100% 30%
P.2 Ability to Withstand Asset-Related Stress: 50%
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio 10%
Concentration Measure 35%
Core Earnings/Average Quarter-End Total Assets* 20%
Credit Quality Measure 35%
P.3 Ability to Withstand Funding-Related Stress: 20%
Core Deposits/Total Liabilities 60%
Balance Sheet Liquidity Ratio 40%
L Loss Severity Score
L.1 Loss Severity Measure 100%

* Average of five quarter-end total assets (most recent and four prior quarters)

(ii)  The scorecard for large institutions produces two scores: performance score and loss severity score.

(A)  Performance score for large institutions. The performance score for large institutions is a weighted average of the scores for three measures: the weighted average CAMELS rating score, weighted at 30 percent; the ability to withstand asset-related stress score, weighted at 50 percent; and the ability to withstand funding-related stress score, weighted at 20 percent.

(1)  Weighted average CAMELS rating score.

(i)To compute the weighted average CAMELS rating score, a weighted average of an institution's CAMELS component ratings is calculated using the following weights:

CAMELS Component Weight
C 25%
A 20%
M 25%
E 10%
L 10%
S 10%

(ii)A weighted average CAMELS rating converts to a score that ranges from 25 to 100. A weighted average rating of 1 equals a score of 25 and a weighted average of 3.5 or greater equals a score of 100. Weighted average CAMELS ratings between 1 and 3.5 are assigned a score between 25 and 100. The score increases at an increasing rate as the weighted average CAMELS rating increases. Appendix B describes the conversion of a weighted average CAMELS rating to a score.

(2)  Ability to withstand asset-related stress score.

(i)The ability to withstand asset-related stress score is a weighted average of the scores for four measures: Tier 1 leverage ratio; concentration measure; the ratio of core earnings to average quarter-end total assets; and the credit quality measure. Appendices A and C define these measures.

(ii)The Tier 1 leverage ratio and the ratio of core earnings to average quarter-end total assets are described in Appendix A and the method of calculating the scores is described in Appendix C.

The score for the concentration measure is the greater of the higher-risk assets to Tier 1 capital and reserves score or the growth-adjusted portfolio concentrations score. Both ratios are described in Appendix C.

The score for the credit quality measure is the greater of the criticized and classified items to Tier 1 capital and reserves score or the underperforming assets to Tier 1 capital and reserves score.

The table below shows the cutoff values and weights for the measures used to calculate the ability to withstand asset-related stress score. Appendix B describes how each measure is converted to a score between 0 and 100 based upon the minimum and maximum cutoff values, where a score of 0 reflects the lowest risk and a score of 100 reflects the highest risk.

Cutoff Values and Weights for Measures to Calculate Ability to Withstand Asset-Related Stress Score

Measures of the Ability to Withstand Asset-Related Stress Cutoff Values Weights
Minimum Maximum
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio 6% 13% 10%
Concentration Measure: 35%
Higher-Risk Assets to Tier 1 Capital and Reserves; or 0% 135%
Growth-Adjusted Portfolio Concentrations 4 56
Core Earnings/Average QuarterEnd Total Assets* 0% 2% 20%
Credit Quality Measure: 35%
Criticized and Classified Items/Tier 1 Capital and Reserves; or 7% 100%
  Underperforming Assets/ Tier 1 Capital and Reserves 2% 35%

* Average of five quarter-end total assets (most recent and four prior quarters)

(iii)The score for each measure is multiplied by its respective weight and the resulting weighted score is summed to arrive at the score for an ability to withstand asset-related stress, which can range from 0 to 100, where a score of 0 reflects the lowest risk and a score of 100 reflects the highest risk.

(3)  Ability to withstand funding-related stress score. Two measures are used to compute the ability to withstand funding-related stress score: a core deposits to total liabilities ratio, and a balance sheet liquidity ratio. Appendix A describes these measures. Appendix B describes how these measures are converted to a score between 0 and 100, where a score of 0 reflects the lowest risk and a score of 100 reflects the highest risk.

The ability to withstand funding-related stress score is the weighted average of the scores for the two measures. The following cutoff values and weights are used to derive an institution's ability to withstand funding-related stress score:

Cutoff Values and Weights to Calculate Ability to Withstand Funding-Related Stress Score

Measures of the Ability to Withstand Funding-Related Stress Cutoff Values Weights
Minimum Maximum
Core Deposits/Total Liabilities 5% 87% 60%
Balance Sheet Liquidity Ratio 7% 243% 40%

(4)  Calculation of Performance Score. The scores for the weighted average CAMELS rating, the ability to withstand asset-related stress, and the ability to withstand funding-related stress are multiplied by their respective weights (30 percent, 50 percent and 20 percent, respectively) and the results are summed to arrive at the performance score. The performance score cannot be less than 0 or more than 100, where a score of 0 reflects the lowest risk and a score of 100 reflects the highest risk.

(B)  Loss severity score. The loss severity score is based on a loss severity measure that is described in Appendix D. Appendix B also describes how the loss severity measure is converted to a score between 0 and 100. The loss severity score cannot be less than 0 or more than 100, where a score of 0 reflects the lowest risk and a score of 100 reflects the highest risk. Cutoff values for the loss severity measure are:

Cutoff Values to Calculate Loss Severity Score

Measure of Loss Severity Cutoff Values
Minimum Maximum
Loss Severity 0% 28%

(C)  Total Score. The performance and loss severity scores are combined to produce a total score. The loss severity score is converted into a loss severity factor that ranges from 0.8 (score of 5 or lower) to 1.2 (score of 85 or higher). Scores at or below the minimum cutoff of 5 receive a loss severity factor of 0.8, and scores at or above the maximum cutoff of 85 receive a loss severity factor of 1.2. The following linear interpolation converts loss severity scores between the cutoffs into a loss severity factor:

The performance score is multiplied by the loss severity factor to produce a total score (total score = performance score * loss severity factor). The total score can be up to 20 percent higher or lower than the performance score but cannot be less than 30 or more than 90. The total score is subject to adjustment, up or down, by a maximum of 15 points, as set forth in section (b)(3). The resulting total score after adjustment cannot be less than 30 or more than 90.

(D)  Initial base assessment rate. A large institution with a total score of 30 pays the minimum initial base assessment rate and an institution with a total score of 90 pays the maximum initial base assessment rate. For total scores between 30 and 90, initial base assessment rates rise at an increasing rate as the total score increases, calculated according to the following formula:



where Rate is the initial base assessment rate (expressed in basis points), Maximum Rate is the maximum initial base assessment rate then in effect (expressed in basis points), and Minimum Rate is the minimum initial base assessment rate then in effect (expressed in basis points). Initial base assessment rates are subject to adjustment pursuant to paragraphs (b)(3), (d)(1), (d)(2), of this section; large institutions that are not well capitalized or have a CAMELS composite rating of 3, 4 or 5 shall be subject to the adjustment at paragraph (d)(3); these adjustments shall result in the institution's total base assessment rate, which in no case can be lower than 50 percent of the institution's initial base assessment rate.

(2)  Assessment scorecard for highly complex institutions.

(i)  A highly complex institution shall have its initial base assessment rate determined using the scorecard for highly complex institutions.

Scorecard for Highly Complex Institutions

Measures and Components Measure Weights Component Weights
P Performance Score
P.1 Weighted Average CAMELS Rating 100% 30%
P.2 Ability to Withstand Asset-Related Stress: 50%
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio 10%
Concentration Measure 35%
Core Earnings/Average Quarter-End Total Assets 20%
Credit Quality Measure and Market Risk Measure 35%
P.3 Ability to Withstand Funding-Related Stress: 20%
Core Deposits/Total Liabilities 50%
Balance Sheet Liquidity Ratio 30%
Average Short-Term Funding/Average Total Assets 20%
L Loss Severity Score
L.1 Loss Severity 100%

(ii)  The scorecard for highly complex institutions produces two scores: performance and loss severity.

(A)  Performance score for highly complex institutions. The performance score for highly complex institutions is the weighted average of the scores for three components: weighted average CAMELS rating, weighted at 30 percent; ability to withstand asset-related stress score, weighted at 50 percent; and ability to withstand funding-related stress score, weighted at 20 percent.

(1)  Weighted average CAMELS rating score.

(i)To compute the score for the weighted average CAMELS rating, a weighted average of an institution's CAMELS component ratings is calculated using the following weights:

CAMELS Component Weight
C 25%
A 20%
M 25%
E 10%
L 10%
S 10%

(ii)A weighted average CAMELS rating converts to a score that ranges from 25 to 100. A weighted average rating of 1 equals a score of 25 and a weighted average of 3.5 or greater equals a score of 100. Weighted average CAMELS ratings between 1 and 3.5 are assigned a score between 25 and 100. The score increases at an increasing rate as the weighted average CAMELS rating increases. Appendix B describes the conversion of a weighted average CAMELS rating to a score.

(2)  Ability to withstand asset-related stress score.

(i)The ability to withstand asset-related stress score is a weighted average of the scores for four measures: Tier 1 leverage ratio; concentration measure; ratio of core earnings to average quarter-end total assets; credit quality measure and market risk measure. Appendix A describes these measures.

(ii)The Tier 1 leverage ratio and the ratio of core earnings to average quarter-end total assets are described in Appendix A and the method of calculating the scores is described in Appendix B.

The score for the concentration measure for highly complex institutions is the greatest of the higher-risk assets to the sum of Tier 1 capital and reserves score, the top 20 counterparty exposure to the sum of Tier 1 capital and reserves score, or the largest counterparty exposure to the sum of Tier 1 capital and reserves score. Each ratio is described in Appendix A. The method used to convert the concentration measure into a score is described in Appendix C.

The credit quality score is the greater of the criticized and classified items to Tier 1 capital and reserves score or the underperforming assets to Tier 1 capital and reserves score. The market risk score is the weighted average of three scores-the trading revenue volatility to Tier 1 capital score, the market risk capital to Tier 1 capital score, and the level 3 trading assets to Tier 1 capital score. All of these ratios are described in Appendix A and the method of calculating the scores is described in Appendix B. Each score is multiplied by its respective weight, and the resulting weighted score is summed to compute the score for the market risk measure. An overall weight of 35 percent is allocated between the scores for the credit quality measure and market risk measure. The allocation depends on the ratio of average trading assets to the sum of average securities, loans and trading assets (trading asset ratio) as follows:

Weight for credit quality score = 35 percent * (1 - trading asset ratio); and,

Weight for market risk score = 35 percent * trading asset ratio.

Each of the measures used to calculate the ability to withstand asset-related stress score is assigned the following cutoff values and weights:

Cutoff Values and Weights for Measures to Calculate the Ability to Withstand Asset-Related Stress Score

Measures of the Ability to Withstand Asset-Related Stress     Cutoff Values Market Risk Measure    
Minimum Maximum Weights
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio 6% 13% 10%
Concentration Measure: 35%
Higher Risk Assets/Tier 1 Capital and Reserves; 0% 135%
Top 20 Counterparty Exposure/Tier 1 Capital and Reserves; or 0% 125%
Largest Counterparty Exposure/Tier 1 Capital and Reserves 0% 20%
Core Earnings/Average Quarter-end Total Assets 0% 2% 20%
Credit Quality Measure*: 35% * (1-Trading Asset Ratio)
  Criticized and Classified Items to Tier 1 Capital and Reserves; or 7% 100%
 Underperforming Assets/Tier 1 Capital and Reserves 2% 35%
Market Risk Measure*: 35% * Trading Asset Ratio
  Trading Revenue Volatility/ Tier 1 Capital 0% 2% 60%
  Market Risk Capital/Tier 1 Capital 0% 10% 20%
 Level 3 Trading Assets/Tier 1 Capital 0% 35% 20%

* Combined, the credit quality measure and the market risk measure are assigned a 35 percent weight. The relative weight of each of the two scores depends on the ratio of average trading assets to the sum of average securities, loans and trading assets (trading asset ratio).

(iii)The score of each measure is multiplied by its respective weight and the resulting weighted score is summed to compute the ability to withstand asset-related stress score, which can range from 0 to 100, where a score of 0 reflects the lowest risk and a score of 100 reflects the highest risk.

(3)  Ability to withstand funding related stress score. Three measures are used to calculate the score for the ability to withstand funding-related stress: a core deposits to total liabilities ratio, a balance sheet liquidity ratio, and average short-term funding to average total assets ratio. Appendix A describes these ratios. Appendix B describes how each measure is converted to a score.

The ability to withstand funding-related stress score is the weighted average of the scores for the three measures. The following cutoff values and weights are used to derive an institution's ability to withstand funding-related stress score:

Cutoff Values and Weights to Calculate Ability to Withstand Funding-Related Stress Measures

Measures of the Ability to Withstand Funding-Related Stress Cutoff Values Weights
Minimum Maximum
Core Deposits/Total Liabilities 5% 87% 50%
Balance Sheet Liquidity Ratio 7% 243% 30%
Average Short-term Funding / Average Total Assets 2% 19% 20%

(4)  Calculation of Performance Score. The weighted average CAMELS score, the ability to withstand asset-related stress score, and the ability to withstand funding-related stress score are multiplied by their respective weights (30 percent, 50 percent and 20 percent, respectively) and the results are summed to arrive at the performance score, which cannot be less than 0 or more than 100.

(B)  Loss severity score. The loss severity score is based on a loss severity measure described in Appendix D. Appendix B also describes how the loss severity measure is converted to a score between 0 and 100. Cutoff values for the loss severity measure are:

Cutoff Values for Loss Severity Measure

Measure of Loss Severity Cutoff Values
Minimum Maximum
Loss Severity 0% 28%

(C)  Total Score. The performance and loss severity scores are combined to produce a total score. The loss severity score is converted into a loss severity factor that ranges from 0.8 (score of 5 or lower) to 1.2 (score of 85 or higher). Scores at or below the minimum cutoff of 5 receive a loss severity factor of 0.8, and scores at or above the maximum cutoff of 85 receive a loss severity factor of 1.2. The following linear interpolation converts loss severity scores between the cutoffs into a loss severity factor:

Loss Severity Factor = 0.8 + [0.005 * (Loss Severity Score -- 5)].

The performance score is multiplied by the loss severity factor to produce a total score (total score = performance score * loss severity factor). The total score can be up to 20 percent higher or lower than the performance score but cannot be less than 30 or more than 90. The total score is subject to adjustment, up or down, by a maximum of 15 points, as set forth in section (b)(3). The resulting total score after adjustment cannot be less than 30 or more than 90.

(D)  Initial base assessment rate. A highly complex institution with a total score of 30 pays the minimum initial base assessment rate and an institution with a total score of 90 pays the maximum initial base assessment rate. For total scores between 30 and 90, initial base assessment rates rise at an increasing rate as the total score increases, calculated according to the following formula:

where Rate is the initial base assessment rate (expressed in basis points), Maximum Rate is the maximum initial base assessment rate then in effect (expressed in basis points), and Minimum Rate is the minimum initial base assessment rate then in effect (expressed in basis points). Initial base assessment rates are subject to adjustment pursuant to paragraphs (b)(3), (d)(1), (d)(2), of this section; highly complex institutions that are not well capitalized or have a CAMELS composite rating of 3, 4 or 5 shall be subject to the adjustment at paragraph (d)(3); these adjustments shall result in the institution's total base assessment rate, which in no case can be lower than 50 percent of the institution's initial base assessment rate.

(3)  Adjustment to total score for large institutions and highly complex institutions. The total score for large institutions and highly complex institutions is subject to adjustment, up or down, by a maximum of 15 points, based upon significant risk factors that are not adequately captured in the appropriate scorecard. In making such adjustments, the FDIC may consider such information as financial performance and condition information and other market or supervisory information. The FDIC will also consult with an institution's primary federal regulator and, for state chartered institutions, state banking supervisor.

(i)  Prior notice of adjustments.

(A)  Prior notice of upward adjustment. Prior to making any upward adjustment to an institution's total score because of considerations of additional risk information, the FDIC will formally notify the institution and its primary federal regulator and provide an opportunity to respond. This notification will include the reasons for the adjustment and when the adjustment will take effect.

(B)  Prior notice of downward adjustment. Prior to making any downward adjustment to an institution's total score because of considerations of additional risk information, the FDIC will formally notify the institution's primary federal regulator and provide an opportunity to respond.

(ii)  Determination whether to adjust upward; effective period of adjustment. After considering an institution's and the primary federal regulator's responses to the notice, the FDIC will determine whether the adjustment to an institution's total score is warranted, taking into account any revisions to scorecard measures, as well as any actions taken by the institution to address the FDIC's concerns described in the notice. The FDIC will evaluate the need for the adjustment each subsequent assessment period. Except as provided in paragraph (b)(3)(iv) of this section, the amount of adjustment cannot exceed the proposed adjustment amount contained in the initial notice unless additional notice is provided so that the primary federal regulator and the institution may respond.

(iii)  Determination whether to adjust downward; effective period of adjustment. After considering the primary federal regulator's responses to the notice, the FDIC will determine whether the adjustment to total score is warranted, taking into account any revisions to scorecard measures. Any downward adjustment in an institution's total score will remain in effect for subsequent assessment periods until the FDIC determines that an adjustment is no longer warranted. Downward adjustments will be made without notification to the institution. However, the FDIC will provide advance notice to an institution and its primary federal regulator and give them an opportunity to respond before removing a downward adjustment.

(iv)  Adjustment without notice. Notwithstanding the notice provisions set forth above, the FDIC may change an institution's total score without advance notice under this paragraph, if the institution's supervisory ratings or the scorecard measures deteriorate.

(c)  Insured branches of foreign banks.

(1)  Risk categories for insured branches of foreign banks. Insured branches of foreign banks shall be assigned to risk categories as set forth at section 327.9(a)(1).

(2)  Capital evaluations for insured branches of foreign banks. Each insured branch of a foreign bank will receive one of the following three capital evaluations on the basis of data reported in the institution's Report of Assets and Liabilities of U.S. Branches and Agencies of Foreign Banks dated as of March 31 for the assessment period beginning the preceding January 1; dated as of June 30 for the assessment period beginning the preceding April 1; dated as of September 30 for the assessment period beginning the preceding July 1; and dated as of December 31 for the assessment period beginning the preceding October 1.

(i)  Well Capitalized. An insured branch of a foreign bank is Well Capitalized if the insured branch:

(A)  Maintains the pledge of assets required under § 347.209 of this chapter; and

(B)  Maintains the eligible assets prescribed under § 347.210 of this chapter at 108 percent or more of the average book value of the insured branch's third-party liabilities for the quarter ending on the report date specified in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.

(ii)  Adequately Capitalized. An insured branch of a foreign bank is Adequately Capitalized if the insured branch:

(A)  Maintains the pledge of assets required under § 347.209 of this chapter; and

(B)  Maintains the eligible assets prescribed under § 347.210 of this chapter at 106 percent or more of the average book value of the insured branch's third-party liabilities for the quarter ending on the report date specified in paragraph (2) of this section; and

(C)  Does not meet the definition of a Well Capitalized insured branch of a foreign bank.

(iii)  Undercapitalized. An insured branch of a foreign bank is undercapitalized institution if it does not qualify as either Well Capitalized or Adequately Capitalized under paragraphs (c)(2)(i) and (c)(2)(ii) of this section.

(3)  Supervisory evaluations for insured branches of foreign banks. Each insured branch of a foreign bank will be assigned to one of three supervisory groups as set forth in 327.9(a)(3).

(4)  Assessment method for insured branches of foreign banks in Risk Category I. Insured branches of foreign banks in Risk Category I shall be assessed using the weighted average ROCA component rating.

(i)  Weighted average ROCA component rating. The weighted average ROCA component rating shall equal the sum of the products that result from multiplying ROCA component ratings by the following percentages: Risk Management--35%, Operational Controls--25%, Compliance--25%, and Asset Quality--15%. The weighted average ROCA rating will be multiplied by 5.076 (which shall be the pricing multiplier). To this result will be added a uniform amount. The resulting sum - the initial base assessment rate - will equal an institution's total base assessment rate; provided, however, that no institution's total base assessment rate will be less than the minimum total base assessment rate in effect for Risk Category I institutions for that quarter nor greater than the maximum total base assessment rate in effect for Risk Category I institutions for that quarter.

(ii)  Uniform amount. Except as adjusted for the actual assessment rates set by the Board under § 327.10(f), the uniform amount for all insured branches of foreign banks shall be:

(A)  -3.127 whenever the assessment rate schedule set forth in § 327.10(a) is in effect;

(B)  -5.127 whenever the assessment rate schedule set forth in § 327.10(b) is in effect;

(C)  -6.127 whenever the assessment rate schedule set forth in § 327.10(c) is in effect; or

(D)  -7.127 whenever the assessment rate schedule set forth in § 327.10(d) is in effect.

(iii)  No insured branch of a foreign bank in any risk category shall be subject to the adjustments in paragraphs (b)(3), (d)(1), or (d)(3) of this section.

(iv)  Implementation of changes between Risk Categories for insured branches of foreign banks. If, during a quarter, a ROCA rating change occurs that results in an insured branch of a foreign bank moving from Risk Category I to Risk Category II, III or IV, the institution's initial base assessment rate for the portion of the quarter that it was in Risk Category I shall be determined using the weighted average ROCA component rating. For the portion of the quarter that the institution was not in Risk Category I, the institution's initial base assessment rate shall be determined under the assessment schedule for the appropriate Risk Category. If, during a quarter, a ROCA rating change occurs that results in an insured branch of a foreign bank moving from Risk Category II, III or IV to Risk Category I, the institution's assessment rate for the portion of the quarter that it was in Risk Category I shall equal the rate determined as provided using the weighted average ROCA component rating. For the portion of the quarter that the institution was not in Risk Category I, the institution's initial base assessment rate shall be determined under the assessment schedule for the appropriate Risk Category.

(v)  Implementation of changes within Risk Category I for insured branches of foreign banks. If, during a quarter, an insured branch of a foreign bank remains in Risk Category I, but a ROCA component rating changes that will affect the institution's initial base assessment rate, separate assessment rates for the portion(s) of the quarter before and after the change(s) shall be determined under this paragraph (c)(4) of this section.

(d)  Adjustments

(1)  Unsecured debt adjustment to initial base assessment rate for all institutions. All institutions, except new institutions as provided under paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(2) of this section and insured branches of foreign banks as provided under paragraph (c)(4)(iii) of this section, shall be subject to an adjustment of assessment rates for unsecured debt. Any unsecured debt adjustment shall be made after any adjustment under paragraph (b)(3) of this section.

(i)  Application of unsecured debt adjustment. The unsecured debt adjustment shall be determined as the sum of the initial base assessment rate plus 40 basis points; that sum shall be multiplied by the ratio of an insured depository institution's long-term unsecured debt to its assessment base. The amount of the reduction in the assessment rate due to the adjustment is equal to the dollar amount of the adjustment divided by the amount of the assessment base.

(ii)  Limitation--No unsecured debt adjustment for any institution shall exceed the lesser of 5 basis points or 50 percent of the institution's initial base assessment rate.

(iii)  Applicable quarterly reports of condition--Unsecured debt adjustment ratios for any given quarter shall be calculated from quarterly reports of condition (Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income and Thrift Financial Reports, or any successor reports to either, as appropriate) filed by each institution as of the last day of the quarter.

(2)  Depository institution debt adjustment to initial base assessment rate for all institutions. All institutions shall be subject to an adjustment of assessment rates for unsecured debt held that is issued by another depository institution. Any such depository institution debt adjustment shall be made after any adjustment under paragraphs (b)(3) and (d)(1) of this section.

(i)  Application of depository institution debt adjustment. An insured depository institution shall pay a 50 basis point adjustment on the amount of unsecured debt it holds that was issued by another insured depository institution to the extent that such debt exceeds 3 percent of the institution's Tier 1 capital. The amount of long-term unsecured debt issued by another insured depository institution shall be calculated using the same valuation methodology used to calculate the amount of such debt for reporting on the asset side of the balance sheets.

(ii)  Applicable quarterly reports of condition. Depository institution debt adjustment ratios for any given quarter shall be calculated from quarterly reports of condition (Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income and Thrift Financial Reports, or any successor reports to either, as appropriate) filed by each institution as of the last day of the quarter.

(3)  Brokered Deposit Adjustment. All small institutions in Risk Categories II, III, and IV, all large institutions and all highly complex institutions, except large and highly complex institutions (including new large and new highly complex institutions) that are well capitalized and have a CAMELS composite rating of 1 or 2, shall be subject to an assessment rate adjustment for brokered deposits. Any such brokered deposit adjustment shall be made after any adjustment under paragraphs (b)(3), (d)(1), and (d)(2) of this section. The brokered deposit adjustment includes all brokered deposits as defined in Section 29 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1831f), and 12 CFR 337.6, including reciprocal deposits as defined in § 327.8(p), and brokered deposits that consist of balances swept into an insured institution from another institution. The adjustment under this paragraph is limited to those institutions whose ratio of brokered deposits to domestic deposits is greater than 10 percent; asset growth rates do not affect the adjustment. Insured branches of foreign banks are not subject to the brokered deposit adjustment as provided in paragraph (c)(4)(iii) of this section.

(i)  Application of brokered deposit adjustment. The brokered deposit adjustment shall be determined by multiplying 25 basis points by the ratio of the difference between an insured depository institution's brokered deposits and 10 percent of its domestic deposits to its assessment base.

(ii)  Limitation. The maximum brokered deposit adjustment will be 10 basis points; the minimum brokered deposit adjustment will be 0.

(iii)  Applicable quarterly reports of condition. Brokered deposit ratios for any given quarter shall be calculated from the quarterly reports of condition (Call Reports and Thrift Financial Reports, or any successor reports to either, as appropriate) filed by each institution as of the last day of the quarter.

(e)  Request to be treated as a large institution--(1) Procedure. Any institution with assets of between $5 billion and $10 billion may request that the FDIC determine its assessment rate as a large institution. The FDIC will consider such a request provided that it has sufficient information to do so. Any such request must be made to the FDIC's Division of Insurance and Research. Any approved change will become effective within one year from the date of the request. If an institution whose request has been granted subsequently reports assets of less than $5 billion in its report of condition for four consecutive quarters, the institution shall be deemed a small institution for assessment purposes.

(2)  Time limit on subsequent request for alternate method. An institution whose request to be assessed as a large institution is granted by the FDIC shall not be eligible to request that it be assessed as a small institution for a period of three years from the first quarter in which its approved request to be assessed as a large institution became effective. Any request to be assessed as a small institution must be made to the FDIC's Division of Insurance and Research.

(3)  An institution that disagrees with the FDIC's determination that it is a large, highly complex, or small institution may request review of that determination pursuant to § 327.4(c).

(f)  New and established institutions and exceptions--(1) New small institutions. A new small Risk Category I institution shall be assessed the Risk Category I maximum initial base assessment rate for the relevant assessment period. No new small institution in any risk category shall be subject to the unsecured debt adjustment as determined under paragraph (d)(1) of this section. All new small institutions in any Risk Category shall be subject to the depository institution debt adjustment as determined under paragraph (d)(2) of this section. All new small institutions in Risk Categories II, III, and IV shall be subject to the brokered deposit adjustment as determined under paragraph (d)(3) of this section.

(2)  New large institutions and new highly complex institutions. All new large institutions and all new highly complex institutions shall be assessed under the appropriate method provided at paragraph (b)(1) or (b)(2) and subject to the adjustments provided at paragraphs (b)(3), (d)(2), and (d)(3). No new highly complex or large institutions are entitled to adjustment under paragraph (d)(1). If a large or highly complex institution has not yet received CAMELS ratings, it will be given a weighted CAMELS rating of 2 for assessment purposes until actual CAMELS ratings are assigned.

(3)  CAMELS ratings for the surviving institution in a merger or consolidation. When an established institution merges with or consolidates into a new institution, if the FDIC determines the resulting institution to be an established institution under § 327.8(k)(1), its CAMELS ratings for assessment purposes will be based upon the established institution's ratings prior to the merger or consolidation until new ratings become available.

(4)  Rate applicable to institutions subject to subsidiary or credit union exception. A small Risk Category I institution that is established under § 327.8(k)(4) or (5), but does not have CAMELS component ratings, shall be assessed at 2 basis points above the minimum initial base assessment rate applicable to Risk Category I institutions until it receives CAMELS component ratings. Thereafter, the assessment rate will be determined by annualizing, where appropriate, financial ratios obtained from all quarterly reports of condition that have been filed, until the institution files four quarterly reports of condition If a large or highly complex institution is considered established under § 327.8(k)(4) or (5), but does not have CAMELS component ratings, it will be given a weighted CAMELS rating of 2 for assessment purposes until actual CAMELS ratings are assigned.

(5)  Request for review. An institution that disagrees with the FDIC's determination that it is a new institution may request review of that determination pursuant to § 327.4(c).

(g)  Assessment rates for bridge depository institutions and conservatorships Institutions that are bridge depository institutions under 12 U.S.C. 1821(n) and institutions for which the Corporation has been appointed or serves as conservator shall, in all cases, be assessed at the Risk Category I minimum initial base assessment rate, which shall not be subject to adjustment under paragraphs (b)(3), (d)(1), (2) or (3) of this section.

[Codified to 12 C.F.R. § 327.9]

[Section 327.13 amended at 55 Fed. Reg. 40817, October 5, 1990, effective November 5, 1990; 56 Fed. Reg. 21068, May 7, 1991, effective June 6, 1991; 57 Fed. Reg. 45286, October 1, 1992, effective November 2, 1992; 58 Fed. Reg. 31159, June 1, 1993, effective July 1, 1993; 58 Fed. Reg. 34365, June 25, 1993, effective October 1, 1993; section 327.13 redesignated as § 327.9 and amended at 59 Fed. Reg. 67165, December 29, 1994, effective April 1, 1995; amended and retained at 60 Fed. Reg. 42741, August 16, 1995, effective September 15, 1995; 60 Fed. Reg. 50409, September 29, 1995, effective October 30, 1995; 60 Fed. Reg. 60755, December 28, 1995, effective September 15, 1995; 61 Fed. Reg. 67696, December 24, 1996, effective December 11, 1996; 62 Fed. Reg. 27176, May 19, 1997, effective May 6, 1997; 64 Fed. Reg. 70181, December 16, 1999, effective April 1, 2000; 71 Fed. Reg. 69309, November 30, 2006 effective January 1, 2007; 74 Fed. Reg. 9552, March 4, 2009, effective April 1, 2009; amended 76 Fed.Reg. 10707, Feb. 25, 2011]

§ 327.10  Assessment rate schedules.

(a)  Assessment rate schedules before the reserve ratio of the DIF reaches 1.15 percent.

(1)  Applicability. The assessment rate schedules in paragraph (a) of this section will cease to be applicable when the reserve ratio of the DIF first reaches 1.15 percent.

(2)  Initial Base Assessment Rate Schedule. Before the reserve ratio of the DIF reaches 1.15 percent, the initial base assessment rate for an insured depository institution shall be the rate prescribed in the following schedule:

Initial Base Assessment Rate Schedule Before the Reserve Ratio of the DIF

Reaches 1.15 Percent
Risk Category I Risk Category II Risk Category III Risk Category IV Large and Highly Complex Institutions
Initial base assessment rate 5–9 14 23 35 5–35

* All amounts for all risk categories are in basis points annually. Initial base rates that are not the minimum or maximum rate will vary between these rates.

(i)  Risk Category I Initial Base Assessment Rate Schedule. The annual initial base assessment rates for all institutions in Risk Category I shall range from 5 to 9 basis points.

(ii)  Risk Category II, III, and IV Initial Base Assessment Rate Schedule. The annual initial base assessment rates for Risk Categories II, III, and IV shall be 14, 23, and 35 basis points, respectively.

(iii)  All institutions in any one risk category, other than Risk Category I, will be charged the same initial base assessment rate, subject to adjustment as appropriate.

(iv)  Large and Highly Complex Institutions Initial Base Assessment Rate Schedule. The annual initial base assessment rates for all large and highly complex institutions shall range from 5 to 35 basis points.

(3)  Total Base Assessment Rate Schedule after Adjustments. Before the reserve ratio of the DIF reaches 1.15 percent, the total base assessment rates after adjustments for an insured depository institution shall be as prescribed in the following schedule.

Total Base Assessment Rate Schedule (after Adjustments)* Before the Reserve

Ratio of the DIF Reaches 1.15 Percent**
Risk Category I Risk Category II Risk Category III Risk Category IV Large and Highly Complex Institutions
Initial base assessment rate 5--9 14 23 35 5--35
Unsecured debt adjustment (4.5)--0 (5)–0 (5)--0 (5)–0 (5)--0
Brokered deposit adjustment ...... 0–10 0--10 0–10 0--10
TOTAL BASE ASSESSMENT RATE 2.5--9 9–24 18--33 30–45 2.5--45

* All amounts for all risk categories are in basis points annually. Total base rates that are not the minimum or maximum rate will vary between these rates.

** Total base assessment rates do not include the depository institution debt adjustment.

(i)  Risk Category I Total Base Assessment Rate Schedule. The annual total base assessment rates for all institutions in Risk Category I shall range from 2.5 to 9 basis points.

(ii)  Risk Category II Total Base Assessment Rate Schedule. The annual total base assessment rates for Risk Category II shall range from 9 to 24 basis points.

(iii)  Risk Category III Total Base Assessment Rate Schedule. The annual total base assessment rates for Risk Category III shall range from 18 to 33 basis points.

(iv)  Risk Category IV Total Base Assessment Rate Schedule. The annual total base assessment rates for Risk Category IV shall range from 30 to 45 basis points.

(v)  Large and Highly Complex Institutions Total Base Assessment Rate Schedule. The annual total base assessment rates for all large and highly complex institutions shall range from 2.5 to 45 basis points.

(b)  Assessment rate schedules once the reserve ratio of the DIF first reaches 1.15 percent, and the reserve ratio for the immediately prior assessment period is less than 2 percent.

(1)  Initial Base Assessment Rate Schedule. Once the reserve ratio of the DIF first reaches 1.15 percent, and the reserve ratio for the immediately prior assessment period is less than 2 percent, the initial base assessment rate for an insured depository institution shall be the rate prescribed in the following schedule:

Initial Base Assessment Rate Schedule Once the Reserve Ratio of the DIF Reaches 1.15 Percent and the Reserve Ratio for the Immediately Prior Assessment Period is Less than 2 Percent

Risk Category I Risk Category II Risk Category III Risk Category IV Large and Highly Complex Institutions
Initial base assessment rate 3–7 12 19 30 3–30

* All amounts for all risk categories are in basis points annually. Initial base rates that are not the minimum or maximum rate will vary between these rates.

(i)  Risk Category I Initial Base Assessment Rate Schedule. The annual initial base assessment rates for all institutions in Risk Category I shall range from 3 to 7 basis points.

(ii)  Risk Category II, III, and IV Initial Base Assessment Rate Schedule. The annual initial base assessment rates for Risk Categories II, III, and IV shall be 12, 19, and 30 basis points, respectively.

(iii)  All institutions in any one risk category, other than Risk Category I, will be charged the same initial base assessment rate, subject to adjustment as appropriate.

(iv)  Large and Highly Complex Institutions Initial Base Assessment Rate Schedule. The annual initial base assessment rates for all large and highly complex institutions shall range from 3 to 30 basis points.

(2)  Total Base Assessment Rate Schedule after Adjustments. Once the reserve ratio of the DIF first reaches 1.15 percent, and the reserve ratio for the immediately prior assessment period is less than 2 percent, the total base assessment rates after adjustments for an insured depository institution shall be as prescribed in the following schedule.

Total Base Assessment Rate Schedule (after Adjustments)* Once the Reserve Ratio of the DIF reaches 1.15 Percent and the Reserve Ratio for the Immediately Prior Assessment Period is Less than 2 Percent**

Risk Category I Risk Category II Risk Category III Risk Category IV Large and Highly Complex Institutions
Initial base assessment rate 3--7 12 19 30 3--30
Unsecured debt adjustment (3.5)--0 (5)–0 (5)--0 (5)–0 (5)--0
Brokered deposit adjustment ...... 0–10 0--10 0–10 0--10
TOTAL BASE ASSESSMENT RATE 1.5--7 7–22 14--29 25–40 1.5--40

* All amounts for all risk categories are in basis points annually. Total base rates that are not the minimum or maximum rate will vary between these rates.

** Total base assessment rates do not include the depository institution debt adjustment.

(i)  Risk Category I Total Base Assessment Rate Schedule. The annual total base assessment rates for institutions in Risk Category I shall range from 1.5 to 7 basis points.

(ii)  Risk Category II Total Base Assessment Rate Schedule. The annual total base assessment rates for Risk Category II shall range from 7 to 22 basis points.

(iii)  Risk Category III Total Base Assessment Rate Schedule. The annual total base assessment rates for Risk Category III shall range from 14 to 29 basis points.

(iv)  Risk Category IV Total Base Assessment Rate Schedule. The annual total base assessment rates for Risk Category IV shall range from 25 to 40 basis points.

(v)  Large and Highly Complex Institutions Total Base Assessment Rate Schedule. The annual total base assessment rates for all large and highly complex institutions shall range from 1.5 to 40 basis points.

(c)  Assessment rate schedules if the reserve ratio of the DIF for the prior assessment period is equal to or greater than 2 percent and less than 2.5 percent. (1) Initial Base Assessment Rate Schedule. If the reserve ratio of the DIF for the prior assessment period is equal to or greater than 2 percent and less than 2.5 percent, the initial base assessment rate for an insured depository institution, except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, shall be the rate prescribed in the following schedule:

Initial Base Assessment Rate Schedule if Reserve Ratio for Prior Assessment Period is Equal to or Greater than 2 Percent but Less than 2.5 Percent

Risk Category I Risk Category II Risk Category III Risk Category IV Large and Highly Complex Institutions
Initial base assessment rate 2--6 10 17 28 2--28

* All amounts for all risk categories are in basis points annually. Initial base rates that are not the minimum or maximum rate will vary between these rates.

(i)  Risk Category I Initial Base Assessment Rate Schedule. The annual initial base assessment rates for all institutions in Risk Category I shall range from 2 to 6 basis points.

(ii)  Risk Category II, III, and IV Initial Base Assessment Rate Schedule. The annual initial base assessment rates for Risk Categories II, III, and IV shall be 10, 17, and 28 basis points, respectively.

(iii)  All institutions in any one risk category, other than Risk Category I, will be charged the same initial base assessment rate, subject to adjustment as appropriate.

(iv)  Large and Highly Complex Institutions Initial Base Assessment Rate Schedule. The annual initial base assessment rates for all large and highly complex institutions shall range from 2 to 28 basis points.

(2)  Total Base Assessment Rate Schedule after Adjustments. If the reserve ratio of the DIF for the prior assessment period is equal to or greater than 2 percent and less than 2.5 percent, the total base assessment rates after adjustments for an insured depository institution, except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, shall be as prescribed in the following schedule.

Total Base Assessment Rate Schedule (after Adjustments)* if Reserve Ratio for Prior Assessment Period is Equal to or Greater than 2 Percent but Less than 2.5 Percent**

Risk Category I Risk Category II Risk Category III Risk Category IV Large and Highly Complex Institutions
Initial base assessment rate 2--6 10 17 28 2--38
Unsecured debt adjustment (3)--0 (5)–0 (5)--0 (5)–0 (5)--0
Brokered deposit adjustment ...... 0–10 0--10 0–10 0--10
TOTAL BASE ASSESSMENT RATE 1--6 5–20 12--27 23–38 1--38

* All amounts for all risk categories are in basis points annually. Total base rates that are not the minimum or maximum rate will vary between these rates.

** Total base assessment rates do not include the depository institution debt adjustment.

(i)  Risk Category I Total Base Assessment Rate Schedule. The annual total base assessment rates for institutions in Risk Category I shall range from 1 to 6 basis points.

(ii)  Risk Category II Total Base Assessment Rate Schedule. The annual total base assessment rates for Risk Category II shall range from 5 to 20 basis points.

(iii)  Risk Category III Total Base Assessment Rate Schedule. The annual total base assessment rates for Risk Category III shall range from 12 to 27 basis points.

(iv)  Risk Category IV Total Base Assessment Rate Schedule. The annual total base assessment rates for Risk Category IV shall range from 23 to 38 basis points.

(v)  Large and Highly Complex Institutions Total Base Assessment Rate Schedule. The annual total base assessment rates for all large and highly complex institutions shall range from 1 to 38 basis points.

(d)  Assessment rate schedules if the reserve ratio of the DIF for the prior assessment period is greater than 2.5 percent.

(1)  Initial Base Assessment Rate Schedule. If the reserve ratio of the DIF for the prior assessment period is greater than 2.5 percent, the initial base assessment rate for an insured depository institution, except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, shall be the rate prescribed in the following schedule:

Initial Base Assessment Rate Schedule if Reserve Ratio for Prior Assessment Period is Greater Than or Equal to 2.5 percent

Risk Category I Risk Category II Risk Category III Risk Category IV Large and Highly Complex Institutions
Initial base assessment rate 1--5 9 15 25 1--25

* All amounts for all risk categories are in basis points annually. Initial base rates that are not the minimum or maximum rate will vary between these rates.

(i)  Risk Category I Initial Base Assessment Rate Schedule. The annual initial base assessment rates for all institutions in Risk Category I shall range from 1 to 5 basis points.

(ii)  Risk Category II, III, and IV Initial Base Assessment Rate Schedule. The annual initial base assessment rates for Risk Categories II, III, and IV shall be 9, 15, and 25 basis points, respectively.

(iii)  All institutions in any one risk category, other than Risk Category I, will be charged the same initial base assessment rate, subject to adjustment as appropriate.

(iv)  Large and Highly Complex Institutions Initial Base Assessment Rate Schedule. The annual initial base assessment rates for all large and highly complex institutions shall range from 1 to 25 basis points.

(2)  Total Base Assessment Rate Schedule after Adjustments. If the reserve ratio of the DIF for the prior assessment period is greater than 2.5 percent, the total base assessment rates after adjustments for an insured depository institution, except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, shall be the rate prescribed in the following schedule.

Total Base Assessment Rate Schedule (after Adjustments)* if Reserve Ratio for Prior Assessment Period is Greater than or Equal to 2.5 Percent**

Risk Category I Risk Category II Risk Category III Risk Category IV Large and Highly Complex Institutions
Initial base assessment rate 1--5 9 15 25 1--25
Unsecured debt adjustment (2.5)--0 (4.5)–0 (5)--0 (5)–0 (5)--0
Brokered deposit adjustment ...... 0–10 0--10 0–10 0--10
TOTAL BASE ASSESSMENT RATE 0.5--5 4.5–19 10--25 20–35 0.5--35

* All amounts for all risk categories are in basis points annually. Total base rates that are not the minimum or maximum rate will vary between these rates.

** Total base assessment rates do not include the depository institution debt adjustment.

(i)  Risk Category I Total Base Assessment Rate Schedule. The annual total base assessment rates for institutions in Risk Category I shall range from 0.5 to 5 basis points.

(ii)  Risk Category II Total Base Assessment Rate Schedule. The annual total base assessment rates for Risk Category II shall range from 4.5 to 19 basis points.

(iii)  Risk Category III Total Base Assessment Rate Schedule. The annual total base assessment rates for Risk Category III shall range from 10 to 25 basis points.

(iv)  Risk Category IV Total Base Assessment Rate Schedule. The annual total base assessment rates for Risk Category IV shall range from 20 to 35 basis points.

(v)  Large and Highly Complex Institutions Total Base Assessment Rate Schedule. The annual total base assessment rates for all large and highly complex institutions shall range from 0.5 to 35 basis points.

(e)  Assessment Rate Schedules for New Institutions. New depository institutions, as defined in 327.8(j), shall be subject to the assessment rate schedules as follows:

(1)  Prior to the reserve ratio of the DIF first reaching 1.15 percent after September 30, 2010. After September 30, 2010, if the reserve ratio of the DIF has not reached 1.15 percent, new institutions shall be subject to the initial and total base assessment rate schedules provided for in paragraph (a) of this section.

(2)  Assessment rate schedules once the DIF reserve ratio first reaches 1.15 percent after September 30, 2010. After September 30, 2010, once the reserve ratio of the DIF first reaches 1.15 percent, new institutions shall be subject to the initial and total base assessment rate schedules provided for in paragraph (b) of this section, even if the reserve ratio equals or exceeds 2 percent or 2.5 percent.

(f)  Total Base Assessment Rate Schedule adjustments and procedures--(1) Board Rate Adjustments. The Board may increase or decrease the total base assessment rate schedule in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section up to a maximum increase of 2 basis points or a fraction thereof or a maximum decrease of 2 basis points or a fraction thereof (after aggregating increases and decreases), as the Board deems necessary. Any such adjustment shall apply uniformly to each rate in the total base assessment rate schedule. In no case may such rate adjustments result in a total base assessment rate that is mathematically less than zero or in a total base assessment rate schedule that, at any time, is more than 2 basis points above or below the total base assessment schedule for the Deposit Insurance Fund in effect pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section, nor may any one such adjustment constitute an increase or decrease of more than 2 basis points.

(2)  Amount of revenue. In setting assessment rates, the Board shall take into consideration the following:

(i)  Estimated operating expenses of the Deposit Insurance Fund;

(ii)  Case resolution expenditures and income of the Deposit Insurance Fund;

(iii)  The projected effects of assessments on the capital and earnings of the institutions paying assessments to the Deposit Insurance Fund;

(iv)  The risk factors and other factors taken into account pursuant to 12 USC 1817(b)(1); and

(v)  Any other factors the Board may deem appropriate.

(3)  Adjustment procedure. Any adjustment adopted by the Board pursuant to this paragraph will be adopted by rulemaking, except that the Corporation may set assessment rates as necessary to manage the reserve ratio, within set parameters not exceeding cumulatively 2 basis points, pursuant to paragraph (f)(1) of this section, without further rulemaking.

(4)  Announcement. The Board shall announce the assessment schedules and the amount and basis for any adjustment thereto not later than 30 days before the quarterly certified statement invoice date specified in § 327.3(b) of this part for the first assessment period for which the adjustment shall be effective. Once set, rates will remain in effect until changed by the Board.

[Codified to 12 C.F.R.§ 327.10]

[Section 327.10 amended at 71 Fed. Reg. 69312, November 30, 2006 effective January 1, 2007; 73 Fed. Reg. 78161, December 22, 2008, effective January 1, 2009; 74 Fed. Reg. March 4, 2009, effective April 1, 20099; amended 76 Fed.Reg. 10707, Feb. 25, 2011]

§ 327.11  Special assessments.

(a)  Special assessment imposed on June 30, 2009. On June 30, 2009, the FDIC shall impose a special assessment on each insured depository institution of 5 basis points based on the institution's total assets less Tier 1 capital as reported on the report of condition for the second assessment period of 2009. The special assessment paid by any institution shall not exceed 10 basis points times the institution's assessment base for the second quarter 2009 risk-based assessment.

(b)  Special assessments after June 30, 2009--(1) Authority for additional special assessments. After June 30, 2009, if the reserve ratio of the Deposit Insurance Fund is estimated to fall to a level that the Board believes would adversely affect public confidence or to a level which shall be close to or below zero at the end of a calendar quarter, a special assessment of up to 5 basis points on total assets less Tier 1 capital as reported on the report of condition for that calendar quarter may be imposed by a vote of the Board on all insured depository institutions. For any institution, the amount of such a special assessment shall not exceed 10 basis points times the institution's assessment base reported as of the date that the special assessment is imposed.

(2)  Termination of authority. The authority to impose additional special assessments under this paragraph (b) shall terminate on January 1, 2010, but such termination of authority shall not prevent the Corporation from thereafter collecting any special assessment imposed prior to January 1, 2010.

(3)  Estimation process. For purposes of any special assessment under this paragraph (b), the FDIC shall estimate the reserve ratio of the Deposit Insurance Fund for the applicable calendar quarter end from available data on, or estimates of, insurance fund assessment income, investment income, operating expenses, other revenue and expenses, and loss provisions, including provisions for anticipated failures. The FDIC will assume that estimated insured deposits will increase during the quarter at the average quarterly rate over the previous four quarters.

(4)  Imposition and announcement of special assessments. Any special assessment under this paragraph (b) shall be imposed on the last day of a calendar quarter and shall be announced by the end of such quarter. As soon as practicable after announcement, the FDIC will have a notice of the special assessment published in the Federal Register.

(c)  Invoicing of any special assessments. The FDIC shall advise each insured depository institution of the amount and calculation of any special assessment imposed under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section. This information shall be provided at the same time as the institution's quarterly certified statement invoice for the assessment period in which the special assessment was imposed.

(d)  Payment of any special assessment. Each insured depository institution shall pay to the Corporation any special assessment imposed under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section in compliance with and subject to the provisions of §§ 327.3, 327.6 and 327.7 of subpart A, and the provisions of subpart B. The payment date for any special assessment shall be the date provided in § 327.3(b)(2) for the institution's quarterly certified statement invoice for the calendar quarter in which the special assessment was imposed.

[Codified to 12 C.F.R. § 327.11]

[Section 327.11 added at 74 Fed. Reg. 9341, March 3, 2009, effective April 1, 2009; amended at 74 Fed. Reg. 25644, May 29, 2009, effective June 30, 2009]

§ 327.12  Prepayment of quarterly risk-based assessments.

(a)  Requirement to prepay assessment. On December 30, 2009, each insured depository institution shall pay to the FDIC a prepaid assessment, which shall equal its estimated quarterly risk-based assessments aggregated for the fourth quarter of 2009, and all of 2010, 2011, and 2012 (the "prepayment period").

(b)  Calculation of prepaid assessment. (1) Prepaid assessment. (i) Fourth quarter 2009 and all of 2010. An institution's prepaid assessment for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010 shall be determined by multiplying its prepaid assessment rate as defined in paragraph (b)(2) of this section times the corresponding prepaid assessment base for each quarter as determined pursuant to paragraph (b)(3) of this section.

(ii)  All of 2011 and 2012. An institution's prepaid assessment for each quarter of 2011 and 2012 shall be determined by multiplying the sum of its prepaid assessment rate as defined in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, plus .75 basis points (which implements the 3 basis point increase in annual assessment rates adopted by the Board on September 29, 2009), times the corresponding prepaid assessment base for each quarter determined pursuant to paragraph (b)(3) of this section.

(2)  Prepaid assessment rate. For each quarter of the prepayment period, an institution's prepaid assessment rate shall equal the total base assessment rate that the institution would have paid for the third quarter of 2009 had the institution's CAMELS ratings in effect on September 30, 2009, and, where applicable, long-term debt issuer ratings in effect on September 30, 2009, been in effect for the entire third quarter of 2009.

(3)  Prepaid assessment base. For each quarter of the prepayment period, an institution's prepaid assessment base shall be calculated by increasing its third quarter 2009 assessment base at an annual rate of 5 percent.

(4)  Finality of prepaid assessment. The prepaid assessment rate and prepaid assessment base defined in paragraphs (b)(2) and (3) of this section shall be determined based upon data in the FDIC's computer systems as of December 24, 2009. Changes to data underlying an institution's adjusted total base assessment rate or assessment base, whether by amendment to a report of condition or otherwise, received by the FDIC after December 24, 2009, shall not affect an institution's prepaid assessment.

(5)  Prepaid assessment rates for mergers and consolidations. For mergers and consolidations recorded in the FDIC's computer systems no later than December 24, 2009, the acquired institution's prepaid assessment rate under paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall be the prepaid assessment rate of the acquiring institution.

(c)  Invoicing of prepaid assessment. The FDIC shall advise each insured depository institution of the amount and calculation of its prepaid assessment at the same time the FDIC provides the institution's quarterly certified statement invoice for the third quarter of 2009. The FDIC will re-invoice through FDICconnect based upon any data changes as provided in paragraph (b)(4) of this section.

(d)  Payment of prepaid assessment. Each insured depository institution shall pay to the Corporation the amount of its prepaid assessment as required under paragraph (a) of this section in compliance with and subject to the provisions of §§ 327.3 and 327.7 of subpart A.

(1)  Exception to ACH payment. If an institution's prepaid assessment is greater than $99 million, the institution shall make payment by wire transfer to the FDIC, rather than by funding its designated deposit account for payment via ACH as provided in § 327.3 of subpart A.

(2)  One-time assessment credits. The FDIC will not apply an institution's one-time assessment credit under subpart B of this part 327 to reduce an institution's prepaid assessment. The FDIC will apply an institution's remaining one-time assessment credits under Part 327 subpart B to its quarterly deposit insurance assessments before applying its prepaid assessments.

(e)  Use of prepaid assessments. Prepaid assessments shall only be used to offset regular quarterly risk-based deposit insurance assessments payable under this subpart A. The FDIC will begin offsetting regular quarterly risk-based deposit insurance assessments against prepaid assessments on March 30, 2010. The FDIC will continue to make such offsets until the earlier of the exhaustion of the institution's prepaid assessment or June 30, 2013. Any prepaid assessment remaining after collection of the amount due on June 30, 2013, shall be returned to the institution. If the FDIC, in its discretion, determines that its liquidity needs allow, it may return any remaining prepaid assessment to the institution prior to June 30, 2013.

(f)  Transfers. An insured depository institution may enter into an agreement to transfer, but not pledge, any portion of that institution's prepaid assessment to another insured depository institution, provided that the parties to the agreement notify the FDIC's Division of Finance and submit a written agreement, signed by legal representatives of both institutions. The parties must include documentation stating that each representative has the legal authority to bind the institution. The institution transferring its prepaid assessment shall submit the required notice and documentation through FDICconnect. That information will be presented by the FDIC through FDICconnect to the institution acquiring the prepaid assessments for its acceptance. The adjustment to the amount of the prepaid assessment for each institution involved in the transfer will be made in the next assessment invoice that is sent at least 10 days after the FDIC's receipt of acceptance by the institution acquiring the prepaid assessments.

(g)  Prepaid assessments following a merger. In the event that an insured depository institution merges with, or consolidates into, another insured depository institution, the surviving or resulting institution will be entitled to use any unused portion of the acquired institution's prepaid assessment not otherwise transferred pursuant to paragraph (f) of this section.

(h)  Disposition in the event of failure or termination of insured status. In the event of failure of an insured depository institution, any amount of its prepaid assessment remaining (other than any amounts needed to satisfy its assessment obligations not yet offset against the prepaid amount) will be refunded to the institution's receiver. In the event that an insured depository institution's insured status terminates, any amount of its prepaid assessment remaining (other than any amounts needed to satisfy its assessment obligations not yet offset against the prepaid amount) will be refunded to the institution, subject to the provisions of § 327.6 of subpart A.

(i)  Exemptions. (1) Exemption without application. The FDIC, after consultation with an institution's primary federal regulator, will exercise its discretion as supervisor and insurer to exempt an institution from the prepayment requirement under paragraph (a) of this section if the FDIC determines that the prepayment would adversely affect the safety and soundness of that institution. No application is required for this review and the FDIC will notify any affected institution of its exemption by November 23, 2009.

(2)  Application for exemption. An institution may also apply to the FDIC for an exemption from the prepayment requirement under paragraph (a) of this section if the prepayment would significantly impair the institution's liquidity, or would otherwise create extraordinary hardship. Written applications for exemption from the prepayment obligation must be submitted to the Director of the Division of Supervision and Consumer Protection on or before December 1, 2009, by electronic mail (prepaidassessmentfdic.gov) or fax (202--898--6676). The application must contain a full explanation of the need for the exemption and provide supporting documentation, including current financial statements, cash flow projections, and any other relevant information, including any information the FDIC may request. The FDIC will exercise its discretion in deciding whether to exempt an institution that files an application for exemption. An application shall be deemed denied unless the FDIC notifies an applying institution by December 15, 2009, either that the institution is exempt from the prepaid assessment or the FDIC has postponed determination under paragraph (i)(4) of this section. The FDIC's denial of applications for exemption will be final and not subject to further agency review.

(3)  Application for Withdrawal of Exemption. An institution that has received an exemption under paragraph (i)(1) of this section may request that the FDIC withdraw the exemption. Written applications for withdrawal of exemption must be submitted to the Director of the Division of Supervision and Consumer Protection on or before December 1, 2009, by electronic mail (prepaidassessmentfdic.gov) or fax (202--898--6676). The application must contain a full explanation of the reasons the exemption is not needed and provide supporting documentation, including current financial statements, cash flow projections, and any other relevant information, including any information the FDIC may request. The FDIC, after consultation with the institution's primary Federal regulator, will exercise its discretion in deciding whether to withdraw the exemption. The FDIC will notify an institution of its decision to withdraw the exemption by December 15, 2009; that determination will be final and not subject to further agency review. An application shall be deemed denied unless the FDIC notifies an applying institution by December 15, 2009, that the exemption is withdrawn.

(4)  Postponement of determination. The FDIC may postpone making a determination on any application for exemption filed under paragraph (i)(2) of this section until no later than January 14, 2010. An institution notified by the FDIC of such postponement will not have to pay the prepaid assessment calculated under paragraph (b) of this section on December 30, 2009. If the FDIC denies the application for exemption, the FDIC will notify the institution of the denial and of the date by which the institution must pay the prepaid assessment. The due date for payment of the prepaid assessment after such a denial will be no less than 15 days after the date of the notice of denial.

(5)  Obligation to pay third quarter 2009 assessment. Any institution exempted from the prepayment requirement or any institution whose application for exemption has been postponed under this section shall pay to the Corporation on December 30, 2009, any amount due for the third quarter of 2009 as shown on the certified statement invoice for that quarter.

[Codified to 12 C.F.R. § 327.12]

[Section 327.12 added at 74 Fed. Reg. 59065, November 17, 2009]


Appendix A to Subpart A of Part 327

Method to Derive Pricing Multipliers and Uniform Amount

I.  Introduction

The uniform amount and pricing multipliers are derived from:

•  A model (the Statistical Model) that estimates the probability that a Risk Category I institution will be downgraded to a composite CAMELS rating of 3 or worse within one year;

•  Minimum and maximum downgrade probability cutoff values, based on data from June 30, 2008, that will determine which small institutions will be charged the minimum and maximum initial base assessment rates applicable to Risk Category I;

•  The minimum initial base assessment rate for Risk Category I, equal to 12 basis points, and

•  The maximum initial base assessment rate for Risk Category I, which is four basis points higher than the minimum rate.

II.  The Statistical Model

The Statistical Model is defined in equations 1 and 3 below.

Equation 1

Downgrade(0,1)i.t= β0 + β1 (Tier 1 Leverage RatioT) + β2 (Loans past due 30 to 89 days ratioi,t) + β3 (Nonperforming asset ratioi,t) + β4 (Net loan charge-off ratioi,t) + β5 (Net income before taxes ratioi,t) + β6 (Adjusted brokered deposit ratioi,ti) + β7 (Weighted average CAMELS component ratingi,t) where Downgrade(01)i,t(the dependent variable--the event being explained) is the incidence of downgrade from a composite rating of 1 or 2 to a rating of 3 or worse during an on-site examination for an institution i between 3 and 12 months after time t. Time t is the end of a year within the multi-year period over which the model was estimated (as explained below). The dependent variable takes a value of 1 if a downgrade occurs and 0 if it does not.

The explanatory variables (regressors) in the model are six financial ratios and a weighted average of the "C," "A," "M," "E" and "L" component ratings. The six financial ratios included in the model are:

•  Tier 1 leverage ratio

•  Loans past due 30-89 days/Gross assets

•  Nonperforming assets/Gross assets

•  Net loan charge-offs/Gross assets

•  Net income before taxes/Risk-weighted assets

•  Brokered deposits/domestic deposits above the 10 percent threshold, adjusted for the asset growth rate factor

Table A.1 defines these six ratios along with the weighted average of CAMELS component ratings. The adjusted brokered deposit ratio (Bi,T) is calculated by multiplying the ratio of brokered deposits to domestic deposits above the 10 percent threshold by an asset growth rate factor that ranges from 0 to 1 as shown in Equation 2 below. The asset growth rate factor (Ai,T) is calculated by subtracting 0.4 from the four-year cumulative gross asset growth rate (expressed as a number rather than as a percentage), adjusted for mergers and acquisitions, and multiplying the remainder by 31/3. The factor cannot be less than 0 or greater than 1.

Equation 2

The component rating for sensitivity to market risk (the "S" rating) is not available for years prior to 1997. As a result, and as described in Table A.1, the Statistical Model is estimated using a weighted average of five component ratings excluding the "S" component. Delinquency and non-accrual data on government guaranteed loans are not available before 1993 for Call Report filers and before the third quarter of 2005 for TFRfilers. As a result, and as also described in Table A.1, the Statistical Model is estimated without deducting delinquent or past-due government guaranteed loans from either the loans past due 30--89 days to gross assets ratio or the nonperforming assets to gross assets ratio. Reciprocal deposits are not presently reported in the Call Report or TFR. As a result, and as also described in Table A.1, the Statistical Model is estimated without deducting reciprocal deposits from brokered deposits in determining the adjusted brokered deposit ratio.

Table A.1—Definitions of Regressors

Regressor Description
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio (%) Tier 1 capital for Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) divided by adjusted average assets based on the definition for prompt corrective action.
Loans Past Due 30–89 Days/Gross Assets (%) Total loans and lease financing receivables past due 30 through 89 days and still accruing interest divided by gross assets (gross assets equal total assets plus allowance for loan and lease financing receivable losses and allocated transfer risk).
Nonperforming Assets/Gross Assets (%) Sum of total loans and lease financing receivables past due 90 or more days and still accruing interest, total nonaccrual loans and lease financing receivables, and other real estate owned divided by gross assets.
Net Loan Charge-Offs/Gross Assets (%) Total charged-off loans and lease financing receivables debited to the allowance for loan and lease losses less total recoveries credited to the allowance to loan and lease losses for the most recent twelve months divided by gross assets.
Net Income before Taxes/Risk-Weighted Assets (%) Income before income taxes and extraordinary items and other adjustments for the most recent twelve months divided by risk-weighted assets.
Adjusted brokered deposit ratio (%) Brokered deposits divided by domestic deposits less 0.10 multiplied by the asset growth rate factor (which is the term Ai,T as defined in equation 2 above) that ranges between 0 and 1.
Weighted Average of C, A, M, E and L Component Ratings The weighted sum of the "C," "A," "M," "E" and "L" CAMELS components, with weights of 28 percent each for the "C" and "M" components, 22 percent for the "A" component, and 11 percent each for the "E" and "L" components. (For the regression, the "S" component is omitted.)

The financial variable regressors used to estimate the downgrade probabilities are obtained from quarterly reports of condition (Reports of Condition and Income and Thrift Financial Reports). The weighted average of the "C," "A," "M," "E" and "L" component ratings regressor is based on component ratings obtained from the most recent bank examination conducted within 24 months before the date of the report of condition.

The Statistical Model uses ordinary least squares (OLS) regression to estimate downgrade probabilities. The model is estimated with data from a multi-year period (as explained below) for all institutions in Risk Category I, except for institutions established within five years before the date of the report of condition.

The OLS regression estimates coefficients, βj for a given regressor j and a constant amount, β0, as specified in equation 1. As shown in equation 3 below, these coefficients are multiplied by values of risk measures at time T, which is the date of the report of condition corresponding to the end of the quarter for which the assessment rate is computed. The sum of the products is then added to the constant amount to produce an estimated probability, diT, that an institution will be downgraded to 3 or worse within 3 to 12 months from time T.

The risk measures are financial ratios as defined in Table A.1, except that: (1) The loans past due 30 to 89 days ratio and the nonperforming asset ratio are adjusted to exclude the maximum amount recoverable from the U.S. Government, its agencies or government-sponsored agencies, under guarantee or insurance provisions; (2) the weighted sum of six CAMELS component ratings is used, with weights of 25 percent each for the "C" and "M" components, 20 percent for the "A" component, and 10 percent each for the "E," "L," and "S" components; and (3) reciprocal deposits are deducted from brokered deposits in determining the adjusted brokered deposit ratio.

Equation 3

diT = β0 + β1(Tier 1 Leverage RatioiT) + β2(Loans past due 30 to 89 days ratioiT) + β3(Nonperforming asset ratioiT) + β4(Net loan charge-off ratioiT) + β5(Net income before taxes ratioiT) + β6(Adjusted brokered deposit ratioiT) + β7(Weighted average CAMELS component ratingiT)

III. Minimum and Maximum Downgrade Probability Cutoff Values

The pricing multipliers are also determined by minimum and maximum downgrade probability cutoff values, which will be computed as follows:

•  The minimum downgrade probability cutoff value will be the maximum downgrade probability among the twenty-five percent of all small insured institutions in Risk Category I (excluding new institutions) with the lowest estimated downgrade probabilities, computed using values of the risk measures as of June 30, 2008.1 2 The minimum downgrade probability cutoff value is 0.0182.

•  The maximum downgrade probability cutoff value will be the minimum downgrade probability among the fifteen percent of all small insured institutions in Risk Category I (excluding new institutions) with the highest estimated downgrade probabilities, computed using values of the risk measures as of June 30, 2008. The maximum downgrade probability cutoff value is 0.1506.

IV. Derivation of Uniform Amount and Pricing Multipliers

The uniform amount and pricing multipliers used to compute the annual base assessment rate in basis points, PiT, for any such institution i at a given time T will be determined from the Statistical Model, the minimum and maximum downgrade probability cutoff values, and minimum and maximum initial base assessment rates in Risk Category I as follows:

Equation 4

PiT= α0+ α1* diT subject to Min ≤ PiTMin + 4

where α0 and α1 are a constant term and a scale factor used to convert diT (the estimated downgrade probability for institution i at a given time T from the Statistical Model) to an assessment rate, respectively, and Min is the minimum initial base assessment rate expressed in basis points. (PiT is expressed as an annual rate, but the actual rate applied in any quarter will be PiT/4.) The maximum initial base assessment rate is 4 basis points above the minimum (Min + 4)

Solving equation 4 for minimum and maximum initial base assessment rates simultaneously,

Min = α0 + α1* 0.0182 and Min + 4 = α0 + α1* 0.1506

where 0.0182 is the minimum downgrade probability cutoff value and 0.1506 is the maximum downgrade probability cutoff value, results in values for the constant amount, α0 and the scale factor, α1:

Equation 5

and Equation 6

Substituting equations 3, 5 and 6 into equation 4 produces an annual initial base assessment rate for institution i at time T, PiT, in terms of the uniform amount, the pricing multipliers and the ratios and weighted average CAMELS component rating referred to in 12 CFR 327.9(d)(2)(i):

Equation 7

PiT = [(Min -- 0.550) + 30.211* β0] + 30.211 * [β1(Tier 1 Leverage RatioT)] + 30.211 * [β2 (Loans past due 30 to 89 days ratioT)] + 30.211 * [β3 (Nonperforming asset ratioT)] + 30.211 * [β4(Net loan charge-off ratioT)] + 30.211 * [β5(Net income before taxes ratioT)] + 30.211 * [β6(Adjusted brokered deposit ratioT)] + 30.211 * [β7 (Weighted average CAMELS component ratingT)]

again subject to Min ≤ PiT ≤ Min + 4

where (Min -- 0.550) + 30.211 * β0 equals the uniform amount, 30.211 * βj is a pricing multiplier for the associated risk measure j, and T is the date of the report of condition corresponding to the end of the quarter for which the assessment rate is computed.

V. Updating the Statistical Model, Uniform Amount, and Pricing Multipliers

The initial Statistical Model is estimated using year-end financial ratios and the weighted average of the "C," "A," "M," "E" and "L" component ratings over the 1988 to 2006 period and downgrade data from the 1989 to 2007 period. The FDIC may, from time to time, but no more frequently than annually, re-estimate the Statistical Model with updated data and publish a new formula for determining initial base assessment rates--equation 7--based on updated uniform amounts and pricing multipliers. However, the minimum and maximum downgrade probability cutoff values will not change without additional notice-and-comment rulemaking. The period covered by the analysis will be lengthened by one year each year; however, from time to time, the FDIC may drop some earlier years from its analysis.

VI. Description of Scorecard Measures

Tier 1 Leverage Ratio Tier 1 capital for Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) divided by adjusted average assets based on the definition for prompt corrective action.
Concentration Measure for Large Insured depository institutions (excluding Highly Complex Institutions) The concentration score for large institutions is the higher of the following two scores:
(1)  Higher-Risk Assets/Tier 1 Capital and Reserves Sum of construction and land development (C&D) loans (funded and unfunded), leveraged loans (funded and unfunded), nontraditional mortgages, and subprime consumer loans divided by Tier 1 capital and reserves. See Appendix C for the detailed description of the ratio.
(2) Growth-Adjusted Portfolio Concentrations The measure is calculated in the following steps:
(1)  Concentration levels (as a ratio to Tier 1 capital and reserves) are calculated for each broad portfolio category:
•  C&D,
•  Other commercial real estate loans,
•  First lien residential mortgages (including non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities),
•  Closed-end junior liens and home equity lines of credit (HELOCs),
•  Commercial and industrial loans,
•  Credit card loans, and
•  Other consumer loans.
(2)  Risk weights are assigned to each loan category based on historical loss rates.
(3)  Concentration levels are multiplied by risk weights and squared to produce a risk-adjusted concentration ratio for each portfolio.
(4)  Three-year merger-adjusted portfolio growth rates are then scaled to a growth factor of 1 to 1.2 where a 3-year cumulative growth rate of 20 percent or less equals a factor of 1 and a growth rate of 80 percent or greater equals a factor of 1.2. If three years of data are not available, a growth factor of 1 will be assigned.
(5)  The risk-adjusted concentration ratio for each portfolio is multiplied by the growth factor and resulting values are summed.
See Appendix C for the detailed description of the measure.
Concentration Measure for Highly Complex Institutions Concentration score for highly complex institutions is the highest of the following three scores:
(1) Higher-Risk Assets/Tier 1 Capital and Reserves Sum of C&D loans (funded and unfunded), leveraged loans (funded and unfunded), nontraditional mortgages, and subprime consumer loans divided by Tier 1 capital and reserves. See Appendix C for the detailed description of the measure.
(2) Top 20 Counterparty Exposure/Tier 1 Capital and Reserves Sum of the total exposure amount to the largest 20 counterparties (in terms of exposure amount) divided by Tier 1 capital and reserves. Counterparty exposure is equal to the sum of Exposure at Default (EAD) associated with derivatives trading and Securities Financing Transactions (SFTs) and the gross lending exposure (including all unfunded commitments) for each counterparty or borrower at the consolidated entity level.1
(3) Largest Counterparty Exposure/Tier 1 Capital and Reserves The amount of exposure to the largest counterparty (in terms of exposure amount) divided by Tier 1 capital and reserves. Counterparty exposure is equal to the sum of Exposure at Default (EAD) associated with derivatives trading and Securities Financing Transactions (SFTs) and the gross lending exposure (including all unfunded commitments) for each counterparty or borrower at the consolidated entity level.
Core Earnings/Average Quarter-End Total Assets Core earnings are defined as net income less extraordinary items and tax-adjusted realized gains and losses on available-for-sale (AFS) and held-to-maturity (HTM) securities, adjusted for mergers. The ratio takes a four-quarter sum of merger-adjusted core earnings and divides it by an average of five quarter-end total assets (most recent and four prior quarters). If four quarters of data on core earnings are not available, data for quarters that are available will be added and annualized. If five quarters of data on total assets are not available, data for quarters that are available will be averaged.
Credit Quality Measure The credit quality score is the higher of the following two scores:
(1)  Criticized and Classified Items/Tier 1 Capital and Reserves Sum of criticized and classified items divided by the sum of Tier 1 capital and reserves. Criticized and classified items include items an institution or its primary federal regulator have graded "Special Mention" or worse and include retail items under Uniform Retail Classification Guidelines, securities, funded and unfunded loans, other real estate owned (ORE), other assets, and marked-to-market counterparty positions, less credit valuation adjustments.2 Criticized and classified items exclude loans and securities in trading books, and the amount recoverable from the U.S. government, its agencies, or government-sponsored agencies, under guarantee or insurance provisions.
(2) Underperforming Assets/Tier 1 Capital and Reserves Sum of loans that are 30 days or more past due and still accruing interest, nonaccrual loans, restructured loans (including restructured 1--4 family loans), and ORE, excluding the maximum amount recoverable from the U.S. government, its agencies, or government-sponsored agencies, under guarantee or insurance provisions, divided by a sum of Tier 1 capital and reserves.
Core Deposits/Total Liabilities Total domestic deposits excluding brokered deposits and uninsured non-brokered time deposits divided by total liabilities.
Balance Sheet Liquidity Ratio Sum of cash and balances due from depository institutions, federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell, and the market value of available for sale and held to maturity agency securities (excludes agency mortgage-backed securities but includes all other agency securities issued by the U.S. Treasury, U.S. government agencies, and U.S. government sponsored enterprises) divided by the sum of federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements, other borrowings (including FHLB) with a remaining maturity of one year or less, 5 percent of insured domestic deposits, and 10 percent of uninsured domestic and foreign deposits.3
Potential Losses/Total Domestic Deposits (Loss Severity Measure) Potential losses to the DIF in the event of failure divided by total domestic deposits. Appendix D describes the calculation of the loss severity measure in detail.
Market Risk Measure for Highly Complex Institutions The market risk score is a weighted average of the following three scores:
(1)  Trading Revenue Volatility/Tier 1 Capital Trailing 4-quarter standard deviation of quarterly trading revenue (merger-adjusted) divided by Tier 1 capital.
(2) Market Risk Capital/Tier 1 Capital Market risk capital divided by Tier 1 capital.4
(3) Level 3 Trading Assets/Tier 1 Capital Level 3 trading assets divided by Tier 1 capital.
Average Short-term Funding/Average Total Assets Quarterly average of federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements divided by the quarterly average of total assets as reported on Schedule RC-K of the Call Reports.

[Codified to 12 C.F.R. Part 327, Appendix A]

[Appendix A added at 71 Fed. Reg. 69313, November 30, 2006, effective January 1, 2007; amended at 74 Fed. Reg. 9557, March 4, 2009, effective April 1, 2009 as amended at 76 FR 10720, Feb. 25, 2011; 76 FR 17521, Mar. 30, 2011]

Appendix B to Subpart A of Part 327—Conversion of Scorecard Measures into Score

1. Weighted Average CAMELS Rating

Weighted average CAMELS ratings between 1 and 3.5 are assigned a score between 25 and 100 according to the following equation:

S = 25 + [(20/3) * (C2 --1)],

where:

S = the weighted average CAMELS score; and

C = the weighted average CAMELS rating.

2. Other Scorecard Measures

For certain scorecard measures, a lower ratio implies lower risk and a higher ratio implies higher risk. These measures include:

•  Concentration measure;

•  Credit quality measure;

•  Market risk measure;

•  Average short-term funding to average total assets ratio; and

•  Potential losses to total domestic deposits ratio (loss severity measure).

For those measures, a value between the minimum and maximum cutoff values is converted linearly to a score between 0 and 100, according to the following formula:

S = (V -- Min) * 100/(Max --Min),

where S is score (rounded to three decimal points), V is the value of the measure, Min is the minimum cutoff value and Max is the maximum cutoff value.

For other scorecard measures, a lower value represents higher risk and a higher value represents lower risk. These measures include:

•  Tier 1 leverage ratio;

•  Core earnings to average quarter-end total assets ratio;

•  Core deposits to total liabilities ratio; and

•  Balance sheet liquidity ratio.

For those measures, a value between the minimum and maximum cutoff values is converted linearly to a score between 0 and 100, according to the following formula:

S = (Max -- V) * 100/(Max --Min),

where S is score (rounded to three decimal points), V is the value of the measure, Max is the maximum cutoff value and Min is the minimum cutoff value.

[Codified to 12 C.F.R. Part 327, Appendix B]

[Appendix b added at 71 Fed. Reg. 69313, November 30, 2006, effective January 1, 2007; amended at 74 Fed. Reg. 9557, March 4, 2009, effective April 1, 2009 as amended at 76 FR 10720, Feb. 25, 2011]

Appendix C to Subpart A to Part 327—Concentration Measures

The concentration score is the higher of the higher-risk assets to Tier 1 capital and reserves score or the growth-adjusted portfolio concentrations score. The concentration score for highly complex institutions is the highest of the higher-risk assets to Tier 1 capital and reserves score, the Top 20 counterparty exposure to Tier 1 capital and reserves score, or the largest counterparty to Tier 1 capital and reserves score. The higher-risk assets to Tier 1 capital and reserve ratio and the growth-adjusted portfolio concentration measure are described below.

A. Higher-Risk Assets/Tier 1 Capital and Reserves

The higher-risk assets to Tier 1 capital and reserves ratio is the sum of the concentrations in each of four risk areas described below and is calculated as:

where:

H is institution i's higher-risk concentration measure and

k is a risk area.1 The four risk areas (k) are defined as:

•  Construction and land development loans (funded and unfunded);

•  Leveraged loans (funded and unfunded);2

•  Nontraditional mortgage loans; and

•  Subprime consumer loans.3

The risk areas are defined according to the interagency guidance for a given product with specific modifications made to minimize reporting discrepancies. The definitions for each risk area are as follows:

1.  Construction and Land Development Loans: Construction and development loans include construction and land development loans outstanding and unfunded commitments.

2.  Leveraged Loans: Leveraged loans include: (1) All commercial loans (funded and unfunded) with an original amount greater than $1 million that meet any one of the conditions below at either origination or renewal, except real estate loans; (2) securities issued by commercial borrowers that meet any one of the conditions below at either origination or renewal, except securities classified as trading book; and (3) and securitizations that are more than 50 percent collateralized by assets that meet any one of the conditions below at either origination or renewal, except securities classified as trading book.4  5

•  Loans or securities where borrower's total or senior debt to trailing twelve-month EBITDA6 (i.e. operating leverage ratio) is greater than 4 or 3 times, respectively. For purposes of this calculation, the only permitted EBITDA adjustments are those adjustments specifically permitted for that borrower in its credit agreement; or

•  Loans or securities that are designated as highly leveraged transactions (HLT) by syndication agent.7

3.  Nontraditional Mortgage Loans: Nontraditional mortgage loans includes all residential loan products that allow the borrower to defer repayment of principal or interest and includes all interest-only products, teaser rate mortgages, and negative amortizing mortgages, with the exception of home equity lines of credit (HELOCs) or reverse mortgages.8  9 10

For purposes of the higher-risk concentration ratio, nontraditional mortgage loans include securitizations where more than 50 percent of the assets backing the securitization meet one or more of the preceding criteria for nontraditional mortgage loans, with the exception of those securities classified as trading book.

4.  Subprime Loans: Subprime loans include loans made to borrowers that display one or more of the following credit risk characteristics (excluding subprime loans that are previously included as nontraditional mortgage loans) at origination or upon refinancing, whichever is more recent.

•  Two or more 30-day delinquencies in the last 12 months, or one or more 60-day delinquencies in the last 24 months;

•  Judgment, foreclosure, repossession, or charge-off in the prior 24 months;

•  Bankruptcy in the last 5 years; or

•  Debt service-to-income ratio of 50 percent or greater, or otherwise limited ability to cover family living expenses after deducting total monthly debt-service requirements from monthly income.11

Subprime loans also include loans identified by an insured depository institution as subprime loans based upon similar borrower characteristics and securitizations where more than 50 percent of assets backing the securitization meet one or more of the preceding criteria for subprime loans, excluding those securities classified as trading book.

B. Growth-Adjusted Portfolio Concentration Measure

The growth-adjusted concentration measure is the sum of the concentration ratio for each of seven portfolios, adjusted for risk weights and growth. The product of the risk weight and the concentration ratio for each portfolio is first squared and then multiplied by the growth factor for each. The measure is calculated as:

where:

N is institution i's growth-adjusted portfolio concentration measure;12

k is a portfolio;

g is a growth factor for institution i's portfolio k; and,

w is a risk weight for portfolio k.

The seven portfolios (k) are defined based on the Call Report/TFR data and they are:

•  Construction and land development loans;

•  Other commercial real estate loans;

•  First-lien residential mortgages and non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities (excludes CMOs, REMICS, CMO and REMIC residuals, and stripped MBS issued by non-U.S. Government issuers for which the collateral consists of MBS issued or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies);

•  Closed-end junior liens and home equity lines of credit (HELOCs);

•  Commercial and industrial loans;

•  Credit card loans; and

•  Other consumer loans.13 14

The growth factor, g, is based on a three-year merger-adjusted growth rate for a given portfolio; g ranges from 1 to 1.2 where a 20 percent growth rate equals a factor of 1 and an 80 percent growth rate equals a factor of 1.2.15 For growth rates less than 20 percent, g is 1; for growth rates greater than 80 percent, g is 1.2. For growth rates between 20 percent and 80 percent, the growth factor is calculated as:

and t is the quarter for which the assessment is being determined.

The risk weight for each portfolio reflects relative peak loss rates for banks at the 90th percentile during the 1990--2009 period.16 These loss rates were converted into equivalent risk weights as shown in Table C.1.

TABLE C.1—90th Percentile Annual Loss Rates

for 1990-2009 Period and Corresponding Risk Weights
Portfolio Loss rates (90th percentile) (percent) Risk weights
First-Lien Mortgages 2.3 0.5
Second/Junior Lien Mortgages 4.6 0.9
Commercial and Industrial (C&I) Loans 5.0 1.0
Construction and Development (C&D) Loans 15.0 3.0
Commercial Real Estate Loans, excluding C&D 4.3 0.9
Credit Card Loans 11.8 2.4
Other Consumer Loans 5.9 1.2

[Codified to 12 C.F.R. Part 327, Appendix CA]

[Appendix C added at 71 Fed. Reg. 69313, November 30, 2006, effective January 1, 2007; amended at 74 Fed. Reg. 9557, March 4, 2009, effective April 1, 2009 as amended at 76 FR 10720, Feb. 25, 2011]

Appendix D to Subpart A of Part 327—Description of the Loss Severity Measure

The loss severity measure applies a standardized set of assumptions to an institution's balance sheet to measure possible losses to the FDIC in the event of an institution's failure. To determine an institution's loss severity rate, the FDIC first applies assumptions about uninsured deposit and other unsecured liability runoff, and growth in insured deposits, to adjust the size and composition of the institution's liabilities. Assets are then reduced to match any reduction in liabilities.1 The institution's asset values are then further reduced so that the Tier 1 leverage ratio reaches 2 percent.2 In both cases, assets are adjusted pro rata to preserve the institution's asset composition. Assumptions regarding loss rates at failure for a given asset category and the extent of secured liabilities are then applied to estimated assets and liabilities at failure to determine whether the institution has enough unencumbered assets to cover domestic deposits. Any projected shortfall is divided by current domestic deposits to obtain an end-of-period loss severity ratio. The loss severity measure is an average loss severity ratio for the three most recent quarters of data available.

Runoff and Capital Adjustment Assumptions

Table D.1 contains run-off assumptions.

Table D.1—Runoff Rate Assumptions

Liability type Runoff rate* (percent)
Insured Deposits (10)
Uninsured Deposits 58
Foreign Deposits 80
Federal Funds Purchased 100
Repurchase Agreements 75
Trading Liabilities 50
Unsecured Borrowings |Ld = 1 Year 75
Secured Borrowings |Ld = 1 Year 25
Subordinated Debt and Limited Liability Preferred Stock 15

* A negative rate implies growth.

Given the resulting total liabilities after runoff, assets are then reduced pro rata to preserve the relative amount of assets in each of the following asset categories and to achieve a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 2 percent:

•  Cash and Interest Bearing Balances;

•  Trading Account Assets;

•  Federal Funds Sold and Repurchase Agreements;

•  Treasury and Agency Securities;

•  Municipal Securities;

•  Other Securities;

•  Construction and Development Loans;

•  Nonresidential Real Estate Loans;

•  Multifamily Real Estate Loans;

•  1--4 Family Closed-End First Liens;

•  1--4 Family Closed-End Junior Liens;

•  Revolving Home Equity Loans; and

•  Agricultural Real Estate Loans.

Recovery Value of Assets at Failure

Table D.2 shows loss rates applied to each of the asset categories as adjusted above.

Table D.2—Asset Loss Rate Assumptions

Asset category Loss rate (percent)
Cash and Interest Bearing Balances 0.0
Trading Account Assets 0.0
Federal Funds Sold and Repurchase Agreements 0.0
Treasury and Agency Securities 0.0
Municipal Securities 10.0
Other Securities 15.0
Construction and Development Loans 38.2
Nonresidential Real Estate Loans 17.6
Multifamily Real Estate Loans 10.8
1–4 Family Closed-End First Liens 19.4
1–4 Family Closed-End Junior Liens 41.0
Revolving Home Equity Loans 41.0
Agricultural Real Estate Loans 19.7
Agricultural Loans 11.8
Commercial and Industrial Loans 21.5
Credit Card Loans 18.3
Other Consumer Loans 18.3
All Other Loans 51.0
Other Assets 75.0

Secured Liabilities at Failure

Federal home loan bank advances, secured federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements are assumed to be fully secured. Foreign deposits are treated as fully secured because of the potential for ring fencing.

Loss Severity Ratio Calculation

The FDIC's loss given failure (LGD) is calculated as:

An end-of-quarter loss severity ratio is LGD divided by total domestic deposits at quarter-end and the loss severity measure for the scorecard in an average of end-of-period loss severity ratios for three most recent quarters.

[Codified to 12 C.F.R. Part 327, Appendix D]

[Source: 76 FR 10720, Feb. 25, 2011]


(e)  Merger means any transaction in which an insured depository institution merges or consolidates with any other insured depository institution. Notwithstanding part 303, subpart D, for purposes of this subpart B and subpart C of the part, merger does not include transactions in which an insured depository institution either directly or indirectly acquires the assets of, or assumes liability to pay any deposits made in, any other insured depository institution, but there is not a legal merger or consolidation of the two insured depository institutions.

(f)  Resulting institution refers to the acquiring, assuming, or resulting institution in a merger.

(g)  Successor means a resulting institution or an insured depository institution that acquired part of another insured depository institution's 1996 assessment base ratio under paragraph 327.33(c) of this subpart under the de facto rule.

[Codified to 12 C.F.R. § 327.31]

§ 327.32  Determination of aggregate credit amount.

The aggregate amount of the one-time credit shall equal $4,707,580,238.19.

[Codified to 12 C.F.R. § 327.32]

§ 327.33 Determination of eligible institution's credit amount.

(a)  Subject to paragraph (c) of this section, allocation of the one-time credit shall be based on each eligible insured depository institution's 1996 assessment base ratio.

(b)  Subject to paragraph (c) of this section, an eligible insured depository institution's 1996 assessment base ratio shall consist of:

(1)  Its assessment base as of December 31, 1996 (adjusted as appropriate to reflect the assessment base of December 31, 1996, of all institutions for which it is the successor), as the numerator; and

(2)  The combined aggregate assessment bases of all eligible insured depository institutions, including any successor institutions, as of December 31, 1996, as the denominator.

(c)  If an insured depository institution is a successor to an eligible insured depository institution under the de facto rule, as defined in paragraph 327.31(c) of this subpart, the successor and the eligible insured depository institution will divide the eligible insured depository institution's 1996 assessment base ratio pro rata, based on the deposit liabilities assumed in the transaction. In any subsequent transaction involving an insured depository institution that previously engaged in a transaction to which the de facto rule applied, the insured depository institution may not be deemed to have transferred more than its remaining 1996 assessment base ratio. If the transferring institution is no longer an insured depository institution after the transfer, the last successor will acquire the transferring institution's remaining 1996 assessment base ratio.

[Codified to 12 C.F.R. § 327.33]

§ 327.34 Transferability of credits.

(a)  Any remaining amount of the one-time assessment credit and the associated 1996 assessment base ratio shall transfer to a successor of an eligible insured depository institution.

(b)  Prior to the final determination of its 1996 assessment base and one-time assessment credit amount by the FDIC, an eligible insured depository institution may enter into an agreement to transfer any portion of such institution's one-time credit amount and 1996 assessment base ratio to another insured depository institution. The parties to the agreement shall notify the FDIC's Division of Finance and submit a written agreement, signed by legal representatives of both institutions. The parties must include documentation stating that each representative has the legal authority to bind the institution. The adjustment to credit amount and the associated 1996 assessment base ratio shall be made in the next assessment invoice that is sent at least 10 days after the FDIC's receipt of the written agreement.

(c)  An eligible insured depository institution may enter into an agreement after the final determination of its 1996 assessment base ratio and one-time credit amount by the FDIC to transfer any portion of such institution's one-time credit amount to another insured depository institution. The parties to the agreement shall notify the FDIC's Division of Finance and submit a written agreement, signed by legal representatives of both institutions. The parties must include documentation stating that each representative has the legal authority to bind the institution. The adjustment to the credit amount shall be made in the next assessment invoice that is sent at least 10 days after the FDIC's receipt of the written agreement.

[Codified to 12 C.F.R. § 327.34]

§ 327.35 Application of credits.

(a)  Subject to the limitations in paragraph (b) of this section, the amount of an eligible insured depository institution's one-time credit shall be applied to the maximum extent allowable by law against that institution's quarterly assessment payment under subpart A of this part, until the institution's credit is exhausted.

(b)  The following limitations shall apply to the application of the credit against assessment payments.

(1)  For assessments that become due for assessment periods beginning in calendar years 2008, 2009, and 2010, the credit may not be applied to more than 90 percent of the quarterly assessment.

(2)  For an insured depository institution that exhibits financial, operational, or compliance weaknesses ranging from moderately severe to unsatisfactory, or is not at least adequately capitalized (as defined pursuant to section 38 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act) at the beginning of an assessment period, the amount of the credit that may be applied against the institution's quarterly assessment for that period shall not exceed the amount that the institution would have been assessed if it had been assessed at the average assessment rate for all insured institutions for that period. The FDIC shall determine the average assessment rate for an assessment period based upon its best estimate of the average rate for the period. The estimate shall be made using the best information available, but shall be made no earlier than 30 days and no later than 20 days prior to the payment due date for the period.

(3)  If the FDIC has established a restoration plan pursuant to section 7(b)(33)(E) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, the FDIC may elect to restrict the application of credit amounts, in any assessment period, up to the lesser of:

(i)  The amount of an insured depository institution's assessment for that period; or

(ii)  The amount equal to 3 basis points of the institution's assessment base.

[Codified to 12 C.F.R. § 327.35]

§ 327.36 Requests for review of credit amount.

(a)(1)  As soon as practicable after the publication date of this rule, the FDIC shall notify each insured depository institution by FDICconnect or mail of its 1996 assessment base ratio and credit amount in a Statement of One-Time Credit ("Statement"), if any. An insured depository institution may submit a request for review of the FDIC's determination of the institution's 1996 assessment base ratio or credit amount as shown on the Statement within 30 days after the effective date of this rule. Such review may be requested if:

(i)  The institution disagrees with a determination as to eligibility for the credit that relates to that institution's credit amount;

(ii)  The institution disagrees with the calculation of the credit as stated on the Statement; or

(iii)  The institution believes that the 1996 assessment base ratio attributed to the institution on the Statement does not fully or accurately reflect its own 1996 assessment base or appropriate adjustments for successors.

(2)  If an institution does not submit a timely request for review, that institution is barred from subsequently requesting review of its credit amount, subject to paragraph (e) of this section.

(b)(1)  An insured depository institution may submit a request for review of the FDIC's adjustment to the credit amount in a quarterly invoice within 30 days of the date on which the FDIC provides the invoice. Such review may be requested if:

(i)  The institution disagrees with the calculation of the credit as stated on the invoice; or

(ii)  The institution believes that the 1996 assessment base ratio attributed to the institution due to the adjustment to the invoice does not fully or accurately reflect appropriate adjustments for successors since the last quarterly invoice.

(2)  If an institution does not submit a timely request for review, that institution is barred from subsequently requesting review of its credit amount, subject to paragraph (e) of this section.

(c)  The request for review shall be submitted to the Division of Finance and shall provide documentation sufficient to support the change sought by the institution. At the time of filing with the FDIC, the requesting institution shall notify, to the extent practicable, any other insured depository institution that would be directly and materially affected by granting the request for review and provide such institution with copies of the request for review, the supporting documentation, and the FDIC's procedures for requests under this subpart. In addition, the FDIC also shall make reasonable efforts, based on its official systems of records, to determine that such institutions have been identified and notified.

(d)  During the FDIC's consideration of the request for review, the amount of credit in dispute shall not be available for use by any institution.

(e)  Within 30 days of being notified of the filing of the request for review, those institutions identified as potentially affected by the request for review may submit a response to such request, along with any supporting documentation, to the Division of Finance, and shall provide copies to the requesting institution. If an institution that was notified under paragraph (c) does not submit a response to the request for review, that institution may not:

(1)  Subsequently dispute the information submitted by other institutions on the transaction(s) at issue in the review process; or

(2)  Appeal the decision by the Director of the Division of Finance.

(f)  If additional information is requested of the requesting or affected institutions by the FDIC, such information shall be provided by the institution within 21 days of the date of the FDIC's request for additional information.

(g)  Any institution submitting a timely request for review will receive a written response from the FDIC's Director of the Division of Finance, (or his or her designee), notifying the requesting and affected institutions of the determination of the Director as to whether the requested change is warranted. Notice of the procedures applicable to appeals under paragraph (h) of this section will be included with the Director's written determination. Whenever feasible, the FDIC will provide the institution with the aforesaid written response the later of:

(1)  Within 60 days of receipt by the FDIC of the request for revision;

(2)  If additional institutions have been notified by the requesting institution or the FDIC, within 60 days of the date of the last response to the notification; or

(3)  If additional information has been requested by the FDIC, within 60 days of receipt of the additional information.

(h)  Subject to paragraph (e) of this section, the insured depository institution that requested review under this section, or an insured depository institution materially affected by the Director's determination, that disagrees with that determination may appeal to the FDIC's Assessment Appeals Committee on the same grounds as set forth under paragraph (a) of this section. Any such appeal must be submitted within 30 calendar days from the date of the Director's written determination. Notice of the procedures applicable to appeals under this section will be included with the Director's written determination. The decision of the Assessment Appeals Committee shall be the final determination of the FDIC.

(i)  Any adjustment to an institution's credits resulting from a determination by the Director of the FDIC's Assessment Appeals Committee shall be reflected in the institution's next assessment invoice. The adjustment to credits shall affect future assessments only and shall not result in a retroactive adjustment of assessment amounts owed for prior periods.

[Codified to 12 C.F.R. § 327.36]


Subpart C—Implementation of Dividend Requirements

§ 327.50  Purpose and scope.

(a)  Scope. This subpart C of part 327 implements the dividend provisions of section 7(e)(2) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, 12 U.S.C. 1817(e)(2), and applies to insured depository institutions.

(b)  Purpose. This subpart C of part 327 provides the rules for:

(1)  The FDIC's annual determination of whether to declare a dividend and the aggregate amount of any dividend;

(2)  The FDIC's determination of the amount of each insured depository institution's share of any declared dividend;

(3)  The time and manner for the FDIC's payments of dividends; and

(4)  An institution's appeal of the FDIC's determination of its dividend amount.

[Codified to 12 C.F.R. § 327.50]

§ 327.51  Definitions.

For purposes of this subpart:

(a)  Assessment base share means an insured depository institution's 1996 assessment base ratio divided by the total of all existing, eligible insured depository institution's shares of the 1996 assessment base (rounded to 14 decimal places).

(b)  Board has the same meaning as under subpart B of this part.

(c)  DIF means the Deposit Insurance Fund.

(d)(1)  An eligible premium means an assessment paid by an insured depository institution (or its predecessor) that did not exceed, for the applicable assessment period, the maximum assessment applicable in that assessment period to a Risk Category 1 institution under subpart A of this part.

(2)  An eligible premium does not include any assessments or fees paid by insured depository institutions for the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. An eligible premium also does not include any emergency special assessments paid by insured depository institutions pursuant to section 13(c)(4)(G) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, 12 U.S.C. 1823(c)(4)(G), whether to repay any loss to the FDIC as a consequence of the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program or for any other reason.

(e)  An insured depository institution's eligible premium share means that institution's cumulative eligible premiums over the previous five years (ending on December 31st of the year prior to the year in which the dividend is declared) divided by the cumulative total of all eligible premiums paid by all existing insured depository institutions or their predecessors over that five-year period (rounded to 14 decimal places).

(f)  An insured depository institution's 1996 assessment base ratio means an institution's 1996 assessment base ratio, as determined pursuant to § 327.33 of this part, adjusted as necessary to reflect subsequent transactions in which the institution succeeds to another institution's assessment base ratio, or a transfer of the assessment base ratio pursuant to § 327.34. The 1996 assessment base ratio shall be rounded to seven decimal places.

(g)  Predecessor, when used in the context of insured depository institutions, refers to the institution merged with or into a resulting institution or acquired by an institution under § 327.33(c) under the de facto rule, consistent with the definition of successor in § 327.31.

[Codified to 12 C.F.R. § 327.51]

§ 327.52  Annual dividend determination.

(a)  If the DIF reserve ratio as of December 31st of 2008 or any later year equals or exceeds 1.35 percent, then on or before May 10th of the following year, the Board shall determine whether to declare a dividend based upon the reserve ratio of the DIF as of December 31st of the preceding year, and the amount of the dividend, if any.

(b)  Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, if the reserve ratio of the DIF equals or exceeds 1.35 percent of estimated insured deposits and does not exceed 1.50 percent, the Board shall declare the amount that is equal to one-half of the amount in excess of the amount required to maintain the reserve ratio at 1.35 percent as the aggregate dividend to be paid to insured depository institutions.

(c)  Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, if the reserve ratio of the DIF exceeds 1.50 percent of estimated insured deposits, the Board shall declare the amount in excess of the amount required to maintain the reserve ratio at 1.50 percent as the aggregate dividend to be paid to insured depository institutions and shall declare a dividend under paragraph (b) of this section.

(d)(1)  The Board may suspend or limit a dividend otherwise required to be paid if the Board determines that:

(i)  A significant risk of losses to the DIF exists over the next one-year period; and

(ii)  It is likely that such losses will be sufficiently high as to justify the Board concluding that the reserve ratio should be allowed:

(A)  To grow temporarily without requiring dividends when the reserve ratio is between 1.35 and 1.50 percent; or

(B)  To exceed 1.50 percent.

(2)  In making a determination under this paragraph, the Board shall consider:

(i)  National and regional conditions and their impact on insured depository institutions;

(ii)  Potential problems affecting insured depository institutions or a specific group or type of depository institution;

(iii)  The degree to which the contingent liability of the FDIC for anticipated failures of insured institutions adequately addresses concerns over funding levels in the DIF; and

(iv)  Any other factors that the Board may deem appropriate.

(3)  Within 270 days of making a determination under this paragraph, the Board shall submit a report to the Committee on Financial Services and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, providing a detailed explanation of its determination, including a discussion of the factors considered.

(e)  The Board shall annually review any determination to suspend or limit dividend payments and must either:

(1)  Make a new finding justifying the renewal of the suspension or limitation under paragraph (d) of this section, and submit a report as required under paragraph (d)(3) of this section; or

(2)  Reinstate the payment of dividends as required by paragraph (b) or (c) of this section.

[Codified to 12 C.F.R. § 327.52]

§ 327.53  Allocation and payment of dividends.

(a)(1)  The allocation of any dividend among insured depository institutions shall be based on the institution's 1996 assessment base share and the institution's eligible premium share.

(2)  As set forth in the following table, the part of a dividend allocated based upon an institution's 1996 assessment base share shall decline steadily from 100 percent to zero over fifteen years, and the part of a dividend allocated based upon an institution's eligible premium share shall increase steadily over the same fifteen-year period from zero to 100 percent. The 15-year period shall begin as if it had applied to a dividend based upon the reserve ratio at the end of 2006 and shall end with respect to any dividend based upon the reserve ratio at the end of 2021. Dividends based upon the reserve ratio as of December 31, 2021, and thereafter shall be allocated among insured depository institutions based solely on eligible premium shares.

TOTAL DIF DIVIDEND DISTRIBUTION TABLE

  Based upon the DIF reserve ratio at year-end Part of total DIF dividend determined by:
1996 Assessment base shares Eligible premium shares
20061 1 (100.0%) 0 (0%)
20071 14/15 (93.3%) 1/15 (6.7%)
2008 13/15 (86.7%) 2/15 (13.3%)
2009 4/5 (80.0%) 1/5 (20.0%)
2010 11/15 (73.3%) 4/15 (26.7%)
2011 2/3 (66.7%) 1/3 (33.3%)
2012 3/5 (60.0%) 2/5 (40.0%)
2013 8/15 (53.3%) 7/15 (46.7%)
2014 7/15 (46.7%) 8/15 (53.3%)
2015 2/5 (40.0%) 3/5 (60.0%)
2016 1/3 (33.3%) 2/3 (66.7%)
2017 4/15 (26.7%) 11/15 (73.3%)
2018 1/5 (20.0%) 4/5 (80.0%)
2019 2/15 (13.3%) 13/15 (86.7%)
2020 1/15 (6.7%) 14/15 (93.3%)
2021 0 (0%) 1 (100.0%)
Thereafter  0 (0%) 1 (100%)
1The 15-year period shall be computed as if it had applied to dividends based upon the reserve ratios at the end of 2006 and 2007.

(b)  The FDIC shall notify each insured depository institution of the amount of such institution's dividend payment based on its share as determined pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section. Notice shall be given as soon as practicable after the Board's declaration of a dividend through a special notice of dividend.

(c)  The FDIC shall pay individual dividend amounts, unless they are the subject of a request for review under § 327.54, to insured depository institutions on June 30 of the year the dividend is declared. The FDIC shall notify institutions whether dividends will offset the next collection of assessments at the time of the invoice. An institution's dividend amount will be settled with that institution's assessment. Any excess dividend amount will be a net credit to the institution and will be deposited into the deposit account designated by the institution for assessment payment purposes pursuant to subpart A of this part. If the dividend amount is less than the amount of assessment due, then the institution's account will be directly debited by the FDIC to reflect the net amount owed to the FDIC as an assessment.

(d)  If an insured depository institution's dividend amount is subject to review under § 327.54, and that request is not finally resolved prior to the dividend payment date, the FDIC shall withhold the payment of the disputed portion of the dividend amount involved in the request for review. Adjustments to an individual institution's dividend amount based on the final determination of a request for review will be handled in the same manner as assessment underpayments and overpayments.

(e)  An institution may sell, assign, or otherwise transfer its right to a current or future dividend. However, the FDIC will pay dividend amounts to insured institutions without regard to any such sale, assignment or transfer, regardless of whether the FDIC has received notice of the sale, assignment or transfer.

[Codified to 12 C.F.R. § 327.53]

§ 327.54  Requests for review.

(a)  An insured depository institution may submit a request for review of the FDIC's determination of the institution's 1996 assessment base share and/or its eligible premium share as shown on the institution's quarterly assessment invoice. Such requests shall be subject to the provisions of § 327.3(f)(3) of this part, except for the invoice provided by the FDIC in March of any calendar year in which the FDIC declares a dividend. If the FDIC declares a dividend, any request for review of an institution's 1996 assessment base share and/or its eligible premium share as shown on the institution's March quarterly assessment invoice must be filed within 30 days of the date that the FDIC notifies the institution of its dividend amount. If an institution does not submit a timely request for review for the first invoice in which the dividend-related information that forms the basis for the request appears, the institution shall be barred from subsequently requesting review of that information.

(b)  An insured depository institution may submit a request for review of the FDIC's determination of the institution's dividend amount as shown on the special notice of dividend. Such review may be requested if:

(1)  The institution disagrees with the calculation of the dividend as stated on the special notice of dividend; or

(2)  The institution believes that the 1996 assessment base ratio attributed to the institution is inaccurate or has not been adjusted to include the 1996 assessment base ratio of an institution acquired by merger or transfer pursuant to §§ 327.33 and 327.34 of this part and § 327.51(g), and the institution has not had a prior opportunity to request review or appeal under subpart B of this part or paragraph (a) of this section; or

(3)  The institution believes that the special notice does not fully or accurately reflect its eligible premiums or those of any of its predecessors and the institution has not had a prior opportunity to request review or appeal under subpart B of this part or paragraph (a) of this section.

(c)  Any such request for review under paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted within 30 days of the date of the special notice of dividend for which a change is requested. The request for review shall be submitted to the Division of Finance and shall provide documentation sufficient to support the change sought by the institution. If an institution does not submit a timely request for review, that institution may not subsequently request review of its dividend amount, subject to paragraph (d) of this section. At the time of filing with the FDIC, the requesting institution shall notify, to the extent practicable, any other insured depository institution that would be directly and materially affected by granting the request for review and provide such institution with copies of the request for review, the supporting documentation, and the FDIC's procedures for requests under this subpart. The FDIC shall make reasonable efforts, based on its official systems of records, to determine that such institutions have been identified and notified.

(d)  During the FDIC's consideration of a request for review, the amount of dividend in dispute will not be paid.

(e)  Within 30 days of receiving notice of the request for review under paragraph (b) of this section, those institutions identified as potentially affected by the request for review may submit a response to such request, along with any supporting documentation, to the Division of Finance, and shall provide copies to the requesting institution. If an institution that was notified under paragraph (c) of this section does not submit a response to the request for review, that institution may not subsequently:

(1)  Dispute the information submitted by any other institution on the transaction(s) at issue in that review process; or

(2)  Appeal the decision by the Director of the Division of Finance.

(f)  If additional information is requested of the requesting or affected institutions by the FDIC, such information shall be provided by the institution within 21 days of the date of the FDIC's request for additional information.

(g)  Any institution submitting a timely request for review under paragraph (b) of this section will receive a written response from the FDIC's Director of the Division of Finance ("Director"), or his or her designee, notifying the affected institutions of the determination of the Director as to whether the requested change is warranted, whenever feasible:

(1)  Within 60 days of receipt by the FDIC of the request for review;

(2)  If additional institutions have been notified by the requesting institution or the FDIC, within 60 days of the date of the last response to the notification; or

(3)  If additional information has been requested by the FDIC, within 60 days of receipt of the additional information, whichever is later. Notice of the procedures applicable to appeals under paragraph (g) of this section will be included with the Director's written determination.

(h)  An insured depository institution may appeal the determination of the Director to the FDIC's Assessment Appeals Committee on the same grounds as set forth under paragraph (b) of this section. Any such appeal must be submitted within 30 calendar days from the date of the Director's written determination. The decision of the Assessment Appeals Committee shall be the final determination of the FDIC.

[Codified to 12 C.F.R. § 327.54]

1As used in this context, a "new institution" means an institution that has been chartered as a bank or thrift for less than five years. Go back to Text

2For purposes of calculating the minimum and maximum downgrade probability cutoff values, institutions that have less than $100,000 in domestic deposits are assumed to have no brokered deposits. Go back to Text

1EAD and SFTs are defined and described in the compilation issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in its June 2006 document, "International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards." The definitions are described in detail in Annex 4 of the document. Any updates to the Basel II capital treatment of counterparty credit risk would be implemented as they are adopted. http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs128.pdf. Go back to Text

2A marked-to-market counterparty position is equal to the sum of the net marked-to-market derivative exposures for each counterparty. The net marked-to-market derivative exposure equals the sum of all positive marked-to-market exposures net of legally enforceable netting provisions and net of all collateral held under a legally enforceable CSA plus any exposure where excess collateral has been posted to the counterparty. For purposes of the Criticized and Classified Items/Tier 1 Capital and Reserves definition a marked-to-market counterparty position less any credit valuation adjustment can never be less than zero. Go back to Text

3Deposit runoff rates for the balance sheet liquidity ratio reflect changes issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in its December 2010 document, "Basel III: International Framework for liquidity risk measurement, standards, and monitoring," http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs188.pdf. Go back to Text

4Market risk capital is defined in Appendix C of Part 325 of the FDIC Rules and Regulations,. http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/2000-4800.html#fdic2000appendixctopart325. Go back to Text

1The high-risk concentration ratio is rounded to two decimal points. Go back to Text

2Unfunded amounts include irrevocable and revocable commitments. Go back to Text

3Each loan concentration category should include purchased credit impaired loans and should exclude the amount recoverable from the U.S. government, its agencies, or government-sponsored agencies, under guarantee or insurance provisions. Go back to Text

4The following guidelines should be used to determine the "original amount" of a loan:   (1)  For loans drawn down under lines of credit or loan commitments, the "original amount" of the loan is the size of the line of credit or loan commitment when the line of credit or loan commitment was most recently approved, extended, or renewed prior to the report date. However, if the amount currently outstanding as of the report date exceeds this size, the "original amount" is the amount currently outstanding on the report date.   (2)  For loan participations and syndications, the "original amount" of the loan participation or syndication is the entire amount of the credit originated by the lead lender.   (3)  For all other loans, the "original amount" is the total amount of the loan at origination or the amount currently outstanding as of the report date, whichever is larger. Go back to Text

5Leveraged loans criteria are consistent with guidance issued by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency in its Comptroller's Handbook, http://www.occ.gov/static/publications/handbook/LeveragedLending.pdf, but do not include all of the criteria in the handbook. Go back to Text

6Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. Go back to Text

7http://www.fdic.gov/news/news/press/2001/pr2801.html. Go back to Text

8For purposes of this rule making, a teaser-rate mortgage loan is defined as a mortgage with a discounted initial rate where the lender offers a lower rate and lower payments for part of the mortgage term. Go back to Text

9http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/federal/2006/06noticeFINAL.html. Go back to Text

10A mortgage loan is no longer considered a nontraditional mortgage once the teaser rate has expired. An interest only loan is no longer considered nontraditional once the loan begins to amortize. Go back to Text

11http://www.fdic.gov/news/news/press/2001/pr0901a.html; however, the definition in the text above excludes any reference to FICO or other credit bureau scores. Go back to Text

12The growth-adjusted portfolio concentration measure is rounded to two decimal points. Go back to Text

13All loan concentrations should include the fair value of purchased credit impaired loans. Go back to Text

14Each loan concentration category should exclude the amount of loans recoverable from the U.S. government, its agencies, or government-sponsored agencies, under guarantee or insurance provisions. Go back to Text

15The growth factor is rounded to two decimal points. Go back to Text

16The risk weights are based on loss rates for each portfolio relative to the loss rate for C&I loans, which is given a risk weight of 1. The peak loss rates were derived as follows. The loss rate for each loan category for each bank with over $5 billion in total assets was calculated for each of the last twenty calendar years (1990--2009). The highest value of the 90th percentile of each loan category over the twenty year period was selected as the peak loss rate. Go back to Text

1In most cases, the model would yield reductions in liabilities and assets prior to failure. Exceptions may occur for institutions primarily funded through insured deposits, which the model assumes to grow prior to failure. Go back to Text

2Of course, in reality, runoff and capital declines occur more or less simultaneously as an institution approaches failure. The loss severity measure assumptions simplify this process for ease of modeling. Go back to Text


[Table of Contents] [Previous Page] [Next Page] [Search]

Last updated September 1, 2011 regs@fdic.gov