Skip Header

Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation

Each depositor insured to at least $250,000 per insured bank



Home Regulation & Examinations Laws & Regulations FDIC Federal Register Citations


   


FDIC Federal Register Citations

From: Ruth.Anne.Norris@cityofmesa.org [mailto:Ruth.Anne.Norris@cityofmesa.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 1:33 PM
To: Comments
Subject: RIN 3064-AC50

I am writing to oppose the FDIC-proposed rule that would alter requirements
under the CRA. These modifications not only decrease the number of banks
that would face comprehensive compliance exams, but would also affect the
examination itself by removing the requirements on the investment and
service elements and instead making them options under the lending test.

With government funding shrinking, eliminating regulatory incentives for
private capital to leverage public dollars is inappropriate. We should be
encouraging more community reinvestment, not reducing incentives.

The CRA has proven its worth by requiring banks to reinvest in local
communities through community development loans, investments and services,
benefiting low- and moderate-income households and communities. A recent
workshop I attended had participation from a number of local financial
institutions; it is very doubtful they would find a reason to participate
with reduced CRA requirements. The FDIC's proposed rule will therefore
impair affordable housing, and community & economic development,
particularly in rural areas.


Last Updated 11/10/2004 regs@fdic.gov

Skip Footer back to content