Skip Header

Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation

Each depositor insured to at least $250,000 per insured bank



Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations




FDIC Federal Register Citations

FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS OF LORAIN

From: John Malanowski [mailto:JOHNRMALANOWSKI@FIRSTFEDLORAIN.COM]
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 11:20 AM
To: Comments
Subject: Community Reinvestment: RIN number 3064-AC50

John Malanowski
VP & SECRETARY
FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS OF LORAIN
3721 OBERLIN AVE
LORAIN, OH 44053-2761

September 17, 2004

Robert E. Feldman

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
550 17th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20429

Dear Robert Feldman:

As a community banker, I am pleased to comment in support of the proposal issued by the FDIC that would amend the definition of a small institution to be a bank that is under $1 billion in assets. I believe that this change will provide much needed regulatory burden relief for me and other community bankers. It seems that every week there is a new or additional regulation with which we must comply. This is one example of regulatory burden relief that will really make a difference. I would much rather use the limited resources available to my bank to serve my community than to collect and maintain data and documents to prove to examiners that I am meeting the needs of my community.

[please include something about your institution, its size, the area it serves, number of employees]

Compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act is something we take very seriously at our bank. We don’t just believe it is the right thing to do; we believe it is the right business thing to do. No community bank can survive and compete without meeting the needs of its customers and communities. We believe in our community and in our customers and want to work with them to provide products and services that best meet their credit needs. We do not need a complicated examination process to show that we are complying with the law.

It is absurd to think that a bank thousands of times larger than my own community bank should be examined using the same procedures. I strongly urge you to amend the definition of a small bank for CRA purposes to be an institution with less than $1 billion in assets, regardless of whether the bank is part of a holding company. This is a good proposal and is the right thing to do.

Thank you for considering my views.

Sincerely,
John Malanowski
440-282-6409
VP & SECRETARY
FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS OF LORAIN

Last Updated 09/30/2004 regs@fdic.gov

Skip Footer back to content