Skip Header

Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation

Each depositor insured to at least $250,000 per insured bank



Home > Regulation & Examinations > Laws & Regulations > FDIC Federal Register Citations




FDIC Federal Register Citations

From: npm8@columbia.edu [mailto:npm8@columbia.edu]
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 1:00 PM
To: Comments
Cc: nmelton@ncrc.org
Subject: RIN 3064-AC50

Mr. Robert E. Feldman
Executive Secretary
Attention: Comments/Legal ESS
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
550 17th St. NW 20429

Dear Mr. Feldman:

I am a concerned citizen opposed to watering down CRA (Community
Reinvestment Act) requirements for mid-sized banks. CRA is vital for
increasing homeownership and economic development in lower-income
communities. However, your proposed changes will halt the progress that
has been made.

I understand that banks with over $250 million in assets must be tested on
their number of loans, investments, and services to low- and
moderate-income communities. But your proposal would eliminate the
investment and service requirements for all banks with under $1 billion in
assets. This will result in significantly fewer loans and investments in
affordable rental housing, health clinics, community centers, and economic
development projects.

In the watered-down exam, you would allow mid-sized banks to choose which
community development activities they will undertake. Right now, these
banks must make community development loans, investments, and services.
Your proposed test allows banks to choose only one of the three
activities. The result will be less community development activity.

You also propose that community development activities in rural areas
should benefit any group of individuals instead of only low- and
moderate-income individuals. But this will allow banks to cherry-pick and
focus on affluent residents of rural areas rather than the lower income
consumers CRA targets. Finally, you would also eliminate publicly
available data on the small business lending of mid-sized banks. Without
data, community groups and citizens cannot hold banks accountable for
lending to small businesses in their neighborhoods.

Your changes directly oppose CRA's mandate to require lenders to meet
community needs. CRA is too important to be gutted. Please drop your
proposal like the two other federal agencies that recognized its harm to
underserved communities.

****************************************************************
Nicole P. Marwell
Assistant Professor
Department of Sociology and Latino/a Studies Program
Columbia University
323M Fayerweather Hall, MC 2551
1180 Amsterdam Avenue, NY, NY

 

 

Last Updated 09/21/2004 regs@fdic.gov

Skip Footer back to content